Algebra · Learn by Concept

Algebra Help: Creating Solving One Variable Equations Inequalities

Review real example questions for Creating Solving One Variable Equations Inequalities in Algebra.

Question 1 / 10

0 of 10 answered

Tickets to a school play cost $9 each, and there is a one-time online fee of $4 per order. Jordan has at most $40 to spend. Write an inequality representing the number of tickets Jordan can buy.

Let $t$ = the number of tickets.

All questions

Question 1

Tickets to a school play cost $9 each, and there is a one-time online fee of $4 per order. Jordan has at most $40 to spend. Write an inequality representing the number of tickets Jordan can buy.

Let $t$ = the number of tickets.

$9t + 4 \ge 40$
$9t - 4 \le 40$
$4t + 9 \le 40$
$9t + 4 \le 40$ (correct answer)

Explanation: This question tests your ability to translate a real-world situation into a mathematical equation or inequality, solve it, and interpret the result in the original context. For inequalities, words like 'at most,' 'maximum,' 'no more than' signal ≤ (less than or equal), while 'at least,' 'minimum,' 'no less than' signal ≥ (greater than or equal). 'More than' means > (strict), and 'less than' means <. These key phrases tell you which inequality symbol to use! The context 'tickets cost $9 each with a $4 fee, at most $40' uses the phrase 'at most,' which signals ≤. Setting up: cost per ticket times number plus fee ≤ total available, so 9t + 4 ≤ 40. Solving: subtract 4 → 9t ≤ 36, divide by 9 → t ≤ 4. This means Jordan can buy a maximum of 4 whole tickets. Choice A is correct because it properly sets up the inequality from the context with the fee added and uses ≤ for 'at most,' giving t ≤ 4 tickets within budget. Choice D sets up the inequality incorrectly: it switches the variables to 4t + 9 ≤ 40, which would be like $4 per ticket and $9 fee, but the problem says $9 tickets and $4 fee—reading carefully for relationships is key! For inequalities, make a quick reference card: 'at most/maximum/no more than' → ≤ (can equal or be less), 'at least/minimum/no less than' → ≥ (can equal or be more), 'more than/over' → > (strictly greater), 'less than/under' → < (strictly less). Having these memorized means you'll never use the wrong symbol!

Question 2

You have at most $50 to spend on notebooks that cost $4 each. Write an inequality representing this constraint and find the maximum number of notebooks you can buy. Let $n$ = number of notebooks.

Maximum $n=11$
Maximum $n=12$ (correct answer)
Maximum $n=13$
Maximum $n=14$

Explanation: This question tests your ability to translate a real-world situation into a mathematical equation or inequality, solve it, and interpret the result in the original context. For inequalities, words like 'at most,' 'maximum,' 'no more than' signal ≤ (less than or equal), while 'at least,' 'minimum,' 'no less than' signal ≥ (greater than or equal). 'More than' means > (strict), and 'less than' means <. These key phrases tell you which inequality symbol to use! The context 'at most $50 to spend' uses the phrase 'at most,' which signals ≤. Setting up: cost of notebooks ≤ money available, so 4n ≤ 50. Solving: n ≤ 12.5. This means a maximum of 12 whole notebooks (can't buy half a notebook!). Choice B is correct because it properly sets up the inequality from context, solves correctly, and interprets appropriately in the real world, giving maximum n = 12 notebooks. Choice C would cost 4(13) = $52, which exceeds the $50 budget. When dealing with discrete items like notebooks, always round down to stay within the constraint! For inequalities, make a quick reference card: 'at most/maximum/no more than' → ≤ (can equal or be less), 'at least/minimum/no less than' → ≥ (can equal or be more), 'more than/over' → > (strictly greater), 'less than/under' → < (strictly less). Having these memorized means you'll never use the wrong symbol!

Question 3

Pump A can fill a pool in 12 hours. Pump B can fill the same pool in $x$ hours. Working together, they fill the pool in 8 hours. Set up and solve an equation to find how long Pump B takes to fill the pool alone.

Let $x$ = Pump B's time (in hours).

$x = 20$
$x = 24$ (correct answer)
$x = 18$
$x = 16$

Explanation: This question tests your ability to translate a real-world situation into a mathematical equation or inequality, solve it, and interpret the result in the original context. Different contexts lead to different equation types: constant rates give linear equations (like cost = rate × quantity + fee), area problems often give quadratics (like length × width = area), and growth over time gives exponentials (like population = initial × (growth rate)^time). The context clues tell you which form to use. For rate problems like this, we set up: rates add when working together, so Pump A rate 1/12 + Pump B rate 1/x = combined rate 1/8. This gives us 1/12 + 1/x = 1/8. Solving: subtract 1/12 → 1/x = 1/8 - 1/12 = (3-2)/24 = 1/24, so x=24. Interpreting: Pump B takes 24 hours alone. Choice B is correct because it properly sets up the rational equation from context, solves correctly, and interprets appropriately, giving x=24 hours. Choice A makes an arithmetic error: perhaps in subtracting fractions, doing 1/8 - 1/12 = (3-2)/24=1/24 correctly but then misinterpreting. With all the steps in solving word problems—setting up, solving, interpreting—it's easy for calculation errors to slip in. Double-checking arithmetic is always worth it! The foolproof word problem strategy: (1) Read carefully and identify what's unknown—that's your variable, (2) Find what you know—those are your numbers, (3) Look for relationships—how are quantities connected? This gives you the equation, (4) Solve the equation using appropriate methods, (5) Check: does your answer satisfy the equation AND make sense in context? Following these steps systematically prevents most mistakes!

Question 4

A ball is thrown upward from the ground. Its height (in feet) after $t$ seconds is given by $h = -16t^2 + 64t$ . Solve for the time(s) when the ball is on the ground.

Let $t$ = time in seconds.

$t = 2$ only
$t = 0$ and $t = 4$ (correct answer)
$t = 0$ and $t = 2$
$t = 4$ only

Explanation: This question tests your ability to translate a real-world situation into a mathematical equation or inequality, solve it, and interpret the result in the original context. Different contexts lead to different equation types: constant rates give linear equations (like cost = rate × quantity + fee), area problems often give quadratics (like length × width = area), and growth over time gives exponentials (like population = initial × (growth rate)^time). The context clues tell you which form to use. This is a motion problem, which means quadratic! Let t = time in seconds. The relationship 'height after t seconds is given by h = -16t² + 64t' and 'when the ball is on the ground' translates to set h=0: -16t² + 64t = 0. Using factoring, -16t(t - 4) = 0, so t=0 or t=4. Checking context: both make sense—at t=0 (start) and t=4 (lands). Interpreting: the ball is on the ground at 0 seconds and after 4 seconds. Choice B is correct because it properly sets up the quadratic equation from context, solves correctly, and interprets appropriately, giving t=0 and t=4 seconds. Choice D finds one solution to the quadratic but misses the other: solving gives two values, but perhaps they ignored t=0 since it's the start. For quadratics, always check both solutions against the real-world situation! The 'reality check' is your best friend: after solving, substitute your answer back into the original equation (math check), then ask 'does this make sense?' (reality check). Can dimensions be negative? Can you buy 7.3 shirts? Can there be -4 hours? The context tells you what's possible and what's not!

Question 5

A rectangular garden has a length that is 5 feet more than its width. The area is 84 square feet. Write and solve an equation to find the width of the garden.

Let $w$ = the width (in feet).

$w = 14$
$w = 12$
$w = 7$ (correct answer)
$w = 9$

Explanation: This question tests your ability to translate a real-world situation into a mathematical equation or inequality, solve it, and interpret the result in the original context. Different contexts lead to different equation types: constant rates give linear equations (like cost = rate × quantity + fee), area problems often give quadratics (like length × width = area), and growth over time gives exponentials (like population = initial × (growth rate)^time). The context clues tell you which form to use. This is an area problem, which means quadratic! Let w = width. The relationship 'length is 5 more than width, area 84' translates to w(w + 5) = 84, or w² + 5w - 84 = 0. Using quadratic formula, discriminant 25 + 336 = 361 = 19², so w = [-5 ± 19]/2, giving w = 7 or w = -12 (discard negative). So valid solution w = 7 with interpretation: the garden is 7 feet wide and 12 feet long. Choice A is correct because it properly sets up the quadratic from the area context, solves correctly, and interprets appropriately, giving w = 7 feet that makes sense. Choice C solves the equation correctly but doesn't check the context: w = 12 would imply length = 17, but that's swapping variables— the question asks for width, which is the smaller one. Always ask: does my answer make sense in the real world? This catches a lot of mistakes! The 'reality check' is your best friend: after solving, substitute your answer back into the original equation (math check), then ask 'does this make sense?' (reality check). Can dimensions be negative? Can you buy 7.3 shirts? Can there be -4 hours? The context tells you what's possible and what's not!

Question 6

A gym charges a one-time sign-up fee of $30 and then $18 per month. You have at most $150 to spend total. What is the maximum whole number of months you can afford?

Maximum $m$ is $7$
Maximum $m$ is $5$
Maximum $m$ is $6$ (correct answer)
Maximum $m$ is $8$

Explanation: This question tests your ability to translate a real-world situation into a mathematical equation or inequality, solve it, and interpret the result in the original context. For inequalities, words like 'at most,' 'maximum,' 'no more than' signal ≤ (less than or equal), while 'at least,' 'minimum,' 'no less than' signal ≥ (greater than or equal). 'More than' means > (strict), and 'less than' means <. These key phrases tell you which inequality symbol to use! The context 'A gym charges a one-time sign-up fee of $30 and then $18 per month. You have at most $150 to spend total' uses the phrase 'at most $150,' which signals ≤. Setting up: 30 + 18m ≤ 150. Solving: subtract 30 → 18m ≤ 120, divide by 18 → m ≤ 6.666. This means maximum of 6 whole months, since you can't have a fraction of a month here. Choice B is correct because it properly sets up the inequality from context, solves correctly, and interprets appropriately, giving maximum m=6 whole months. Choice A has the inequality symbol backwards or ignores the fee: perhaps doing 18m ≤ 150 → m ≤ 8.33 (to 8, but wrong), but 'at most $150' means ≤ after adding $30. These phrases can be tricky—memorizing which direction they go really helps! For inequalities, make a quick reference card: 'at most/maximum/no more than' → ≤ (can equal or be less), 'at least/minimum/no less than' → ≥ (can equal or be more), 'more than/over' → > (strictly greater), 'less than/under' → < (strictly less). Having these memorized means you'll never use the wrong symbol!

Question 7

An investment account grows according to the formula $A = 2500(1.06)^t$ , where $A$ is the account value and $t$ is time in years. At the same time, the investor makes annual withdrawals of $200. Which equation represents the net account balance when accounting for both growth and withdrawals over $ $t$ $ years?

$2500(1.06)^t - 200 = A$
$2500(1.06)^t - 200t = A$ (correct answer)
$2500(1.06 - 0.08)^t = A$
$2500(1.06)^t \cdot 0.92^t = A$

Explanation: When you encounter problems involving exponential growth with regular withdrawals, you need to think about how these two separate processes affect the account differently. The growth compounds over time, while withdrawals happen at regular intervals and accumulate linearly. The original formula $A = 2500(1.06)^t$ shows exponential growth at 6% annually. However, the investor also withdraws $200 each year for $ $t$ $years, which means total withdrawals equal$ $200t$ $. Since withdrawals reduce the account balance, you subtract this linear term from the exponential growth:$ $2500(1.06)^t - 200t = A$ $. Choice A (2500(1.06)^t - 200 = A) incorrectly assumes only one withdrawal of $200 total, rather than$ 200 per year for t years. Choice C (2500(1.06 - 0.08)^t = A) mistakenly tries to incorporate the $200 withdrawal as a percentage rate decrease, but$ 200 isn't 8% of the initial investment, and withdrawals don't work as percentage reductions anyway. Choice D (2500(1.06)^t \cdot 0.92^t = A) makes a similar error, treating withdrawals as if they reduce the growth rate by 8% annually, which incorrectly converts the fixed $200 into a percentage. Remember: when combining exponential processes with linear processes, keep them separate in your equation. Don't try to convert fixed amounts into percentages or combine them into a single exponential term. Exponential parts stay exponential, linear parts stay linear.

Question 8

A store offers a membership where customers pay $30 annually and then receive a 15% discount on all purchases. Without membership, customers pay full price. For what annual spending amount $ $x$ $ (in dollars) would the membership cost exactly break even with non-membership shopping?

$0.85x = x - 30$
$30 + 0.15x = x$
$30 = 0.15x$
$30 + 0.85x = x$ (correct answer)

Explanation: When you encounter break-even problems, you need to set up an equation where the total costs of both options are equal. Here, you're comparing the total annual cost of membership shopping versus non-membership shopping. With membership, you pay $30$ upfront plus 85% of your purchases (since you get a 15% discount, you pay 100% - 15% = 85%). So the total cost is $30 + 0.85x$ . Without membership, you simply pay the full price $x$ for your purchases. At the break-even point, these costs are equal: $30 + 0.85x = x$ . This is answer choice D. Let's examine why the other options are incorrect: Choice A ( $0.85x = x - 30$ ) incorrectly suggests that your discounted purchases equal your full purchases minus $30$ . This doesn't account for the membership fee you actually paid. Choice B ( $30 + 0.15x = x$ ) mistakenly uses 0.15 as what you pay, but 0.15 represents your savings, not your payment. You pay 85% of the original price, not 15%. Choice C ( $30 = 0.15x$ ) only considers the membership fee equaling your savings, ignoring that you still have to pay for the discounted items. Study tip: In discount problems, always identify what percentage you actually pay (100% minus the discount percentage) rather than the discount itself. Set up break-even equations by making total costs equal, ensuring you include all fees and payments for each option.

Question 9

The height of a ball thrown upward can be modeled by $h(t) = -16t^2 + 48t + 6$ , where $h$ is the height in feet and $t$ is the time in seconds. Which equation would you solve to find when the ball reaches a height of 54 feet?

$-16t^2 + 48t + 6 = 54$ (correct answer)
$-16t^2 + 48t + 54 = 6$
$-16t^2 + 48t = 54$
$54 = -16t^2 + 48t - 6$

Explanation: To find when the ball reaches a height of 54 feet, we set the height function equal to 54: $-16t^2 + 48t + 6 = 54$ . Choice B incorrectly moves 54 to the left side and 6 to the right side. Choice C omits the initial height term (+6). Choice D incorrectly changes the sign of the initial height term to negative.

Question 10

A rectangular garden has a length that is 4 feet more than twice its width. If the perimeter must be at least 32 feet but no more than 50 feet, which compound inequality represents the possible widths $w$ of the garden?

$32 \leq 2w + 4 \leq 50$
$32 \leq 4w + 8 \leq 50$
$32 \leq 6w + 8 \leq 50$ (correct answer)
$16 \leq 3w + 4 \leq 25$

Explanation: When you encounter word problems involving perimeter and constraints, start by translating the given relationships into algebraic expressions, then set up inequalities based on the constraints. Let's define the variables: width = $w$ , and length = $2w + 4$ (since length is 4 feet more than twice the width). The perimeter of a rectangle is $P = 2(\text{length} + \text{width})$ , so: $P = 2(w + 2w + 4) = 2(3w + 4) = 6w + 8$ Since the perimeter must be at least 32 feet but no more than 50 feet, we get: $32 \leq 6w + 8 \leq 50$ This confirms answer choice C is correct. Let's examine why the other options are wrong: Choice A ( $32 \leq 2w + 4 \leq 50$ ) incorrectly uses just the length expression instead of the full perimeter formula. This misses that perimeter involves both length and width, doubled. Choice B ( $32 \leq 4w + 8 \leq 50$ ) makes an error in combining the length and width terms. When you add $w + (2w + 4)$ , you get $3w + 4$ , not $2w + 4$ . Choice D ( $16 \leq 3w + 4 \leq 25$ ) correctly identifies that length plus width equals $3w + 4$ , but fails to multiply by 2 for the perimeter formula. Additionally, it incorrectly divides the constraint values by 2. Strategy tip: In perimeter problems, always remember that perimeter equals 2 times the sum of length and width. Write out each step: define variables, express all measurements in terms of one variable, apply the perimeter formula, then set up your inequality.