What this deck covers
This deck focuses on Resolve Paradox Discrepancy, giving you a quick way to review the definitions, rules, and examples that matter most for GRE Verbal.
Study Resolve Paradox Discrepancy in GRE Verbal with focused flashcards that help you recognize the idea, recall the key rule, and apply it in practice-style prompts.
0% Complete
Identify the best resolution move: a policy reduces emissions, yet air quality worsens; why?
Tap card or press Space to flip
Other pollutants increased or weather trapped pollution despite lower emissions. External factors can counteract emission reductions, leading to poorer air quality despite policy efforts.
How well did you know it?
Card 1 / 25
Space to flip · ← / → to move · once flipped, → Got it · ← Still learning
This deck focuses on Resolve Paradox Discrepancy, giving you a quick way to review the definitions, rules, and examples that matter most for GRE Verbal.
Work through these flashcards in short sessions. Try to answer each prompt before flipping the card, then revisit any cards you miss until the explanation feels automatic.
Answer: Other pollutants increased or weather trapped pollution despite lower emissions. External factors can counteract emission reductions, leading to poorer air quality despite policy efforts.
Answer: Costs rose enough to outweigh the higher revenue. Increased expenses can negate revenue gains, making both sales increase and profit decline consistent.
Answer: Qualifiers like "only if," "except," "in some cases," or "for a subset". Such language introduces nuances that differentiate scenarios, allowing both facts to coexist.
Answer: Routes or schedules became less convenient, or alternatives became cheaper. Changes in convenience or competition can offset capacity increases, leading to lower usage.
Answer: Show the two claims refer to different groups, times, or conditions. Differentiating contexts allows both claims to hold true without direct opposition.
Answer: Higher prices funded improvements or signaled prestige, increasing demand. Price hikes can enhance perceived value or fund attractions, boosting attendance counterintuitively.
Answer: Choose the option that makes both facts true by adding a missing detail. This task requires selecting an answer that reconciles apparent contradictions by providing additional context that harmonizes both facts.
Answer: Food scarcity, parasites, or harsh weather reduces chick survival. Alternative threats undermine expected benefits from low predation, explaining poor nesting outcomes.
Answer: A one-sided explanation that strengthens one fact but ignores the other. These traps appear explanatory but leave the paradox intact by neglecting the conflicting element.
Answer: Induced demand increased traffic volume enough to raise congestion. Added capacity attracts more users, increasing overall traffic and congestion despite initial time savings.
Answer: A choice that merely restates one fact without reconciling both. These options fail to address the conflict, as they do not integrate or explain the opposing fact.
Answer: It is an unstated premise that, when corrected, removes the conflict. Identifying and challenging an implicit but flawed assumption dissolves the apparent contradiction.
Answer: New hires were inexperienced or training time reduced productivity per worker. Integration challenges with new staff can temporarily lower efficiency, aligning hiring with reduced productivity.
Answer: Lower price signaled lower quality or the product mix changed. Perceived devaluation or altered offerings can deter purchases, explaining reduced sales despite lower prices.
Answer: Reporting or detection increased, raising recorded crime without more crime. Enhanced detection inflates statistics without actual crime rising, reconciling added police with higher reports.
Answer: A choice that introduces a relevant distinction or hidden variable. Such choices resolve paradoxes by clarifying overlooked differences that eliminate the perceived inconsistency.
Answer: It must make both statements simultaneously plausible and consistent. The resolution must integrate both elements of the paradox into a coherent, non-contradictory scenario.
Answer: It is bought mainly as a one-time item (gift, trial, durable good). Non-recurring purchase patterns reconcile high initial popularity with low repeat business.
Answer: Real-world patients differ (dosage, adherence, comorbidities, selection). Variations in real-world application create discrepancies between controlled trials and practical outcomes.
Answer: A confounder differs (health behavior, income) or the populations differ. Underlying variables can explain positive longevity despite negative correlations in isolated studies.
Answer: More water infiltrated/evaporated or upstream withdrawals increased. Loss mechanisms reduce net water flow, reconciling higher precipitation with diminished river levels.
Answer: Two claims seem inconsistent but are both presented as true. A paradox arises when two statements appear mutually exclusive yet are both asserted as factual in the passage.
Answer: Paraphrase the two conflicting facts as a single clear contradiction. Rephrasing sharpens focus on the core inconsistency, aiding in identifying resolving factors.
Answer: Score distribution shifted: more high scores and more very low scores. A bimodal shift raises the mean through top performers while increasing failures at the bottom.
Answer: Another limiting factor persists (habitat loss, disease, food shortage). Persistent external threats maintain decline despite protection, harmonizing the two observations.