What this deck covers
This deck focuses on Campaign Finance, giving you a quick way to review the definitions, rules, and examples that matter most for AP Government and Politics.
Study Campaign Finance in AP Government and Politics with focused flashcards that help you recognize the idea, recall the key rule, and apply it in practice-style prompts.
0% Complete
What was the impact of Citizens United v. FEC (2010)?
Tap card or press Space to flip
Allowed corporations/unions to spend unlimited funds on ads. Overturned Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce.
How well did you know it?
Card 1 / 58
Space to flip · ← / → to move · once flipped, → Got it · ← Still learning
This deck focuses on Campaign Finance, giving you a quick way to review the definitions, rules, and examples that matter most for AP Government and Politics.
Work through these flashcards in short sessions. Try to answer each prompt before flipping the card, then revisit any cards you miss until the explanation feels automatic.
Answer: Allowed corporations/unions to spend unlimited funds on ads. Overturned Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce.
Answer: Struck down increased contribution limits for opponents. Violated First Amendment by restricting wealthy candidates' rights.
Answer: Group raising/spending over $1,000 for federal elections. Includes PACs, party committees, and candidate committees.
Answer: Tax-exempt group influencing elections without advocating. Must disclose donors, unlike 501(c)(4) organizations.
Answer: Banning soft money contributions to national parties. Also restricted electioneering communications near elections.
Answer: PACs used by politicians to raise funds for others. Help politicians build influence and support networks.
Answer: FEC audits, fines, and legal actions. Can impose civil penalties and refer criminal cases.
Answer: Funds passed through an intermediary, like a PAC. Facilitates donations while maintaining contribution limits.
Answer: Spending for ads supporting/against candidates, uncoordinated. Protected as free speech under Citizens United ruling.
Answer: Struck down increased contribution limits for opponents. Violated First Amendment by restricting wealthy candidates' rights.
Answer: Ads focusing on issues, not explicitly on candidates. Avoids explicit candidate endorsement to escape regulations.
Answer: Ads explicitly urging voters to support/oppose candidates. Uses magic words like 'vote for' or 'defeat.'
Answer: Federal Election Commission (FEC). Independent agency created by FECA in 1975.
Answer: Buckley v. Valeo (1976). First Amendment protects political spending as free speech.
Answer: PACs used by politicians to raise funds for others. Help politicians build influence and support networks.
Answer: Broadcast ads naming candidates close to elections. Restricted within 60 days of general or 30 days of primary.
Answer: Buckley v. Valeo (1976). First Amendment protects political spending as free speech.
Answer: First federal law prohibiting corporate contributions. Established precedent for restricting corporate political influence.
Answer: Oversee state/local campaign finance laws and violations. Parallel federal oversight but for state and local races.
Answer: First Amendment (freedom of speech). Political expenditures considered protected speech.
Answer: Government matches small contributions for candidates. Encourages small-donor participation in campaigns.
Answer: To provide transparency about campaign funding sources. Allows voters to track money sources and potential conflicts.
Answer: Ads focusing on issues, not explicitly on candidates. Avoids explicit candidate endorsement to escape regulations.
Answer: Regulated contributions directly to candidates. Subject to strict contribution limits and disclosure requirements.
Answer: 36,500 as of 2023. Higher limit reflects parties' broader organizational role.
Answer: Regulated contributions directly to candidates. Subject to strict contribution limits and disclosure requirements.
Answer: 1,000 in contributions or expenditures. Triggers federal reporting and disclosure requirements.
Answer: Increase transparency in lobbying and campaign finance. Enhanced disclosure rules for lobbying and political activities.
Answer: Federal Election Commission (FEC). Enforces federal campaign finance laws and regulations.
Answer: They can engage in political activity without disclosing donors. Primary purpose must be social welfare, not politics.
Answer: McCain-Feingold Act. Named after its primary sponsors, McCain and Feingold.
Answer: Ads explicitly urging voters to support/oppose candidates. Uses magic words like 'vote for' or 'defeat.'
Answer: Indirect; affected voting rights, not directly finance. Weakened voting rights protections, not campaign finance directly.
Answer: Funds passed through an intermediary, like a PAC. Facilitates donations while maintaining contribution limits.
Answer: Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA). Established contribution limits and disclosure requirements in 1971.
Answer: They allow influence by wealthy donors with large sums. Creates potential for corruption and inequality in elections.
Answer: Collecting individual contributions to present as a group. Amplifies influence of wealthy donors and lobbyists.
Answer: 527 organizations. Political committees with tax-exempt status under IRC 527.
Answer: To regulate the funding of political campaigns. Ensures transparency and limits corruption in elections.
Answer: Unregulated contributions to parties for general activities. Banned by McCain-Feingold Act in 2002.
Answer: Group raising/spending over $1,000 for federal elections. Includes PACs, party committees, and candidate committees.
Answer: To provide transparency about campaign funding sources. Allows voters to track money sources and potential conflicts.
Answer: Oversee state/local campaign finance laws and violations. Parallel federal oversight but for state and local races.
Answer: McCutcheon v. FEC (2014). Removed overall contribution caps while keeping per-candidate limits.
Answer: They allow influence by wealthy donors with large sums. Creates potential for corruption and inequality in elections.
Answer: Political spending by undisclosed donors. Often flows through 501(c)(4) social welfare organizations.
Answer: Increase transparency in lobbying and campaign finance. Enhanced disclosure rules for lobbying and political activities.
Answer: McCutcheon v. FEC (2014). Removed overall contribution caps while keeping per-candidate limits.
Answer: Super PACs can raise unlimited funds but cannot coordinate. Cannot coordinate with candidates but can spend unlimited amounts.
Answer: Varies by state and office; set by FEC annually. Adjusted for inflation and population changes.
Answer: 527 organizations. Political committees with tax-exempt status under IRC 527.
Answer: 1,000 in contributions or expenditures. Triggers federal reporting and disclosure requirements.
Answer: First Amendment (freedom of speech). Political expenditures considered protected speech.
Answer: 2,900 as of 2023. Per election means both primary and general elections count separately.
Answer: Political spending by undisclosed donors. Often flows through 501(c)(4) social welfare organizations.
Answer: To raise and spend money to elect/defeat candidates. Traditional PACs have $5,000 contribution limits.
Answer: 2,900 as of 2023. Per election means both primary and general elections count separately.
Answer: Federal Election Commission (FEC). Independent agency created by FECA in 1975.