What this deck covers
This deck focuses on Trace And Evaluate Arguments, giving you a quick way to review the definitions, rules, and examples that matter most for 6th Grade Reading.
Study Trace And Evaluate Arguments in 6th Grade Reading with focused flashcards that help you recognize the idea, recall the key rule, and apply it in practice-style prompts.
0% Complete
Which option best describes a supported claim: one with evidence or one with only opinions?
Tap card or press Space to flip
A claim supported with relevant evidence. Evidence makes claims credible, not mere opinions.
How well did you know it?
Card 1 / 47
Space to flip · ← / → to move · once flipped, → Got it · ← Still learning
This deck focuses on Trace And Evaluate Arguments, giving you a quick way to review the definitions, rules, and examples that matter most for 6th Grade Reading.
Work through these flashcards in short sessions. Try to answer each prompt before flipping the card, then revisit any cards you miss until the explanation feels automatic.
Answer: A claim supported with relevant evidence. Evidence makes claims credible, not mere opinions.
Answer: A) "Because it improves safety". Reasons explain why; evidence shows specific proof.
Answer: B) "Recycling helps the planet.". Claims state positions; evidence provides proof.
Answer: "In a 2023 study, grades rose after later start times.". This provides specific data supporting the argument.
Answer: Facts or details that support a reason or claim. Evidence provides concrete proof for reasons and claims.
Answer: Unsupported claim (absolute, no evidence given). Absolute claims need evidence, which isn't provided.
Answer: A statistic (verifiable data). Numbers provide objective, measurable proof.
Answer: "A survey found 68% support uniforms.". Surveys provide measurable data, not just feelings.
Answer: Later start times give students more sleep, improving focus. This explains why the claim should be accepted.
Answer: Uniforms limit self-expression. "Some argue" introduces an opposing viewpoint.
Answer: What reasons and evidence does the author provide. This directly examines the support structure of arguments.
Answer: A) "The program works". Claims state positions; evidence provides proof.
Answer: A study found teens learn better with 8 to 10 hours of sleep. Research data provides concrete proof for the argument.
Answer: A flaw in reasoning that weakens an argument. Fallacies make arguments seem valid when they're not.
Answer: School should start later. This is the author's position to be proven.
Answer: Teens need more sleep. The "because" clause explains why the claim is true.
Answer: The overall position supported by claims, reasons, and evidence. The central thesis built from interconnected elements.
Answer: A claim that opposes the author's main claim. It challenges or contradicts the main argument.
Answer: Injury-rate data. Injury data directly relates to safety claims.
Answer: Homework should be banned because it causes stress. "Some argue" signals an opposing viewpoint.
Answer: Specific facts, examples, data, or quotations supporting a reason. Concrete proof that backs up reasoning.
Answer: "Recycling helps.". Too vague—lacks specific reasons or proof.
Answer: School should start later to help students. This states what should happen—a position to prove.
Answer: "In a survey, 70% of students reported more sleep". Survey data provides measurable support for claims.
Answer: A fact is verifiable; an opinion is a belief or judgment. Facts can be proven true/false; opinions cannot.
Answer: A) "for example". "For example" introduces supporting evidence.
Answer: A description of bike colors and styles. Bike appearance doesn't relate to traffic reduction.
Answer: B) "Everyone agrees this works.". No data or facts support this sweeping generalization.
Answer: B) Expert study. Expert research carries more weight than anecdotes.
Answer: A fact is verifiable; an opinion is a belief or judgment. Facts can be proven true or false; opinions cannot.
Answer: A) "This foolish rule". "Foolish" shows the author's negative judgment.
Answer: The main position the author supports with reasons and evidence. This is the thesis that all other points work to prove.
Answer: B) "Test scores rose 10%.". Statistics are concrete facts; opinions are reasons.
Answer: Reason = why; evidence = proof that the why is true. Reasons explain logic; evidence provides concrete support.
Answer: Data showing vocabulary growth in frequent readers. Research data directly proves vocabulary improvement.
Answer: Judge whether reasons and evidence support the claim. Assess if the support logically proves the claim.
Answer: Judge whether it is supported by strong, relevant evidence. Assessing if the proof adequately backs the claim.
Answer: The reason does not prove the policy should change. Personal preference isn't logical justification for policy.
Answer: B) "The cost is 10". Cost is a verifiable fact; "terrible" is subjective.
Answer: A statement the author wants the reader to accept as true. Claims are assertions that need support to be convincing.
Answer: "It saves money.". Reasons explain why; evidence shows specific facts.
Answer: A claim supported by reasons and evidence. Combines a position with logical support to persuade readers.
Answer: School should start later to improve student learning. This states what should happen and why.
Answer: B) "Everyone knows it is best". "Everyone knows" lacks concrete proof or data.
Answer: A statement that explains why the claim should be believed. Reasons provide the logical basis for accepting claims.
Answer: No; unrelated evidence does not support the claim. Evidence must connect to the claim to support it.
Answer: Claiming something is true because many people believe it. Popularity doesn't determine truth or validity.