What this deck covers
This deck focuses on The Judicial Branch, giving you a quick way to review the definitions, rules, and examples that matter most for AP Government and Politics.
Study The Judicial Branch in AP Government and Politics with focused flashcards that help you recognize the idea, recall the key rule, and apply it in practice-style prompts.
0% Complete
What is the primary purpose of the circuit courts?
Tap card or press Space to flip
To hear appeals from district courts. Intermediate appellate courts between district courts and Supreme Court.
How well did you know it?
Card 1 / 56
Space to flip · ← / → to move · once flipped, → Got it · ← Still learning
This deck focuses on The Judicial Branch, giving you a quick way to review the definitions, rules, and examples that matter most for AP Government and Politics.
Work through these flashcards in short sessions. Try to answer each prompt before flipping the card, then revisit any cards you miss until the explanation feels automatic.
Answer: To hear appeals from district courts. Intermediate appellate courts between district courts and Supreme Court.
Answer: The authority to review a lower court's decision. Most Supreme Court cases come through appellate jurisdiction review.
Answer: Gideon v. Wainwright (1963). Extended Sixth Amendment right to counsel to state criminal proceedings.
Answer: Bush v. Gore (2000). Halted Florida recount, effectively deciding the presidential election.
Answer: To interpret and apply the law. Ensures laws comply with the Constitution through judicial review.
Answer: Permission to proceed without court fees due to indigence. Latin term allowing poor defendants to proceed without paying fees.
Answer: To serve as trial courts for federal cases. Federal trial courts with original jurisdiction over federal matters.
Answer: The U.S. Senate. Provides advice and consent as part of the appointment process.
Answer: Mapp v. Ohio (1961). Applied Fourth Amendment protections to state criminal proceedings.
Answer: The principle of adhering to precedent in judicial decisions. Latin for 'let the decision stand,' ensuring legal consistency and stability.
Answer: A session where a case is heard before all judges of a court. Used for important cases requiring full court consideration.
Answer: The authority of a court to hear a case first. Courts with original jurisdiction include Supreme Court and district courts.
Answer: The principle of 'one person, one vote'. Required equal population in legislative districts for fair representation.
Answer: It recognized a woman's right to choose abortion. Established constitutional right to abortion under privacy doctrine.
Answer: The U.S. Senate. Provides advice and consent as part of the appointment process.
Answer: New York Times Co. v. United States (1971). Upheld press freedom against prior restraint by government.
Answer: Obergefell v. Hodges (2015). Extended Fourteenth Amendment equal protection to marriage rights.
Answer: Nine justices. Set by Congress in 1869, though the Constitution doesn't specify the number.
Answer: Four justices must agree to grant certiorari. Minimum votes needed to accept a case for Supreme Court review.
Answer: Federal laws are supreme over state laws. Established federal supremacy and implied powers doctrine.
Answer: Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978). Allowed race as one factor but prohibited strict quotas.
Answer: The President of the United States. Presidential nomination requires Senate confirmation for appointment.
Answer: Courts limiting their own power, deferring to other branches. Philosophy emphasizing strict interpretation and limited judicial intervention.
Answer: The authority of a court to hear a case first. Courts with original jurisdiction include Supreme Court and district courts.
Answer: John Jay. Appointed by George Washington, served from 1789 to 1795.
Answer: Article III. Creates the federal court system and outlines judicial powers.
Answer: To hear appeals from district courts. Intermediate appellate courts between district courts and Supreme Court.
Answer: Federal laws are supreme over state laws. Established federal supremacy and implied powers doctrine.
Answer: Judicial rulings based on personal views rather than law. Critics argue this approach exceeds proper judicial authority.
Answer: To serve as trial courts for federal cases. Federal trial courts with original jurisdiction over federal matters.
Answer: Obergefell v. Hodges (2015). Extended Fourteenth Amendment equal protection to marriage rights.
Answer: Judicial rulings based on personal views rather than law. Critics argue this approach exceeds proper judicial authority.
Answer: Plessy v. Ferguson (1896). Upheld racial segregation in public facilities for nearly 60 years.
Answer: Korematsu v. United States (1944). Upheld wartime executive power despite civil liberties violations.
Answer: Citizens United v. FEC (2010). Expanded First Amendment protections to corporate political spending.
Answer: Griswold v. Connecticut (1965). Found privacy rights in penumbras of other constitutional amendments.
Answer: It established Miranda rights for detained suspects. Required police to inform suspects of Fifth Amendment rights.
Answer: The principle of adhering to precedent in judicial decisions. Latin for 'let the decision stand,' ensuring legal consistency and stability.
Answer: The principle of 'one person, one vote'. Required equal population in legislative districts for fair representation.
Answer: An opinion that disagrees with the majority decision. Often influences future legal development and constitutional interpretation.
Answer: Plessy v. Ferguson (1896). Upheld racial segregation in public facilities for nearly 60 years.
Answer: A 'friend of the court' brief offering information. Submitted by interested parties not directly involved in the case.
Answer: Citizens United v. FEC (2010). Expanded First Amendment protections to corporate political spending.
Answer: Article III. Creates the federal court system and outlines judicial powers.
Answer: A court decision that establishes significant new legal principles. Creates binding precedent and shapes constitutional interpretation.
Answer: An order for a lower court to deliver its record for review. Allows Supreme Court discretionary review of lower court decisions.
Answer: An opinion that disagrees with the majority decision. Often influences future legal development and constitutional interpretation.
Answer: Mapp v. Ohio (1961). Applied Fourth Amendment protections to state criminal proceedings.
Answer: The Supreme Court of the United States. Has final appellate jurisdiction over all federal and constitutional questions.
Answer: Brown v. Board of Education (1954). Declared separate educational facilities inherently unequal and unconstitutional.
Answer: Lifetime tenure, pending good behavior. Ensures judicial independence from political pressure and electoral cycles.
Answer: Four justices must agree to grant certiorari. Minimum votes needed to accept a case for Supreme Court review.
Answer: The power of courts to declare laws unconstitutional. Established in Marbury v. Madison, allowing courts to check legislative and executive power.
Answer: Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978). Allowed race as one factor but prohibited strict quotas.
Answer: An opinion that agrees with the majority but for different reasons. Allows justices to explain their reasoning while supporting the outcome.
Answer: New York Times Co. v. United States (1971). Upheld press freedom against prior restraint by government.