Appropriate Evidence to Support a Claim Practice Test
•15 QuestionsRead the passage and answer the question.
Many communities are debating whether to remove single-use plastics from restaurants and grocery stores. Supporters argue that plastic waste harms wildlife and clogs waterways. Opponents argue that alternatives can be more expensive and sometimes have their own environmental costs.
Cities should phase out single-use plastic bags and require retailers to offer reusable or compostable options. While no policy is perfect, bag bans target a common source of litter and can shift consumer habits quickly. The goal is not to shame shoppers but to reduce a preventable stream of waste.
Paragraph 3: Bag bans can reduce visible litter in public spaces. When fewer lightweight bags circulate, fewer end up stuck in trees, storm drains, and roadside ditches. After my town banned plastic bags, the park looked cleaner during my weekend walks. That improvement matters because cleaner parks are safer for wildlife and more inviting for residents.
To make the policy fair, the city can distribute free reusable bags and allow exemptions for certain medical or sanitation uses. A ban works best when it is paired with practical support.
Which evidence would most effectively support the claim in paragraph 3?
Read the passage and answer the question.
Many communities are debating whether to remove single-use plastics from restaurants and grocery stores. Supporters argue that plastic waste harms wildlife and clogs waterways. Opponents argue that alternatives can be more expensive and sometimes have their own environmental costs.
Cities should phase out single-use plastic bags and require retailers to offer reusable or compostable options. While no policy is perfect, bag bans target a common source of litter and can shift consumer habits quickly. The goal is not to shame shoppers but to reduce a preventable stream of waste.
Paragraph 3: Bag bans can reduce visible litter in public spaces. When fewer lightweight bags circulate, fewer end up stuck in trees, storm drains, and roadside ditches. After my town banned plastic bags, the park looked cleaner during my weekend walks. That improvement matters because cleaner parks are safer for wildlife and more inviting for residents.
To make the policy fair, the city can distribute free reusable bags and allow exemptions for certain medical or sanitation uses. A ban works best when it is paired with practical support.
Which evidence would most effectively support the claim in paragraph 3?