What this deck covers
This deck focuses on Affirmative Action, giving you a quick way to review the definitions, rules, and examples that matter most for AP Government and Politics.
Study Affirmative Action in AP Government and Politics with focused flashcards that help you recognize the idea, recall the key rule, and apply it in practice-style prompts.
0% Complete
What did the Supreme Court rule in Parents Involved v. Seattle (2007)?
Tap card or press Space to flip
Race cannot be used as the sole criterion for school assignments. Race alone insufficient justification for student assignment policies.
How well did you know it?
Card 1 / 76
Space to flip · ← / → to move · once flipped, → Got it · ← Still learning
This deck focuses on Affirmative Action, giving you a quick way to review the definitions, rules, and examples that matter most for AP Government and Politics.
Work through these flashcards in short sessions. Try to answer each prompt before flipping the card, then revisit any cards you miss until the explanation feels automatic.
Answer: Race cannot be used as the sole criterion for school assignments. Race alone insufficient justification for student assignment policies.
Answer: It promotes diversity and equality in education and employment. Benefits extend beyond minorities to create enriched learning environments.
Answer: It undermines meritocracy by prioritizing race over qualifications. Argues race-based preferences ignore individual merit and achievement.
Answer: Achieving a student body with varied racial and ethnic backgrounds. Creates inclusive campus environments benefiting all students.
Answer: The theory that affirmative action places students in environments too competitive for them. Claims affirmative action harms intended beneficiaries academically.
Answer: Socioeconomic-based admissions policies. Focuses on economic disadvantage rather than racial identity.
Answer: Gratz v. Bollinger (2003). Challenged mechanical point-based affirmative action systems.
Answer: A criterion for evaluating the constitutionality of affirmative action. Government must prove important societal need for race-conscious policies.
Answer: Achieving a student body with varied racial and ethnic backgrounds. Creates inclusive campus environments benefiting all students.
Answer: The 14th Amendment, concerning equal protection under the law. Guarantees all citizens equal treatment under the law.
Answer: To enforce federal laws prohibiting employment discrimination. Federal agency investigating and remedying workplace discrimination.
Answer: The 14th Amendment, concerning equal protection under the law. Guarantees all citizens equal treatment under the law.
Answer: Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978). Ruled racial quotas violate equal protection clause.
Answer: Policies that promote opportunities for historically marginalized groups. Designed to address historical discrimination and level the playing field.
Answer: It applied strict scrutiny to federal affirmative action programs. Established consistent constitutional standard for all affirmative action.
Answer: Executive Order 10925, signed by President Kennedy in 1961. Required federal contractors to ensure equal employment opportunity.
Answer: It requires government contractors to take affirmative action. Applied affirmative action requirements to companies receiving federal contracts.
Answer: The theory that affirmative action places students in environments too competitive for them. Claims affirmative action harms intended beneficiaries academically.
Answer: Socioeconomic-based admissions policies. Focuses on economic disadvantage rather than racial identity.
Answer: The Civil Rights Act of 1964. Prohibited discrimination in employment and public accommodations.
Answer: To rectify past discrimination and promote diversity. Addresses systemic inequalities through proactive measures.
Answer: Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978). Allowed race as a factor in admissions but banned racial quotas.
Answer: It applied strict scrutiny to federal affirmative action programs. Established consistent constitutional standard for all affirmative action.
Answer: Affirmative action in university admissions was upheld. Survived strict scrutiny as narrowly tailored diversity program.
Answer: Sufficient minority representation to ensure diverse perspectives. Minimum enrollment needed to realize diversity's educational benefits.
Answer: Gratz v. Bollinger (2003). Challenged mechanical point-based affirmative action systems.
Answer: City of Richmond v. J.A. Croson Co. (1989). Applied strict scrutiny to state and local affirmative action programs.
Answer: States can ban affirmative action policies via voter initiatives. States have authority to ban affirmative action through democratic process.
Answer: A fixed number or percentage of opportunities reserved for minorities. Struck down in Bakke as unconstitutional racial preferences.
Answer: A judicial review standard for assessing affirmative action policies. Highest level of constitutional review for race-based policies.
Answer: To increase minority representation in higher education institutions. Aims to diversify student bodies and expand educational access.
Answer: A policy that considers race as one of many factors in admissions. Race is one factor among many in holistic evaluation.
Answer: To increase minority representation in higher education institutions. Aims to diversify student bodies and expand educational access.
Answer: Policies that do not consider race at all in decision-making. Race-neutral approach treating all applicants identically.
Answer: Evaluating applicants based on a wide range of factors, including race. Comprehensive assessment considering multiple aspects of applicant background.
Answer: A policy that considers race as one of many factors in admissions. Race is one factor among many in holistic evaluation.
Answer: The Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP). Monitors federal contractor compliance with affirmative action requirements.
Answer: Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978). Ruled racial quotas violate equal protection clause.
Answer: The use of a point system that favored minority applicants too heavily. Lacked individualized consideration required for constitutional compliance.
Answer: Race cannot be used as the sole criterion for school assignments. Race alone insufficient justification for student assignment policies.
Answer: To enforce federal laws prohibiting employment discrimination. Federal agency investigating and remedying workplace discrimination.
Answer: Policies that promote opportunities for historically marginalized groups. Designed to address historical discrimination and level the playing field.
Answer: Affirmative action policies must be specifically designed to achieve diversity. Policies must be carefully crafted to achieve stated goals minimally.
Answer: The use of a point system that favored minority applicants too heavily. Lacked individualized consideration required for constitutional compliance.
Answer: Policies that do not consider race at all in decision-making. Race-neutral approach treating all applicants identically.
Answer: Executive Order 10925, signed by President Kennedy in 1961. Required federal contractors to ensure equal employment opportunity.
Answer: Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978). Allowed race as a factor in admissions but banned racial quotas.
Answer: It undermines meritocracy by prioritizing race over qualifications. Argues race-based preferences ignore individual merit and achievement.
Answer: President Lyndon B. Johnson. Major civil rights legislation prohibiting various forms of discrimination.
Answer: It upheld affirmative action in private sector employment. Allowed voluntary affirmative action programs in private employment.
Answer: A judicial review standard for assessing affirmative action policies. Highest level of constitutional review for race-based policies.
Answer: President Lyndon B. Johnson. Major civil rights legislation prohibiting various forms of discrimination.
Answer: To rectify past discrimination and promote diversity. Addresses systemic inequalities through proactive measures.
Answer: It promotes diversity and equality in education and employment. Benefits extend beyond minorities to create enriched learning environments.
Answer: Affirmative action in university admissions is constitutional. Upheld race-conscious admissions for achieving educational diversity.
Answer: Sufficient minority representation to ensure diverse perspectives. Minimum enrollment needed to realize diversity's educational benefits.
Answer: It upheld affirmative action in private sector employment. Allowed voluntary affirmative action programs in private employment.
Answer: The argument that diversity benefits all students in educational settings. Justifies affirmative action based on educational benefits for all.
Answer: States can ban affirmative action policies via voter initiatives. States have authority to ban affirmative action through democratic process.
Answer: Preference in admissions given to relatives of alumni. Traditional preference system benefiting children of graduates.
Answer: Discrimination against majority groups due to affirmative action. When affirmative action allegedly disadvantages majority group members.
Answer: Affirmative action in university admissions was upheld. Survived strict scrutiny as narrowly tailored diversity program.
Answer: A fixed number or percentage of opportunities reserved for minorities. Struck down in Bakke as unconstitutional racial preferences.
Answer: A criterion for evaluating the constitutionality of affirmative action. Government must prove important societal need for race-conscious policies.
Answer: It can lead to reverse discrimination against non-minority groups. Claims qualified majority candidates are unfairly disadvantaged.
Answer: It requires government contractors to take affirmative action. Applied affirmative action requirements to companies receiving federal contracts.
Answer: The Civil Rights Act of 1964. Prohibited discrimination in employment and public accommodations.
Answer: Preference in admissions given to relatives of alumni. Traditional preference system benefiting children of graduates.
Answer: The Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP). Monitors federal contractor compliance with affirmative action requirements.
Answer: It can lead to reverse discrimination against non-minority groups. Claims qualified majority candidates are unfairly disadvantaged.
Answer: The argument that diversity benefits all students in educational settings. Justifies affirmative action based on educational benefits for all.
Answer: Evaluating applicants based on a wide range of factors, including race. Comprehensive assessment considering multiple aspects of applicant background.
Answer: Discrimination against majority groups due to affirmative action. When affirmative action allegedly disadvantages majority group members.
Answer: City of Richmond v. J.A. Croson Co. (1989). Applied strict scrutiny to state and local affirmative action programs.
Answer: Affirmative action in university admissions is constitutional. Upheld race-conscious admissions for achieving educational diversity.
Answer: Affirmative action policies must be specifically designed to achieve diversity. Policies must be carefully crafted to achieve stated goals minimally.