PRAXIS CORE WRITING (5723) • LANGUAGE AND RESEARCH SKILLS FOR WRITING

Correct Parallel Structure — Recognize and correct errors in parallel structure.

Mastering grammatical consistency within coordinated elements strengthens clarity and precision on the PRAXIS Core Writing exam.

Historical Context & Motivation

The principle of parallel structure—also called parallelism—has roots stretching back to the earliest Western rhetorical traditions, where balanced and symmetrical phrasing served as the hallmark of persuasive speech and elegant prose. Greek and Roman rhetoricians recognized that when coordinated elements share the same grammatical form, the resulting sentence achieves a rhythmic balance that enhances both clarity and memorability. This concern with structural balance has persisted through centuries of prescriptive grammar, becoming codified in modern style guides and standardized assessments such as the PRAXIS Core Writing exam. For aspiring educators, understanding parallel structure is doubly important: you must demonstrate mastery of it on your certification test and, subsequently, model it for your own students.

~350 BCE
Aristotle's Rhetoric
Aristotle codified principles of balanced clause construction in persuasive oratory, emphasizing that symmetrical phrasing (isocolon and parison) amplified logical force and audience engagement.
~95 CE
Quintilian's Institutio Oratoria
Quintilian formalized parallel construction as a core element of effective Latin prose style, connecting grammatical symmetry to rhetorical persuasion and intellectual rigor.
1776
The Declaration of Independence
Thomas Jefferson's repeated 'He has…' clauses demonstrated the persuasive power of sustained parallelism in political discourse, influencing generations of American writing instruction.
1959
Strunk & White's The Elements of Style
The widely adopted style manual elevated parallel construction to a central rule—'Express coordinate ideas in similar form'—making it a standard expectation in academic and professional writing.
Present
PRAXIS Core Writing (5723)
ETS includes parallel structure as a tested skill on the PRAXIS Core Writing exam, requiring future teachers to identify and correct faulty parallelism in selected-response questions.

The persistent emphasis on parallelism across these milestones reflects a simple but profound insight: when writers coordinate two or more elements—whether words, phrases, or clauses—the reader's cognitive burden is reduced if those elements share the same grammatical pattern. Faulty parallelism, by contrast, forces readers to re-parse a sentence, disrupting comprehension and undermining the writer's credibility. On the PRAXIS Core Writing exam, test items targeting this skill typically present a sentence with an underlined portion containing a coordination error; your task is to identify the version that aligns every coordinated element in the same grammatical form.

Core Principles & Definitions

At its core, parallel structure requires that items joined by coordinating conjunctions (and, but, or, nor, yet, so), correlative conjunctions (both…and, either…or, neither…nor, not only…but also), or listed in a series share the same grammatical form. Whether those items are single words, phrases, or subordinate clauses, they must match in part of speech and syntactic function. Mastery of this principle depends on understanding five foundational ideas that govern how parallelism operates at different levels of sentence architecture.

1

Grammatical Equivalence

Every element in a coordinate series must serve the same syntactic role. If the first item is a gerund phrase, every subsequent item must also be a gerund phrase—not an infinitive or a noun clause.
2

Conjunctions as Signal Words

Coordinating and correlative conjunctions signal the reader that a parallel series is underway. Whenever you encounter 'and,' 'or,' 'both…and,' or 'not only…but also,' check that what follows each part of the conjunction matches in form.
3

Level Consistency

Parallelism can occur at the word level (nouns with nouns), phrase level (prepositional phrases with prepositional phrases), or clause level (dependent clauses with dependent clauses). Mixing levels breaks the pattern.
4

Comparison Parallelism

Constructions using 'than' or 'as' require that the elements on each side of the comparison share the same grammatical form: 'Running is harder than swimming,' not 'Running is harder than to swim.'
5

List & Series Parallelism

In a series of three or more items, every item must adopt the same structure. A common error is to shift from noun phrases to a full clause in the final item of a list.
KEY TAKEAWAY
Think of parallel structure like a set of train tracks: both rails must run in the same direction and maintain the same gauge. If one rail suddenly shifts to a different width or veers off course, the train derails. In the same way, coordinated grammatical elements must maintain the same form—the same 'gauge'—so the reader's comprehension can travel smoothly from one item to the next without a cognitive derailment.

Visual Explanation — Mapping Parallel Structure

The following diagram illustrates how a sentence with a coordinated series should align its elements grammatically. On the left, a faulty sentence mixes grammatical forms; on the right, the corrected version ensures every element shares the same structure. The connecting lines highlight where each coordinated element branches from the conjunction, making the required symmetry visually explicit.

The left side shows a faulty sentence where the three coordinated elements branch from the verb 'enjoys' but use mixed forms (gerund, infinitive, gerund). The right side shows the corrected version where all three branches are gerunds, creating structural symmetry.

Notice how the diagram makes the structural mismatch visible: the infinitive 'to write' is highlighted in red because it does not match the gerund pattern established by 'reading' and 'hiking.' On the PRAXIS exam, you should mentally construct this kind of branching diagram whenever you encounter a sentence with coordinated elements. Ask yourself: does each branch carry the same grammatical form? If not, the sentence contains a parallelism error.

How Parallel Structure Works — Types and Triggers

Parallel structure errors arise in predictable contexts, and recognizing these trigger patterns is the key to both identifying and correcting them efficiently. The PRAXIS Core Writing exam tests parallelism across four primary construction types, each governed by a specific grammatical trigger. Understanding these types allows you to approach test items systematically rather than relying on ear alone.

Type 1 — Coordinating Conjunctions (FANBOYS)

When for, and, nor, but, or, yet, so join two or more elements, those elements must match in grammatical form. This is the most frequently tested type. Consider: 'The principal values punctuality, creativity, and being dedicated.' The first two items are abstract nouns, but the third shifts to a gerund phrase. The correction: 'The principal values punctuality, creativity, and dedication.'

Type 2 — Correlative Conjunctions

Correlative conjunctions work in pairs—both…and, either…or, neither…nor, not only…but also—and the grammatical structure that follows the first half must be mirrored after the second half. A common PRAXIS-style error: 'The new policy not only affects class schedules but also the budget for extracurriculars.' After 'not only' we have a verb phrase ('affects class schedules'), so after 'but also' we need a verb phrase too: 'but also reduces the budget for extracurriculars.'

Type 3 — Comparisons (than / as)

Comparisons using 'than' or 'as…as' require structural symmetry on both sides of the comparison word. Faulty: 'Writing lesson plans is more time-consuming than to grade papers.' The subject is a gerund phrase, so the comparison element must also be a gerund phrase: 'Writing lesson plans is more time-consuming than grading papers.'

Type 4 — Lists and Series

When a sentence presents a list—often introduced by a colon or embedded in a series—every item must share the same form. This type appears frequently on the PRAXIS because longer lists increase the likelihood of a form mismatch in the final item. Consider: 'The workshop covered how to differentiate instruction, creating formative assessments, and classroom management strategies.' This list mixes an infinitive clause, a gerund phrase, and a noun phrase. A parallel revision: 'The workshop covered differentiating instruction, creating formative assessments, and developing classroom management strategies.'

💡 PRAXIS TIP
On the PRAXIS Core Writing exam, when you spot a coordinating conjunction, a correlative conjunction pair, a comparison word (than/as), or a colon introducing a list, immediately check that every element on each side of that trigger shares the same grammatical form. This diagnostic habit alone can help you answer the majority of parallelism questions correctly.

Common Error Patterns & Classification

Research on standardized writing assessments reveals that certain parallelism errors recur with high frequency. Recognizing these error patterns accelerates your ability to spot faulty parallelism under timed conditions. The following classification table organizes the most common patterns, illustrating each with a faulty example and its corrected counterpart. After the table, a detailed flowchart will guide you through the diagnostic reasoning process.

Common Parallelism Error Patterns Tested on the PRAXIS Core Writing Exam
Error PatternFaulty ExampleCorrected Version
Gerund–Infinitive MixShe likes swimming, biking, and to run.She likes swimming, biking, and running.
Noun–Clause MixThe goals are accuracy, efficiency, and that we remain consistent.The goals are accuracy, efficiency, and consistency.
Active–Passive MixThe committee reviewed the budget and the proposal was approved.The committee reviewed the budget and approved the proposal.
Correlative MisplacementShe both wants to teach and to coach.She wants both to teach and to coach.
Prepositional Phrase ShiftThe curriculum focuses on reading, on writing, and math skills.The curriculum focuses on reading, on writing, and on math skills.
Follow this decision tree when analyzing PRAXIS sentences: locate the trigger word (conjunction, comparison, or series marker), isolate each coordinated element, label its grammatical form, and check for mismatches. If forms differ, the sentence contains a parallelism error.

Worked Example — PRAXIS-Style Question

The following worked example replicates the format of a PRAXIS Core Writing selected-response item, walking you through every reasoning step from identification to correction. As you study this example, pay attention to the systematic approach: locate the trigger, isolate the coordinated elements, label their forms, and select the answer that aligns all elements in the same structure.

PRAXIS-Style Parallelism Question
1
Step 1 — Read the SentenceThe original sentence reads: 'The school board decided to increase funding for technology, hiring additional staff, and to renovate the gymnasium.' We need to determine whether the underlined portions contain a parallelism error.
2
Step 2 — Locate the TriggerThe sentence contains the coordinating conjunction 'and' linking three items in a series. The introductory structure is 'decided to,' which establishes an infinitive pattern.
Trigger identified: three-item series joined by 'and'
3
Step 3 — Isolate Each Coordinated ElementItem 1: 'to increase funding for technology' — infinitive phrase. Item 2: 'hiring additional staff' — gerund phrase. Item 3: 'to renovate the gymnasium' — infinitive phrase.
Forms: Infinitive + Gerund + Infinitive
4
Step 4 — Identify the MismatchItems 1 and 3 are infinitive phrases, but Item 2 is a gerund phrase. The gerund 'hiring' breaks the infinitive pattern established by 'to increase' and continued by 'to renovate.'
Error: Item 2 ('hiring additional staff') breaks the infinitive pattern
5
Step 5 — Select the CorrectionTo restore parallelism, convert Item 2 to an infinitive phrase that matches Items 1 and 3. The corrected sentence reads: 'The school board decided to increase funding for technology, to hire additional staff, and to renovate the gymnasium.'
Corrected: Infinitive + Infinitive + Infinitive ✓
📝 ALTERNATIVE CORRECTION
An equally valid correction would convert all three items to gerund phrases: 'The school board decided on increasing funding for technology, hiring additional staff, and renovating the gymnasium.' On the PRAXIS exam, however, only one answer choice will be offered, so look for the option that makes all items match—regardless of which form it uses.

Strategies & Common Pitfalls

While the rule for parallel structure is straightforward in principle—coordinate elements must share the same grammatical form—certain sentence constructions make errors more difficult to detect. The table below contrasts effective test-taking strategies with common pitfalls that lead to incorrect answers on the PRAXIS Core Writing exam.

Strategies vs. Pitfalls for PRAXIS Parallelism Questions
Effective StrategyCommon Pitfall
Scan for trigger words first (and, or, both…and, not only…but also, than, as) before reading the full sentence.Reading the sentence for meaning alone and relying on 'what sounds right'—parallelism errors can sound natural in informal speech.
Isolate each coordinated element and label it (noun, gerund, infinitive, clause, prepositional phrase).Treating long, complex elements as a single unit without breaking them into their grammatical category.
For correlative conjunctions, check that the structure immediately after each half of the pair is symmetrical.Checking only the final element in a series and ignoring misplaced correlative conjunctions that split elements unevenly.
Test each answer choice by substituting it into the sentence and labeling all elements—confirm they all match.Selecting the first answer that 'fixes' one element without verifying that all elements are now parallel.
Watch for passive-voice insertions that break an active-voice series, even when the content seems correct.Overlooking voice shifts (active to passive) because the sentence is grammatically complete and makes logical sense.
KEY TAKEAWAY
Think of parallelism diagnosis like quality control on an assembly line: each product (coordinated element) must pass through the same checkpoint (grammatical form). If one product is shaped differently from the rest, the line shuts down until the defect is corrected. On the PRAXIS, you are the quality inspector—your job is to verify that every item rolling off the conjunction matches the established template.

Connection to Advanced Writing Concepts

Parallel structure does not exist in isolation; it intersects with several other PRAXIS Core Writing competencies and broader principles of effective composition. As a future educator, understanding these connections will help you not only answer exam questions but also teach writing with greater depth and coherence. The table below maps parallel structure to related concepts you will encounter both on the PRAXIS and in your professional practice.

Parallel Structure in the Broader PRAXIS Writing Framework
Related ConceptConnection to Parallel StructurePRAXIS Relevance
Sentence CombiningWhen combining short sentences into a longer one using conjunctions, parallelism is required to maintain structural coherence.Tested in revision-in-context passages where you must combine choppy sentences.
Modifier PlacementMisplaced modifiers can disguise parallelism errors; a misplaced phrase may appear to create a parallel series when it actually modifies the wrong element.Modifier questions overlap with parallelism in complex sentences.
Subject-Verb AgreementCompound subjects joined by 'and' or 'or' require parallel structure and specific agreement rules that interact with verb conjugation.Questions may test both parallelism and agreement simultaneously.
Rhetorical EffectivenessSustained parallelism creates rhetorical power (anaphora, epistrophe, tricolon). Understanding these devices elevates parallelism from a grammar rule to a stylistic tool.The essay section rewards effective use of parallelism for emphasis and rhythm.

Looking beyond the PRAXIS exam, the concept of parallelism connects to the broader field of rhetorical grammar—a pedagogical approach that positions grammar instruction within the context of effective communication rather than mere rule-following. When you eventually teach writing, framing parallel structure as a tool for clarity and persuasion—rather than simply a rule to avoid errors—will help your students internalize the concept at a deeper level. Rhetorical theorists from Aristotle to contemporary composition scholars such as Martha Kolln have argued that structural balance is not an arbitrary convention but an intrinsic feature of how humans process language: symmetrical patterns reduce cognitive load and signal logical relationships between ideas.

Practice Problems

The following five problems progress from conceptual understanding to critical analysis. Each problem mirrors the format and difficulty level you will encounter on the PRAXIS Core Writing (5723) exam. Attempt each one before reading the answer.

PROBLEM 1CONCEPTUAL
Define parallel structure in your own words and explain why a sentence that mixes gerunds and infinitives in a coordinated series is considered grammatically flawed.
PROBLEM 2BASIC APPLICATION
Identify and correct the parallelism error in the following sentence: 'The new teacher orientation covers classroom management, how to use the learning management system, and assessment design.'
PROBLEM 3INTERMEDIATE
The following sentence contains a correlative conjunction error. Identify the error and provide a corrected version: 'The superintendent not only praised the teachers' dedication but also their innovative lesson plans were acknowledged.'
PROBLEM 4APPLIED
A PRAXIS question presents the following sentence with four answer choices. Select the revision that corrects the parallelism error: 'Effective differentiated instruction requires knowing your students' learning styles, to create flexible grouping strategies, and adapting assessments to individual needs.' (A) No change (B) knowing your students' learning styles, creating flexible grouping strategies, and adapting assessments to individual needs (C) to know your students' learning styles, to create flexible grouping strategies, and to adapt assessments to individual needs (D) Both B and C
PROBLEM 5CRITICAL THINKING
Consider the following sentence: 'The board voted to reduce class sizes, that the district should invest in professional development, and to expand after-school programming.' A student argues that the sentence is parallel because all three items express things the board voted on. Evaluate this claim. Is the student correct? Explain your reasoning, and provide a corrected version of the sentence.

Summary — Parallel Structure at a Glance

Parallel structure requires that all elements joined by coordinating conjunctions (and, but, or), correlative conjunctions (both…and, not only…but also), comparison words (than, as), or presented in a list or series share the same grammatical form—whether that form is a noun, gerund, infinitive, phrase, or clause. This principle, rooted in classical rhetoric and codified in modern style guides, ensures that coordinated ideas receive equal grammatical weight, reducing cognitive load and enhancing clarity.

To diagnose errors on the PRAXIS Core Writing exam, use the trigger-isolation-label method: first locate the trigger word (conjunction, comparison, or series marker), then isolate each coordinated element, and finally label its grammatical form. If forms do not match, select the answer choice that aligns all elements into a single consistent structure. Watch especially for gerund–infinitive mixes, active–passive voice shifts, and correlative conjunction misplacement—these are the most frequently tested error patterns. As aspiring educators, mastering parallel structure prepares you not only to pass the PRAXIS but to model precise, persuasive writing for your future students.

Varsity Tutors • PRAXIS Core Writing (5723) • Correct Parallel Structure