Resolve Issues of Complex or Contested Usage, Consulting...

SECTION 1

Historical Context & Motivation

English has never been a perfectly uniform language. From its origins as a blend of Germanic, Latin, and French influences, English has always contained competing forms and shifting rules. What counts as "correct" usage has been debated for centuries, with grammarians, writers, and scholars frequently disagreeing about everything from split infinitives to the use of singular they. Understanding this history helps explain why contested usage exists and why consulting references is an essential skill, not a sign of weakness.

1755

Johnson's Dictionary Published

Samuel Johnson published the first comprehensive English dictionary, attempting to standardize spelling and meaning. Yet even Johnson admitted language resists rigid rules.

1906

Fowler's Modern English Usage

H.W. Fowler's influential guide championed clear, logical writing while acknowledging many usage debates. His work shaped modern style guides.

1959

Strunk & White's Elements of Style

This concise guide became a staple of American writing education, providing prescriptive rules that remain widely referenced—and sometimes contested—today.

2017

AP Stylebook Accepts Singular 'They'

The Associated Press officially endorsed singular 'they' for nonbinary individuals, marking a major shift in a long-contested usage debate and demonstrating that language standards evolve.

These milestones show that the "rules" of English are not fixed commandments carved in stone but rather evolving conventions shaped by culture, context, and consensus. The central question this lesson addresses is: when you encounter a usage issue that has no single "right" answer, how do you make an informed, defensible choice? The answer lies in learning to consult and evaluate authoritative references.

SECTION 2

Core Principles of Contested Usage

Before you can resolve a contested usage issue, you need to understand what makes usage "contested" in the first place. A usage is contested when educated writers and authoritative references disagree about whether a particular word, phrase, or grammatical construction is acceptable in formal writing. These disagreements often arise from the tension between prescriptive grammar (rules that dictate how language should be used) and descriptive grammar (observations about how language is actually used). Mastering these core principles will equip you to navigate these gray areas with confidence.

Identify the Contested Issue

Recognize when a usage question lacks a clear, universally agreed-upon answer. Common signals include seeing different rules in different textbooks, hearing conflicting advice from teachers, or noticing that professional publications handle the same construction differently.

Consult Multiple References

Never rely on a single source. Compare guidance from style guides (AP, Chicago, MLA), usage dictionaries (Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of English Usage), and grammar handbooks. Cross-referencing reveals where consensus exists and where legitimate disagreement remains.

Consider Context and Audience

Usage choices depend on whether you are writing a college application essay, a newspaper article, an academic paper, or a creative piece. What is appropriate in one context may be out of place in another.

Evaluate Register and Formality

Register refers to the level of formality in your writing. A contested form may be perfectly acceptable in informal writing but inappropriate in a research paper. Adjust your usage choices based on the required register.

Make a Defensible Decision

After researching, commit to a choice and be prepared to explain your reasoning. In academic and professional settings, demonstrating awareness of the debate and citing a reputable reference strengthens your credibility.

✦ KEY TAKEAWAY

Think of contested usage like choosing what to wear to an event where the dress code says "smart casual." There is no single correct outfit, but some choices are clearly better than others depending on the venue, the host, and the crowd. Similarly, the "right" usage choice depends on your audience, your purpose, and the guidance of credible references. The goal is not perfection but a well-informed, context-appropriate decision.

SECTION 3

Visual Explanation: The Decision-Making Process

This flowchart illustrates the decision-making process for resolving contested usage. Begin at the top by identifying whether the rule is clear. If not, consult multiple references. When references agree, follow the consensus. When they disagree, weigh context, audience, and register to make and justify your own informed choice.

The flowchart above captures the essential process in a few steps. Notice that the path branches at two key decision points: first, whether the rule is actually contested at all, and second, whether your references reach consensus. Most of the time, you will find that reputable style guides agree—issues like subject-verb agreement or comma-splice correction are not truly contested. The harder and more interesting cases arise when references genuinely diverge, and that is when your ability to evaluate context, audience, and register becomes critical.

SECTION 4

How Contested Usage Works: Categories and Strategies

Contested usage issues typically fall into a few recurring categories. Understanding these categories helps you predict when a debate is likely and which references will be most useful for resolving it.

Category 1: Grammar Myths vs. Genuine Rules

Some "rules" that students are taught are actually grammar myths—prohibitions that have no basis in the history or structure of English. For example, the "rule" against ending a sentence with a preposition was imported from Latin grammar in the seventeenth century and has been rejected by virtually every modern style guide. The Chicago Manual of Style, Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of English Usage, and the AP Stylebook all agree: terminal prepositions are standard English. By consulting references, you can distinguish genuine rules from unfounded prohibitions.

Category 2: Evolving Usage

Language changes over time, and some forms move from informal to standard. The word "hopefully" used as a sentence adverb (meaning "I hope that") was condemned by many authorities in the 1960s and 1970s but is now accepted by most major references. Similarly, using "they" as a singular pronoun has moved from contested to widely accepted. To resolve evolving usage, check the most recent edition of your reference—older editions may reflect outdated judgments.

Category 3: Style-Guide Disagreements

Different style guides serve different audiences and purposes, so they sometimes give conflicting advice. The Oxford comma (the comma before "and" in a list) is required by the Chicago Manual of Style and the MLA Handbook but discouraged by the AP Stylebook. When guides conflict, the correct approach is to identify which guide governs your writing context (your teacher, your publication, or your field) and follow it consistently.

Category 4: Commonly Confused Words and Constructions

Some usage disputes concern pairs of words or constructions that are frequently confused. Should you write "different from" or "different than"? Is "between you and I" acceptable? These questions have clearer answers than many people realize, but the persistence of nonstandard forms makes them feel contested. A good usage dictionary will explain the history, current consensus, and any remaining areas of genuine debate.

SECTION 5

Key References and How to Use Them

Not all references are created equal, and knowing which one to reach for in a given situation is a skill in itself. The diagram below maps the most important reference types to their best use cases, and the table that follows provides a quick comparison.

This diagram shows three categories of reference materials—style guides, usage dictionaries, and standard dictionaries—along with their best use cases. Cross-referencing across categories produces the most reliable guidance.

Key references for resolving contested English usage

Reference	Type	Best For	Example Use
Chicago Manual of Style	Style Guide	Academic & book publishing conventions	Oxford comma, capitalization, citation format
AP Stylebook	Style Guide	Journalism and media writing	No Oxford comma, number formatting, title abbreviations
Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of English Usage	Usage Dictionary	Detailed history of contested words and constructions	"Who" vs. "whom," "comprise" vs. "compose"
Garner's Modern English Usage	Usage Dictionary	Prescriptive guidance with a language-change index	Rates how far a contested form has moved toward acceptance
Merriam-Webster.com	Standard Dictionary	Definitions, parts of speech, pronunciation	Checking whether a new word is recognized as standard

SECTION 6

Worked Example: Resolving "Who" vs. "Whom"

Let's walk through a real contested usage issue step by step. A student is writing a college application essay and encounters this sentence: "The teacher who/whom I admire most inspired me to study biology." The student isn't sure whether to use "who" or "whom." Here is how to resolve it.

Resolving "Who" vs. "Whom" in a College Essay

Step 1 — Identify the Contested IssueThe question is whether to use "who" (subjective case) or "whom" (objective case) in a relative clause. Many modern speakers and even some publications have dropped "whom" in casual contexts, making this a genuinely contested choice in certain registers.

Step 2 — Consult ReferencesChecking the Chicago Manual of Style (17th ed., §5.67): "whom" is the correct objective form. Checking Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of English Usage: the entry confirms that "whom" is grammatically required as the object of a verb or preposition, though it notes that "who" is increasingly accepted in speech. Checking Garner's Modern English Usage: Garner rates the use of "who" for "whom" at Stage 3 on his Language-Change Index, meaning it is widespread but not yet fully accepted in formal writing.

All three references agree: "whom" is the correct formal choice.

Step 3 — Consider Context and AudienceThe student is writing a college application essay, which is a formal context where admissions officers may notice grammatical choices. Using "whom" correctly signals attention to detail and a strong command of written English. In a text message or a creative dialogue, "who" might be perfectly appropriate—but not here.

Step 4 — Apply the Grammar TestTo double-check, substitute a personal pronoun: "I admire him most" (not "I admire he most"). Since the objective form "him" fits, the objective relative pronoun "whom" is correct.

Correct sentence: "The teacher whom I admire most inspired me to study biology."

Step 5 — Document Your ReasoningIf questioned, you can explain: "I chose 'whom' because the pronoun functions as the object of 'admire,' and three major references—Chicago, Merriam-Webster's Usage, and Garner's—confirm that 'whom' remains the standard formal choice." This demonstrates informed, defensible decision-making.

SECTION 7

Strengths and Limitations of Different Reference Types

No single reference is perfect for every situation. Each type has strengths and limitations, and understanding these helps you choose the right tool for the job. The table below compares the three major reference categories across several dimensions.

Comparing reference types for resolving usage issues

Dimension	Style Guides	Usage Dictionaries	Standard Dictionaries
Depth on contested issues	Moderate — gives a ruling but often brief	Deep — provides history, evidence, and reasoning	Minimal — usually just labels forms as standard or nonstandard
Authority in academic writing	High — often required by teachers and publishers	High — trusted by professional editors	Moderate — authoritative for definitions but not style
Currency (how up-to-date)	Updated regularly (online versions stay current)	Updated less frequently — check edition dates	Frequently updated, especially online editions
Accessibility for students	Some require subscriptions; MLA & APA handbooks are affordable	Available in most school and public libraries	Free online (Merriam-Webster.com)
Limitation	Rules can vary between guides, creating apparent contradictions	May overwhelm beginners with too much detail	Does not address grammar or sentence-level usage

✦ KEY TAKEAWAY

Think of these three reference types as different kinds of maps. A style guide is like GPS directions—it tells you what to do in your specific context. A usage dictionary is like a road atlas with historical notes—it explains why certain roads exist and how traffic patterns have changed. A standard dictionary is like a street sign—it confirms names and locations but does not tell you which route to take. The best navigators use all three.

SECTION 8

Connecting to Advanced Language Study

The skill of resolving contested usage is not just a high school exercise—it is the same skill that professional editors, linguists, and legal writers use every day. Understanding how this lesson connects to more advanced language study can motivate you to continue building your expertise.

How this lesson's skills connect to advanced study and professional writing

This Lesson	Advanced Application
Consulting style guides to resolve comma disputes	Professional editors follow house style sheets that resolve hundreds of contested issues for a specific publication
Distinguishing grammar myths from genuine rules	Linguists study prescriptivism vs. descriptivism as competing philosophies of language standardization
Adapting usage to audience and register	Sociolinguistics examines how language varies by social context, power dynamics, and identity
Using Garner's Language-Change Index	Corpus linguistics uses massive databases of real texts to track how usage shifts statistically over time
Making a defensible usage choice in a college essay	Legal writing requires precise usage, where a single word choice—such as "shall" vs. "may"—can change the meaning of a contract or statute

As you move into college-level writing, you will encounter more nuanced debates—such as whether to use the subjunctive mood in conditional clauses, how to handle gendered language in academic prose, or when to adopt newly coined terminology in a research paper. The process you are learning now—identify, consult, evaluate, decide, justify—will serve you in all of these contexts.

SECTION 9

Practice Problems

PROBLEM 1 — CONCEPTUAL

Explain in your own words what makes a usage issue "contested" rather than simply "wrong." Why is it important to distinguish between the two?

PROBLEM 2 — BASIC

A student writes: "Everyone should bring their laptop to class." A classmate argues this is grammatically incorrect and should read "his or her laptop." Using at least two references, determine whether the singular "their" is acceptable in this sentence.

PROBLEM 3 — INTERMEDIATE

You are editing a research paper for your English class, and you encounter this sentence: "The data shows that students who read more perform better on standardized tests." Your teacher follows the Chicago Manual of Style. Is "data shows" or "data show" the correct form? Walk through the reference-consulting process to justify your answer.

PROBLEM 4 — APPLIED

You are writing an article for your school newspaper (which follows AP style) and a research paper for your AP English class (which follows MLA style). In both, you need to list three items in a series. Write the same list sentence in both styles, explain the difference, and cite the specific reference that governs each choice.

PROBLEM 5 — CRITICAL THINKING

Some language scholars argue that enforcing traditional grammar rules can marginalize speakers of nonstandard dialects and reflect cultural biases. Others argue that shared conventions are necessary for clear communication. Write a paragraph in which you take a position on this debate, using at least one specific contested usage example to support your argument. Cite a reference to back up your claim.

SUMMARY

Lesson Summary

Resolving complex or contested usage requires a systematic approach: first, recognize that the issue is genuinely debated rather than a clear-cut error. Then, consult at least two authoritative references from different categories—style guides like the Chicago Manual of Style or AP Stylebook, usage dictionaries like Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of English Usage or Garner's Modern English Usage, and standard dictionaries. Compare what they say, evaluate whether they reach consensus, and weigh the demands of your specific context, audience, and register.

Key categories of contested usage include grammar myths (rules that were never real), evolving usage (forms shifting from nonstandard to standard), style-guide disagreements (like the Oxford comma), and commonly confused words. In every case, the five-step process—identify, consult, evaluate, decide, and justify—will lead you to an informed and defensible choice. This is the same process used by professional writers and editors, and mastering it now will serve you throughout college and beyond.