Changes in the AD-AS Model

Help Questions

AP Macroeconomics › Changes in the AD-AS Model

Questions 1 - 10
1

Based on the AD–AS model shown, the central bank conducts an open-market purchase that increases the money supply, shifting aggregate demand from $AD_1$ to $AD_2$ in the short run. Which statement correctly compares the initial equilibrium $E_1$ with the new equilibrium $E_2$?

The price level falls and real GDP falls from $E_1$ to $E_2$.

The price level rises and real GDP rises from $E_1$ to $E_2$.

The price level rises and real GDP falls from $E_1$ to $E_2$.

The price level falls and real GDP rises from $E_1$ to $E_2$.

The price level stays constant and real GDP rises from $E_1$ to $E_2$.

Explanation

In the AD-AS framework, monetary policy affects the economy through aggregate demand, as changes in money supply influence interest rates and spending. When the central bank conducts open-market purchases, it increases money supply, lowering interest rates and stimulating investment and consumption, which shifts AD rightward from AD₁ to AD₂. The new equilibrium E₂ occurs where the higher AD intersects the unchanged SRAS curve, resulting in both higher price level and higher real GDP. A common error is thinking monetary expansion only boosts output, but increased spending also bids up prices as the economy moves along the upward-sloping SRAS. To analyze monetary policy effects, first identify that expansionary policy shifts AD right, then trace the movement up along SRAS to find the new equilibrium with higher P and Y.

2

Based on the AD–AS model shown, the central bank raises the policy interest rate, reducing interest-sensitive spending and shifting aggregate demand from $AD_1$ to $AD_2$ in the short run. Which statement best compares the initial equilibrium $E_1$ and the new equilibrium $E_2$?

The price level rises and real GDP rises from $E_1$ to $E_2$.

The price level falls and real GDP rises from $E_1$ to $E_2$.

The price level stays constant and real GDP falls from $E_1$ to $E_2$.

The price level falls and real GDP falls from $E_1$ to $E_2$.

The price level rises and real GDP falls from $E_1$ to $E_2$.

Explanation

The AD-AS model shows how monetary policy affects the economy through interest rate channels that influence aggregate demand. When the central bank raises policy rates, borrowing becomes more expensive, reducing investment and interest-sensitive consumption, which shifts AD leftward from AD₁ to AD₂. The new equilibrium E₂ occurs where lower AD intersects the unchanged SRAS curve, resulting in both lower price level and lower real GDP. Students often forget that contractionary monetary policy affects both output and prices, not just one or the other. The key strategy is recognizing that higher interest rates shift AD left through reduced spending, then following the movement down along SRAS to find the new equilibrium with lower P and Y.

3

Based on the AD–AS model shown, a natural disaster disrupts supply chains and reduces productive capacity in the short run, shifting short-run aggregate supply from $SRAS_1$ to $SRAS_2$. Which statement correctly classifies the change and identifies the short-run outcome?

It is cost-push inflation, with a lower price level and higher real GDP at $E_2$.

It is demand-pull inflation, with a lower price level and lower real GDP at $E_2$.

It is demand-pull inflation, with a higher price level and higher real GDP at $E_2$.

It is a long-run adjustment, with no change in real GDP at $E_2$.

It is cost-push inflation, with a higher price level and lower real GDP at $E_2$.

Explanation

The AD-AS model distinguishes between demand-pull inflation (from AD shifts) and cost-push inflation (from SRAS shifts). When natural disasters disrupt supply chains, production capacity falls and costs rise, shifting SRAS leftward from SRAS₁ to SRAS₂. This creates cost-push inflation at E₂, characterized by a higher price level combined with lower real GDP—the worst of both worlds economically. Students often confuse all inflation as demand-driven, but supply shocks create stagflation where prices rise despite falling output. The diagnostic strategy is to identify the source of the shift: if SRAS moves left due to higher costs or reduced capacity, expect cost-push inflation with the painful combination of higher P and lower Y.

4

Based on the AD–AS model shown, the government raises personal income taxes, decreasing consumption and shifting aggregate demand from $AD_1$ to $AD_2$ in the short run. Which combination of changes occurs from $E_1$ to $E_2$?

The price level stays constant and real GDP falls from $E_1$ to $E_2$.

The price level rises and real GDP rises from $E_1$ to $E_2$.

The price level rises and real GDP falls from $E_1$ to $E_2$.

The price level falls and real GDP falls from $E_1$ to $E_2$.

The price level falls and real GDP rises from $E_1$ to $E_2$.

Explanation

In the AD-AS framework, fiscal policy works through aggregate demand by affecting disposable income and spending. When government raises personal income taxes, households have less after-tax income, reducing consumption and shifting AD leftward from AD₁ to AD₂. The new equilibrium E₂ occurs where lower AD intersects the unchanged SRAS curve, resulting in both lower price level and lower real GDP. Students sometimes think tax increases only reduce output, missing that decreased spending also eases price pressures. The key is recognizing that contractionary fiscal policy (higher taxes) shifts AD left, then following the movement down along SRAS to find the new equilibrium with lower P and Y.

5

Based on the AD–AS model shown, consumer confidence falls sharply, reducing consumption and shifting aggregate demand from $AD_1$ to $AD_2$ in the short run. What is the short-run change in the price level and real GDP from $E_1$ to $E_2$?

The price level rises and real GDP rises from $E_1$ to $E_2$.

The price level rises and real GDP falls from $E_1$ to $E_2$.

The price level falls and real GDP falls from $E_1$ to $E_2$.

The price level falls and real GDP rises from $E_1$ to $E_2$.

The price level stays constant and real GDP falls from $E_1$ to $E_2$.

Explanation

The AD-AS model illustrates how changes in spending behavior affect macroeconomic equilibrium through shifts in aggregate demand. When consumer confidence falls sharply, households reduce consumption spending, causing AD to shift leftward from AD₁ to AD₂. With SRAS unchanged, the economy moves to a new equilibrium E₂ where the lower AD intersects SRAS at both a lower price level and lower real GDP. Many students incorrectly assume that reduced demand only lowers output, forgetting that decreased spending also reduces pressure on prices. The key insight is that leftward AD shifts create recessionary conditions with both P and Y falling as the economy slides down along the SRAS curve to the new equilibrium.

6

Based on the AD–AS model shown, a sudden increase in oil prices raises firms’ production costs, shifting short-run aggregate supply from $SRAS_1$ to $SRAS_2$ in the short run. Compared with the initial equilibrium $E_1$, what happens to the price level and real GDP at the new equilibrium $E_2$?

The price level rises and real GDP rises from $E_1$ to $E_2$.

The price level falls and real GDP rises from $E_1$ to $E_2$.

The price level rises and real GDP falls from $E_1$ to $E_2$.

The price level stays constant and real GDP falls from $E_1$ to $E_2$.

The price level falls and real GDP falls from $E_1$ to $E_2$.

Explanation

The AD-AS model shows how price level (P) and real GDP (Y) are determined by the intersection of aggregate demand and aggregate supply curves. When oil prices increase, firms face higher production costs, causing the short-run aggregate supply (SRAS) curve to shift leftward from SRAS₁ to SRAS₂. With AD unchanged, the new equilibrium E₂ occurs at a higher price level but lower real GDP compared to E₁—this combination is called stagflation. Students often mistakenly think supply shocks only affect prices, but remember that leftward SRAS shifts reduce the economy's ability to produce at any given price level. The strategy is to recognize cost shocks shift SRAS left, then follow the AD curve to find where higher prices coincide with lower output.

7

Based on the AD–AS model shown, the government increases spending on infrastructure, shifting aggregate demand from $AD_1$ to $AD_2$ in the short run. Which outcome best describes the change from the initial equilibrium $E_1$ to the new equilibrium $E_2$?

The price level rises and real GDP rises from $E_1$ to $E_2$.

The price level falls and real GDP rises from $E_1$ to $E_2$.

The price level rises and real GDP falls from $E_1$ to $E_2$.

The price level stays constant and real GDP rises from $E_1$ to $E_2$.

The price level falls and real GDP falls from $E_1$ to $E_2$.

Explanation

In the AD-AS framework, aggregate demand (AD) represents total spending at each price level, while short-run aggregate supply (SRAS) shows production at each price level. When government spending on infrastructure increases, AD shifts rightward from AD₁ to AD₂, creating a new intersection with the unchanged SRAS curve. This rightward AD shift causes both the price level and real GDP to increase as the economy moves from E₁ to E₂ along the upward-sloping SRAS curve. A common misconception is thinking that increased spending only affects output without impacting prices, but in reality, higher demand puts upward pressure on both. The key strategy is to identify which curve shifts (here, AD moves right) and then trace the movement along the stationary curve (SRAS) to find the new equilibrium with higher P and Y.

8

Based on the AD–AS model shown, firms cut back on planned investment spending due to pessimistic profit expectations, shifting aggregate demand from $AD_1$ to $AD_2$ in the short run. Compared with $E_1$, which outcome occurs at $E_2$?

The price level falls and real GDP falls from $E_1$ to $E_2$.

The price level stays constant and real GDP falls from $E_1$ to $E_2$.

The price level rises and real GDP rises from $E_1$ to $E_2$.

The price level rises and real GDP falls from $E_1$ to $E_2$.

The price level falls and real GDP rises from $E_1$ to $E_2$.

Explanation

In the AD-AS framework, investment spending is a key component of aggregate demand, sensitive to business expectations about future profitability. When firms become pessimistic and cut planned investment, this reduces aggregate demand, shifting AD leftward from AD₁ to AD₂. The new equilibrium E₂ forms where lower AD meets the unchanged SRAS curve, resulting in both lower price level and lower real GDP. A common error is thinking reduced investment only affects output, but decreased spending also reduces inflationary pressure. The analytical approach is to recognize that negative investment shocks shift AD left, then trace the movement down along SRAS to find the recessionary equilibrium with lower P and Y.

9

Based on the AD–AS model shown, a productivity improvement lowers unit production costs, shifting short-run aggregate supply from $SRAS_1$ to $SRAS_2$ in the short run. Which outcome best describes the movement from $E_1$ to $E_2$?

The price level rises and real GDP falls from $E_1$ to $E_2$.

The price level falls and real GDP rises from $E_1$ to $E_2$.

The price level rises and real GDP rises from $E_1$ to $E_2$.

The price level stays constant and real GDP rises from $E_1$ to $E_2$.

The price level falls and real GDP falls from $E_1$ to $E_2$.

Explanation

In the AD-AS framework, productivity improvements affect the economy through the supply side by reducing production costs per unit of output. When productivity rises, firms can produce more at any given price level, shifting SRAS rightward from SRAS₁ to SRAS₂. The new equilibrium E₂ occurs where unchanged AD intersects the new SRAS curve, resulting in a lower price level but higher real GDP—an ideal combination for economic growth. Students often confuse this with demand-driven growth, but productivity gains work through supply, allowing more output without inflationary pressure. To analyze supply-side improvements, identify that positive productivity shocks shift SRAS right, then follow the AD curve down to find the new equilibrium with lower P and higher Y.

10

Based on the AD–AS model shown, foreign incomes rise, increasing demand for the country’s exports and shifting aggregate demand from $AD_1$ to $AD_2$ in the short run. Which statement correctly identifies the short-run effect from $E_1$ to $E_2$?

The price level rises and real GDP falls from $E_1$ to $E_2$.

The price level stays constant and real GDP rises from $E_1$ to $E_2$.

The price level rises and real GDP rises from $E_1$ to $E_2$.

The price level falls and real GDP rises from $E_1$ to $E_2$.

The price level falls and real GDP falls from $E_1$ to $E_2$.

Explanation

The AD-AS model shows how international trade affects domestic equilibrium through aggregate demand channels. When foreign incomes rise, overseas consumers demand more of our exports, increasing net exports (X-M) and shifting AD rightward from AD₁ to AD₂. The new equilibrium E₂ forms where higher AD meets the unchanged SRAS curve, resulting in both higher price level and higher real GDP. A common misconception is thinking export growth only boosts output, but increased foreign demand also creates inflationary pressure as the economy moves up along SRAS. The analytical strategy is to recognize that positive external demand shocks shift AD right, then trace the movement along SRAS to find the new equilibrium with higher P and Y.