Read Grade-Level Literary Nonfiction Practice Test
•5 QuestionsRead the biographical passage and answer the question.
In the winter of 1906, Ida B. Wells wrote with the stubborn precision of someone who refused to let rumors do the work of history. By then, she was already known for investigating lynching—collecting names, dates, and testimonies when many newspapers treated violence against Black Americans as either entertainment or silence.
Her method was not glamorous. She read local reports line by line, noticing contradictions others ignored: a man described as “dangerous” in one paragraph and “successful” in the next, as if prosperity itself were evidence. She wrote letters to ministers and editors, asking for confirmation, and she kept records that could be checked, not merely believed.
In speeches, Wells did something even riskier than accusation: she demanded that audiences examine their own comfort. One listener recalled her saying, “The way to right wrongs is to turn the light of truth upon them.” The phrase sounds simple, but it contains a challenge. Light reveals; it also makes it harder to look away.
Wells faced threats, and she faced a different kind of resistance too—polite dismissal. Some people said she was “too intense,” as if intensity were a flaw rather than a response to injustice. Yet her insistence on evidence helped shift the conversation from excuses to accountability, forcing readers to confront what had been strategically ignored.
Question: What is the author’s purpose in describing Wells’s “not glamorous” method and her emphasis on evidence?
Read the biographical passage and answer the question.
In the winter of 1906, Ida B. Wells wrote with the stubborn precision of someone who refused to let rumors do the work of history. By then, she was already known for investigating lynching—collecting names, dates, and testimonies when many newspapers treated violence against Black Americans as either entertainment or silence.
Her method was not glamorous. She read local reports line by line, noticing contradictions others ignored: a man described as “dangerous” in one paragraph and “successful” in the next, as if prosperity itself were evidence. She wrote letters to ministers and editors, asking for confirmation, and she kept records that could be checked, not merely believed.
In speeches, Wells did something even riskier than accusation: she demanded that audiences examine their own comfort. One listener recalled her saying, “The way to right wrongs is to turn the light of truth upon them.” The phrase sounds simple, but it contains a challenge. Light reveals; it also makes it harder to look away.
Wells faced threats, and she faced a different kind of resistance too—polite dismissal. Some people said she was “too intense,” as if intensity were a flaw rather than a response to injustice. Yet her insistence on evidence helped shift the conversation from excuses to accountability, forcing readers to confront what had been strategically ignored.
Question: What is the author’s purpose in describing Wells’s “not glamorous” method and her emphasis on evidence?