What this deck covers
This deck focuses on Select Relevant Sufficient Evidence Fiction Drama, giving you a quick way to review the definitions, rules, and examples that matter most for AP English Literature and Composition.
Study Select Relevant Sufficient Evidence Fiction Drama in AP English Literature and Composition with focused flashcards that help you recognize the idea, recall the key rule, and apply it in practice-style prompts.
0% Complete
What is the definition of relevant evidence in a literary analysis paragraph?
Tap card or press Space to flip
Evidence that directly supports the specific claim being argued. Must connect directly to your thesis, not just relate to the topic.
How well did you know it?
Card 1 / 40
Space to flip · ← / → to move · once flipped, → Got it · ← Still learning
This deck focuses on Select Relevant Sufficient Evidence Fiction Drama, giving you a quick way to review the definitions, rules, and examples that matter most for AP English Literature and Composition.
Work through these flashcards in short sessions. Try to answer each prompt before flipping the card, then revisit any cards you miss until the explanation feels automatic.
Answer: Evidence that directly supports the specific claim being argued. Must connect directly to your thesis, not just relate to the topic.
Answer: A) A quoted image. Direct textual imagery proves claims about sensory language.
Answer: Integrate a brief quote into your own sentence with a clear purpose. Embedding quotes shows control and prevents listing without analysis.
Answer: Enough well-chosen support to make the claim convincing and clear. Quality and quantity together create persuasive literary analysis.
Answer: Repeated appearances plus context showing how the symbol functions. Patterns and contextual use establish symbolic significance.
Answer: Lines showing audience knowledge that a character in the scene lacks. Dramatic irony requires the audience to know more than characters.
Answer: A revealing action, line of dialogue, or narrated thought with context. Character development shown through actions, speech, and thoughts.
Answer: B) Action plus thought. Internal conflict requires both external behavior and inner thoughts.
Answer: Two images with opposing connotations placed in close proximity. Juxtaposition of opposites creates poetic tension.
Answer: It could support many different claims without needing interpretation. Vague evidence weakens arguments by requiring excessive interpretation.
Answer: Narrow the claim or add a second, complementary passage as support. Either refine the scope or expand the supporting evidence.
Answer: A pattern of choices, images, or conflicts that recur across the text. Themes emerge through patterns, not isolated incidents.
Answer: Evidence that directly supports the specific claim being made. Relevance means the evidence must connect directly to your specific argument.
Answer: B) Two varied moments. Different examples show pattern; repetition without analysis is weak.
Answer: Choose the most precise passage that proves the claim with least summary. Precision and directness strengthen analytical arguments.
Answer: Use details that show the minor character's function in the protagonist's arc. Minor characters matter only as they affect main characters.
Answer: Embed the quoted words within your own syntax and context. Integration creates smooth, grammatically correct analysis.
Answer: A moment where audience knowledge exceeds a character's knowledge. Dramatic irony requires audience awareness vs. character ignorance.
Answer: Descriptions emphasizing enclosure, barriers, narrowness, or restricted movement. Physical details of limitation prove the confining atmosphere.
Answer: A brief quoted word or phrase showing the diction in question. Specific word choice reveals author's craft more than long passages.
Answer: Select the passage that most directly proves the claim and shows complexity. Choose evidence that reveals layers, not just surface support.
Answer: B) Narrator's evaluative wording. Word choice like "foolish" or "brave" reveals narrator's judgment.
Answer: A described structural choice (shift, pacing, order, or juxtaposition). Structure focuses on how text is organized, not what it says.
Answer: An earlier detail that later gains predictive significance in hindsight. Foreshadowing only exists when early details predict later events.
Answer: To target precise proof and maintain focus on analysis over summary. Brevity keeps focus on interpretation rather than plot retelling.
Answer: Contradictions between the narrator's account and observable events. Discrepancies between telling and showing reveal unreliability.
Answer: B) A passage before and after the shift. Contrast shows the change; single moments can't prove shifts.
Answer: A) Repeated conflict pattern. Themes emerge from patterns of conflict and resolution.
Answer: A) Interruptions. Speech patterns reveal who controls conversations.
Answer: Evidence is textual detail; commentary explains how it proves the claim. Evidence shows what; commentary explains why it matters.
Answer: Repeated image/object moments that change or accumulate significance. Motifs gain meaning through repetition and transformation.
Answer: A reader could follow the proof without accepting unstated assumptions. Self-contained proof requires no leaps of logic.
Answer: Early details that later gain significance by accurately anticipating events. Foreshadowing gains meaning through fulfilled predictions.
Answer: Key appearances of the symbol paired with the surrounding context. Context reveals how symbols function beyond literal meaning.
Answer: Paired moments early and late showing a clear contrast in actions or values. Before/after comparison demonstrates character development.
Answer: Specific diction or imagery from before and after the shift. Comparing language before/after pinpoints the tonal transition.
Answer: It is interpreted to prove a claim, not retold to recount events. Analysis explains how evidence proves the claim, not what happens.
Answer: Enough well-chosen support to make the claim convincing and complete. Quality matters more than quantity; depth of analysis proves the point.
Answer: A passage showing the character's choices, thoughts, or stated reasons. Internal evidence reveals why characters act as they do.
Answer: A specific stage direction that affects tone, pacing, or character power. Stage directions reveal unspoken dynamics and authorial intent.