What this deck covers
This deck focuses on The Court In Action, giving you a quick way to review the definitions, rules, and examples that matter most for AP Government and Politics.
Study The Court In Action in AP Government and Politics with focused flashcards that help you recognize the idea, recall the key rule, and apply it in practice-style prompts.
0% Complete
What is judicial review?
Tap card or press Space to flip
The power of courts to declare laws unconstitutional. Established in Marbury v. Madison to check legislative and executive power.
How well did you know it?
Card 1 / 57
Space to flip · ← / → to move · once flipped, → Got it · ← Still learning
This deck focuses on The Court In Action, giving you a quick way to review the definitions, rules, and examples that matter most for AP Government and Politics.
Work through these flashcards in short sessions. Try to answer each prompt before flipping the card, then revisit any cards you miss until the explanation feels automatic.
Answer: The power of courts to declare laws unconstitutional. Established in Marbury v. Madison to check legislative and executive power.
Answer: Precedent. Prior rulings guide future judicial decisions under stare decisis.
Answer: Friend of the court, a party not involved in the case offering information. Allows outside parties to provide expertise on legal issues.
Answer: Judges making decisions based on personal views or policy considerations. Courts actively interpret law to promote social change.
Answer: Baker v. Carr (1962). Required equal population in legislative districts for fair representation.
Answer: Jurisdiction. Determines which courts can legally hear specific cases.
Answer: Brown v. Board of Education (1954). Declared segregated schools inherently unequal and unconstitutional.
Answer: The Fourth Amendment. Protects against unreasonable searches and requires warrants.
Answer: Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978). Race can be factor but not sole basis for admissions.
Answer: Marbury v. Madison (1803). Chief Justice Marshall established judicial review precedent.
Answer: The authority to hear a case first, before any other court. Trial court level where cases begin in the judicial system.
Answer: To interpret the Constitution and review laws. Serves as final arbiter of constitutional meaning and federal law.
Answer: An opinion that agrees with the majority outcome but for different reasons. Agrees with result but offers different legal rationale.
Answer: Legalized abortion nationwide under the right to privacy. Based decision on Fourteenth Amendment privacy rights.
Answer: Established the requirement of Miranda warnings for detained suspects. Protects Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.
Answer: Plessy v. Ferguson (1896). Upheld racial segregation for nearly 60 years until Brown.
Answer: The authority to review decisions made by lower courts. Appeals courts review for legal errors, not new evidence.
Answer: The Judicial Branch. One of three co-equal branches under separation of powers.
Answer: To interpret the Constitution and ensure laws comply with it. Final constitutional interpreter and guardian of federal law.
Answer: Struck down laws banning interracial marriage. Marriage is fundamental right regardless of racial differences.
Answer: The Judicial Branch. One of three co-equal branches under separation of powers.
Answer: Legalized same-sex marriage nationwide. Extended marriage equality nationwide under Fourteenth Amendment.
Answer: Legalized abortion nationwide under the right to privacy. Based decision on Fourteenth Amendment privacy rights.
Answer: McCulloch v. Maryland (1819). Established federal law supremacy over conflicting state laws.
Answer: Marbury v. Madison (1803). Marshall's decision created judicial review precedent in 1803.
Answer: The Fourth Amendment. Protects against unreasonable searches and requires warrants.
Answer: Resolved the 2000 presidential election dispute. Stopped Florida recount and effectively decided presidential election.
Answer: Judges limiting their power by deferring to elected branches and precedent. Courts avoid policy-making and defer to legislative intent.
Answer: The doctrine of adhering to precedent in judicial decisions. Latin for 'let the decision stand'; promotes legal stability.
Answer: Limited presidential power through the rejection of absolute executive privilege. Executive privilege exists but is not absolute or unlimited.
Answer: An opinion disagreeing with the majority in a court ruling. Expresses disagreement and alternative legal reasoning.
Answer: Right to counsel for defendants unable to afford an attorney. Guaranteed under Sixth Amendment for all criminal defendants.
Answer: Plessy v. Ferguson (1896). Upheld racial segregation for nearly 60 years until Brown.
Answer: Resolved the 2000 presidential election dispute. Stopped Florida recount and effectively decided presidential election.
Answer: Four justices must agree to grant a writ of certiorari. Minimum votes needed to review a case on appeal.
Answer: An order by which a higher court reviews a lower court's decision. Latin for 'to be informed'; grants discretionary review.
Answer: The authority to hear a case first, before any other court. Trial court level where cases begin in the judicial system.
Answer: Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978). Race can be factor but not sole basis for admissions.
Answer: Korematsu v. United States (1944). Upheld wartime internment based on military necessity claims.
Answer: Four justices must agree to grant a writ of certiorari. Minimum votes needed to review a case on appeal.
Answer: Friend of the court, a party not involved in the case offering information. Allows outside parties to provide expertise on legal issues.
Answer: Established the requirement of Miranda warnings for detained suspects. Protects Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.
Answer: The authority to review decisions made by lower courts. Appeals courts review for legal errors, not new evidence.
Answer: Tinker v. Des Moines (1969). Students retain constitutional rights in public school settings.
Answer: Presides over court sessions, administers oaths, leads the federal judiciary. Senior justice with additional administrative and ceremonial duties.
Answer: An order by which a higher court reviews a lower court's decision. Latin for 'to be informed'; grants discretionary review.
Answer: A judicial opinion agreed to by more than half of the court. Establishes binding precedent and court's official reasoning.
Answer: Mapp v. Ohio (1961). Illegally obtained evidence cannot be used in court proceedings.
Answer: Judges making decisions based on personal views or policy considerations. Courts actively interpret law to promote social change.
Answer: Baker v. Carr (1962). Required equal population in legislative districts for fair representation.
Answer: Presides over court sessions, administers oaths, leads the federal judiciary. Senior justice with additional administrative and ceremonial duties.
Answer: Cases involving constitutional or federal law issues. Focuses on significant legal questions and constitutional matters.
Answer: Represents the federal government before the Supreme Court. Chief advocate for federal government in Supreme Court cases.
Answer: Miranda v. Arizona (1966). Required police to inform suspects of their constitutional rights.
Answer: Struck down laws banning interracial marriage. Marriage is fundamental right regardless of racial differences.
Answer: An opinion disagreeing with the majority in a court ruling. Expresses disagreement and alternative legal reasoning.
Answer: Judges limiting their power by deferring to elected branches and precedent. Courts avoid policy-making and defer to legislative intent.