Compare Two Populations Using Data
Help Questions
7th Grade Math › Compare Two Populations Using Data
A teacher randomly sampled 7 words from a 7th-grade science article and 7 words from a 4th-grade science article and counted the number of letters in each word.
7th grade (letters): 5, 6, 4, 7, 5, 6, 5
4th grade (letters): 3, 4, 3, 5, 4, 3, 4
About how much larger is the difference in the means (7th grade minus 4th grade)?
About 1.7 letters
About 0.7 letters
About 1.0 letter
About 3.7 letters
Explanation
Tests comparing two populations using random sample data, calculating measures of center (mean, median) and variability (range, MAD), drawing informal inferences about population differences. Comparing populations from samples: calculate center (mean or median for each), calculate variability (range=max-min, or MAD=average distance from mean), compare centers (which higher? mean₁ vs mean₂), compare variability (which more spread? range₁ vs range₂), draw inference (population with higher center generally higher values, population with larger variability more spread/less consistent). Example: 7th grade words mean 5.4 letters vs 4th grade mean 3.7 letters (difference 1.7 letters, 7th grade words generally longer—higher center). For these word lengths, 7th grade has a mean of about 5.43 and 4th grade about 3.71, so the difference is about 1.7 letters, inferring 7th grade words are generally longer by that amount. Common errors include arithmetic mistakes in means (e.g., wrong sum like 38/7 as 5.7), reversing subtraction (4th minus 7th giving negative), or confusing with range difference instead of means. Steps: (1) calculate centers (mean=sum/count, or median=middle value when ordered), (2) calculate variability (range=max-min, or MAD=average of |x-mean|), (3) compare centers (mean₁ vs mean₂: which larger?), (4) compare variability (range₁ vs range₂: which larger?), (5) infer (if mean₁>mean₂ substantially: population 1 generally higher values; if range₁>range₂: population 1 more variable/spread out/less consistent). Informal inference: not formal statistical test (no p-values), just observation (centers differ by X, which is [small/large] relative to variabilities, so populations [appear similar/different]); uses: comparing grade levels (vocabulary complexity), teams (performance), classes (achievement), groups (characteristics); mistakes: calculating centers/variability wrong, comparing without both measures (center only or variability only insufficient), reversing comparisons, overstating small differences or understating large ones.
A store compared checkout times (in minutes) for two cashiers. A random sample of 8 customers was recorded for each cashier.
Cashier A: 4, 5, 6, 5, 4, 6, 5, 5
Cashier B: 3, 7, 4, 8, 5, 6, 4, 7
Which statement is correct about the sample means and ranges?
Cashier B has a lower mean and a smaller range than Cashier A.
Both cashiers have the same mean and the same range.
Cashier A has a lower mean and a smaller range than Cashier B.
Cashier A has a higher mean and a larger range than Cashier B.
Explanation
Tests comparing two populations using random sample data, calculating measures of center (mean, median) and variability (range, MAD), drawing informal inferences about population differences. Comparing populations from samples: calculate center (mean or median for each), calculate variability (range=max-min, or MAD=average distance from mean), compare centers (which higher? mean₁ vs mean₂), compare variability (which more spread? range₁ vs range₂), draw inference (population with higher center generally higher values, population with larger variability more spread/less consistent). Example: 7th grade words mean 5.4 letters vs 4th grade mean 3.7 letters (difference 1.7 letters, 7th grade words generally longer—higher center). For these checkout times, Cashier A has a mean of 5 and range of 2, while Cashier B has a mean of 5.5 and range of 5, so Cashier A has a lower mean and a smaller range, inferring Cashier A generally faster with more consistency. Common errors include claiming same means when 5<5.5, miscalculating range (e.g., for A as larger), or confusing mean with median. Steps: (1) calculate centers (mean=sum/count, or median=middle value when ordered), (2) calculate variability (range=max-min, or MAD=average of |x-mean|), (3) compare centers (mean₁ vs mean₂: which larger?), (4) compare variability (range₁ vs range₂: which larger?), (5) infer (if mean₁>mean₂ substantially: population 1 generally higher values; if range₁>range₂: population 1 more variable/spread out/less consistent). Informal inference: not formal statistical test (no p-values), just observation (centers differ by X, which is [small/large] relative to variabilities, so populations [appear similar/different]); uses: comparing grade levels (vocabulary complexity), teams (performance), classes (achievement), groups (characteristics); mistakes: calculating centers/variability wrong, comparing without both measures (center only or variability only insufficient), reversing comparisons, overstating small differences or understating large ones.
Two classes each took a 5-question quiz (scores out of 100). A random sample of 7 students was taken from each class.
Class A scores: 78, 82, 80, 76, 84, 79, 81
Class B scores: 70, 88, 75, 92, 68, 85, 72
Which statement best compares the center and variability of the two populations using the sample mean and range?
Class B has a higher mean, but Class A has a larger range.
Class A has a higher mean and a larger range than Class B.
Class A has a higher mean, and Class B has a larger range.
Class B has a higher mean and a smaller range than Class A.
Explanation
Tests comparing two populations using random sample data, calculating measures of center (mean, median) and variability (range, MAD), drawing informal inferences about population differences. Comparing populations from samples: calculate center (mean or median for each), calculate variability (range=max-min, or MAD=average distance from mean), compare centers (which higher? mean₁ vs mean₂), compare variability (which more spread? range₁ vs range₂), draw inference (population with higher center generally higher values, population with larger variability more spread/less consistent). Example: 7th grade words mean 5.4 letters vs 4th grade mean 3.7 letters (difference 1.7 letters, 7th grade words generally longer—higher center). For these quiz scores, Class A has a mean of 80 and range of 8, while Class B has a mean of about 78.57 and range of 24, so Class A has a higher mean and Class B has a larger range, inferring Class A students generally scored higher but with less variability in scores. Common errors include reversing the comparison (claiming Class B has higher mean when 78.57<80), miscalculating range (e.g., forgetting to subtract min from max correctly), or drawing inferences that contradict the data like saying variabilities are similar when 24 is much larger than 8. Steps: (1) calculate centers (mean=sum/count, or median=middle value when ordered), (2) calculate variability (range=max-min, or MAD=average of |x-mean|), (3) compare centers (mean₁ vs mean₂: which larger?), (4) compare variability (range₁ vs range₂: which larger?), (5) infer (if mean₁>mean₂ substantially: population 1 generally higher values; if range₁>range₂: population 1 more variable/spread out/less consistent). Informal inference: not formal statistical test (no p-values), just observation (centers differ by X, which is [small/large] relative to variabilities, so populations [appear similar/different]); uses: comparing grade levels (vocabulary complexity), teams (performance), classes (achievement), groups (characteristics); mistakes: calculating centers/variability wrong, comparing without both measures (center only or variability only insufficient), reversing comparisons, overstating small differences or understating large ones.
A coach compared the number of minutes players spent practicing free throws in one week. She took a random sample from each team.
Team 1 (minutes): 22, 25, 24, 26, 23, 25
Team 2 (minutes): 15, 20, 28, 30, 18, 27
Using the median for center and the range for variability, which conclusion is best supported?
Team 1 has a lower median and is more variable than Team 2.
Team 1 has a higher median and is less variable than Team 2.
Both teams have the same median and the same range.
Team 2 has a higher median and is less variable than Team 1.
Explanation
Tests comparing two populations using random sample data, calculating measures of center (mean, median) and variability (range, MAD), drawing informal inferences about population differences. Comparing populations from samples: calculate center (mean or median for each), calculate variability (range=max-min, or MAD=average distance from mean), compare centers (which higher? mean₁ vs mean₂), compare variability (which more spread? range₁ vs range₂), draw inference (population with higher center generally higher values, population with larger variability more spread/less consistent). Example: 7th grade words mean 5.4 letters vs 4th grade mean 3.7 letters (difference 1.7 letters, 7th grade words generally longer—higher center). For these practice times, Team 1 has a median of 24.5 and range of 4, while Team 2 has a median of 23.5 and range of 15, so Team 1 has a higher median and is less variable, inferring Team 1 players generally practiced more with more consistency. Common errors include confusing median with mean (e.g., calculating averages instead), miscalculating range (e.g., using max-min incorrectly for Team 2 as smaller), or inferring the opposite variability like claiming Team 1 is more variable when its range is smaller. Steps: (1) calculate centers (mean=sum/count, or median=middle value when ordered), (2) calculate variability (range=max-min, or MAD=average of |x-mean|), (3) compare centers (mean₁ vs mean₂: which larger?), (4) compare variability (range₁ vs range₂: which larger?), (5) infer (if mean₁>mean₂ substantially: population 1 generally higher values; if range₁>range₂: population 1 more variable/spread out/less consistent). Informal inference: not formal statistical test (no p-values), just observation (centers differ by X, which is [small/large] relative to variabilities, so populations [appear similar/different]); uses: comparing grade levels (vocabulary complexity), teams (performance), classes (achievement), groups (characteristics); mistakes: calculating centers/variability wrong, comparing without both measures (center only or variability only insufficient), reversing comparisons, overstating small differences or understating large ones.
Two plants were grown with different amounts of sunlight. After 10 days, a random sample of 6 plants from each group was measured for height growth (in cm).
More Sunlight: 9, 10, 11, 10, 9, 11
Less Sunlight: 6, 7, 12, 5, 8, 10
Which statement is the best informal comparison of the two populations using the mean and the range?
More Sunlight has a lower mean growth and a larger range, so it is less consistent.
The means are the same, but More Sunlight has a larger range.
Less Sunlight has a higher mean growth and a smaller range, so it is more consistent.
More Sunlight has a higher mean growth and a smaller range, so it is more consistent.
Explanation
Tests comparing two populations using random sample data, calculating measures of center (mean, median) and variability (range, MAD), drawing informal inferences about population differences. Comparing populations from samples: calculate center (mean or median for each), calculate variability (range=max-min, or MAD=average distance from mean), compare centers (which higher? mean₁ vs mean₂), compare variability (which more spread? range₁ vs range₂), draw inference (population with higher center generally higher values, population with larger variability more spread/less consistent). Example: 7th grade words mean 5.4 letters vs 4th grade mean 3.7 letters (difference 1.7 letters, 7th grade words generally longer—higher center). For these plant growths, More Sunlight has a mean of 10 and range of 2, while Less Sunlight has a mean of 8 and range of 7, so More Sunlight has higher mean growth and smaller range, inferring more sunlight leads to greater and more consistent growth. Common errors include claiming Less Sunlight higher mean when 8<10, miscalculating range (e.g., for More as larger), or overstating similarity when centers differ substantially. Steps: (1) calculate centers (mean=sum/count, or median=middle value when ordered), (2) calculate variability (range=max-min, or MAD=average of |x-mean|), (3) compare centers (mean₁ vs mean₂: which larger?), (4) compare variability (range₁ vs range₂: which larger?), (5) infer (if mean₁>mean₂ substantially: population 1 generally higher values; if range₁>range₂: population 1 more variable/spread out/less consistent). Informal inference: not formal statistical test (no p-values), just observation (centers differ by X, which is [small/large] relative to variabilities, so populations [appear similar/different]); uses: comparing grade levels (vocabulary complexity), teams (performance), classes (achievement), groups (characteristics); mistakes: calculating centers/variability wrong, comparing without both measures (center only or variability only insufficient), reversing comparisons, overstating small differences or understating large ones.
A student compared how many text messages were sent in one day by two groups of students. Random samples were taken.
Group A texts: 22, 25, 24, 23, 26, 24, 25, 23
Group B texts: 18, 35, 20, 32, 22, 30, 19, 34
Which inference is most reasonable when comparing both center (mean) and variability (range)?
Group A generally sends more texts, and Group A is more variable.
Group A generally sends more texts, and Group B is less variable.
Group B generally sends more texts, and Group B is more variable.
The groups have about the same mean, so no comparison of variability can be made.
Explanation
Tests comparing two populations using random sample data, calculating measures of center (mean, median) and variability (range, MAD), drawing informal inferences about population differences. Comparing populations from samples: calculate center (mean or median for each), calculate variability (range=max-min, or MAD=average distance from mean), compare centers (which higher? mean₁ vs mean₂), compare variability (which more spread? range₁ vs range₂), draw inference (population with higher center generally higher values, population with larger variability more spread/less consistent). Example: 7th grade words mean 5.4 letters vs 4th grade mean 3.7 letters (difference 1.7 letters, 7th grade words generally longer—higher center). For these text messages, Group A has a mean of 24 and range of 4, while Group B has a mean of 26.25 and range of 17, so Group B generally sends more texts and is more variable, inferring Group B students text more on average but with less consistency. Common errors include claiming similar means when 26.25>24, miscalculating range (e.g., for Group B as smaller), or inferring no comparison possible when centers differ. Steps: (1) calculate centers (mean=sum/count, or median=middle value when ordered), (2) calculate variability (range=max-min, or MAD=average of |x-mean|), (3) compare centers (mean₁ vs mean₂: which larger?), (4) compare variability (range₁ vs range₂: which larger?), (5) infer (if mean₁>mean₂ substantially: population 1 generally higher values; if range₁>range₂: population 1 more variable/spread out/less consistent). Informal inference: not formal statistical test (no p-values), just observation (centers differ by X, which is [small/large] relative to variabilities, so populations [appear similar/different]); uses: comparing grade levels (vocabulary complexity), teams (performance), classes (achievement), groups (characteristics); mistakes: calculating centers/variability wrong, comparing without both measures (center only or variability only insufficient), reversing comparisons, overstating small differences or understating large ones.
Two science classes measured the length (in centimeters) of paper airplanes made during a lab. A random sample of 6 airplanes was selected from each class.
Class 1 lengths: 24, 25, 26, 25, 24, 26
Class 2 lengths: 22, 28, 23, 27, 24, 26
Which statement best compares the populations using the median and the IQR?
Class 2 has a lower median and a smaller IQR than Class 1.
Class 1 has about the same median as Class 2, but a smaller IQR.
Class 1 has a higher median and a larger IQR than Class 2.
Class 2 has a higher median and a smaller IQR than Class 1.
Explanation
Tests comparing two populations using random sample data, calculating measures of center (mean, median) and variability (range, MAD), drawing informal inferences about population differences. Comparing populations from samples: calculate center (mean or median for each), calculate variability (range=max-min, or MAD=average distance from mean), compare centers (which higher? mean₁ vs mean₂), compare variability (which more spread? range₁ vs range₂), draw inference (population with higher center generally higher values, population with larger variability more spread/less consistent). Example: 7th grade words mean 5.4 letters vs 4th grade mean 3.7 letters (difference 1.7 letters, 7th grade words generally longer—higher center). For these airplane lengths, both classes have a median of 25, Class 1 has IQR of 2 and Class 2 has IQR of 4, so medians are the same but Class 1 has a smaller IQR, inferring similar typical lengths but Class 1 airplanes more consistent in length. Common errors include miscalculating IQR (e.g., wrong quartiles for Class 2), claiming different medians when both are 25, or confusing IQR with range. Steps: (1) calculate centers (mean=sum/count, or median=middle value when ordered), (2) calculate variability (range=max-min, or MAD=average of |x-mean|), (3) compare centers (mean₁ vs mean₂: which larger?), (4) compare variability (range₁ vs range₂: which larger?), (5) infer (if mean₁>mean₂ substantially: population 1 generally higher values; if range₁>range₂: population 1 more variable/spread out/less consistent). Informal inference: not formal statistical test (no p-values), just observation (centers differ by X, which is [small/large] relative to variabilities, so populations [appear similar/different]); uses: comparing grade levels (vocabulary complexity), teams (performance), classes (achievement), groups (characteristics); mistakes: calculating centers/variability wrong, comparing without both measures (center only or variability only insufficient), reversing comparisons, overstating small differences or understating large ones.
Two groups of students each did a short jump test. A random sample of 7 students from each group was recorded (jump distances in centimeters).
Group A: 140, 145, 150, 148, 152, 146, 149
Group B: 135, 160, 142, 158, 145, 155, 140
Which conclusion is best supported using mean for center and MAD for variability?
Group A has a higher mean and is less variable (lower MAD) than Group B.
Group A has a higher mean and is more variable (higher MAD) than Group B.
Group B has a lower mean and is less variable (lower MAD) than Group A.
Group B has a higher mean and is more variable (higher MAD) than Group A.
Explanation
Tests comparing two populations using random sample data, calculating measures of center (mean, median) and variability (range, MAD), drawing informal inferences about population differences. Comparing populations from samples: calculate center (mean or median for each), calculate variability (range=max-min, or MAD=average distance from mean), compare centers (which higher? mean₁ vs mean₂), compare variability (which more spread? range₁ vs range₂), draw inference (population with higher center generally higher values, population with larger variability more spread/less consistent). Example: 7th grade words mean 5.4 letters vs 4th grade mean 3.7 letters (difference 1.7 letters, 7th grade words generally longer—higher center). For these jump distances, Group A has a mean of about 147.14 and MAD of about 2.98, while Group B has a mean of about 147.86 and MAD of about 8.41, so Group B has a higher mean and is more variable, inferring Group B generally jumps farther but with less consistency. Common errors include reversing means (claiming A higher when 147.14<147.86), miscalculating MAD (e.g., not averaging deviations correctly), or understating the variability difference. Steps: (1) calculate centers (mean=sum/count, or median=middle value when ordered), (2) calculate variability (range=max-min, or MAD=average of |x-mean|), (3) compare centers (mean₁ vs mean₂: which larger?), (4) compare variability (range₁ vs range₂: which larger?), (5) infer (if mean₁>mean₂ substantially: population 1 generally higher values; if range₁>range₂: population 1 more variable/spread out/less consistent). Informal inference: not formal statistical test (no p-values), just observation (centers differ by X, which is [small/large] relative to variabilities, so populations [appear similar/different]); uses: comparing grade levels (vocabulary complexity), teams (performance), classes (achievement), groups (characteristics); mistakes: calculating centers/variability wrong, comparing without both measures (center only or variability only insufficient), reversing comparisons, overstating small differences or understating large ones.
A PE teacher randomly selected 5 students from each class and recorded how many push-ups each student completed in 1 minute.
Class A: 18, 20, 21, 22, 24
Class B: 12, 16, 20, 24, 28
Which statement best compares the two populations using the mean and the range?
Class A has a higher mean, and Class B has a larger range.
Class A has a higher mean, and Class A has a larger range.
Class B has a higher mean, and both classes have the same range.
Class B has a higher mean, and Class B has a smaller range.
Explanation
Tests comparing two populations using random sample data, calculating measures of center (mean, median) and variability (range, MAD), drawing informal inferences about population differences. Comparing populations from samples: calculate center (mean or median for each), calculate variability (range=max-min, or MAD=average distance from mean), compare centers (which higher? mean₁ vs mean₂), compare variability (which more spread? range₁ vs range₂), draw inference (population with higher center generally higher values, population with larger variability more spread/less consistent). Example: Class A push-ups mean 21 vs Class B mean 20 (difference 1, Class A generally more push-ups—higher center). Example: two samples: Class A 18,20,21,22,24 (mean:105/5=21, range:24-18=6), Class B 12,16,20,24,28 (mean:100/5=20, range:28-12=16), compare:21>20 (Class A higher by 1), Class B range larger (16>6, more variable), inference: Class A generally more push-ups than Class B, but Class B more variable. Correct comparison and inference: Class A has a higher mean, and Class B has a larger range, so Class A appears stronger overall but Class B has more spread in performance. Error like comparison reversed (lower mean claimed higher:20>21), variability wrong (range 6 claimed larger than 16 when opposite), calculations arithmetic errors (mean sum/count wrong), inference contradicting data (claims classes similar when centers differ), or measure confusion (uses median as mean). Steps: (1) calculate centers (mean=sum/count, or median=middle value when ordered), (2) calculate variability (range=max-min, or MAD=average of |x-mean|), (3) compare centers (mean₁ vs mean₂: which larger?), (4) compare variability (range₁ vs range₂: which larger?), (5) infer (if mean₁>mean₂ substantially: population 1 generally higher values; if range₁>range₂: population 1 more variable/spread out/less consistent). Informal inference: not formal statistical test (no p-values), just observation (centers differ by X, which is [small/large] relative to variabilities, so populations [appear similar/different]). Uses: comparing grade levels (vocabulary complexity), teams (performance), classes (achievement), groups (characteristics). Mistakes: calculating centers/variability wrong, comparing without both measures (center only or variability only insufficient), reversing comparisons, overstating small differences or understating large ones.
Two classes took the same 10-question quiz. A random sample of 6 students from each class is shown.
Class 1 scores: 7, 8, 8, 9, 9, 10
Class 2 scores: 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
Using the mean and the MAD (mean absolute deviation), which statement is best supported?
Class 2 has a higher mean and a lower MAD, so it did better and was more consistent.
Both classes have the same mean and the same MAD.
Class 1 has a lower mean and a higher MAD, so it did worse and was less consistent.
Class 1 has a higher mean and a lower MAD, so it did better and was more consistent.
Explanation
Tests comparing two populations using random sample data, calculating measures of center (mean, median) and variability (range, MAD), drawing informal inferences about population differences. Comparing populations from samples: calculate center (mean or median for each), calculate variability (range=max-min, or MAD=average distance from mean), compare centers (which higher? mean₁ vs mean₂), compare variability (which more spread? range₁ vs range₂), draw inference (population with higher center generally higher values, population with larger variability more spread/less consistent). Example: Class 1 scores mean 8.5 vs Class 2 mean 7.5 (difference 1, Class 1 generally higher scores—higher center). Example: two samples: Class 1 7,8,8,9,9,10 (mean:51/6=8.5, MAD≈0.833), Class 2 5,6,7,8,9,10 (mean:45/6=7.5, MAD=1.5), compare:8.5>7.5 (Class 1 higher by 1), Class 1 MAD smaller (0.833<1.5, less variable), inference: Class 1 generally higher quiz scores than Class 2 and more consistent. Correct comparison and inference: Class 1 has a higher mean and a lower MAD, so it did better and was more consistent. Error like comparison reversed (lower mean claimed higher:7.5>8.5), variability wrong (MAD 0.833 claimed larger than 1.5 when opposite), calculations arithmetic errors (mean sum/count wrong), inference contradicting data (claims classes similar when centers differ), or measure confusion (uses range as MAD). Steps: (1) calculate centers (mean=sum/count, or median=middle value when ordered), (2) calculate variability (range=max-min, or MAD=average of |x-mean|), (3) compare centers (mean₁ vs mean₂: which larger?), (4) compare variability (range₁ vs range₂: which larger?), (5) infer (if mean₁>mean₂ substantially: population 1 generally higher values; if range₁>range₂: population 1 more variable/spread out/less consistent). Informal inference: not formal statistical test (no p-values), just observation (centers differ by X, which is [small/large] relative to variabilities, so populations [appear similar/different]). Uses: comparing grade levels (vocabulary complexity), teams (performance), classes (achievement), groups (characteristics). Mistakes: calculating centers/variability wrong, comparing without both measures (center only or variability only insufficient), reversing comparisons, overstating small differences or understating large ones.