Question 1 of 25
A manufacturing process requires the width of a component to satisfy . Additionally, quality control rejects components where or . What range of widths passes both requirements?
Prealgebra
Practice Test 2 for Prealgebra: real questions and explanations from the Varsity Tutors practice-test pool.
0%
0 / 25 answered
Question 1 of 25
A manufacturing process requires the width w of a component to satisfy ∣w−12∣≤0.5. Additionally, quality control rejects components where w<11.7 or w>12.4. What range of widths passes both requirements?
Question Navigator
A manufacturing process requires the width w of a component to satisfy ∣w−12∣≤0.5. Additionally, quality control rejects components where w<11.7 or w>12.4. What range of widths passes both requirements?
Explanation: First, solve ∣w−12∣≤0.5: this gives −0.5≤w−12≤0.5, so 11.5≤w≤12.5. Quality control accepts components where it's NOT true that w<11.7 or w>12.4, meaning 11.7≤w≤12.4. The intersection of both requirements is 11.7≤w≤12.4. Choice A gives only the absolute value constraint. Choice C incorrectly takes the left bound from quality control and right bound from absolute value. Choice D incorrectly takes the left bound from absolute value and right bound from quality control.
Marcus is planning a school fundraiser selling two types of items: keychains for $3 each and bookmarks for $2 each. He needs to raise at least $240 and wants to sell exactly 100 items total. If he sells $k $ keychains, which inequality represents the constraint for reaching his fundraising goal, and what is the minimum number of keychains he must sell?
Explanation: The inequality 3k+2(100−k)≥240 correctly represents the constraint where Marcus sells k keychains at $3 each and (100-k) bookmarks at $2 each. Solving: $3k+200−2k≥240 ,so k≥40 $. Choice B uses the correct inequality but miscalculates the solution. Choice C switches the prices. Choice D incorrectly assumes all non-keychains cost $0.
A local theater sells adult tickets for $12 each and student tickets for $8 each. For a particular show, they need to sell exactly 100 tickets and collect exactly $1000 in revenue.
If this situation is modeled as a system of equations and graphed, what does the intersection point represent in this real-world context?
Explanation: The system is: a + s = 100 (total tickets) and 12a + 8s = 1000 (total revenue), where a = adult tickets and s = student tickets. Solving: from the first equation, s = 100 - a. Substituting: 12a + 8(100 - a) = 1000, so 12a + 800 - 8a = 1000, giving 4a = 200, so a = 50 and s = 50. Verification: 50 + 50 = 100 tickets ✓ and 12(50) + 8(50) = 600 + 400 = 1000 ✓. The intersection represents the unique combination that satisfies both constraints simultaneously. Choice A mentions profit maximization which isn't specified. Choices B and C give incorrect ticket combinations.
A machine can produce 450 widgets in 6 hours. Working at the same rate, how many widgets can 3 such machines produce in 8 hours?
Explanation: First find the rate per machine: 6 hours450 widgets=75 widgets per hour per machine. With 3 machines for 8 hours: 3×75×8=1800 widgets. Choice A incorrectly uses only 2 machines or 6 hours instead of 8. Choice B uses 2 machines for 8 hours. Choice D incorrectly calculates 450×68×3 with an arithmetic error.
A researcher wants to determine if the relationship between hours of sleep and reaction time is linear. She collected data from 20 participants and now needs to decide between creating a scatter plot with trend line, calculating correlation coefficient, or making a frequency table of sleep hours. Her goal is to assess linearity and determine the strength of the relationship. What tool choice provides the most complete analysis?
Explanation: The researcher has two distinct goals: assess linearity (best shown visually with scatter plot) and measure relationship strength (quantified by correlation coefficient). Using both tools provides complete analysis - the scatter plot reveals whether the relationship appears linear and identifies outliers, while the correlation coefficient gives a numerical measure of strength. Single tools address only one goal (A, B, C).
Consider the system {x−2y=4y=21x+c where c is a constant. If this system has no solution, what can you conclude about the relationship between the two equations?
Explanation: When you encounter a system of equations and need to determine when it has no solution, focus on the relationship between the lines represented by each equation. A system has no solution when the lines are parallel (same slope, different y-intercepts). To analyze this system, convert both equations to slope-intercept form (y=mx+b). The second equation is already in this form: y=21x+c. For the first equation, solve for y: x−2y=4 −2y=−x+4 y=21x−2 Both equations now have the same slope of 21. For the system to have no solution, the lines must be parallel, which occurs when they have identical slopes but different y-intercepts. This happens when c=−2. Choice A is incorrect because lines with the same slope don't intersect (unless they're identical). Choice B is wrong because perpendicular lines would have slopes that are negative reciprocals; here both slopes equal 21. Choice C reverses the logic—when c=−2, the equations represent the same line (infinitely many solutions), but when c=−2, they're parallel (no solution). Choice D correctly identifies that the equations represent parallel lines because they have identical slopes when written in slope-intercept form. Strategy tip: When analyzing systems for solution types, always convert to slope-intercept form first. Same slope with different y-intercepts = no solution; same slope with same y-intercept = infinite solutions; different slopes = one solution.
A student runs a simulation to estimate the probability of getting exactly 2 heads when flipping 4 coins. She uses a random number generator producing digits 0-9, where even digits represent heads and odd digits represent tails. After 500 trials, she gets 180 successes. Based on these results, what should she conclude about her simulation?
Explanation: The theoretical probability of exactly 2 heads in 4 flips is C(4,2) × (0.5)^4 = 6/16 = 0.375. Her simulation result is 180/500 = 0.36, which is very close. Even and odd digits do represent a fair 50-50 split. Choice B is wrong because simulations give estimates, not exact theoretical values. Choice C is incorrect about the digit assignment. Choice D is wrong because 500 trials is sufficient for a reasonable estimate.
In the expression 4x2−6x+9−2x(x+3), which of the following correctly identifies the terms after expanding but before any combining of like terms?
Explanation: First, expand −2x(x+3)=−2x2−6x. The complete expanded expression is 4x2−6x+9−2x2−6x, which has 5 terms: 4x2, −6x, 9, −2x2, and −6x. Choice A doesn't expand the last factor. Choice B incorrectly shows +6x instead of −6x from the expansion. Choice D incorrectly separates the factors within the parentheses.
The distance from Earth to the nearest star (other than the Sun) is approximately 4.1×1013 kilometers. The distance from Earth to the Moon is approximately 380,000 kilometers. How many times farther is the nearest star than the Moon?
Explanation: First convert Moon distance to scientific notation: 380,000=3.8×105. Then divide star distance by Moon distance: 3.8×1054.1×1013=3.84.1×1013−5=1.08×108. Choice B uses incorrect exponent subtraction. Choice C inverts the coefficient division. Choice D multiplies the distances instead of dividing.
A digital scale displays weights to the nearest gram. The scale shows three different readings throughout the day: 847 g in the morning, 851 g at noon, and 849 g in the evening.
If the actual weight at noon was 850.7 grams, what is the range of possible actual weights (in grams) for the morning reading, assuming the scale's rounding behavior is consistent?
Explanation: When you encounter rounding problems, you need to understand the range of values that round to a specific displayed number. Since this scale rounds to the nearest gram, any actual weight from 846.5 up to (but not including) 847.5 grams would display as 847 g. Let's verify this logic using the given information. The noon reading shows 851 g, and we know the actual weight was 850.7 g. Since 850.7 is closer to 851 than to 850, it correctly rounds to 851 g. This confirms the scale rounds to the nearest whole number. For any displayed value, the actual weight falls within a range of ±0.5 grams around whole numbers. Specifically, a reading of 847 g means the actual weight is anywhere from 846.5 g (inclusive) up to 847.5 g (exclusive). However, since we're dealing with continuous measurements, we typically express this as 846.5 to 847.5 grams. Looking at the wrong answers: Choice A (846.5 to 847.4) cuts off too early at 847.4, missing values like 847.45 that would still round to 847. Choice B (846.0 to 848.0) is far too wide—weights like 846.2 would round to 846, not 847, and 847.8 would round to 848. Choice D (847.0 to 847.9) misses the lower half of the range entirely, excluding values like 846.8 that clearly round up to 847. Remember: when a value rounds to the nearest whole number, the actual range extends 0.5 units below and 0.5 units above that displayed number.
A elevator has a weight limit and currently contains 4 adults averaging 160 pounds each and some children averaging 80 pounds each. The elevator can safely hold a maximum of 2,000 pounds total. If c represents the number of children currently in the elevator, which inequality represents the constraint on the number of additional adults a that can enter?
Explanation: When you encounter inequality word problems, the key is systematically translating each piece of information into mathematical terms, then combining them to represent the constraint. Let's build this inequality step by step. The elevator currently has 4 adults at 160 pounds each, which gives us 4×160=640 pounds from adults already inside. We also have c children at 80 pounds each, contributing 80c pounds. Finally, a additional adults will add 160a pounds. The total weight is 640+80c+160a, and this must be less than or equal to the 2,000-pound limit. Answer choice C correctly captures this: 640+80c+160a≤2000. Answer choice A treats each person as weighing 1 pound instead of using their actual weights—this completely ignores the weight information given in the problem. Answer choice B makes a critical error by using 160 for the current adults instead of 4×160=640, essentially treating the current load as just one adult rather than four. Answer choice D uses the correct weight calculation but has the inequality flipped—it suggests the total weight should be greater than or equal to 2,000 pounds, which would mean the elevator is overloaded. When solving inequality word problems, always identify what's already present, what's being added, and what the constraint is. Calculate existing quantities completely before setting up your inequality, and double-check that your inequality symbol points in the logical direction for the constraint.
What is the value of 22×32−23(23)2−34?
Explanation: When you encounter complex expressions with exponents, the key is to work systematically using the order of operations and exponent rules. This problem tests your ability to evaluate powers and simplify fractions carefully. Let's evaluate the numerator first: (23)2−34. Using the power rule (am)n=amn, we get (23)2=26=64. Then 34=81, so the numerator equals 64−81=−17. For the denominator: 22×32−23. We have 22=4, 32=9, and 23=8, giving us 4×9−8=36−8=28. Therefore, our expression equals 28−17, which is answer choice C. Now for the wrong answers: Choice A (28−65) likely comes from incorrectly calculating the numerator as 64−81=−17 but then making an arithmetic error. Choice B (2817) results from getting the correct absolute value but missing the negative sign in the numerator. Choice D (2865) combines both errors—wrong sign and possibly miscalculating 64+81 instead of 64−81. Remember to always follow PEMDAS strictly with exponent problems: calculate all powers first, then handle multiplication and subtraction from left to right. Double-check your arithmetic, especially with negative numbers, as sign errors are common traps in these problems.
Two hikers start at the same point. One hiker walks 5 miles north, then 12 miles east. The other hiker walks directly to the first hiker's final position. How much farther did the first hiker walk compared to the second hiker?
Explanation: When you see a problem involving perpendicular paths and direct distances, think about the Pythagorean theorem. The first hiker's path forms two legs of a right triangle, while the second hiker travels along the hypotenuse. Let's trace the first hiker's journey: 5 miles north plus 12 miles east equals a total distance of 5+12=17 miles. The second hiker walks directly to the same endpoint, creating the hypotenuse of a right triangle with legs of 5 miles and 12 miles. Using the Pythagorean theorem: c2=a2+b2, so c2=52+122=25+144=169. Therefore, c=169=13 miles. The difference between their distances is 17−13=4 miles. Looking at the wrong answers: A) 3.5 miles likely comes from incorrectly calculating the hypotenuse or making an arithmetic error. C) 4.8 miles might result from confusion about which distance to subtract from which, or from using the wrong formula entirely. D) 5.2 miles could stem from incorrectly using one of the leg lengths (5 miles) in the final calculation instead of properly applying the Pythagorean theorem. The correct answer is B) 4 miles. Study tip: When you see right-angle movement problems, immediately identify the right triangle. The two perpendicular movements form the legs, and the direct path is always the hypotenuse. Remember that 5-12-13 is a common Pythagorean triple worth memorizing for quick recognition.
Consider the expression 3x2+7xy−2x2+5y−4xy+8. After combining like terms, how many terms in the simplified expression have a coefficient with an absolute value greater than 4?
Explanation: First, combine like terms: 3x2−2x2=x2, 7xy−4xy=3xy, 5y stays the same, and 8 is the constant. The simplified expression is x2+3xy+5y+8. The coefficients are 1, 3, 5, and 8. Only 5 and 8 have absolute values greater than 4, so there are 2 terms. Choice A would result from not identifying any coefficients correctly. Choice B might come from only counting the constant term 8. Choice D would result from incorrectly counting the coefficient 1 as having absolute value greater than 4.
A delivery truck can carry a maximum load of 2400 pounds. It already has packages weighing 1650 pounds loaded. If each additional package weighs 25 pounds, what is the solution to the inequality representing how many more packages p can be loaded?
Explanation: The inequality is 1650+25p≤2400. Subtracting 1650: 25p≤750. Dividing by 25: p≤30. This means at most 30 packages. Choice A incorrectly states 'exactly' instead of 'at most'. Choice C uses strict inequality when equality is allowed. Choice D reverses the inequality direction completely.
A machine produces 353 widgets in 54 of a minute. What is the production rate in widgets per minute?
Explanation: Convert 353 to 518 widgets. Find the unit rate: 54518=518×45=418=29=421 widgets per minute. Choice B results from incorrectly computing 518×54. Choice C comes from subtracting 54 from 353. Choice D represents an incorrect decimal conversion.
A recipe calls for ingredients in the ratio 2:3:5 by weight. If the total weight of these three ingredients is 4.8 kg, and one ingredient makes up 30% of the mixture, what is the weight of the heaviest ingredient?
Explanation: The ratio 2:3:5 means the parts are 102=20%, 103=30%, and 105=50% of the total. The ingredient that makes up 30% corresponds to the middle ratio part (3). The heaviest ingredient corresponds to ratio part 5, which is 50% of 4.8 kg = 2.4 kg. Choice B assumes the 30% ingredient is the heaviest. Choice C miscalculates 30% of 4.8. Choice D calculates 30% of 4.8, identifying the wrong ingredient as heaviest.
A rectangular field is 80 meters long and 60 meters wide. A diagonal path cuts across the field from one corner to the opposite corner. If a person walks along the perimeter from the same starting corner to the opposite corner, how many meters longer is the perimeter route compared to the diagonal path?
Explanation: When you encounter a problem involving rectangular shapes and diagonal paths, you're working with the Pythagorean theorem. This question asks you to compare two different routes between opposite corners of a rectangle. First, let's find the diagonal path length. Using the Pythagorean theorem with legs of 80 meters and 60 meters: 802+602=6400+3600=10000=100 meters. Next, calculate the perimeter route. Walking along the edges from one corner to the opposite corner means traveling the length plus the width: 80+60=140 meters. The difference between these routes is 140−100=40 meters, confirming answer C. Looking at the wrong answers: A) 35 meters might result from calculation errors when finding the square root or from rounding mistakes. B) 45 meters could come from incorrectly calculating the diagonal or making arithmetic errors in the subtraction. D) 50 meters might occur if you mistakenly calculated half the full perimeter (280 ÷ 2 = 140, then confused this in your final calculation). Remember this key strategy: rectangle diagonal problems almost always involve the Pythagorean theorem, and when you see "nice" numbers like 60 and 80, check if they form a Pythagorean triple. Here, 60-80-100 is a multiple of the 3-4-5 triangle (multiplied by 20), which can speed up your calculations and help you avoid computational errors.
The equation 3x+5=8 has the same solution as which of the following equations?
Explanation: Solving 3x+5=8: multiply both sides by 3 to get x+5=24, then x=19. Choice B gives the same equation after the first step. Choice A would give x=6, Choice C would give x=9, and Choice D would give x=−37.
A water tank loses 61 of its water each day due to evaporation. If the tank starts with 54 of its capacity filled, what fraction of the tank's total capacity remains after 2 days?
Explanation: Each day, 65 of the water remains (since 61 evaporates). After day 1: 54×65=3020=32 of capacity. After day 2: 32×65=1810=95 of capacity. Choice A represents the amount after only 1 day. Choice B is the unsimplified form of 32. Choice D comes from incorrectly subtracting 61 twice from 54.
A student simplified 5a2b−3ab2+2a2b+4ab2−ab2 and got 7a2b+0ab2. The student then wrote the final answer as 7a2b. What error, if any, did the student make?
Explanation: Let's check the student's work: For a2b terms: 5a2b+2a2b=7a2b ✓. For ab2 terms: −3ab2+4ab2−ab2=0ab2=0 ✓. The student correctly identified that a2b and ab2 are not like terms, combined each group separately, and properly wrote 7a2b+0=7a2b. Choice A gives wrong coefficient calculation. Choice B miscalculates the ab2 terms. Choice D incorrectly suggests the student confused unlike terms.
A water tank is being filled at a rate of 15 gallons per minute and drained at a rate of 8 gallons per minute simultaneously. The tank starts with 120 gallons and must maintain at least 50 gallons at all times for safety reasons. Which inequality represents the time constraint t (in minutes) for how long this process can continue?
Explanation: Net rate = 15 - 8 = 7 gallons per minute (filling faster than draining). After t minutes: amount = 120 + 7t. The constraint is this amount ≥ 50, so 120 + 7t ≥ 50. Choice B incorrectly assumes the tank is losing water overall. Choices C and D are mathematically equivalent to A and B respectively, but don't simplify the net rate, making them less clear representations of the constraint.
Point A is located at −12 on a number line. Point B is the same distance from zero as point A, but in the opposite direction. Point C is located so that the distance from C to zero equals the distance from A to B. How many possible locations are there for point C?
Explanation: When you encounter problems about points on a number line and distances, focus on understanding absolute value and how distance works in both directions from any reference point. Let's work through this step by step. Point A is at −12. Since point B is the same distance from zero as A but in the opposite direction, B must be at +12. The distance from A to zero is ∣−12∣=12, so B is 12 units on the positive side. Now find the distance from A to B: from −12 to +12 is 12−(−12)=24 units total. Point C must be located so that its distance from zero equals this distance from A to B, which is 24 units. Since distance is always positive, C could be either 24 units to the right of zero (at +24) or 24 units to the left of zero (at −24). That gives us exactly two possible locations for point C. Answer choice A is wrong because there isn't just one location—distance from zero creates two possibilities. Answer choice B incorrectly suggests four locations, which would happen if you mistakenly counted distances in multiple directions or made calculation errors. Answer choice C suggests three locations, which has no mathematical basis for this type of distance problem. Remember: whenever a problem asks for points at a specific distance from zero (or any reference point), there are typically two solutions—one in each direction along the number line, unless the point is exactly at the reference point itself.
Two competing cell phone plans charge data overage fees of 0.025 dollars per MB and 2.8% of a dollar per MB, respectively. What is the difference between these rates expressed as a percentage of a dollar?
Explanation: When comparing rates that are expressed in different formats, you need to convert them to the same units before finding the difference. Here you have one rate as a decimal (0.025 dollars per MB) and another as a percentage (2.8% of a dollar per MB). First, convert both rates to the same format. Since the question asks for the answer as a percentage, let's convert the decimal to a percentage. To convert 0.025 dollars to a percentage of a dollar, multiply by 100: 0.025×100=2.5% Now you can compare the two rates directly: 2.5% per MB versus 2.8% per MB. The difference is 2.8%−2.5%=0.3% Looking at the wrong answers: Choice A (2.5%) gives you just the first rate converted to a percentage, but doesn't calculate the difference. Choice B (0.53%) likely comes from incorrectly converting 2.8% to a decimal (0.028) and then subtracting 0.025, giving 0.003, which someone might mistakenly read as 0.53%. Choice D (0.28%) appears to come from confusing 2.8% with 0.28% during the calculation. The correct answer is C. Study tip: When comparing rates in different formats, always convert to the same units first. Remember that to convert a decimal to a percentage, you multiply by 100, and to convert a percentage to a decimal, you divide by 100. Double-check your conversions before doing any arithmetic.
A store marks up items by 37.5% above cost. If an item costs the store $24, what fraction of the selling price represents the store's profit?
Explanation: First convert the markup percentage: 37.5%=83=0.375. The selling price is $24+$24×0.375=$24+$9=$33. The profit is $9, so the fraction of selling price that is profit is $339=113 .ChoiceArepresentsthemarkuprateasafractionofcost,notsellingprice.ChoiceCrepresentscostasafractionofsellingprice.ChoiceDresultsfromincorrectlycalculating 37.5% as 135 $.