Home

Tutoring

Subjects

Live Classes

Study Coach

Essay Review

On-Demand Courses

Colleges

Games


Sign up

Log in

Opening subject page...

Loading your content

Practice

  • All Subjects
  • Algebra Flashcards
  • SAT Math Practice Tests
  • Math Question of the Day
  • Live Classes
  • On-Demand Courses

Varsity Tutors

  • Find a Tutor
  • Test Prep
  • Online Classes
  • K-12 Learning
  • College Search
  • VarsityTutors.com

© 2026 Varsity Tutors. All rights reserved.

← Back to quizzes

Middle School Earth and Space Science Quiz

Middle School Earth and Space Science Quiz: Why Orbits Happen

Practice Why Orbits Happen in Middle School Earth and Space Science with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.

Question 1 / 20

0 of 20 answered

A simplified model shows a planet orbiting a star. At one point on the orbit, the planet has a forward-motion arrow tangent to the curved path and a gravity-pull arrow pointing toward the star. The model states: “Orbit results from gravity plus motion, not a single cause.”

Which statement is supported by the model? (Choose ONE.)

Select an answer to continue

What this quiz covers

This quiz focuses on Why Orbits Happen, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for Middle School Earth and Space Science.

How to use this quiz

Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.

All questions

Question 1

A simplified model shows a planet orbiting a star. At one point on the orbit, the planet has a forward-motion arrow tangent to the curved path and a gravity-pull arrow pointing toward the star. The model states: “Orbit results from gravity plus motion, not a single cause.”

Which statement is supported by the model? (Choose ONE.)

  1. If gravity suddenly disappeared, the planet would keep moving forward in the direction of the forward-motion arrow rather than continuing the curved orbit. (correct answer)
  2. If gravity suddenly disappeared, the planet would still curve around the star because the orbit path is already curved.
  3. If gravity suddenly disappeared, the planet would immediately stop moving because gravity is what causes motion.
  4. If gravity suddenly disappeared, the planet would move straight toward the star because motion always points inward.

Explanation: Explaining why orbits happen involves understanding the balance of gravitational force and inertial movement for stable trajectories. Gravity pulls inward, constantly accelerating the object toward the center without letting it escape. The object's forward motion provides the sideways component, turning the path into a curve instead of a straight fall. A checking strategy is to look for inward gravity combined with perpendicular velocity that results in ongoing curvature. A misconception is that orbits require forces to balance perfectly with nothing changing, but direction changes constantly in an orbit. This applies generally to moons orbiting planets or planets around stars. In all gravitational systems, motion and pull interact to create these paths.

Question 2

A simplified model of an orbit shows a planet at the center and a moon moving around it. The moon has an inward arrow labeled “gravity pull” and a forward arrow labeled “forward motion.” A curved path shows the orbit. The model states: “Orbit results from gravity plus motion, not a single cause.”

A student says: “The moon stays in orbit because gravity and motion balance each other so nothing changes.” Which statement best evaluates the student’s idea using the model?

  1. The student is correct because orbit happens when two forces balance and the moon stays still in space.
  2. The student is incorrect because gravity plus forward motion makes a changing direction (curved path), not a situation where nothing changes. (correct answer)
  3. The student is correct because the forward motion arrow points away from the planet and cancels gravity.
  4. The student is incorrect because gravity is not involved in orbits; only forward motion matters.

Explanation: Orbits happen due to the combined effects of gravity and an object's velocity, leading to stable curved paths. Gravity provides the inward pull, directing the object toward the center continuously. The forward motion counters this by moving the object tangentially, resulting in a perpetual curve. Check by looking for inward pull plus sideways motion that maintains the path. A misconception is that orbits are a balance where nothing changes, but they involve constant acceleration and direction shifts. Orbits are widespread, from artificial satellites to natural moons. Generally, these dynamics apply wherever gravity and motion coexist in space.

Question 3

A student draws a simplified orbit model of a satellite around Earth. The drawing includes a curved path around Earth and a forward-motion arrow tangent to the path. But the student also draws a second arrow pointing away from Earth labeled “force that keeps it from falling in.” The student writes: “Orbit happens because inward gravity is balanced by an outward force.”

Based on the idea that orbit results from gravity plus motion (and gravity always pulls inward), which claim about this model is incorrect?

  1. Gravity pulls the satellite inward toward Earth.
  2. The satellite has forward motion along its path.
  3. An outward force must push the satellite away from Earth to balance gravity and create orbit. (correct answer)
  4. The curved path can be explained using both inward pull and forward motion.

Explanation: Orbits occur because gravity and motion work together to create curved paths around a central body. Gravity pulls the orbiting object inward, toward the center, preventing it from flying off into space. The forward motion of the object carries it sideways, ensuring it doesn't crash directly into the central body. To verify an orbit model, check for an inward gravitational arrow and a sideways motion arrow leading to a curved path. A frequent misconception is the idea of an outward force balancing gravity, but orbits rely on inertia, not opposition forces. This concept generalizes to many scenarios, such as planets orbiting stars or moons around planets. In essence, orbits are universal wherever gravity interacts with sufficient tangential velocity.

Question 4

A simplified model shows a moon orbiting a planet with an inward arrow labeled “gravity pull,” a forward arrow labeled “forward motion,” and a curved orbit path. The model states: “Orbit results from gravity plus motion, not a single cause.”

What would most likely happen to the moon’s path if the moon’s forward motion became much slower while gravity stayed the same?

  1. The moon would move in a tighter curved path and could eventually fall inward toward the planet. (correct answer)
  2. The moon would move in a straighter path away from the planet because slower motion makes gravity weaker.
  3. Nothing would change because the curved orbit path is already drawn in the model.
  4. The moon would keep the same orbit because gravity would automatically adjust to match the slower speed.

Explanation: The fundamental skill in understanding orbits is recognizing how gravity and velocity combine to produce circular or elliptical paths. Gravity exerts an inward pull, drawing the object toward the central mass continuously. Forward motion propels the object tangentially, keeping it from plummeting straight down and forming a curve. For checking, ensure the model shows inward pull plus sideways speed that maintains the orbit's shape. People often mistakenly think orbits involve an outward force countering gravity, but it's purely the effect of inertial motion. Orbits are seen in diverse contexts, from asteroids around the Sun to satellites encircling Earth. Broadly, any system with gravity and appropriate motion can sustain such paths.

Question 5

Model: A planet is shown orbiting a star. At one point on the orbit, the planet has (1) an arrow pointing toward the star labeled “gravity (pull)” and (2) an arrow tangent to the path labeled “forward motion.” A curved path shows the orbit. The caption says: “Orbit results from gravity plus motion.”

Prediction: If the planet’s forward motion suddenly became slower while the star’s gravity stayed the same, what would most likely happen next?

  1. The planet would move in a tighter curved path and could fall closer toward the star because gravity would bend its path more. (correct answer)
  2. The planet would keep the exact same orbit because gravity alone decides the orbit shape.
  3. The planet would fly away in a straight line because slower motion means less gravity pulling on it.
  4. The planet would stop moving and hang in place because gravity cancels motion when motion slows down.

Explanation: The core skill focuses on why objects orbit, highlighting the mechanics of celestial paths. Gravity pulls inward, attracting the object toward the star or central body continuously. Forward motion keeps the object from falling straight in, bending its path into an orbit. To check, seek evidence of inward pull plus sideways motion in the system's description. People often misconceive that gravity is balanced by an outward force, but actually, inertia alone sustains the motion against gravity's pull. Such orbits form wherever gravity interacts with motion, including moons around planets. Planets around stars exemplify this on a grand scale.

Question 6

Two simplified models are shown in words.

Model 1: A planet is next to a star. Only one arrow is drawn: an inward arrow toward the star labeled “gravity.” The path drawn is a straight line into the star. Model 2: The same planet also has a forward arrow labeled “motion,” and the path drawn is a curved line around the star. Both models include the note: “Orbit results from gravity plus motion.”

Which statement is supported by comparing Model 1 and Model 2?​

  1. With gravity only, the planet would keep going in a curved path because gravity makes paths curve automatically.
  2. With motion only, the planet would still orbit because motion by itself makes circles.
  3. Adding forward motion changes the result from falling straight in to following a curved path around the star. (correct answer)
  4. The planet orbits in both models because the arrows are just labels and do not affect what happens.

Explanation: The core skill is explaining why objects orbit by combining key physical principles. Gravity clarifies its role by pulling objects inward toward the center of the system, like toward a star. Forward motion ensures the object does not fall straight in, instead curving its trajectory around the central body. A useful checking strategy is to look for both the inward pull of gravity and the sideways motion of the object. One misconception is that orbits require a balance between gravity and an outward force, but orbits result purely from inward gravity and inertia. This interaction enables orbits in diverse scenarios, such as moons around planets. It also applies to planets orbiting stars, demonstrating the universality of these principles.

Question 7

Model: A planet orbits a star. The gravity arrow points inward toward the star. The motion arrow points forward along the direction the planet is moving. A curved path is shown. Caption: “Orbit results from gravity plus motion.”

What would change if the star’s gravity became weaker while the planet’s forward motion stayed the same?

  1. The planet would curve more sharply toward the star because weaker gravity bends the path more.
  2. The planet would follow a less-curved path and could move farther away because the inward pull would bend its motion less. (correct answer)
  3. The planet would instantly stop because weaker gravity means less motion.
  4. Nothing would change because orbits are fixed paths that do not depend on gravity once started.

Explanation: Explaining why objects orbit builds on understanding gravitational dynamics. Gravity pulls inward toward the star, influencing the planet's direction. Forward motion keeps the planet from falling directly inward, shaping a curved path. Check for orbits by identifying inward pull plus sideways motion. A misconception is that gravity balances with an outward force, but actually, no outward force is needed; inertia suffices. Orbits occur wherever gravity and motion interact, like moons around planets. Planets orbiting stars further demonstrate this widespread phenomenon.

Question 8

A simplified model shows a satellite orbiting Earth: an arrow points inward toward Earth labeled “gravity (pull),” an arrow points sideways labeled “forward motion,” and a curved line shows the orbit. The model states that orbit results from gravity plus motion, not a single cause. Which claim about orbits is incorrect based on the model?

  1. Gravity pulls the satellite inward while the satellite keeps moving forward, so the path curves around Earth.
  2. If the satellite had no forward motion, gravity would pull it closer to Earth instead of keeping it on the curved path.
  3. The satellite stays in orbit because gravity is balanced by an equal outward force, so the net pull is zero. (correct answer)
  4. Gravity always points toward Earth in the model, even though the satellite’s motion points forward.

Explanation: To understand why objects orbit, we must recognize the combined effect of two factors. Gravity always pulls objects inward toward the center of mass, like Earth pulling on a satellite. The orbiting object also has forward motion that carries it sideways along its path. To identify incorrect claims about orbits, check whether the explanation includes both inward gravity and sideways motion working together. One major misconception is the idea of balanced forces—there is no outward force in orbits, only inward gravity changing the direction of motion. This principle applies everywhere in space, from the International Space Station orbiting Earth to comets orbiting the Sun.

Question 9

A simplified orbit model shows an asteroid near a star. The gravity arrow points toward the star, the forward-motion arrow points sideways, and the asteroid’s path is curved. The model states that orbit results from gravity plus motion, not a single cause. Which explanation best fits why the asteroid follows a curved path rather than moving in a straight line?

  1. The asteroid follows a curved path because gravity keeps pulling it inward while it continues moving forward, so its direction keeps changing. (correct answer)
  2. The asteroid follows a curved path because gravity stops its forward motion a little bit each moment, forcing it to turn.
  3. The asteroid follows a curved path because it is already on a curved path, and objects naturally keep the same path shape.
  4. The asteroid follows a curved path because the star’s gravity only pulls sideways, not inward.

Explanation: Understanding orbital paths requires recognizing how gravity continuously affects motion. Gravity constantly pulls objects inward toward the center of mass. As the object moves forward, this inward pull doesn't stop the motion but continuously changes its direction, creating a curved path. To identify correct explanations, look for descriptions where gravity changes the direction of motion rather than stopping it. Avoid the misconception that curved paths exist independently—the curve results from the ongoing interaction of gravity and motion. This principle explains all orbital motion, from asteroids passing near stars to spacecraft orbiting Earth.

Question 10

A simplified model shows a moon orbiting a planet. The gravity arrow points toward the planet, the forward-motion arrow points sideways, and a curved path is shown. The model states that orbit results from gravity plus motion, not a single cause. Which set of statements is supported by the model? (Choose the best option.)

  1. Gravity pulls inward; forward motion carries the moon ahead; the combination makes the path curve around the planet. (correct answer)
  2. Gravity pulls inward; the curved path pulls the moon along like a track; forward motion is not needed once the orbit starts.
  3. Forward motion pushes outward; an outward force cancels gravity; the moon stays at the same distance because forces balance.
  4. The moon stays in orbit because it is small; the planet’s mass does not matter as long as the moon is moving.

Explanation: Understanding orbital motion requires recognizing how gravity and forward motion work together. Gravity constantly pulls objects inward toward the center of mass. The object's forward motion carries it sideways, and these two factors combine to create a curved path around the central body. To verify correct explanations, look for descriptions that include both inward gravity and sideways motion without adding unnecessary forces. Avoid the misconception that forces must balance—in orbits, the inward force continuously changes the direction of motion without stopping it. This fundamental principle explains all orbits in the universe, from human-made satellites to natural moons and planets.

Question 11

Two models are shown for the same moon near a planet. In Model 1, only a gravity arrow points toward the planet. In Model 2, a gravity arrow points toward the planet and a forward-motion arrow points sideways; a curved path is shown. The models state that orbit results from gravity plus motion, not a single cause. Which comparison is supported by these models?

  1. Model 1 would show the moon curving around the planet because gravity alone makes objects move in circles.
  2. Model 2 would show the moon staying in orbit because inward gravity changes the direction of the moon’s forward motion, creating a curved path. (correct answer)
  3. Both models would show the same orbit path because the path is fixed and does not depend on motion.
  4. Model 2 would show the moon flying away because forward motion always cancels gravity.

Explanation: Explaining why orbits occur requires understanding how gravity and motion combine. Gravity pulls objects inward toward the center of a planet or star. Without forward motion, an object would simply fall straight toward the gravity source. To evaluate orbit models, check that they show inward gravity plus sideways motion creating a curved path. A common error is thinking gravity alone creates circular motion—it doesn't; you need both factors. This combination of gravity and motion explains all orbital motion in the universe, from moons around planets to entire solar systems orbiting within galaxies.

Question 12

A student draws a model of an orbit. The model includes a central planet and a moon on a curved path. The student adds an arrow pointing outward away from the planet and labels it “force keeping the moon from falling.” The model also shows an inward gravity arrow and a forward-motion arrow, and it states that orbit results from gravity plus motion, not a single cause. What is the best evaluation of the student’s outward arrow?

  1. It is correct because orbits require an outward force that pushes the moon away from the planet.
  2. It is correct because gravity sometimes points outward when an object moves fast enough.
  3. It is not needed because the model can explain the curved path using only inward gravity plus the moon’s forward motion. (correct answer)
  4. It is needed because without an outward arrow the moon would instantly stop moving forward.

Explanation: To explain why orbits happen, we must understand that only two components are needed. Gravity provides a constant inward pull toward the center of the planet or star. The orbiting object's forward motion carries it sideways, preventing it from falling straight in. When evaluating orbit diagrams, check that only these two factors appear—any outward arrow is incorrect and unnecessary. A persistent misconception is that something must push outward to "balance" gravity, but this isn't true; the curved path results naturally from inward pull plus sideways motion. This simple combination explains all orbital motion, from Earth's moon to distant galaxies orbiting each other.

Question 13

A model shows a moon orbiting a planet with an inward gravity arrow, a forward-motion arrow, and a curved orbit path. The model states that orbit results from gravity plus motion, not a single cause. Which claim about the model is incorrect?

  1. The moon would move in a straight line if there were forward motion but no gravity pulling inward.
  2. The moon’s path curves because gravity keeps pulling inward while the moon keeps moving forward.
  3. The moon stays in orbit because the planet’s mass is irrelevant; any object can orbit any other object the same way. (correct answer)
  4. If the moon had no forward motion, the inward pull would bring it closer to the planet instead of keeping it on a curved path.

Explanation: Explaining why orbits occur means understanding what each factor contributes to the motion. Gravity provides the inward pull toward the center of the planet or star. Forward motion carries the object sideways, and without it, gravity would simply pull the object straight in. When evaluating claims about orbits, check whether they correctly describe both factors and their effects. A common error is thinking the planet's mass doesn't matter—it does, because mass determines gravity's strength. This fundamental relationship between gravity, motion, and mass governs all orbital systems, from binary stars to planetary rings.

Question 14

A model shows a satellite orbiting a planet with a gravity arrow pointing inward and a forward-motion arrow pointing along the path. The model states that orbit results from gravity plus motion, not a single cause. What would most likely happen if gravity suddenly became much weaker while the satellite’s forward motion stayed the same?

  1. The satellite would curve less and follow a path that becomes straighter, moving farther away instead of staying in a tight orbit. (correct answer)
  2. The satellite would fall straight down because weaker gravity pulls objects inward faster.
  3. The satellite would keep the exact same orbit because motion alone creates the curved path.
  4. The satellite would stop moving forward because gravity is what keeps objects moving.

Explanation: Explaining why orbits occur involves understanding how changing one factor affects the path. Gravity pulls objects inward toward the center of mass. Forward motion carries the object sideways, and together they create the curved orbital path. When analyzing what happens if gravity weakens, consider that less inward pull means the forward motion dominates more, making the path less curved and allowing the object to move farther away. Don't confuse gravity with what keeps objects moving—gravity changes direction, not speed. This relationship between gravity strength and orbit shape applies everywhere, from satellites around Earth to planets around stars.

Question 15

A student claims: “A satellite orbits because the forces are balanced: gravity pulls inward and the satellite’s motion pulls outward.” Use the simplified orbit model with an inward gravity arrow, a forward-motion arrow, and a curved path.

Statement: The orbit results from gravity plus motion, not a single cause.

Which evaluation best matches the model?

  1. The claim is correct because forward motion is a force that points outward and balances gravity.
  2. The claim is incorrect because the model shows gravity pulling inward while motion is forward; the curved path comes from inward pull plus forward motion, not an outward force balance. (correct answer)
  3. The claim is correct because once a satellite is on a curved path, it will follow that path even if gravity disappears.
  4. The claim is incorrect because gravity points forward along the path, not toward the planet, so the arrows should be reversed.

Explanation: The skill involves understanding the true nature of orbital forces versus common misconceptions. Gravity pulls objects inward toward the center of mass - this is the only force acting in most orbital situations. Forward motion is not a force but rather the object's velocity, which carries it ahead. To evaluate orbital explanations, check whether they correctly identify gravity as the sole inward force and motion as velocity, not an outward force. The widespread misconception is thinking orbits require balanced forces with something pushing outward to counter gravity. In truth, the curved path emerges from unbalanced forces - gravity constantly changes the direction of forward motion, creating continuous curvature. This principle applies universally, explaining why satellites orbit Earth and why Earth orbits the Sun through the same mechanism.

Question 16

Use the simplified orbit model shown. The arrows represent (1) gravity pulling inward toward the star and (2) the moon’s forward motion. The curved line shows the moon’s path. Which explanation best fits the model for why the moon stays in orbit (a curved path) instead of falling straight into the star or flying away?

Statement: The orbit results from gravity plus motion, not a single cause.

  1. The moon stays in orbit because there is an outward force pushing it away that cancels gravity.
  2. The moon stays in orbit because gravity pulls it inward while its forward motion carries it ahead, so it keeps “falling around” the star along a curved path. (correct answer)
  3. The moon stays in orbit because the curved path itself guides the moon like a track, so forces are not needed.
  4. The moon stays in orbit because its forward motion creates gravity, so faster motion automatically means a stronger inward pull.

Explanation: The skill here is understanding why objects orbit instead of falling straight in or flying away. Gravity pulls objects inward toward the center of mass, like a star pulling on a moon. The moon's forward motion keeps it moving ahead, preventing it from falling straight into the star. To check if an explanation is correct, look for both an inward pull from gravity and sideways motion working together. A common misconception is that there's an outward force pushing away to balance gravity, but orbits actually result from inward pull combined with forward motion. This principle applies everywhere in space - from moons orbiting planets to planets orbiting stars, wherever gravity and motion interact, curved orbital paths can form.

Question 17

A simplified orbit model shows a dwarf planet with a moon. The moon has a forward-motion arrow and a gravity arrow pointing toward the dwarf planet, and its path is curved.

Statement: The orbit results from gravity plus motion, not a single cause.

Which claim about the model is incorrect?

  1. The moon keeps moving forward while gravity pulls inward, so its path bends into a curve around the dwarf planet.
  2. Gravity always pulls the moon toward the dwarf planet, not away from it.
  3. The moon stays in orbit because its forward motion is an outward force that balances gravity. (correct answer)
  4. If the forward motion changed, the curved path could change too because orbit depends on motion and gravity together.

Explanation: Understanding orbital mechanics means distinguishing between forces and motion. Gravity is the force that pulls objects inward toward the center of mass. Forward motion is the object's velocity, not a force, and it carries the object ahead tangentially. To identify incorrect claims, watch for statements that treat motion as a force or suggest it pushes outward to balance gravity. This common misconception confuses velocity with force - motion isn't pushing against anything, it's simply the object's speed and direction. The curved orbital path results from gravity constantly redirecting forward motion inward, not from balanced forces. This principle governs all celestial mechanics, explaining how moons, planets, and even entire star systems maintain their orbital paths through the interaction of gravity and motion.

Question 18

In the simplified orbit model, a satellite has a forward motion arrow and a gravity arrow pointing toward the planet, producing a curved path. Prediction: If gravity suddenly weakened while the satellite’s forward motion stayed the same, what would most likely happen?

  1. The satellite would curve inward more and hit the planet because weaker gravity pulls harder toward the planet.
  2. The satellite would follow a less-curved path and could drift farther away because the inward pull would be smaller compared with its forward motion. (correct answer)
  3. The satellite would keep the exact same curved path because the curved path is what causes orbit, not gravity.
  4. The satellite would immediately stop because gravity is what keeps it moving forward.

Explanation: Orbital motion results from the continuous interaction between inward gravitational pull and forward motion, creating a curved path through space. Gravity acts as the centripetal force, constantly pulling objects toward the center and changing their direction of motion. If gravity weakens while forward motion remains constant, the object's path becomes less curved because the inward pull can't bend the path as sharply. To analyze orbital stability, always compare the strength of gravity's inward pull with the object's forward speed - weaker gravity means the forward motion dominates more, creating a wider orbit or escape trajectory. A common error is thinking gravity provides forward motion, but gravity only pulls inward - the forward motion comes from the object's initial velocity. This principle explains why objects need higher speeds to orbit at lower altitudes where gravity is stronger, and why the Moon is slowly drifting away from Earth as tidal forces gradually weaken their gravitational interaction.

Question 19

A simplified orbit model shows a moon with a forward motion arrow and a gravity arrow toward the planet, producing a curved path. Which statement is supported by this model? (Select the ONE supported explanation.)

  1. The moon orbits because the planet’s gravity pulls inward while the moon continues moving forward, so its path keeps bending around the planet. (correct answer)
  2. The moon orbits because there is no gravity in space, so it can keep circling without being pulled in.
  3. The moon orbits because the curved path is a physical ring that holds it in place like a track.
  4. The moon orbits because its mass does not matter, so gravity cannot change its motion.

Explanation: Objects maintain stable orbits through the continuous interaction of inward gravitational pull and perpendicular forward motion. Gravity acts as a centripetal force, constantly pulling orbiting objects toward the center of the more massive body - this pull never stops or reverses direction. The orbiting object's forward motion carries it sideways relative to gravity's pull, and as gravity continuously changes the direction of this motion without stopping it, a curved path results. To verify orbital motion is occurring, check for both components: gravitational attraction pulling inward plus tangential velocity carrying the object forward. Common misconceptions include thinking space lacks gravity, imagining physical tracks exist, or believing mass doesn't affect gravitational interactions - but orbits depend entirely on gravity's inward pull combined with forward motion. This principle operates at every scale, from quantum particles to cosmic structures, wherever masses interact gravitationally while in motion.

Question 20

Two simplified models show the same satellite near a planet. Model 1 shows only a gravity arrow pulling toward the planet. Model 2 shows a gravity arrow pulling toward the planet and a forward motion arrow, and the satellite follows a curved path. Based on these models, which statement is supported?

  1. Model 1 and Model 2 both predict the satellite will move in the same curved orbit because gravity automatically makes objects curve.
  2. Model 1 predicts the satellite will keep moving straight and never get closer to the planet because there is no forward motion arrow shown.
  3. Model 2 predicts an orbit because gravity pulls inward while forward motion carries the satellite ahead, creating a curved path. (correct answer)
  4. Model 2 predicts an orbit because the curved path itself forces the satellite to go around like a track, even without gravity.

Explanation: To understand why orbits happen, we need to see how gravity and motion work together to create curved paths. Gravity alone pulls objects straight toward the center of a planet or star - it never makes things curve by itself. When an object also has forward motion perpendicular to gravity's pull, something special happens: the object moves ahead while being pulled inward. The key checking strategy is to identify both components: inward gravitational pull plus sideways motion occurring simultaneously. Many people mistakenly think gravity automatically creates curves or that curved paths exist like invisible tracks in space, but orbits only form when both gravity and motion are present. This combination of inward pull and forward motion creates all stable orbits, from the International Space Station to Jupiter's many moons.