What this deck covers
This deck focuses on Drawing Conclusions, giving you a quick way to review the definitions, rules, and examples that matter most for ISEE Middle Level Reading Comprehension.
Study Drawing Conclusions in ISEE Middle Level Reading Comprehension with focused flashcards that help you recognize the idea, recall the key rule, and apply it in practice-style prompts.
0% Complete
Which is stronger support for a conclusion: one unclear detail or several consistent details?
Tap card or press Space to flip
Several consistent details. Multiple aligned details create a stronger, more reliable foundation for inferences than a single ambiguous one.
How well did you know it?
Card 1 / 25
Space to flip · ← / → to move · once flipped, → Got it · ← Still learning
This deck focuses on Drawing Conclusions, giving you a quick way to review the definitions, rules, and examples that matter most for ISEE Middle Level Reading Comprehension.
Work through these flashcards in short sessions. Try to answer each prompt before flipping the card, then revisit any cards you miss until the explanation feels automatic.
Answer: Several consistent details. Multiple aligned details create a stronger, more reliable foundation for inferences than a single ambiguous one.
Answer: It is strongly supported by multiple relevant text details. Validity depends on robust textual backing to ensure the conclusion logically follows from the evidence provided.
Answer: Information suggested by details but not directly stated. Implied information emerges from subtle textual cues, requiring inference to uncover meanings not explicitly expressed.
Answer: The author favors the other plan. Emphasizing flaws in one plan while comparing implies preference for the alternative with fewer highlighted issues.
Answer: Identify relevant details and determine what they imply. Starting with key details allows for systematic analysis to infer logical conclusions supported by the text.
Answer: The announcement was disappointing or shocking. Silence and downward stares following an announcement suggest a negative emotional reaction like disappointment or shock.
Answer: Luis wants to avoid being late. Setting multiple alarms and preparing in advance indicates proactive measures to ensure punctuality.
Answer: Hard work. Daily practice leading to improvement emphasizes effort and dedication as the key factors in progress.
Answer: Relevant details, facts, or examples from the passage. Textual evidence provides the factual foundation necessary to validate conclusions drawn from a passage's content.
Answer: A conclusion is evidence-based; an opinion may lack support. Conclusions must be grounded in textual evidence for objectivity, whereas opinions can stem from personal bias without substantiation.
Answer: "Therefore". The phrase 'therefore' indicates a logical outcome derived from preceding evidence, signaling the drawing of a conclusion.
Answer: A judgment inferred from text details and prior knowledge. This definition captures how conclusions integrate explicit text information with logical reasoning from background knowledge to form supported judgments.
Answer: The narrator is trying to be honest and accurate. Admitting errors and making corrections reflects a commitment to truthfulness and precision in narration.
Answer: Protective. Barking at strangers aligns with protective instincts rather than friendliness, based on common behavioral interpretations.
Answer: Specific evidence. Conclusions require concrete, verifiable support from the text to ensure validity, unlike vague impressions that lack precision.
Answer: The author supports recycling. Listing benefits and employing positive language demonstrates the author's endorsement of recycling's value.
Answer: It goes beyond the passage's evidence. A broad conclusion overextends the text's details, resulting in claims not adequately justified by the available evidence.
Answer: It probably just rained or is about to rain. Wet sidewalks combined with dark clouds logically point to recent or impending rain as the most supported inference.
Answer: "For instance". Phrases like 'for instance' introduce examples that bolster arguments by providing concrete illustrations of ideas.
Answer: The passage (plus only general, reasonable background knowledge). Conclusions should primarily derive from the passage's content, supplemented only by common knowledge to avoid unsubstantiated claims.
Answer: Overgeneralizing beyond what the text supports. Relying on isolated details can lead to unsupported extrapolations that exceed the text's actual implications.
Answer: Maya is cold. The actions of shivering and hugging the coat suggest a physical response to low temperature, implying coldness.
Answer: Choose the most supported idea. Effective strategies prioritize conclusions backed by substantial textual evidence over those that are merely sensational.
Answer: She is uncomfortable or upset. Behaviors like avoiding eye contact and brief responses typically signal emotional discomfort or distress.
Answer: A logical guess based on evidence in the text. Inferences rely on textual clues to form reasonable assumptions about unstated ideas, distinguishing them from direct statements.