What this deck covers
This deck focuses on Support Claims With Logical Reasoning, giving you a quick way to review the definitions, rules, and examples that matter most for 7th Grade Writing.
Study Support Claims With Logical Reasoning in 7th Grade Writing with focused flashcards that help you recognize the idea, recall the key rule, and apply it in practice-style prompts.
0% Complete
Which type of evidence is usually strongest: specific facts or vague opinions?
Tap card or press Space to flip
Specific facts. Facts can be verified; opinions are subjective beliefs.
How well did you know it?
Card 1 / 56
Space to flip · ← / → to move · once flipped, → Got it · ← Still learning
This deck focuses on Support Claims With Logical Reasoning, giving you a quick way to review the definitions, rules, and examples that matter most for 7th Grade Writing.
Work through these flashcards in short sessions. Try to answer each prompt before flipping the card, then revisit any cards you miss until the explanation feels automatic.
Answer: Specific facts. Facts can be verified; opinions are subjective beliefs.
Answer: A trustworthy source written by qualified authors with reliable facts. These three elements ensure information is accurate and unbiased.
Answer: Restating a source's ideas in your own words accurately. Maintains meaning while changing the wording.
Answer: The source may not be credible or verifiable. Unknown sources lack authority and reliability.
Answer: Quote or paraphrase accurately and cite the source. Proper citation gives credit to original authors.
Answer: To show where evidence came from and strengthen credibility. Citations prove you researched and aren't making up facts.
Answer: A warrant (the explanation connecting evidence to the claim). Warrants explain how evidence proves the claim.
Answer: Verifiable facts or data from credible sources. Facts can be proven true, unlike opinions or feelings.
Answer: Clear thinking that connects evidence to a claim in a valid way. It shows the relationship between your evidence and claim.
Answer: Facts, examples, quotations, or data used to support a claim. Evidence must be verifiable to distinguish it from mere opinion.
Answer: Peer-reviewed journal. Peer review ensures accuracy through expert verification.
Answer: An opposing viewpoint to the main claim. Acknowledges other perspectives on the issue.
Answer: Quote with correct context. Context shows comprehension of the source material.
Answer: A one-sided viewpoint that may distort the information. Bias presents unfair or incomplete perspectives.
Answer: To prove the claim with relevant facts, examples, and sources. Evidence must be factual and verifiable to strengthen arguments.
Answer: Exact words from a source; use when wording is especially important. Preserves powerful language or technical precision.
Answer: Change words and keep the original meaning. Paraphrasing shows comprehension while avoiding plagiarism.
Answer: "Data show it increased.". Data provides objective, measurable proof.
Answer: A recent publication date that fits the topic's needs. Outdated sources may contain inaccurate or irrelevant information.
Answer: Claim is the position; reason explains why the claim is true. Claims state what; reasons explain why it's true.
Answer: A response that refutes the counterclaim with reasoning and evidence. Disproves opposing arguments with logic and facts.
Answer: To give credit and let readers locate and verify the source. Citations prevent plagiarism and establish credibility.
Answer: The handbook states the rule. It provides factual information, not an opinion.
Answer: "The rule changed in 2022". Facts can be verified; opinions express feelings.
Answer: In a 2023 survey of 500 students. Specific numbers and dates strengthen evidence credibility.
Answer: Because. Shows cause-and-effect relationship between ideas.
Answer: No author and no date listed. Missing authorship and dates indicate unreliable sources.
Answer: A claim is an opinion; evidence is support that can be verified. Claims express viewpoints; evidence provides factual support.
Answer: Reasoning. Reasoning bridges the gap between evidence and claim.
Answer: Expertise shown through relevant education or professional experience. Knowledge in the field ensures accurate, informed content.
Answer: For example. This phrase introduces specific instances or proof.
Answer: Nutrition data. Evidence must directly relate to your specific claim.
Answer: Explain the quote's meaning and connect it directly to the claim. This demonstrates comprehension beyond just copying text.
Answer: For instance. Introduces specific examples to support claims.
Answer: Because. This word shows one thing leads to another.
Answer: For example. This phrase introduces supporting details or proof.
Answer: Claim = position; reason = why the claim is true. Claims state what you believe; reasons explain why it's true.
Answer: Enough evidence to convincingly support each reason. Multiple pieces of evidence strengthen your argument.
Answer: Evidence that directly supports the specific claim being argued. It must connect to your specific argument, not just the topic.
Answer: A direct quote from the novel. Text evidence directly supports literary analysis claims.
Answer: Bandwagon fallacy (appeal to popularity). Popularity doesn't determine truth or validity.
Answer: A school handbook rule. Official documents provide authoritative proof.
Answer: A survey result. Multiple responses provide stronger support than individual views.
Answer: Reliable, expert, accurate, and up-to-date sources. Credible sources have expertise and can be trusted.
Answer: Students need uniforms. It states an arguable position, not a fact.
Answer: Restating in your own words; you must still cite the source. Paraphrasing still uses someone else's ideas.
Answer: Evidence that directly connects to the claim and reasons. Relevant evidence must relate to your specific argument.
Answer: Data. Scientific claims require measurable, objective evidence.
Answer: Direct quote from the text. Quotes provide specific textual proof of themes.
Answer: Expert-reviewed source. Experts have credentials and knowledge to verify information.
Answer: To credit ideas and allow readers to verify information. Citations establish credibility and prevent plagiarism.
Answer: Accurate summary. Summarizing demonstrates comprehension of key ideas.
Answer: It lacks authorship and citations, so it is not credible. Anonymous, unsourced content cannot be verified.
Answer: Using a source's exact words inside quotation marks. Preserves the author's original language exactly.
Answer: One specific statistic. Statistics provide measurable, objective support.
Answer: Explanation of how the evidence supports the claim. This analysis shows why the evidence proves your point.