What this deck covers
This deck focuses on Passage Comparison, giving you a quick way to review the definitions, rules, and examples that matter most for LSAT Reading.
Study Passage Comparison in LSAT Reading with focused flashcards that help you recognize the idea, recall the key rule, and apply it in practice-style prompts.
0% Complete
Which option type is usually correct for "Passage B responds to Passage A by…" questions?
Tap card or press Space to flip
An option describing B's function relative to A's claim. Focus on how B engages with A's specific argument.
How well did you know it?
Card 1 / 39
Space to flip · ← / → to move · once flipped, → Got it · ← Still learning
This deck focuses on Passage Comparison, giving you a quick way to review the definitions, rules, and examples that matter most for LSAT Reading.
Work through these flashcards in short sessions. Try to answer each prompt before flipping the card, then revisit any cards you miss until the explanation feels automatic.
Answer: An option describing B's function relative to A's claim. Focus on how B engages with A's specific argument.
Answer: B addresses A's claims by supporting, refining, challenging, or reframing. B engages with A's content rather than presenting independent views.
Answer: Identify each passage's main point and overall purpose separately. Understand each passage independently before comparing them.
Answer: Different purposes: exposition in A versus evaluation/argument in B. A informs neutrally while B takes a critical position.
Answer: Tone is attitude; stance is the position taken on the issue. Tone reflects emotional coloring; stance is the substantive position.
Answer: The author's main task (for example: explain, argue, critique, propose). Purpose is the author's primary action verb, not just the topic.
Answer: Same subject matter, different purposes. Topic overlap doesn't mean purpose alignment.
Answer: Check whether key terms match, shift meaning, or are defined differently. Terms may appear similar but carry different meanings across passages.
Answer: Agreement level: same view, qualified agreement, or disagreement. Agreement level frames all other comparison dimensions.
Answer: Choosing a response that fits the topic but contradicts B's stance or tone. B's actual perspective must guide the response, not general relevance.
Answer: Qualifies. Accepts validity but restricts where it applies.
Answer: Critique of underlying framework or interpretation. Questions the foundation while accepting surface-level data.
Answer: How broad or narrow the claim's coverage is. Scope determines the boundaries of what the claim covers.
Answer: Determine how Passage B relates to Passage A in view, purpose, and support. Focus on relationship dynamics rather than isolated content.
Answer: Critiquing A's proposal by predicting negative consequences. B challenges A's optimism by highlighting potential harms.
Answer: Whether each uses examples, studies, definitions, or causal reasoning. Different argumentative tools reveal different approaches.
Answer: The type of support used: data, examples, theory, history, analogy, etc. Focus on evidence types rather than abstract theoretical approaches.
Answer: It must be supported by each passage independently. Each passage must independently support the statement.
Answer: Main point = claim; purpose = why the author presents it. Claim is what's argued; purpose is the author's goal in arguing.
Answer: The author's attitude toward the subject or other views. Tone reveals stance toward topic and opposing viewpoints.
Answer: Choosing a statement supported by only one passage. Both means both, not just one passage's view.
Answer: Reject unless the question asks for a specific detail-level comparison. Main point comparisons trump detail comparisons in most questions.
Answer: B recommends action while A mainly explains or reports. Descriptive explains what is; prescriptive advocates what should be.
Answer: Qualified agreement (adds nuance or limits scope). Accepts core but adds conditions or boundaries to the claim.
Answer: Agreeing while narrowing A's scope. B accepts the principle but restricts its application domain.
Answer: Each passage's main point and overall stance. Start with core arguments to establish comparison framework.
Answer: Undermines. Attacks the logical connection between premises and conclusion.
Answer: Claims or assumptions both authors accept or rely on. Shared premises form the foundation for both passages' arguments.
Answer: Reframing A's issue by changing the explanatory lens. B provides alternative conceptual tools to understand A's phenomenon.
Answer: Agreement on facts, disagreement on implications. Shared data foundation but divergent interpretive conclusions.
Answer: Accepting the conclusion while challenging A's support. B agrees with the outcome but questions the reasoning process.
Answer: They share a core claim but differ in scope, emphasis, or conditions. Partial overlap with boundaries or exceptions distinguishes it from full agreement.
Answer: Evidence supports; conclusion is the claim being supported. Evidence proves; conclusion is what's being proven.
Answer: Find overlapping claims explicitly supported in both passages. Both passages must explicitly endorse the shared position.
Answer: Compare thesis, purpose, tone, and key support in parallel. Systematic parallel analysis ensures comprehensive comparison.
Answer: Uses absolute language such as "always," "completely," or "proves". Extreme modifiers exceed what passages typically support.
Answer: How broad or narrow the claim is (topic range, time, population, cases). Scope measures the breadth of application for claims.
Answer: A shared claim or shared evaluation, not merely shared subject. Agreement requires shared judgment, not just shared topic.
Answer: Agreement in conclusion, divergence in reasoning. Same destination, different paths taken to arrive there.