What this deck covers
This deck focuses on Selective Incorporation, giving you a quick way to review the definitions, rules, and examples that matter most for AP Government and Politics.
Study Selective Incorporation in AP Government and Politics with focused flashcards that help you recognize the idea, recall the key rule, and apply it in practice-style prompts.
0% Complete
Which case incorporated the right to an impartial jury?
Tap card or press Space to flip
Parker v. Gladden. Applied Sixth Amendment impartial jury requirement to state criminal trials.
How well did you know it?
Card 1 / 66
Space to flip · ← / → to move · once flipped, → Got it · ← Still learning
This deck focuses on Selective Incorporation, giving you a quick way to review the definitions, rules, and examples that matter most for AP Government and Politics.
Work through these flashcards in short sessions. Try to answer each prompt before flipping the card, then revisit any cards you miss until the explanation feels automatic.
Answer: Parker v. Gladden. Applied Sixth Amendment impartial jury requirement to state criminal trials.
Answer: Not incorporated. Third Amendment quartering protection rarely applied in modern context.
Answer: De Jonge v. Oregon. Applied First Amendment assembly rights to state government restrictions.
Answer: Robinson v. California. Applied Eighth Amendment cruel punishment ban to state criminal justice.
Answer: Timbs v. Indiana. Applied Eighth Amendment excessive fines protection to state government actions.
Answer: Washington v. Texas. Applied Sixth Amendment right to compel witness testimony in state trials.
Answer: Cantwell v. Connecticut. Applied First Amendment religious freedom to state government actions.
Answer: Gideon v. Wainwright. Established Sixth Amendment right to attorney applies in state courts.
Answer: Robinson v. California. Applied Eighth Amendment punishment restrictions to state criminal justice systems.
Answer: Klopfer v. North Carolina. Applied Sixth Amendment speedy trial guarantee to state court systems.
Answer: Gitlow v. New York (1925). First case to apply First Amendment free speech protections to states.
Answer: In re Oliver. Applied Sixth Amendment public trial requirement to state court proceedings.
Answer: Timbs v. Indiana. Applied Eighth Amendment excessive fines protection to state government actions.
Answer: Mapp v. Ohio. Applied Fourth Amendment search protection and exclusionary rule to states.
Answer: Robinson v. California. Applied Eighth Amendment punishment restrictions to state criminal justice systems.
Answer: Gideon v. Wainwright. Applied Sixth Amendment counsel right to all serious state criminal cases.
Answer: Mapp v. Ohio. Applied Fourth Amendment protections and exclusionary rule to state law enforcement.
Answer: Not necessary; applies inherently. Constitutional prohibition applies directly to all governments without incorporation.
Answer: Duncan v. Louisiana. Applied Sixth Amendment jury trial right to serious state criminal cases.
Answer: Benton v. Maryland. Applied Fifth Amendment double jeopardy protection to state prosecutions.
Answer: It is the legal basis for applying Bill of Rights to states. Due Process Clause provides constitutional mechanism to apply rights to states.
Answer: Not necessary; applies inherently. Constitutional prohibition applies directly to all governments without incorporation.
Answer: Duncan v. Louisiana. Applied Sixth Amendment criminal jury trial right to state courts.
Answer: Not necessary; applies inherently. Constitutional prohibition applies directly to all governments without incorporation.
Answer: De Jonge v. Oregon. Applied First Amendment assembly rights to state government restrictions.
Answer: Duncan v. Louisiana. Applied Sixth Amendment criminal jury trial right to state courts.
Answer: Prevent state discrimination in applying rights. Ensures states cannot selectively deny constitutional protections to individuals.
Answer: Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. City of Chicago. Applied Fifth Amendment takings compensation requirement to state governments.
Answer: Miranda v. Arizona. Applied Fifth Amendment self-incrimination protections to state cases.
Answer: Washington v. Texas. Applied Sixth Amendment right to compel witness testimony in state trials.
Answer: Not incorporated. Third Amendment quartering protection rarely applied in modern context.
Answer: Griswold v. Connecticut. Established privacy right in marital relationships against state interference.
Answer: Fundamental rights test. Courts determine if rights are fundamental to ordered liberty concept.
Answer: Parker v. Gladden. Applied Sixth Amendment impartial jury requirement to state criminal trials.
Answer: McDonald v. City of Chicago. Applied Second Amendment individual gun rights to state governments.
Answer: Pointer v. Texas. Applied Sixth Amendment confrontation right to state criminal trials.
Answer: Griswold v. Connecticut. Established privacy right in marital relationships against state interference.
Answer: Most Bill of Rights protections. Nearly all Bill of Rights provisions now apply to state governments.
Answer: Klopfer v. North Carolina. Applied Sixth Amendment speedy trial guarantee to state court systems.
Answer: Application of Bill of Rights to states via 14th Amendment. Uses 14th Amendment's Due Process to make Bill of Rights binding on states.
Answer: Miranda v. Arizona. Applied Fifth Amendment protection against forced self-incrimination to states.
Answer: Fundamental rights test. Courts determine if rights are fundamental to ordered liberty concept.
Answer: Not necessary; applies inherently. Constitutional right applies directly without need for incorporation doctrine.
Answer: 14th Amendment. Contains Due Process Clause used as basis for selective incorporation.
Answer: McDonald v. City of Chicago. Applied Second Amendment individual gun rights to state governments.
Answer: Near v. Minnesota. Applied First Amendment press freedoms against state prior restraint.
Answer: Benton v. Maryland. Applied Fifth Amendment double jeopardy protection to state prosecutions.
Answer: Gideon v. Wainwright. Established Sixth Amendment right to attorney applies in state courts.
Answer: 14th Amendment. Contains Due Process Clause used as basis for selective incorporation.
Answer: Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. City of Chicago. Applied Fifth Amendment takings compensation requirement to state governments.
Answer: Duncan v. Louisiana. Applied Sixth Amendment jury trial right to serious state criminal cases.
Answer: Not necessary; applies inherently. Constitutional prohibition applies directly to all governments without incorporation.
Answer: Application of Bill of Rights to states via 14th Amendment. Uses 14th Amendment's Due Process to make Bill of Rights binding on states.
Answer: In re Oliver. Applied Sixth Amendment public trial requirement to state court proceedings.
Answer: Prevent state discrimination in applying rights. Ensures states cannot selectively deny constitutional protections to individuals.
Answer: Miranda v. Arizona. Applied Fifth Amendment self-incrimination protections to state cases.
Answer: Mapp v. Ohio. Applied Fourth Amendment protections and exclusionary rule to state law enforcement.
Answer: Gideon v. Wainwright. Applied Sixth Amendment counsel right to all serious state criminal cases.
Answer: Miranda v. Arizona. Applied Fifth Amendment protection against forced self-incrimination to states.
Answer: Not necessary; applies inherently. Constitutional right applies directly without need for incorporation doctrine.
Answer: Cantwell v. Connecticut. Applied First Amendment religious freedom to state government actions.
Answer: Near v. Minnesota. Applied First Amendment press freedoms against state prior restraint.
Answer: Robinson v. California. Applied Eighth Amendment cruel punishment ban to state criminal justice.
Answer: Pointer v. Texas. Applied Sixth Amendment confrontation right to state criminal trials.
Answer: Gitlow v. New York. Applied First Amendment speech protections to state governments for first time.
Answer: Mapp v. Ohio. Applied Fourth Amendment search protection and exclusionary rule to states.