What this deck covers
This deck focuses on Resolve A Contradiction, giving you a quick way to review the definitions, rules, and examples that matter most for LSAT Reading.
Study Resolve A Contradiction in LSAT Reading with focused flashcards that help you recognize the idea, recall the key rule, and apply it in practice-style prompts.
0% Complete
Identify the resolution pattern: 'the museum is crowded' but 'ticket sales are down'—what reconciles this?
Tap card or press Space to flip
More visitors entered for free or via memberships despite fewer paid tickets. Non-ticket entry methods explain the crowd-sales gap.
How well did you know it?
Card 1 / 35
Space to flip · ← / → to move · once flipped, → Got it · ← Still learning
This deck focuses on Resolve A Contradiction, giving you a quick way to review the definitions, rules, and examples that matter most for LSAT Reading.
Work through these flashcards in short sessions. Try to answer each prompt before flipping the card, then revisit any cards you miss until the explanation feels automatic.
Answer: More visitors entered for free or via memberships despite fewer paid tickets. Non-ticket entry methods explain the crowd-sales gap.
Answer: A surprising result is unexpected; a contradiction is seemingly impossible. Contradictions seem logically impossible until resolved.
Answer: Precisely restate the contradiction in your own words. Clear articulation helps identify what needs reconciling.
Answer: Select the choice that explains how both facts can be true. The goal is finding how seemingly incompatible facts coexist.
Answer: The date reflects copying of an older text with later marginal additions. Later additions to older texts explain anachronistic references.
Answer: A different toxin or temperature shift caused deaths despite cleaner water overall. New harmful factors can override general improvements.
Answer: Assume it is true and check that it makes both claims jointly plausible. If true, the answer should make both claims sensible together.
Answer: A small number of large increases raised the mean despite many decreases. Outliers can skew averages even when most values drop.
Answer: Add a reconciling fact that makes the apparent conflict disappear. Adding context resolves contradictions; attacking facts creates new problems.
Answer: The species is active outside survey times or in unsampled microhabitats. Survey limitations miss actual abundance patterns.
Answer: Costs increased enough to outweigh the higher revenue. Higher costs can eliminate profits despite revenue gains.
Answer: Heat rose due to expanded pavement or a hotter climate, outweighing tree effects. Other factors overwhelmed the cooling effect of trees.
Answer: Qualifiers such as "some," "often," "in certain contexts," or "earlier". These limit statements to specific conditions where both can be true.
Answer: Improved reporting or awareness increased complaints despite better outcomes. Better detection often reveals more problems to report.
Answer: Eliminate it; the correct answer must be consistent with the passage. Answers must work within the passage's established facts.
Answer: A larger population base makes the rate fall while the count rises. Rate = count/population; population growth explains this pattern.
Answer: Increased monitoring or habitat concentration raised sightings despite decline. Better observation methods find more of fewer animals.
Answer: A few very high scores raised the average despite many declines. Outliers skew averages despite majority decline.
Answer: An option that strengthens one side while leaving the conflict intact. This makes one claim stronger but doesn't reconcile the contradiction.
Answer: Resolve supplies a reconciliation; it does not deny either statement. Resolution accepts both claims; explaining away rejects one.
Answer: More people began driving, offsetting congestion while some routes became faster. Individual gains can coexist with overall worsening.
Answer: A choice that restates one side without reconciling the conflict. Watch for choices that explain only one side.
Answer: The author favors simple goals but complex rules to achieve them. Different aspects allow both simplicity and complexity preferences.
Answer: The real-world patients differ from trial subjects or use the drug incorrectly. Real-world conditions differ from controlled trial settings.
Answer: Ticket prices increased or more visitors bought higher-priced tickets. Price increases offset volume decreases.
Answer: One that introduces a new contradiction or conflicts with the passage. Creating new problems doesn't solve the original contradiction.
Answer: Explain how both can be true. Resolution preserves both statements rather than refuting one.
Answer: One that introduces a plausible hidden variable. Hidden factors explain apparent contradictions.
Answer: A new cause or contextual fact that reconciles the two claims. New information explains the apparent conflict without denying either claim.
Answer: The trial population or dosage differed from the conditions where it works. Different test conditions explain different results.
Answer: A single sentence stating Claim A and Claim B cannot both hold. Clearly state why the claims seem mutually exclusive.
Answer: A scope shift (time/place/group) that makes both claims compatible. Different contexts allow both statements to be true.
Answer: Other pollution sources rose or weather trapped pollutants despite lower emissions. Multiple factors affect air quality beyond one source.
Answer: Addresses only one fact. Must reconcile both facts, not just explain one.
Answer: However. Contrast words signal opposing claims to reconcile.