Functions, Graphs, and Limits - AP Calculus BC
Card 0 of 750

Given the above graph of
, what is
?

Given the above graph of , what is
?
Examining the graph, we can observe that ") does not exist, as
is not continuous at
. We can see this by checking the three conditions for which a function
is continuous at a point
:
- A value
exists in the domain of 
- The limit of
exists as
approaches 
- The limit of
at
is equal to 
Given
, we can see that condition #1 is not satisfied because the graph has a vertical asymptote instead of only one value for
and is therefore an infinite discontinuity at
.
We can also see that condition #2 is not satisfied because ") approaches two different limits:
from the left and
from the right.
Based on the above, condition #3 is also not satisfied because ") is not equal to the multiple values of
.
Thus, ") does not exist.
Examining the graph, we can observe that ") does not exist, as is not continuous at
. We can see this by checking the three conditions for which a function
is continuous at a point
:
- A value
exists in the domain of
- The limit of
exists as
approaches
- The limit of
at
is equal to
Given , we can see that condition #1 is not satisfied because the graph has a vertical asymptote instead of only one value for
and is therefore an infinite discontinuity at
.
We can also see that condition #2 is not satisfied because ") approaches two different limits: from the left and
from the right.
Based on the above, condition #3 is also not satisfied because ") is not equal to the multiple values of .
Thus, ") does not exist.
Compare your answer with the correct one above

Given the graph of
above, what is
?

Given the graph of above, what is
?
Examining the graph of the function above, we need to look at three things:
-
What is the limit of the function as it approaches zero from the left?
-
What is the limit of the function as it approaches zero from the right?
-
What is the function value at zero and is it equal to the first two statements?
If we look at the graph we see that as
approaches zero from the left the
values approach zero as well. This is also true if we look the values as
approaches zero from the right. Lastly we look at the function value at zero which in this case is also zero.
Therefore, we can observe that
as
approaches
.
Examining the graph of the function above, we need to look at three things:
-
What is the limit of the function as it approaches zero from the left?
-
What is the limit of the function as it approaches zero from the right?
-
What is the function value at zero and is it equal to the first two statements?
If we look at the graph we see that as approaches zero from the left the
values approach zero as well. This is also true if we look the values as
approaches zero from the right. Lastly we look at the function value at zero which in this case is also zero.
Therefore, we can observe that as
approaches
.
Compare your answer with the correct one above

Given the graph of
above, what is
?

Given the graph of above, what is
?
Examining the graph above, we need to look at three things:
-
What is the limit of the function as
approaches zero from the left?
-
What is the limit of the function as
approaches zero from the right?
-
What is the function value as
and is it the same as the result from statement one and two?
Therefore, we can determine that
does not exist, since
approaches two different limits from either side :
from the left and
from the right.
Examining the graph above, we need to look at three things:
-
What is the limit of the function as
approaches zero from the left?
-
What is the limit of the function as
approaches zero from the right?
-
What is the function value as
and is it the same as the result from statement one and two?
Therefore, we can determine that does not exist, since
approaches two different limits from either side :
from the left and
from the right.
Compare your answer with the correct one above

Given the above graph of
, what is
?
Given the above graph of , what is
?
Examining the graph, we want to find where the graph tends to as it approaches zero from the right hand side. We can see that there appears to be a vertical asymptote at zero. As the x values approach zero from the right the function values of the graph tend towards positive infinity.
Therefore, we can observe that
as
approaches
from the right.
Examining the graph, we want to find where the graph tends to as it approaches zero from the right hand side. We can see that there appears to be a vertical asymptote at zero. As the x values approach zero from the right the function values of the graph tend towards positive infinity.
Therefore, we can observe that as
approaches
from the right.
Compare your answer with the correct one above

Compare your answer with the correct one above

Compare your answer with the correct one above

Compare your answer with the correct one above

Compare your answer with the correct one above

Compare your answer with the correct one above

Compare your answer with the correct one above

Compare your answer with the correct one above

Compare your answer with the correct one above

Compare your answer with the correct one above

Compare your answer with the correct one above

Compare your answer with the correct one above

Compare your answer with the correct one above
A cylinder of height
and radius
is expanding. The radius increases at a rate of
and its height increases at a rate of
. What is the rate of growth of its surface area?
A cylinder of height and radius
is expanding. The radius increases at a rate of
and its height increases at a rate of
. What is the rate of growth of its surface area?
The surface area of a cylinder is given by the formula:

To find the rate of growth over time, take the derivative of each side with respect to time:

Therefore, the rate of growth of surface area is:


The surface area of a cylinder is given by the formula:
To find the rate of growth over time, take the derivative of each side with respect to time:
Therefore, the rate of growth of surface area is:
Compare your answer with the correct one above
The rate of growth of the population of Reindeer in Norway is proportional to the population. The population increased from 9876 to 10381 between 2013 and 2015. What is the expected population in 2030?
The rate of growth of the population of Reindeer in Norway is proportional to the population. The population increased from 9876 to 10381 between 2013 and 2015. What is the expected population in 2030?
We're told that the rate of growth of the population is proportional to the population itself, meaning that this problem deals with exponential growth/decay. The population can be modeled thusly:

Where
is an initial population value, and
is the constant of proportionality.
Since the population increased from 9876 to 10381 between 2013 and 2015, we can solve for this constant of proportionality:




Using this, we can calculate the expected value from 2015 to 2030:

We're told that the rate of growth of the population is proportional to the population itself, meaning that this problem deals with exponential growth/decay. The population can be modeled thusly:
Where is an initial population value, and
is the constant of proportionality.
Since the population increased from 9876 to 10381 between 2013 and 2015, we can solve for this constant of proportionality:
Using this, we can calculate the expected value from 2015 to 2030:
Compare your answer with the correct one above
The rate of decrease due to poaching of the elephants in unprotected Sahara is proportional to the population. The population in one region decreased from 1038 to 817 between 2010 and 2015. What is the expected population in 2017?
The rate of decrease due to poaching of the elephants in unprotected Sahara is proportional to the population. The population in one region decreased from 1038 to 817 between 2010 and 2015. What is the expected population in 2017?
We're told that the rate of growth of the population is proportional to the population itself, meaning that this problem deals with exponential growth/decay. The population can be modeled thusly:

Where
is an initial population value, and
is the constant of proportionality.
Since the population decreased from 1038 to 817 between 2010 and 2015, we can solve for this constant of proportionality:




Using this, we can calculate the expected value from 2015 to 2017:

We're told that the rate of growth of the population is proportional to the population itself, meaning that this problem deals with exponential growth/decay. The population can be modeled thusly:
Where is an initial population value, and
is the constant of proportionality.
Since the population decreased from 1038 to 817 between 2010 and 2015, we can solve for this constant of proportionality:
Using this, we can calculate the expected value from 2015 to 2017:
Compare your answer with the correct one above

Compare your answer with the correct one above