Externalities

Help Questions

AP Microeconomics › Externalities

Questions 1 - 10
1

A market for education (years of schooling) creates a positive externality because more educated workers raise productivity and civic participation. Based on the externality shown in the graph, is the market outcome socially efficient?

Curves (linear):

  • Demand: $D=MPB: P=90-3Q$
  • Social benefit: $MSB: P=120-3Q$
  • Supply: $S=MPC=MSC: P=0+3Q$

(Price/Cost on vertical axis; Quantity of years of schooling (in millions) on horizontal axis.)

Question graphic

Yes; because $MSC=MPC$, the market equilibrium is socially optimal even when $MSB>MPB$.

No; the external benefit is a transfer only, so there is no inefficiency.

No; the market underproduces because $MSB>MPB$, so the efficient quantity is greater than the market quantity.

Yes; because $MSB$ is above $MPB$, the market equilibrium quantity is efficient.

No; the market overproduces because $MSC>MPC$, so the efficient quantity is less than the market quantity.

Explanation

This question tests your understanding of externalities and market efficiency in AP Microeconomics. A positive externality occurs when production or consumption provides unaccounted benefits to third parties, making marginal social benefit (MSB) greater than marginal private benefit (MPB), while a negative externality imposes unaccounted costs, making marginal social cost (MSC) greater than marginal private cost (MPC). In the graph, the MSB curve is above the MPB curve, showing the positive externality from education's societal benefits, with MSC equal to MPC. The market outcome is not socially efficient because it underproduces, as MSB > MPB leads to an efficient quantity greater than the market quantity where MPB = MPC. A common misconception is that the market equilibrium equals the social optimum, but with positive externalities, the market fails to account for external benefits, resulting in inefficiency. To analyze such problems, always compare marginal social costs to marginal social benefits. The efficient outcome occurs where MSC equals MSB, maximizing net social welfare.

2

A market for ride-sharing trips is shown in the graph. Additional trips increase traffic congestion for other drivers, a negative externality. Based on the externality shown in the graph, what is the socially optimal quantity of ride-sharing trips?

Question graphic

$Q=20$ trips, because it is where $S=MPC$ intersects $D=MPB$

$Q=30$ trips, because it is where $MSC$ intersects $D=MSB$

$Q=25$ trips, because it is where $MSC$ intersects $D=MSB$

$Q=25$ trips, because it is where $S=MPC$ intersects $MSC$

$Q=30$ trips, because it is where $S=MPC$ intersects $D=MPB$

Explanation

This question tests your understanding of externalities and efficiency in markets. A negative externality occurs when consumption imposes uncompensated costs on third parties, like traffic congestion, while a positive externality provides benefits; marginal social cost (MSC) equals marginal private cost (MPC) plus external costs, and marginal social benefit (MSB) equals marginal private benefit (MPB) plus external benefits. The graph shows the MSC curve above the S=MPC supply curve due to the congestion externality, with demand as D=MPB=MSB. The socially optimal quantity is Q=25 trips, because it is where MSC intersects D=MSB, equating full societal costs and benefits for maximum welfare. A common misconception is that the market equilibrium equals the social optimum, but negative externalities cause overproduction as private costs ignore external harms. To analyze similar problems, compare MSC to MSB on the graph. The efficient outcome occurs where MSC equals MSB.

3

A market for fireworks produces a negative externality from noise and air pollution affecting nearby residents. Based on the externality shown in the graph, is the market outcome socially efficient?

Curves (linear):

  • Demand: $D=MSB=MPB: P=50-Q$
  • Private supply: $S=MPC: P=5+Q$
  • Social cost: $MSC: P=15+Q$

(Price/Cost on vertical axis; Quantity of fireworks packs on horizontal axis.)

Question graphic

No; the market overproduces because $MSC>MPC$, so the efficient quantity is less than the market quantity.

Yes; because $MSB=MPB$, the market equilibrium equals the socially optimal quantity.

Yes; because $MSC$ lies above demand, the market equilibrium is efficient.

No; the external cost is a transfer only, so there is no efficiency loss.

No; the market underproduces because $MSB>MPB$, so the efficient quantity is greater than the market quantity.

Explanation

This question tests your understanding of externalities and market efficiency in AP Microeconomics. A negative externality occurs when production or consumption imposes unaccounted costs on third parties, making marginal social cost (MSC) greater than marginal private cost (MPC), while a positive externality provides unaccounted benefits, making marginal social benefit (MSB) greater than marginal private benefit (MPB). In the graph, the MSC curve is above the MPC curve, indicating the negative externality from fireworks noise and pollution, with MSB equal to MPB. The market outcome is not socially efficient because it overproduces, as MSC > MPC leads to an efficient quantity less than the market quantity where MPB = MPC. A common misconception is that the market equilibrium equals the social optimum, but with negative externalities, the market fails to account for external costs, causing inefficiency. To analyze such problems, always compare marginal social costs to marginal social benefits. The efficient outcome occurs where MSC equals MSB, maximizing net social welfare.

4

A market for beekeeping services creates a positive externality because bees pollinate nearby crops. Based on the externality shown in the graph, is the market outcome socially efficient?

Curves (linear):

  • Demand: $D=MPB: P=70-2Q$
  • Social benefit: $MSB: P=90-2Q$
  • Supply: $S=MPC=MSC: P=10+Q$

(Price/Cost on vertical axis; Quantity of beekeeping service contracts on horizontal axis.)

Question graphic

Yes; because $MSC=MPC$, any equilibrium quantity is socially optimal.

No; the external benefit is a transfer only, so there is no inefficiency.

No; the market underproduces because $MSB>MPB$, so the efficient quantity is greater than the market quantity.

No; the market overproduces because $MSC>MPC$, so the efficient quantity is less than the market quantity.

Yes; because $MPB=MSB$ at all quantities, the market equilibrium is efficient.

Explanation

This question tests your understanding of externalities and market efficiency in AP Microeconomics. A positive externality occurs when production or consumption provides unaccounted benefits to third parties, making marginal social benefit (MSB) greater than marginal private benefit (MPB), while a negative externality imposes unaccounted costs, making marginal social cost (MSC) greater than marginal private cost (MPC). In the graph, the MSB curve is above the MPB curve, illustrating the positive externality from beekeeping pollination, with MSC equal to MPC. The market outcome is not socially efficient because it underproduces, as MSB > MPB leads to an efficient quantity greater than the market quantity where MPB = MPC. A common misconception is that the market equilibrium equals the social optimum, but with positive externalities, the market fails to account for external benefits, resulting in inefficiency. To analyze such problems, always compare marginal social costs to marginal social benefits. The efficient outcome occurs where MSC equals MSB, maximizing net social welfare.

5

A market for plastic shopping bags creates a negative externality because litter harms wildlife and increases cleanup costs. Based on the externality shown in the graph, what is the socially optimal quantity of plastic bags (in thousands per week)?

Curves (linear):

  • Demand: $D=MSB=MPB: P=60-2Q$
  • Private supply: $S=MPC: P=0+Q$
  • Social cost: $MSC: P=10+Q$

(Price/Cost on vertical axis; Quantity in thousands per week on horizontal axis.)

Question graphic

$Q=16.7$ thousand bags per week

$Q=30$ thousand bags per week

$Q=20$ thousand bags per week

$Q=15$ thousand bags per week

$Q=25$ thousand bags per week

Explanation

This question tests your understanding of externalities and market efficiency in AP Microeconomics. A negative externality occurs when production or consumption imposes unaccounted costs on third parties, making marginal social cost (MSC) greater than marginal private cost (MPC), while a positive externality provides unaccounted benefits, making marginal social benefit (MSB) greater than marginal private benefit (MPB). In the graph, the MSC curve is above the MPC curve, indicating the negative externality from plastic bag litter, with MSB equal to MPB. The socially optimal quantity is where MSB equals MSC, solving 60 - 2Q = 10 + Q to get Q = 50/3 ≈ 16.7 thousand bags per week, justifying lower output to internalize external costs. A common misconception is that the market equilibrium equals the social optimum, but with negative externalities, the market overproduces by ignoring external costs. To analyze such problems, always compare marginal social costs to marginal social benefits. The efficient outcome occurs where MSC equals MSB, maximizing net social welfare.

6

A market for chemical solvent used by factories is shown in the graph. Disposal contaminates groundwater, creating a negative externality. Based on the externality shown, which curve represents the marginal social cost (MSC)?

Question graphic

The curve where $S=MPC$ intersects $D=MPB$

The demand curve labeled $D=MPB$

The downward-sloping curve above $D=MPB$ labeled $MSB$

The supply curve labeled $S=MPC$

The upward-sloping curve above $S=MPC$ labeled $MSC$

Explanation

This question tests your understanding of externalities and efficiency in markets. A negative externality occurs when production imposes uncompensated costs on third parties, like groundwater contamination, while a positive externality provides benefits; marginal social cost (MSC) equals marginal private cost (MPC) plus external costs, and marginal social benefit (MSB) equals marginal private benefit (MPB) plus external benefits. The graph shows the MSC curve as the upward-sloping line above S=MPC due to the disposal externality, with demand as D=MPB=MSB. The curve representing marginal social cost (MSC) is the upward-sloping curve above S=MPC labeled MSC, as it incorporates the external costs of contamination. A common misconception is that the market equilibrium equals the social optimum, but negative externalities cause overproduction by ignoring these added social costs. To analyze similar problems, compare MSC to MSB on the graph. The efficient outcome occurs where MSC equals MSB.

7

A market for lawn-care services is illustrated in the graph. Gas-powered mowing creates noise that affects neighbors, a negative externality. Based on the externality shown in the graph, is the market outcome socially efficient?

Question graphic

No; the market overproduces because $MSC$ lies above $MPC$, so $Q_m>Q^*$

Yes; the market outcome is efficient because $Q_m$ occurs where $MSC$ intersects $D=MSB$

No; the externality is only a transfer, so efficiency is unchanged

No; the market underproduces because $MSC$ lies above $MPC$, so $Q_m<Q^*$

Yes; the market outcome is efficient because $S=MPC$ already includes all costs

Explanation

This question tests your understanding of externalities and efficiency in markets. A negative externality occurs when production imposes uncompensated costs on third parties, like noise pollution, while a positive externality provides uncompensated benefits; marginal social cost (MSC) equals marginal private cost (MPC) plus external costs, and marginal social benefit (MSB) equals marginal private benefit (MPB) plus external benefits. The graph shows the MSC curve above the S=MPC supply curve due to the noise externality, with demand as D=MPB=MSB. The market outcome is not socially efficient because it overproduces, as MSC lies above MPC leading to Qm > Q* where social costs exceed benefits beyond the optimum. A common misconception is that the market equilibrium equals the social optimum, but negative externalities cause inefficiency through overproduction ignoring external costs. To analyze similar problems, compare MSC to MSB on the graph. The efficient outcome occurs where MSC equals MSB.

8

A market for residential insulation services is shown in the graph. Better insulation reduces energy use and local air pollution, creating a positive externality. Based on the externality shown in the graph, what is the socially optimal quantity of insulation services?

Question graphic

$Q=15$ services, because it is where $MSC$ intersects $MSB$

$Q=25$ services, because it is where $S=MPC$ intersects $MSB$

$Q=25$ services, because it is where $MSC$ intersects $MPB$

$Q=15$ services, because it is where $S=MPC$ intersects $D=MPB$

$Q=35$ services, because it is where $MPB$ intersects $MSB$

Explanation

This question tests your understanding of externalities and efficiency in markets. A positive externality occurs when consumption provides uncompensated benefits to third parties, like reduced pollution from insulation, while a negative externality imposes costs; marginal social benefit (MSB) equals marginal private benefit (MPB) plus external benefits, and marginal social cost (MSC) equals marginal private cost (MPC) plus external costs. The graph shows the MSB curve above the D=MPB demand curve due to the energy-saving externality, with supply as S=MPC=MSC. The socially optimal quantity is Q=25 services, because it is where S=MPC intersects MSB, equating social benefits with costs for maximum welfare. A common misconception is that the market equilibrium equals the social optimum, but positive externalities cause underproduction as private benefits ignore external gains. To analyze similar problems, compare MSC to MSB on the graph. The efficient outcome occurs where MSC equals MSB.

9

A market for public certification classes in food safety is shown. Certification reduces the risk of foodborne illness for customers, creating a positive externality. Based on the externality shown in the graph, is the market outcome socially efficient?

Question graphic

No; the market underproduces because $MSB$ lies above $MPB$, so $Q_m<Q^*$

No; the externality is only a transfer, so $Q_m$ is efficient

Yes; the market outcome is efficient because $Q_m$ occurs where $MSB$ intersects $MSC$

No; the market overproduces because $MSB$ lies above $MPB$, so $Q_m>Q^*$

Yes; the market outcome is efficient because $MSC$ exceeds $MPC$

Explanation

This question tests your understanding of externalities and efficiency in markets. A positive externality occurs when consumption provides uncompensated benefits to third parties, like reduced illness from certification, while a negative externality imposes costs; marginal social benefit (MSB) equals marginal private benefit (MPB) plus external benefits, and marginal social cost (MSC) equals marginal private cost (MPC) plus external costs. The graph shows the MSB curve above the D=MPB demand curve due to the safety externality, with supply as S=MPC=MSC. The market outcome is not socially efficient because it underproduces, as MSB lies above MPB leading to Qm < Q* where additional units would yield net social gains. A common misconception is that the market equilibrium equals the social optimum, but positive externalities cause inefficiency through underproduction ignoring external benefits. To analyze similar problems, compare MSC to MSB on the graph. The efficient outcome occurs where MSC equals MSB.

10

A market for beekeeping services (renting hives to pollinate nearby farms) is shown. Pollination benefits nearby crop growers who do not pay the beekeeper, creating a positive externality. Based on the externality shown in the graph, is the market outcome socially efficient?

Question graphic

Yes; the market outcome is efficient because $MSC$ lies above $MPC$

No; the market underproduces because $MSB$ lies above $MPB$, so $Q_m<Q^*$

No; the market overproduces because $MSB$ lies above $MPB$, so $Q_m>Q^*$

Yes; the market outcome is efficient because $MSB$ equals $MPB$

No; the efficient quantity is where $MPC$ intersects $MPB$

Explanation

This question tests your understanding of externalities and efficiency in markets. A positive externality occurs when production provides uncompensated benefits to third parties, like pollination, while a negative externality imposes costs; marginal social benefit (MSB) equals marginal private benefit (MPB) plus external benefits, and marginal social cost (MSC) equals marginal private cost (MPC) plus external costs. The graph shows the MSB curve above the D=MPB demand curve due to the beekeeping externality, with supply as S=MPC=MSC. The market outcome is not socially efficient because it underproduces, as MSB lies above MPB leading to Qm < Q* where additional units would yield net social gains. A common misconception is that the market equilibrium equals the social optimum, but positive externalities cause inefficiency through underproduction ignoring external benefits. To analyze similar problems, compare MSC to MSB on the graph. The efficient outcome occurs where MSC equals MSB.

Page 1 of 3