Use Technology to Publish and Cite
Help Questions
7th Grade ELA › Use Technology to Publish and Cite
Maya is creating a digital report about teen sleep for an online portfolio. She includes a small table of recommended sleep hours by age and links to her sources. She paraphrases a sentence from the CDC but only adds the URL in parentheses: (https://www.cdc.gov/sleep). Her References section includes:
CDC Sleep. 2022.
What is the main citation problem Maya needs to fix to meet a standard citation format taught in grade 7 (MLA or APA)?
She should remove the link and use only her own opinions so she does not need citations at all.
There is no problem because any URL in parentheses counts as a complete in-text citation and reference entry.
Her in-text citation and reference are missing key details (full organization/author, specific page title, date, and website/publisher), and the format is incomplete and inconsistent.
She should cite only direct quotes, not paraphrases, so she can delete the CDC information from her References section.
Explanation
This question tests W.7.6—use technology to produce/publish writing, link/cite sources, interact/collaborate; display information flexibly/dynamically. Technology enhances writing: PRODUCTION (word processing: formatting with headings/fonts/spacing, organization tools: outlines/comments, revision tracking changes), PUBLISHING (sharing: Google Docs/class website/blog/portfolio, formatting for readability, including multimedia), UPDATING (responding to feedback digitally, revising shared docs, version control), COLLABORATION (shared documents for group writing, comments for peer feedback, track changes for collaborative editing), DISPLAYING INFORMATION (tables for data, embedded images/videos, hyperlinks to sources, formatting varying for sections). Maya's in-text citation "(https://www.cdc.gov/sleep)" and References entry "CDC Sleep. 2022." lack required MLA/APA elements: full organization name (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), specific page title, website/publisher name, and complete URL. Choice B correctly identifies missing key details and inconsistent format. Choices A, C, and D incorrectly claim URLs alone work, citations aren't needed, or only quotes need citation. Teachers should model complete citation format, practice identifying all required elements, and emphasize that paraphrases require citations just like quotes to avoid plagiarism.
Chen writes an informational article in Microsoft Word about earthquake safety. He uses a single font, no headings, and long paragraphs with no spacing. He does not use the built-in outline or styles, and he doesn’t include any hyperlinks. He uploads the file to the class website. He lists sources at the bottom like this:
-
USGS earthquake page
Which is the best critique of Chen’s technology use and citations?
Chen’s work meets expectations because typing and uploading are enough, and web addresses count as complete citations.
Chen only needs to add pictures; citations are unnecessary for government websites like Ready.gov and USGS.
Chen should improve readability by using headings/styles and spacing, and he should provide consistent MLA entries (author/organization, page title, website, date, URL) instead of incomplete source notes.
Chen should delete the source list because including any sources might make it look like he copied.
Explanation
This question tests W.7.6—use technology to produce/publish writing, link/cite sources, interact/collaborate; display information flexibly/dynamically. Technology enhances writing: PRODUCTION (word processing: formatting with headings/fonts/spacing, organization tools: outlines/comments, revision tracking changes), PUBLISHING (sharing: Google Docs/class website/blog/portfolio, formatting for readability, including multimedia), UPDATING (responding to feedback digitally, revising shared docs, version control), COLLABORATION (shared documents for group writing, comments for peer feedback, track changes for collaborative editing), DISPLAYING INFORMATION (tables for data, embedded images/videos, hyperlinks to sources, formatting varying for sections). Chen uses single font with no headings or spacing (poor display), provides incomplete citations with only URLs or partial names instead of full MLA format. Choice B correctly identifies need for headings/styles for readability and complete MLA citations with author/organization, page title, website name, date, and URL. Choices A, C, and D incorrectly claim URLs alone suffice, government sites don't need citation, or sources should be deleted. Teachers should demonstrate using Word's styles/headings features, practice formatting MLA citations with all required elements, and explain that all sources including government sites require proper documentation.
Yuki publishes an article on the class website about how to stay safe online. She embeds a short video from a trusted organization and includes a caption. She quotes a line from the video’s webpage but does not include quotation marks. Her in-text citation says (Common Sense Media) and her Works Cited entry says:
Common Sense Media. Internet Safety Tips. https://www.commonsensemedia.org.
Which revision would best improve Yuki’s citation accuracy and avoid plagiarism?
Keep the wording the same and only add a longer URL in the in-text citation to make it more detailed.
Add quotation marks for the quoted line and revise the Works Cited to include the specific page title, publication date (if available), the website name, and the full URL in a consistent MLA format.
Remove the caption under the video because captions are not allowed in online publishing.
Delete the Works Cited because the website name is already in the in-text citation.
Explanation
This question tests W.7.6—use technology to produce/publish writing, link/cite sources, interact/collaborate; display information flexibly/dynamically. Technology enhances writing: PRODUCTION (word processing: formatting with headings/fonts/spacing, organization tools: outlines/comments, revision tracking changes), PUBLISHING (sharing: Google Docs/class website/blog/portfolio, formatting for readability, including multimedia), UPDATING (responding to feedback digitally, revising shared docs, version control), COLLABORATION (shared documents for group writing, comments for peer feedback, track changes for collaborative editing), DISPLAYING INFORMATION (tables for data, embedded images/videos, hyperlinks to sources, formatting varying for sections). Yuki quotes without quotation marks (plagiarism risk) and provides incomplete citation missing specific page title, date, and proper MLA formatting. Choice B correctly identifies need for quotation marks around direct quotes and complete Works Cited with page title, date, website name, and full URL. Choices A, C, and D incorrectly suggest deleting Works Cited, adding longer URLs to in-text citations, or removing captions. Teachers should emphasize quotation marks for all direct quotes, model complete MLA format with all elements, and explain that proper citation prevents plagiarism even when embedding multimedia.
Keisha writes an argumentative essay in a word processor and submits it as a PDF. She uses a title, but she does not use headings, paragraph spacing, or any revision tools. Her teacher left digital comments on her draft, but Keisha submits the exact same file again without changes. She includes a Works Cited with one entry, even though she used three sources.
Which evaluation is most accurate?
Keisha met W.7.6 because she typed the essay and turned it into a PDF, which is the main purpose of technology in writing.
Keisha met W.7.6 because revision is optional, and citing one source is enough if the other sources were only used for ideas.
Keisha’s only issue is that she submitted a PDF; if she submits a Word file instead, her citations will automatically be correct.
Keisha did not fully meet W.7.6 because she did not use technology to update her writing based on feedback, did not format for readability, and did not cite all sources she used in a consistent standard format.
Explanation
This question tests W.7.6—use technology to produce/publish writing, link/cite sources, interact/collaborate; display information flexibly/dynamically. Technology enhances writing: PRODUCTION (word processing: formatting with headings/fonts/spacing, organization tools: outlines/comments, revision tracking changes), PUBLISHING (sharing: Google Docs/class website/blog/portfolio, formatting for readability, including multimedia), UPDATING (responding to feedback digitally, revising shared docs, version control), COLLABORATION (shared documents for group writing, comments for peer feedback, track changes for collaborative editing), DISPLAYING INFORMATION (tables for data, embedded images/videos, hyperlinks to sources, formatting varying for sections). Keisha minimally used technology—she typed and converted to PDF but failed to use formatting features (no headings or paragraph spacing), ignored digital feedback by resubmitting the same file without revisions, and incompletely cited sources (one entry for three sources used). The correct answer is B because W.7.6 requires using technology throughout the writing process: formatting for readability, responding to digital feedback through revision, and citing all sources in a consistent standard format. Option A reduces technology use to mere typing, C incorrectly makes revision optional and allows incomplete citations, and D mistakenly links file format to citation accuracy. Teachers should explicitly teach formatting tools for organization and readability, model how to respond to digital feedback through revision features, and require complete Works Cited entries for every source consulted.
Marcus is turning in a science article through Google Classroom. He wrote it in a word processor but did not use headings, did not add links, and did not respond to peer comments. His teacher asked students to include at least one table to organize data and to submit a revised version after feedback.
Which improvement best matches W.7.6 expectations for using technology to enhance writing (not just type it)?
Add headings and spacing for readability, insert a table to organize the data, use comments/Suggesting or Track Changes to revise based on feedback, and resubmit an updated version through the platform.
Change the font to something decorative; that is the main way technology improves writing.
Print the article and mark changes with a pen; digital tools should not be used for revision.
Keep the article as one block of text to show it is original, and ignore comments so the voice stays the same.
Explanation
This question tests W.7.6—use technology to produce/publish writing, link/cite sources, interact/collaborate; display information flexibly/dynamically. Technology enhances writing: PRODUCTION (word processing: formatting with headings/fonts/spacing, organization tools: outlines/comments, revision tracking changes), PUBLISHING (sharing: Google Docs/class website/blog/portfolio, formatting for readability, including multimedia), UPDATING (responding to feedback digitally, revising shared docs, version control), COLLABORATION (shared documents for group writing, comments for peer feedback, track changes for collaborative editing), DISPLAYING INFORMATION (tables for data, embedded images/videos, hyperlinks to sources, formatting varying for sections). Marcus fails to use technology effectively—he doesn't format with headings, doesn't respond to peer comments, doesn't include requested table for data display, and doesn't submit revised version. Choice B correctly identifies needed improvements: add headings and spacing for readability, insert table to organize data (flexible display), use comment features or track changes to show revision based on feedback, and resubmit updated version through the platform. Choice A promotes poor practices; Choice C rejects digital revision tools; Choice D focuses only on decorative fonts. Teachers should require students to use multiple technology features beyond basic typing—formatting tools, tables/charts for data, revision tracking, and digital submission of updated versions.
Emma is writing a 2-page research report about how plastic pollution affects oceans. She writes it in Google Docs and uses headings ("Causes," "Effects," "Solutions"), a bulleted list for solutions, and inserts a hyperlink to each website she used. She shares the doc with her teacher for comments, then revises in Suggesting mode based on feedback. In her report she includes this sentence: “Plastic debris can injure or kill marine animals through entanglement and ingestion” (NOAA, 2023). Her Works Cited includes:
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. “How Marine Debris Impacts Our Ocean.” NOAA Marine Debris Program, 2023, https://marinedebris.noaa.gov.
Which statement best evaluates Emma’s technology use and citation practices for W.7.6?
Emma’s technology use is effective, but her citation is incorrect because MLA never allows organization names like NOAA as an author in the Works Cited.
Emma’s citation is fine, but sharing the document and using Suggesting mode is not useful because only the final draft matters.
Emma should avoid headings and bulleted lists because they make online writing less formal, and citations are optional when a link is included.
Emma uses technology effectively to produce, publish, and update her writing, and her in-text citation and Works Cited entry include key MLA elements and match the source she used.
Explanation
This question tests W.7.6—use technology to produce/publish writing, link/cite sources, interact/collaborate; display information flexibly/dynamically. Technology enhances writing: PRODUCTION (word processing: formatting with headings/fonts/spacing, organization tools: outlines/comments, revision tracking changes), PUBLISHING (sharing: Google Docs/class website/blog/portfolio, formatting for readability, including multimedia), UPDATING (responding to feedback digitally, revising shared docs, version control), COLLABORATION (shared documents for group writing, comments for peer feedback, track changes for collaborative editing), DISPLAYING INFORMATION (tables for data, embedded images/videos, hyperlinks to sources, formatting varying for sections). Emma uses Google Docs with headings, bulleted lists, and hyperlinks (effective display), shares for comments and revises using Suggesting mode (collaboration/updating), includes proper in-text citation "(NOAA, 2023)" and complete Works Cited with organization name, page title, website, year, and URL following MLA format. Choice A correctly identifies all elements meet W.7.6 standards. Choices B, C, and D incorrectly claim headings/lists are informal, organization names can't be authors, or collaboration doesn't matter. Teachers should model using formatting tools for clarity, demonstrate Suggesting mode for revision, and practice MLA citation format including organization names as authors when no individual author exists.
Riley writes a short argument essay in Google Docs about whether students should have homework. A classmate leaves comments suggesting Riley add evidence from a reliable source. Riley finds an article online, copies two sentences into the essay, and changes a few words. Riley does not add quotation marks, does not include an in-text citation, and does not add the article to a Works Cited.
Which choice best identifies the problem with Riley’s use of sources and what Riley should do?
Riley should keep the copied sentences but add only the website’s homepage link at the end of the essay.
Riley should delete the peer comments because feedback is not part of digital writing standards.
There is no problem because changing a few words makes the sentences Riley’s own and citations are optional.
Riley has committed plagiarism by using another author’s wording/ideas without credit and should either quote with quotation marks and an in-text citation or fully paraphrase and cite, plus add the source to Works Cited.
Explanation
This question tests W.7.6—use technology to produce/publish writing, link/cite sources, interact/collaborate; display information flexibly/dynamically. Technology enhances writing: PRODUCTION (word processing: formatting with headings/fonts/spacing, organization tools: outlines/comments, revision tracking changes), PUBLISHING (sharing: Google Docs/class website/blog/portfolio, formatting for readability, including multimedia), UPDATING (responding to feedback digitally, revising shared docs, version control), COLLABORATION (shared documents for group writing, comments for peer feedback, track changes for collaborative editing), DISPLAYING INFORMATION (tables for data, embedded images/videos, hyperlinks to sources, formatting varying for sections). Riley copies sentences with minor changes but no quotation marks or citations—textbook plagiarism violating academic integrity and W.7.6 citation requirements. Choice C correctly identifies plagiarism and solutions: either quote with quotation marks and citation or fully paraphrase with citation, plus Works Cited entry. Choices A, B, and D incorrectly claim changing words makes it original, suggest only adding homepage link, or dismiss peer feedback. Teachers should explicitly teach plagiarism consequences, practice proper quoting versus paraphrasing techniques, and emphasize all borrowed ideas need citation regardless of wording changes.
Jamal and Sofia are partners writing a class blog post about the benefits of school gardens. They type in a shared Google Doc, but Jamal keeps the file set to “View only,” so Sofia can’t add text or comments. Jamal also ignores Sofia’s email with suggested changes and submits the first draft without revising. The post includes facts copied from a website, but there are no in-text citations and no Works Cited section.
Which choice best explains what Jamal should do to meet W.7.6 expectations for collaboration, updating, and citing sources?
Submit the first draft because collaboration is only required in person, and citations are only required for direct quotes.
Let Sofia edit, but skip revision history and citations since the blog platform automatically tracks changes and sources.
Change sharing to allow editing or commenting, use comments/Suggesting to revise based on feedback, and add in-text citations plus a properly formatted Works Cited for every source used.
Keep the document view-only to prevent mistakes, and add the website link at the end so citations are not needed.
Explanation
This question tests W.7.6—use technology to produce/publish writing, link/cite sources, interact/collaborate; display information flexibly/dynamically. Technology enhances writing: PRODUCTION (word processing: formatting with headings/fonts/spacing, organization tools: outlines/comments, revision tracking changes), PUBLISHING (sharing: Google Docs/class website/blog/portfolio, formatting for readability, including multimedia), UPDATING (responding to feedback digitally, revising shared docs, version control), COLLABORATION (shared documents for group writing, comments for peer feedback, track changes for collaborative editing), DISPLAYING INFORMATION (tables for data, embedded images/videos, hyperlinks to sources, formatting varying for sections). Jamal's "View only" setting prevents Sofia from collaborating, ignoring feedback prevents updating, and missing citations violates source documentation requirements. Choice B correctly identifies needed changes: enable editing/commenting for collaboration, use comments/Suggesting for revision based on feedback, and add both in-text citations and Works Cited for all sources. Choices A, C, and D incorrectly suggest keeping view-only, avoiding collaboration, or skipping citations. Teachers should require shared editing permissions for group work, model using comments for feedback, and teach that all sources need proper citation regardless of format.
Chen is creating a short article for the class website about how sleep affects learning. He uses Microsoft Word’s Styles to format headings, adds a sidebar text box labeled “Quick Tips,” embeds a hyperlink to a CDC page, and includes a screenshot of a simple schedule he made. He then uploads the article to the class site as a PDF. After peer review, he uses Track Changes to revise and re-uploads the updated file labeled “v2.”
His References section includes:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2023). Sleep and Sleep Disorders. https://www.cdc.gov/sleep/
Which choice best explains how Chen is using technology to produce, publish, update, and display information flexibly (W.7.6)?
Chen’s work is not effective because PDFs cannot be published online, and adding an image makes the writing less clear.
Chen’s work is effective only because he used a hyperlink; headings, Track Changes, and version labels do not help writing.
Chen’s work is only effective if he handwrites the final draft; digital revision tools do not count as updating writing.
Chen’s work shows effective technology use: he formats for readability, publishes to a digital platform, updates using Track Changes and version labels, and uses features like a sidebar, image, and hyperlink for flexible display.
Explanation
This question tests W.7.6—use technology to produce/publish writing, link/cite sources, interact/collaborate; display information flexibly/dynamically. Technology enhances writing: PRODUCTION (word processing: formatting with headings/fonts/spacing, organization tools: outlines/comments, revision tracking changes), PUBLISHING (sharing: Google Docs/class website/blog/portfolio, formatting for readability, including multimedia), UPDATING (responding to feedback digitally, revising shared docs, version control), COLLABORATION (shared documents for group writing, comments for peer feedback, track changes for collaborative editing), DISPLAYING INFORMATION (tables for data, embedded images/videos, hyperlinks to sources, formatting varying for sections). Chen demonstrates excellent technology use: he formats with Styles for headings (production), adds a sidebar text box and embedded image (flexible display), includes hyperlinks to sources, publishes to class website as PDF, uses Track Changes for revision (updating), and labels versions clearly. Choice A correctly identifies all these effective practices. Choice B incorrectly claims PDFs cannot be published online and that images reduce clarity; Choice C wrongly requires handwriting; Choice D minimizes the value of multiple technology features. Teachers should highlight Chen's work as a model for using various digital tools to enhance writing presentation, organization, and revision processes.
Carlos and Keisha are writing a group report in a shared document about migration patterns of monarch butterflies. Keisha uses the outline tool to organize sections, assigns Carlos to draft the “Threats” section, and leaves specific comments with questions. Carlos writes his section, replies to each comment with answers, and uses Suggesting mode to make edits so Keisha can review them. They add a properly formatted Works Cited with matching in-text citations.
Does this group use technology to collaborate effectively and update writing (W.7.6)?
No; using Suggesting mode prevents real collaboration because it shows edits instead of hiding them.
No; collaboration only counts if one person writes the whole report and the other person proofreads on paper.
Yes; but only because they used an outline tool—comments, replies, and citations do not matter for collaboration.
Yes; they use shared tools to plan, draft, comment, revise with tracked changes, and keep citations consistent, which supports collaboration and updating.
Explanation
This question tests W.7.6—use technology to produce/publish writing, link/cite sources, interact/collaborate; display information flexibly/dynamically. Technology enhances writing: PRODUCTION (word processing: formatting with headings/fonts/spacing, organization tools: outlines/comments, revision tracking changes), PUBLISHING (sharing: Google Docs/class website/blog/portfolio, formatting for readability, including multimedia), UPDATING (responding to feedback digitally, revising shared docs, version control), COLLABORATION (shared documents for group writing, comments for peer feedback, track changes for collaborative editing), DISPLAYING INFORMATION (tables for data, embedded images/videos, hyperlinks to sources, formatting varying for sections). Carlos and Keisha demonstrate excellent collaboration: they use outline tool for organization (production), assign sections and leave specific comments (collaboration), reply to comments and use Suggesting mode for transparent editing (updating/collaboration), and maintain consistent citations throughout. Choice A correctly identifies their effective use of shared tools for planning, drafting, commenting, revising with tracked changes, and citation consistency. Choice B wrongly requires one person to write everything; Choice C incorrectly claims Suggesting mode prevents collaboration; Choice D minimizes the importance of comments and citations. Teachers should use this as a model for group work—showing how digital tools enable true collaboration through shared planning, commenting, transparent revision, and consistent documentation.