Exponential Functions

Help Questions

Pre-Calculus › Exponential Functions

Questions 1 - 10
1

Solve:

None of the other answers.

Explanation

Combine the constants:

Isolate the exponential function by dividing:

Take the natural log of both sides:

Finally isolate x:

2

Solve for .

Explanation

First, let's begin by simplifying the left hand side.

becomes and becomes . Remember that , and the in that expression can come out to the front, as in .

Now, our expression is

From this, we can cancel out the 2's and an x from both sides.

Thus our answer becomes:

.

3

Solve:

None of the other answers.

Explanation

Combine the constants:

Isolate the exponential function by dividing:

Take the natural log of both sides:

Finally isolate x:

4

Solve for .

Explanation

First, let's begin by simplifying the left hand side.

becomes and becomes . Remember that , and the in that expression can come out to the front, as in .

Now, our expression is

From this, we can cancel out the 2's and an x from both sides.

Thus our answer becomes:

.

5

Solve the equation for .

Explanation

The key to this is that . From here, the equation can be factored as if it were .

and

and

and

Now take the natural log (ln) of the two equations.

and

and

6

Solve the equation for .

Explanation

The key to this is that . From here, the equation can be factored as if it were .

and

and

and

Now take the natural log (ln) of the two equations.

and

and

7

The population of fish in a pond is modeled by the exponential function

, where is the population of fish and is the number of years since January 2010.

Determine the population of fish in January 2010 and January 2015.

2010: fish

2015: fish

2010: fish

2015: fish

2010: fish

2015: fish

2010: fish

2015: fish

Explanation

In 2010, in our equation because we have had no years past 2010. Plugging that in to the model equation and solving:

, since anything raised to the power of zero becomes . So the population of fish in 2010 is fish.

In 2015, because 5 years have passed since 2010. Plugging that into our equation and solving gives us

So the population of fish in 2015 is fish. This is an example of exponential decay since the function is decreasing.

8

The population of fish in a pond is modeled by the exponential function

, where is the population of fish and is the number of years since January 2010.

Determine the population of fish in January 2010 and January 2015.

2010: fish

2015: fish

2010: fish

2015: fish

2010: fish

2015: fish

2010: fish

2015: fish

Explanation

In 2010, in our equation because we have had no years past 2010. Plugging that in to the model equation and solving:

, since anything raised to the power of zero becomes . So the population of fish in 2010 is fish.

In 2015, because 5 years have passed since 2010. Plugging that into our equation and solving gives us

So the population of fish in 2015 is fish. This is an example of exponential decay since the function is decreasing.

9

Choose the description that matches the equation below:

Exponential decay

Exponential decay

Exponential decay

Exponential growth

Exponential growth

Explanation

Exponential graphs can either decay or grow. This is based on the value of the base of the exponent. If the base is greater than , the graph will be growth. And, if the base is less than , then the graph will be decay. In this situation, our base is . Since this is less than , we have a decay graph. Then, to determine the y-intercept we substitute . Thus, we get:

for the y-intercept.

10

Choose the description that matches the equation below:

Exponential decay

Exponential decay

Exponential decay

Exponential growth

Exponential growth

Explanation

Exponential graphs can either decay or grow. This is based on the value of the base of the exponent. If the base is greater than , the graph will be growth. And, if the base is less than , then the graph will be decay. In this situation, our base is . Since this is less than , we have a decay graph. Then, to determine the y-intercept we substitute . Thus, we get:

for the y-intercept.

Page 1 of 3
Return to subject