0%
0 / 18 answered

English Language Arts: Argumentative Writing (TEKS.ELA.9-12.11.C) Practice Test

18 Questions
Question
1 / 18
Q1

Texas should adopt statewide guidelines that permit generative AI as a scaffold for learning under teacher oversight, rather than allow district-by-district bans that spur inequity. When tools are banned, affluent students simply access them at home, while others are left experimenting in the shadows or falling behind. AI can model revision, provide multilingual support, and free teachers to focus on higher-order tasks. Critics warn of plagiarism and skill atrophy. Those are genuine risks, but blanket prohibition often breeds workarounds and confusion. A coherent policy can clarify when AI is a drafting aid and when it is off-limits. Moreover, Texas prides itself on innovation; preparing students for emerging tools is part of civic readiness. Some early reports suggest AI feedback improves writing, yet evidence remains mixed. The state should move cautiously but not freeze. Clear guardrails, transparency, and teacher training are better than a patchwork of inconsistent, punitive rules.

Which revision most effectively strengthens the argument by adding credible evidence and a principled approach to academic integrity while addressing counterarguments?

Question Navigator