Question 1 of 25
On a map, 1.5 inches represents 60 miles. Two cities are 8.25 inches apart on the map. A car travels between these cities at an average speed of 55 mph. How long will the trip take?
Prealgebra
Practice Test 12 for Prealgebra: real questions and explanations from the Varsity Tutors practice-test pool.
0%
0 / 25 answered
Question 1 of 25
On a map, 1.5 inches represents 60 miles. Two cities are 8.25 inches apart on the map. A car travels between these cities at an average speed of 55 mph. How long will the trip take?
Question Navigator
On a map, 1.5 inches represents 60 miles. Two cities are 8.25 inches apart on the map. A car travels between these cities at an average speed of 55 mph. How long will the trip take?
Explanation: First find the actual distance: 60 miles1.5 inches=x miles8.25 inches. Cross multiply: 1.5x=60×8.25=495, so x=1.5495=330 miles. Time = 55 mph330 miles=6 hours. Choice A uses incorrect distance calculation. Choice C results from using 50 mph instead of 55 mph. Choice D comes from arithmetic errors in the proportion setup.
In the expression x2−2x+4x3+8, Zoe recognizes that the numerator is a sum of cubes. After factoring the numerator and simplifying the entire expression, what does she get?
Explanation: When you see an expression with x3+8 in the numerator, recognize this as a sum of cubes since 8=23. The sum of cubes formula is a3+b3=(a+b)(a2−ab+b2). Let's factor the numerator: x3+8=x3+23=(x+2)(x2−2x+4) Now substitute this back into the original expression: x2−2x+4x3+8=x2−2x+4(x+2)(x2−2x+4) Since the factor (x2−2x+4) appears in both numerator and denominator, they cancel out (assuming x2−2x+4=0), leaving us with x+2. Looking at the wrong answers: Choice A gives x−2, which would result if you mistakenly thought this was a difference of cubes or made a sign error during factoring. Choice C gives x2+2x+4, which might tempt you if you incorrectly canceled the (x+2) terms instead of the (x2−2x+4) terms. Choice D suggests x−2x+2, which could result from confusion about which terms should cancel or from incorrectly factoring the denominator. Study tip: Memorize both cube formulas: a3+b3=(a+b)(a2−ab+b2) and a3−b3=(a−b)(a2+ab+b2). When simplifying rational expressions, always look for common factors that cancel completely.
Consider the expression 2(x+4)+3(x−1)+5. Which of the following statements about the structure of this expression is correct?
Explanation: Before distributing, the expression has 3 terms: 2(x+4), 3(x−1), and 5. After distributing: 2x+8+3x−3+5, which has 5 terms. Choice A miscounts the terms after distribution. Choice C is incorrect because there are more than 2 factors when considering the expressions in parentheses. Choice D is incorrect because after simplifying to 5x+10, the coefficient of x is 5 and the constant term is 10, so they are equal, but this is coincidental and not generally true for such expressions.
Sarah is solving the system x+2y=8 and 3x−y=1 using substitution. She solves the first equation for x and gets x=8−2y. When she substitutes this into the second equation, what equation does she get?
Explanation: When using substitution, we replace the variable we solved for (x) with its expression (8 - 2y) in the other equation. The second equation is 3x - y = 1. Substituting x = 8 - 2y gives us 3(8 - 2y) - y = 1. This can be simplified to 24 - 6y - y = 1, then 24 - 7y = 1, giving y = 23/7. Choice B incorrectly substitutes the expression for y instead of x. Choice C substitutes into the wrong equation (the first one we already used). Choice D omits the coefficient 3 that multiplies x in the second equation.
The expression 43×252210×510 can be simplified by recognizing patterns in the exponents and bases. What is the simplified form?
Explanation: First, recognize that 210×510=(2×5)10=1010. Next, convert the denominator: 43=(22)3=26 and 252=(52)2=54. So the expression becomes 26×541010. Since 26×54=26×54, we can pair up factors: 26×54210×510=210−6×510−4=24×54=(2×5)4=104. Choice A makes an arithmetic error in the denominator calculation. Choice B leaves the expression unsimplified. Choice D incorrectly multiplies instead of using the pattern (ab)n=anbn.
A recipe calls for 32 cup of flour. If you want to make portions that each use 83 cup of flour, how many complete portions can you make from the original amount?
Explanation: Calculate 32÷83=32×38=916=197. Since we need complete portions only, the answer is 1. Choice B results from rounding 1.78 incorrectly. Choice C comes from adding numerators (2+3=5, then estimating). Choice D results from multiplying denominators and misinterpreting the result.
The temperature dropped from 15.6°C to -3.8°C over a 6-hour period. What was the average rate of temperature change per hour?
Explanation: Temperature change = -3.8 - 15.6 = -19.4°C. Average rate = -19.4 ÷ 6 = -3.233... ≈ -3.23°C per hour. Choice A incorrectly calculates the temperature difference as positive. Choice C uses incorrect division or rounding. Choice D gives the total change without dividing by time.
Which statement correctly compares the numbers 5.7×10−6 and 9.2×10−7?
Explanation: When comparing numbers in scientific notation with different exponents, the number with the larger exponent is greater (when both are positive or both are negative). Since −6>−7, we have 10−6>10−7, so 5.7×10−6>9.2×10−7. Converting to decimal form: 5.7×10−6=0.0000057 and 9.2×10−7=0.00000092. Choice A incorrectly compares only coefficients. Choice C incorrectly states −6<−7. Choice D has wrong reasoning about coefficients.
Three students compared the decimal numbers 2.4056, 2.405, and 2.4. Sarah claims that when all three numbers are rounded to the same number of decimal places, two of them become equal. What is the minimum number of decimal places needed to make Sarah's claim true?
Explanation: Testing different decimal places: At 1 decimal place: 2.4056→2.4, 2.405→2.4, 2.4→2.4 (all three equal, not just two). At 2 decimal places: 2.4056→2.41, 2.405→2.41, 2.4→2.40 (two equal: 2.4056 and 2.405 both round to 2.41). This satisfies Sarah's claim with the minimum number of decimal places. Choice A makes all three equal, not two. Choice C (3 places) works but isn't the minimum. Choice D (4 places) makes all numbers different.
A cell phone plan charges a monthly fee of $25 plus $0.10 per text message. If someone's bill was $32.50 for one month, which equation represents the number of text messages $t $ they sent?
Explanation: When you encounter word problems about costs or pricing, your goal is to translate the real-world situation into a mathematical equation by identifying the fixed costs and variable costs. In this cell phone plan, there are two components: a fixed monthly fee of $25 (this stays the same regardless of usage) and a variable cost of $0.10 per text message (this depends on how many texts are sent). The total bill equals the fixed cost plus the variable cost, so: Total Bill = Fixed Fee + (Cost per text × Number of texts). Substituting the given values: $32.50=25+0.10t ,whichcanberewrittenas 25+0.10t=32.50 $. This matches answer choice C. Let's examine why the other options are incorrect. Choice A (0.10t - 25 = 32.50) subtracts the monthly fee instead of adding it, which doesn't make sense since fees increase your bill. Choice B (25t + 0.10 = 32.50) incorrectly multiplies the monthly fee by the number of texts and treats the per-text cost as a fixed amount. Choice D (25(t + 0.10) = 32.50) uses distribution incorrectly, suggesting the monthly fee is multiplied by both the number of texts and the per-text rate. Study tip: In cost problems, always identify what stays constant (fixed costs) and what changes based on usage (variable costs). Write the equation as: Total = Fixed + (Rate × Variable). This pattern appears frequently in pre-algebra word problems involving phone plans, taxi fares, and rental costs.
Two students create scatter plots using the same dataset showing the relationship between temperature and ice cream sales. Student A uses a scale from 60°F to 100°F on the x-axis, while Student B uses a scale from 0°F to 120°F on the x-axis. Both plots show the same data points. How will the apparent strength of the association differ between the two plots?
Explanation: The correct answer is A. Student A's narrower scale (60°F to 100°F) will compress the x-axis, making the data points appear more spread out vertically relative to horizontally, creating the visual impression of a stronger association. Student B's wider scale (0°F to 120°F) will make the same points appear more compressed vertically relative to horizontally, making the association appear weaker. Choice B reverses this relationship. Choice C incorrectly assumes visual appearance is unaffected by scale. Choice D incorrectly suggests the actual correlation changes, when only the visual impression changes.
A rectangular garden has a diagonal walkway that measures 25 feet. If the garden is 15 feet wide, what is the area of the garden in square feet?
Explanation: Using the Pythagorean theorem: 152+l2=252, so 225+l2=625, which gives l2=400, so l=20 feet. The area is 15×20=300 square feet. Choice B uses the incorrect length (25) instead of finding the actual length. Choice C incorrectly calculates 15×25. Choice D represents a computational error in the Pythagorean calculation.
A function f is defined by f(x)=3x−7. If f(a)=8, what is the value of f(2a)?
Explanation: First, find a by solving f(a)=8: 3a−7=8, so 3a=15 and a=5. Then f(2a)=f(10)=3(10)−7=23. Choice A results from calculating 2⋅8=16. Choice C comes from finding a correctly but calculating f(a+a) incorrectly. Choice D results from f(2)⋅f(a)=−1⋅8.
A student is investigating whether the pattern in the sequence 2, 6, 18, 54, 162, ... continues predictably. She wants to verify her hypothesis about the pattern rule and predict the next three terms. She has access to a calculator, graph paper, and a table format. Which tool choice would most effectively help her confirm the pattern and make accurate predictions?
Explanation: When you encounter a sequence like 2, 6, 18, 54, 162, you need to identify what type of pattern it follows. Sequences can be arithmetic (with constant differences) or geometric (with constant ratios), and choosing the right analysis tool is crucial for accurate pattern recognition. Looking at this sequence, let's check for a geometric pattern by examining ratios between consecutive terms: 6÷2 = 3, 18÷6 = 3, 54÷18 = 3, 162÷54 = 3. The consistent ratio of 3 confirms this is a geometric sequence where each term is multiplied by 3. A calculator makes these ratio calculations quick and accurate, allowing you to verify the pattern definitively and predict future terms (486, 1458, 4374). Option B suggests graphing, but while exponential curves do show characteristic shapes, plotting points is time-consuming and less precise than calculating exact ratios. The visual pattern doesn't give you the specific multiplier needed for predictions. Option C recommends using a table format. While organization helps, simply arranging data doesn't reveal the underlying mathematical relationship—you still need to perform calculations to identify the pattern. Option D focuses on finding differences between consecutive terms (4, 12, 36, 108), but these differences aren't constant, which would indicate this isn't an arithmetic sequence. This approach leads you away from the correct geometric pattern. Study tip: When analyzing sequences, always test for geometric patterns first by calculating ratios between consecutive terms. If ratios are constant, you've found a geometric sequence; if differences are constant, it's arithmetic.
A company's monthly profit P (in thousands of dollars) is modeled by P=15t−40, where t is the number of months since the company started. The company plans to use this model to predict profit for month 60. Which statement best describes the reliability of this prediction?
Explanation: Extrapolating 60 months into the future using a linear model is potentially unreasonable because many external factors (market conditions, competition, economic changes) could alter the relationship over such a long period. Choice A incorrectly assumes linear models are always accurate for extrapolation. Choice C confuses early negative profits (which may be realistic for a startup) with model reliability. Choice D ignores the fundamental issue that long-term extrapolation assumes conditions remain constant.
Consider the equation 4x+2−6x−1=1. After finding a common denominator and clearing fractions, what is the coefficient of x in the resulting equation?
Explanation: When you encounter an equation with fractions, your goal is to eliminate them by finding a common denominator and then clearing the fractions entirely. This transforms the equation into a simpler form where you can easily identify coefficients. Let's work through 4x+2−6x−1=1 step by step. First, find the least common denominator of 4 and 6, which is 12. Rewrite each fraction: 4x+2=123(x+2)=123x+6 6x−1=122(x−1)=122x−2 Now your equation becomes: 123x+6−122x−2=1 Combine the fractions: 12(3x+6)−(2x−2)=1 123x+6−2x+2=1 12x+8=1 To clear the fraction, multiply both sides by 12: x+8=12 The coefficient of x is 1, making C correct. Choice A (3) likely comes from mistakenly using just the coefficient from the first fraction. Choice B (2) might result from using the coefficient from the second fraction. Choice D (-1) could occur if you incorrectly handled the subtraction when combining fractions. Remember: when clearing fractions, always multiply the entire equation by the common denominator. The resulting linear equation will have integer coefficients that are much easier to work with than the original fractions.
A rhombus has side length (2p+1) and height (p−3). If we use the formula A=base×height, which shows the correct first step of applying the distributive property?
Explanation: When you see a problem asking for the "first step" of applying the distributive property, you need to set up the multiplication without actually completing it. The distributive property breaks down multiplication of expressions like (a+b)(c+d) into separate parts. Here, you're finding the area using A=base×height=(2p+1)(p−3). The first step of the distributive property is to distribute each term in the first expression to the entire second expression. This means taking 2p and multiplying it by (p−3), then taking 1 and multiplying it by (p−3). So the correct setup is A=2p(p−3)+1(p−3), which is choice C. Choice A shows what happens after you've already distributed and partially simplified—this skips the "first step" the question asks for. Choice B goes even further by completely combining like terms, making it a final answer rather than a first step. Choice D attempts to distribute but incorrectly breaks apart the second expression (p−3) into separate multiplications with p and 3, which isn't how the distributive property works. Remember that when a question asks for the "first step" of the distributive property, you're looking for the setup that shows each term from the first expression being distributed to the complete second expression. Don't be tempted by answers that show partial or complete simplification—stick to what the question specifically requests.
Consider the piecewise relation defined as:
2x + 1 & \text{if } x < 0 \\ 3 & \text{if } x = 0 \\ -x + 4 & \text{if } x > 0 \end{cases}Which statement best explains why this relation is or is not a function?
Explanation: This piecewise relation is a function because for every possible input value of x, there is exactly one corresponding output value. For x < 0, use 2x + 1; for x = 0, use 3; for x > 0, use -x + 4. No x-value is assigned to multiple y-values. Choice A is incorrect because using different formulas for different intervals doesn't prevent something from being a function. Choice B is wrong because the change in formula doesn't create multiple outputs for any single input. Choice D is incorrect because continuity is not required for a relation to be a function (though it may be required for other properties).
The surface area of a sphere is SA=4πr2, where r is the radius. If the surface area of a spherical ball is 144π square inches, what is the diameter of the ball?
Explanation: Given SA = 4πr² = 144π. Dividing both sides by 4π: r² = 36, so r = 6 inches. Since diameter = 2r, the diameter is 2(6) = 12 inches. Choice B gives the radius, not the diameter. Choice C (18) would correspond to r = 9, giving SA = 4π(81) = 324π ≠ 144π. Choice D (24) would correspond to r = 12, giving SA = 4π(144) = 576π ≠ 144π.
Maria wants to estimate the probability that a basketball player makes at least 2 out of 3 free throws. She knows the player has a 60% free throw percentage. Maria decides to simulate this using a random number generator that produces integers from 1 to 10. Which simulation design would be most appropriate for estimating this probability?
Explanation: For a 60% success rate using numbers 1-10, we need 6 out of 10 numbers to represent success (1-6). Since we want to simulate 3 free throws with at least 2 successes, we generate 3 numbers and count success when at least 2 fall in the range 1-6. Choice B uses wrong range (40% instead of 60%). Choice C simulates wrong scenario (6 out of 10 throws). Choice D simulates only 1 throw instead of 3.
A recipe calls for 43 cup of flour, which represents 3 parts flour divided into 4 equal parts total. If Luis wants to make the recipe but only has a 81 cup measuring tool, what does the fraction 86 represent in this context?
Explanation: 43=86 represents the same quantity expressed with different denominators. Both fractions represent the division of the same amount into different-sized equal parts: 43 means 3 out of 4 equal parts, while 86 means 6 out of 8 equal parts of the same whole. Choice B misunderstands equivalent fractions as different amounts. Choice C confuses the division interpretation. Choice D incorrectly suggests addition rather than equivalence.
A class of 28 students took a survey about favorite pets. The results showed that 12 students chose dogs, 8 chose cats, 5 chose birds, and 3 chose fish. What is the simplified ratio that compares students who chose mammals to students who chose non-mammals?
Explanation: When you encounter ratio problems involving categories, you need to carefully classify the items before comparing. This question asks you to compare mammals to non-mammals among the pet choices.
First, identify which pets are mammals and which aren't. Dogs and cats are both mammals, while birds and fish are not mammals. So you have:
The ratio of students who chose mammals to non-mammals is 20:8. However, ratios should always be simplified by dividing both numbers by their greatest common factor. Since both 20 and 8 are divisible by 4, you get 20÷4=5 and 8÷4=2, giving you the simplified ratio 5:2.
Looking at the wrong answers: B) 20:8 is the correct ratio before simplification, but ratios must be in simplest form. C) 12:8 incorrectly compares only dogs to cats, missing the broader mammal vs. non-mammal classification. D) 3:2 appears to reverse part of the comparison or use incorrect groupings.
When working with ratios, always remember to simplify by finding the greatest common factor. Also, read the question carefully to understand what categories you're actually comparing—don't just focus on the individual items listed.
A carpenter cuts a board into three pieces. The first piece is 52 of the original length, and the second piece is 31 of the original length. If 151 of the original board length was lost to sawdust during cutting, what fraction of the original length is the third piece?
Explanation: The total must equal 1 (the whole board). We have: first piece + second piece + third piece + sawdust = 1. So: 52+31+third piece+151=1. Converting to common denominator 15: 156+155+third piece+151=1. This gives us: 1512+third piece=1. Therefore: third piece = 1−1512=1515−1512=153=51. Choice A is correct. Choice B (154) would result if students forgot to account for sawdust. Choice C (151) might result from calculation errors. Choice D (152) could result from misreading the sawdust amount.
A solution is 15% salt by volume. If 2.4 liters of water is added to 3.6 liters of this solution, what percent of the new mixture is salt?
Explanation: When you encounter mixture problems involving percentages, focus on tracking the actual amount of the substance (salt) and the total volume separately, then find the new percentage. Start with what you know: 3.6 liters of 15% salt solution contains 3.6×0.15=0.54 liters of pure salt. When you add 2.4 liters of water, you're adding zero salt but increasing the total volume. The new mixture has 0.54 liters of salt in a total volume of 3.6+2.4=6.0 liters. The new percentage is 6.00.54=0.09=9%, making C correct. Looking at the wrong answers: A) 10% likely comes from incorrectly assuming the percentage drops proportionally to the volume increase (15%×6.03.6=9% would be correct, but students might miscalculate). B) 7.5% results from the common error of thinking the percentage is simply halved because you're roughly doubling the volume (15%÷2=7.5%). D) 12% might come from subtracting the percentage of water added relative to original solution (15%−3%=12%), which is mathematically meaningless. For mixture problems, always calculate the actual amount of the key substance first, then find the new total, and finally compute the new percentage. Don't try to work directly with percentages—track the concrete quantities.
A parallelogram has a base of (4y+3) units and a height of (y−2) units. If the area formula for a parallelogram is A=bh, which step correctly applies the distributive property to find the area?
Explanation: The distributive property can be applied by factoring out each term in the first expression: (4y+3)(y−2)=4y(y−2)+3(y−2). This correctly shows the first step of distribution. Choice A shows an incorrect intermediate step with wrong signs. Choice B shows the complete distribution but isn't the clearest first step. Choice C shows terms after distribution but with incorrect arrangement.