Comparison in Period 7

Help Questions

AP U.S. History › Comparison in Period 7

Questions 1 - 10
1

Secondary source excerpt (Period 7 comparison, 1890-1945): When comparing Progressive reform to the New Deal, historians often cite different approaches to labor. Progressive reforms sometimes improved working conditions and limited child labor but frequently stopped short of endorsing collective bargaining nationwide. The New Deal, especially through the Wagner Act (1935), more explicitly protected union organizing and collective bargaining. Which statement best reflects this comparison?

Progressives and New Dealers both rejected any role for the federal government in labor disputes.

The New Deal relied mainly on state-level reforms and avoided federal labor legislation entirely.

Progressive reform created a federal guarantee of collective bargaining, while the New Deal dismantled unions to promote open shops.

The New Deal more directly supported union rights through federal law, while Progressive reforms were more limited and uneven regarding collective bargaining.

Progressives focused on the 40-hour workweek established by the Fair Labor Standards Act, while the New Deal focused on the Triangle Shirtwaist Fire investigations.

Explanation

This question compares Progressive and New Deal approaches to labor rights and collective bargaining. Progressive reforms made some improvements to working conditions and limited child labor but generally did not establish nationwide protections for union organizing and collective bargaining. The New Deal marked a major shift with the Wagner Act (1935), which explicitly protected workers' rights to organize unions and engage in collective bargaining under federal law. Option C correctly identifies this comparison, noting the New Deal's more direct federal support for union rights versus Progressive reforms' more limited approach. Option A incorrectly claims Progressives created federal collective bargaining guarantees, which was actually a New Deal achievement.

2

Secondary-source excerpt (1890–1945): Historians often compare how WWI and WWII mobilization reshaped the economy. WWI saw agencies like the War Industries Board coordinate production and the federal government promote Liberty Bonds and food/fuel conservation, but demobilization was relatively rapid. WWII featured deeper “total war” mobilization, with the War Production Board, massive deficit spending, and sustained conversion of industry that helped end the Great Depression. Which comparison is most accurate?

Both wars involved federal coordination, but WWII mobilization was larger and more sustained, helping drive long-term industrial expansion and employment.

WWI mobilization was more extensive than WWII mobilization because WWII relied mainly on private charity rather than federal coordination.

WWI featured rationing and price controls on a scale unmatched by WWII, which had no rationing system.

WWII ended the Great Depression by returning the nation to the gold standard, while WWI ended it through the Tennessee Valley Authority.

Neither war affected the economy because the federal government avoided involvement in production and wages.

Explanation

This question compares economic mobilization during World War I and World War II. The correct answer B accurately identifies that while both wars involved federal coordination of the economy, WWII mobilization was larger, more sustained, and more transformative, ultimately helping to end the Great Depression through massive government spending and full employment. WWI mobilization through agencies like the War Industries Board was significant but shorter-lived, with rapid demobilization after 1918. Option E incorrectly claims WWI had more extensive rationing than WWII, when in fact WWII rationing was more comprehensive and long-lasting. The scale and duration of WWII mobilization fundamentally transformed the American economy and validated Keynesian economic theories.

3

Secondary-source excerpt (1890–1945): Scholars compare U.S. war aims in WWI and WWII. In WWI, Wilson framed U.S. entry around “making the world safe for democracy” and promoted a postwar League of Nations, though the Senate rejected membership. In WWII, U.S. leaders articulated broad goals through the Atlantic Charter and later helped found the United Nations, while also committing to total victory over Axis powers. Which statement best compares U.S. internationalism after the two wars?

After WWI, the United States more fully embraced collective security institutions than it did after WWII.

After WWII, the United States rejected the United Nations for the same constitutional reasons it rejected the League of Nations.

After WWI, U.S. policy moved toward greater isolationism, whereas after WWII the United States took a leading role in building and joining new international institutions.

After WWI, the United States created NATO, while after WWII it returned to strict neutrality laws.

After both wars, the United States immediately annexed large European territories to enforce peace.

Explanation

This question compares U.S. internationalism after World War I versus World War II. The correct answer B accurately identifies the key difference: after WWI, the U.S. moved toward isolationism (rejecting League of Nations membership), while after WWII, the U.S. took a leading role in creating and joining international institutions like the United Nations and NATO. This represents a fundamental shift in American foreign policy from interwar isolationism to postwar internationalism. Option A incorrectly suggests the U.S. embraced collective security more after WWI than WWII, which contradicts the historical record. The contrast between post-WWI withdrawal and post-WWII engagement shaped the international order for decades.

4

Secondary source excerpt (1890–1945): “Both the Progressive Era and the New Deal sought to address workers’ conditions, but Progressives often emphasized mediation and limited protections (such as workplace safety and child labor restrictions), whereas New Deal policies more directly strengthened organized labor and established nationwide labor standards.” Which option best reflects this comparison?

Progressive labor reforms focused on farm subsidies, while New Deal labor reforms focused only on prohibition enforcement.

Progressives created the Social Security system, while New Dealers abolished it.

Progressive reforms often promoted safety and limited labor protections, while New Deal measures like the Wagner Act and Fair Labor Standards Act expanded collective bargaining rights and set national standards.

Progressives and New Dealers both opposed unions and outlawed collective bargaining.

New Deal labor policy primarily relied on state militias to break strikes, unlike Progressive policy.

Explanation

This AP US History Period 7 question tests comparison skills by differentiating labor reforms in the Progressive Era and New Deal. The excerpt describes Progressives' emphasis on mediation and limited protections versus New Deal strengthening of unions and national standards. Choice B accurately reflects this with Progressive safety and child labor laws compared to New Deal's Wagner Act and Fair Labor Standards Act, which protected bargaining and set wages. This evolution responded to increasing labor unrest and Depression-era needs. As a distractor, Choice A falsely claims both opposed unions and outlawed bargaining, ignoring Progressive support for some reforms and New Deal's pro-labor stance. Understanding these comparisons illustrates the growing federal role in labor relations across the early 20th century.

5

Secondary source excerpt (1890–1945): “Although both world wars encouraged demands for civil liberties, wartime governments repeatedly limited dissent; however, repression during World War I often targeted radicals and antiwar speech through federal prosecutions, while World War II restrictions more prominently included mass relocation and incarceration based on ancestry.” Which option best illustrates this comparison?

Neither war saw any federal action that restricted civil liberties because Congress refused to act.

World War I featured Japanese American internment, while World War II featured the Palmer Raids.

The Espionage and Sedition Acts during World War I and Executive Order 9066 during World War II both show wartime limits on liberties, but WWII more directly involved ancestry-based internment.

World War II restrictions were limited to banning labor unions, while World War I restrictions focused only on price controls.

World War I expanded free speech protections through Schenck v. United States, while World War II eliminated all federal censorship.

Explanation

This question in AP US History Period 7 evaluates comparison skills by contrasting civil liberties restrictions during World War I and World War II. The excerpt points out WWI's targeting of radicals through prosecutions versus WWII's ancestry-based internment. Choice A illustrates this effectively with the Espionage and Sedition Acts in WWI and Executive Order 9066 in WWII, showing shared limits but differing focuses on speech versus relocation of Japanese Americans. This comparison reveals how wartime fears led to varying forms of repression, influenced by global contexts. Choice B acts as a distractor by swapping historical events, claiming WWI featured Japanese internment (which was WWII) and WWII the Palmer Raids (post-WWI Red Scare). Analyzing these differences underscores the tension between security and liberties in U.S. history from 1914 to 1945.

6

Secondary source excerpt (1890–1945): “Both the Progressive Era and the New Deal expanded federal responsibility for Americans’ welfare, but they differed in emphasis: Progressives often pursued regulation and efficiency through expert-led commissions, while New Deal reform more directly used federal spending and relief programs to stabilize a collapsed economy.” Which option best compares the Progressive Era and the New Deal as described?

Progressives and New Dealers both rejected any role for the federal government in labor disputes.

The New Deal reduced the federal government’s role in the economy more than Progressivism did.

Progressives focused mainly on dismantling the Federal Reserve, while the New Deal focused on creating it.

Progressive reforms emphasized regulatory oversight and professional administration, while New Deal programs emphasized direct federal relief and economic stimulus.

Both relied primarily on Supreme Court decisions rather than legislation to expand federal power.

Explanation

This question assesses the comparison skill in AP US History Period 7 by requiring students to distinguish between the Progressive Era and the New Deal based on their approaches to federal responsibility and economic reform. The excerpt highlights how both eras expanded federal roles but differed in methods, with Progressives focusing on regulation and efficiency, while the New Deal emphasized direct relief amid economic collapse. Choice B correctly reflects this comparison by noting Progressive emphasis on regulatory oversight and professional administration versus New Deal focus on direct relief and stimulus. This aligns with historical examples like Progressive antitrust laws and commissions compared to New Deal programs such as the CCC and WPA for immediate aid. In contrast, Choice C is a distractor that inaccurately claims Progressives dismantled the Federal Reserve, when in fact it was created during the Progressive Era under Wilson in 1913, and the New Deal reformed banking without creating the Fed anew. Overall, understanding these differences helps explain the evolution of federal intervention from moral and regulatory reforms to crisis-driven economic planning.

7

Secondary-source excerpt (Period 7 comparison, 1890–1945): “Both Progressives and New Dealers expanded federal responsibility, but they differed in emphasis: Progressive reformers (1900–1917) often sought to curb corporate power and professionalize government through regulation and moral uplift, while New Deal policymakers (1933–1939) more directly used federal spending, social insurance, and labor protections to stabilize capitalism amid mass unemployment.” Which option best captures a key difference highlighted in the excerpt?

Progressives created permanent wartime agencies to manage industry, while New Dealers avoided regulating business to protect free markets.

Progressives primarily relied on deficit-financed relief programs, while New Dealers focused on constitutional amendments to expand voting rights.

Progressives emphasized regulation and efficiency reforms, while the New Deal emphasized federal relief, social insurance, and labor protections.

Progressives and New Dealers both centered their efforts mainly on overseas empire-building rather than domestic reform.

Progressives opposed any federal role in economic affairs, while New Dealers returned to laissez-faire policies after 1933.

Explanation

This question tests the skill of comparing reform movements within Period 7 by examining differences between Progressive Era and New Deal approaches to federal responsibility. The excerpt explicitly states that Progressives focused on regulation and moral uplift to curb corporate power, while New Dealers used federal spending, social insurance, and labor protections to address mass unemployment. Answer B correctly captures this distinction between regulatory/efficiency reforms versus direct federal intervention through relief and social programs. Answer A incorrectly claims Progressives used deficit spending and New Dealers focused on voting rights amendments, which reverses and misrepresents both movements' actual priorities.

8

Secondary-source excerpt (Period 7 comparison, 1890–1945): “In World War I, U.S. leaders portrayed intervention as making the world ‘safe for democracy,’ while in World War II the conflict was more often described as a total war against fascism that required unconditional surrender and a more expansive postwar vision for international institutions.” Which comparison best reflects the excerpt’s point about U.S. war aims?

World War I required unconditional surrender, while World War II ended with a negotiated peace based on the Fourteen Points.

World War I emphasized democratic ideals and a negotiated peace, while World War II emphasized total war against fascism and unconditional surrender with broader planning for postwar institutions.

World War II was fought mainly to restore the gold standard, while World War I was fought mainly to create Social Security.

World War I and World War II had identical war aims, both centered on annexing Canada and Mexico.

World War I was primarily an undeclared naval conflict, while World War II involved no U.S. ground combat.

Explanation

This question compares U.S. war aims between World War I and World War II within Period 7. The excerpt contrasts WWI's goal of making the world "safe for democracy" with WWII's framing as total war against fascism requiring unconditional surrender and expansive postwar planning. Answer B correctly captures this distinction between democratic ideals/negotiated peace versus total war/unconditional surrender with broader institutional planning. Answer D reverses the actual pattern by claiming WWI required unconditional surrender and WWII ended with negotiated peace based on the Fourteen Points, which confuses Wilson's WWI peace plan with WWII's actual conclusion.

9

Secondary-source excerpt (Period 7 comparison, 1890–1945): “Both the Progressive Era and the New Deal used new federal agencies, yet their political coalitions differed: Progressives drew heavily from middle-class reformers and some business leaders favoring ‘good government,’ while the New Deal coalition incorporated urban immigrants, many African American voters in northern cities, organized labor, and white southern Democrats.” Which option best compares the coalitions described?

The Progressive coalition was dominated by formerly enslaved people in the rural South, while the New Deal coalition excluded unions and immigrants.

Progressives built a coalition mainly of isolationists opposed to any domestic reform, while New Dealers relied mainly on Supreme Court justices for votes.

The New Deal coalition depended primarily on Populist farmers of the 1890s, while Progressives depended on Cold War anticommunists.

The Progressive coalition relied more on middle-class reformers, while the New Deal coalition was broader and included labor and many urban ethnic voters.

Both coalitions were identical because they were each led by the same political party faction in the same decade.

Explanation

This question tests comparison of political coalitions between the Progressive Era and New Deal within Period 7. The excerpt describes Progressive coalitions as drawing from middle-class reformers and business leaders versus the New Deal's broader coalition including urban immigrants, African Americans in northern cities, organized labor, and southern Democrats. Answer A accurately reflects this distinction between a narrower middle-class reform coalition and a broader, more diverse political alliance. Answer B incorrectly claims the Progressive coalition was dominated by formerly enslaved people in the rural South, which misrepresents the actual Progressive Era demographics and political alignments.

10

Secondary source excerpt (1890–1945): “Reformers in the Progressive Era promoted democratic participation through direct-election measures, while New Deal reformers, facing economic emergency, were more likely to expand the administrative state and executive power to implement relief and recovery.” Which choice best compares political reforms in the Progressive Era with New Deal governance?

The New Deal centered on trust-busting through the Sherman Antitrust Act, while Progressives created the SEC to regulate stock markets.

Progressives advanced initiatives like the referendum, recall, and the direct election of senators, while the New Deal expanded executive agencies and federal administration to manage the economy.

Both movements focused primarily on expanding voting rights by repealing the Fifteenth Amendment.

Progressives abolished presidential power, while New Dealers replaced Congress with a parliamentary system.

Progressive reforms were aimed at ending all federal taxation, while New Deal reforms created the first income tax.

Explanation

This question assesses comparison in AP US History Period 7 by contrasting political reforms in the Progressive Era and New Deal governance. The excerpt highlights Progressives' direct democracy measures versus New Deal expansion of executive agencies for relief. Choice A best captures this with Progressive tools like referendums and the 17th Amendment compared to New Deal bureaucratic growth, such as the NRA or AAA. This reflects responses to corruption and economic emergency. Choice B serves as a distractor by exaggerating, claiming Progressives abolished presidential power and New Dealers created a parliamentary system, which ignores actual reforms like increased executive authority under FDR. Recognizing these approaches explains shifts in American democracy from 1890 to 1945.

Page 1 of 6