CERTIFIED EKG TECHNICIAN (CET) • EKG ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

Ischemia Recognition — Differentiate ischemia, injury, and infarction

Learn to distinguish the three progressive stages of myocardial oxygen deprivation through systematic EKG pattern recognition.

Historical Context & Motivation

The ability to recognize myocardial ischemia on an electrocardiogram stands as one of the most consequential diagnostic achievements in modern cardiology. Before the advent of electrocardiography, physicians relied almost entirely on clinical symptoms—chest pain, diaphoresis, and dyspnea—to identify patients suffering from coronary artery disease. The development of the electrocardiogram (EKG) transformed cardiovascular medicine by providing a non-invasive, real-time window into myocardial electrical activity that could reveal not only the presence but also the progression and anatomical location of coronary events.

1902
Einthoven's String Galvanometer
Willem Einthoven developed the string galvanometer, producing the first clinically useful electrocardiographic recordings and establishing the foundational PQRST waveform nomenclature still used today.
1920
ST-Segment Changes Linked to Ischemia
Harold Pardee published the first description of the electrocardiographic changes associated with acute myocardial infarction, noting the characteristic tall, peaked T waves and ST-segment abnormalities that signaled coronary occlusion.
1942
Goldberger's Augmented Limb Leads
Emanuel Goldberger introduced the augmented limb leads (aVR, aVL, aVF), completing the standard 12-lead EKG system and allowing clinicians to localize ischemic changes to specific myocardial territories.
1988
Pathological Q-Wave Classification
Refined diagnostic criteria for pathological Q waves enabled clinicians to distinguish completed infarction from acute injury, leading to the classification framework of ischemia, injury, and infarction that remains central to EKG interpretation.
2018
Fourth Universal Definition of MI
The Joint ESC/ACC/AHA/WHF Task Force published the Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction, refining the EKG criteria for ST-elevation and non-ST-elevation events and integrating biomarker data into the diagnostic algorithm.

This historical progression underscores a fundamental clinical question that every EKG technician must be able to answer: when you observe an abnormal tracing, does it represent reversible ischemia, ongoing injury, or irreversible infarction? The answer determines the urgency of intervention and profoundly influences patient outcomes.

Core Principles & Definitions

Understanding the electrocardiographic signatures of ischemia, injury, and infarction requires a solid grasp of the underlying pathophysiology. These three conditions represent a continuum of myocardial oxygen deprivation, each producing distinct changes in the electrical behavior of cardiac cells. When coronary blood flow is reduced, the affected myocardium progresses through predictable stages that are reflected on the EKG in specific waveform components: the T wave for ischemia, the ST segment for injury, and the Q wave for infarction.

1

Ischemia — T-Wave Changes

Ischemia represents the earliest and most reversible stage of oxygen deprivation. Affected myocardial cells experience delayed repolarization, which manifests as T-wave inversion (subepicardial ischemia) or tall, peaked, symmetric T waves (subendocardial ischemia) in the leads overlying the affected territory.
2

Injury — ST-Segment Changes

Injury indicates more severe, ongoing damage where cells are still viable but in acute distress. An injury current flows between damaged and healthy tissue, producing ST-segment elevation (transmural injury) or ST depression (subendocardial injury). This stage is potentially reversible with prompt reperfusion.
3

Infarction — Pathological Q Waves

Infarction represents irreversible necrosis of myocardial tissue. Dead tissue cannot conduct electrical impulses, creating an "electrical window" that allows recording of activity from the opposite wall. This produces pathological Q waves—abnormally deep and wide deflections at the beginning of the QRS complex.
4

The Continuum Concept

These three stages exist on a time-dependent continuum. Prolonged ischemia progresses to injury, and sustained injury leads to infarction. On the EKG, you may see all three patterns simultaneously in different leads, reflecting zones at different stages of compromise around the central infarct.
✦ KEY TAKEAWAY
Think of a coronary event like a campfire burning through a log. Ischemia is the wood that is merely heated and darkened—remove the flame and it returns to normal. Injury is the actively smoldering section—still potentially salvageable if you douse it with water quickly. Infarction is the charred ash—irreversibly consumed. On the EKG, each zone leaves its own signature: T-wave changes, ST-segment shifts, and Q waves, respectively.

Visual Explanation — The Ischemia-Injury-Infarction Triad on the EKG

Top row: Four EKG waveform patterns showing the progressive changes from normal to ischemia (T-wave inversion), injury (ST elevation), and infarction (pathological Q waves). Bottom: The temporal continuum showing reversibility decreasing from left to right.

The diagram above illustrates the four key EKG patterns you must be able to differentiate. In the normal tracing, the T wave is upright and the ST segment sits along the isoelectric baseline. In ischemia, the most prominent change occurs in the T wave, which becomes symmetrically inverted due to delayed repolarization of the oxygen-deprived subepicardial tissue. The ST segment remains at baseline because the resting membrane potential has not yet been significantly affected. As the process worsens to injury, the ST segment elevates above baseline, reflecting an active current of injury flowing between damaged and healthy myocardium during the period between ventricular depolarization and repolarization. Finally, in infarction, the dead tissue creates an electrical void, and the initial QRS vector shifts away from the necrotic zone, producing deep, wide Q waves that persist indefinitely as markers of permanent tissue loss.

Electrophysiological Mechanisms

The EKG changes associated with ischemia, injury, and infarction are rooted in the electrophysiology of individual cardiac myocytes and the way their collective electrical behavior is sensed by surface electrodes. Understanding the mechanism behind each pattern—rather than merely memorizing waveform shapes—enables you to predict what you will see on the EKG based on clinical context and to recognize atypical presentations.

Ischemia: Altered Repolarization

Under normal conditions, repolarization proceeds from the epicardium (outer surface) inward toward the endocardium. When subepicardial ischemia occurs—as in transmural ischemia—the epicardial cells experience delayed repolarization, reversing the normal repolarization sequence. Since the repolarization wave now travels from endocardium to epicardium (the same direction as depolarization), the T wave inverts in the leads facing the ischemic territory. Conversely, subendocardial ischemia delays repolarization in the inner wall, exaggerating the normal repolarization direction and producing tall, peaked, symmetric T waves.

Injury: The Current of Injury

In injured myocardium, the resting membrane potential of damaged cells becomes less negative (partially depolarized), typically shifting from the normal −90 mV toward −60 to −70 mV. This creates a voltage gradient between injured and healthy tissue during electrical diastole (the TP segment), producing a diastolic current of injury that effectively depresses the true baseline. During the ST segment, when all ventricular cells should be uniformly depolarized, the injured cells actually repolarize earlier because their action potential duration is shortened, creating a systolic current of injury. The net effect of both mechanisms is apparent ST-segment elevation in leads facing the injured region and reciprocal ST depression in opposing leads.

Infarction: The Electrical Window

Necrotic tissue is electrically inert—it neither depolarizes nor repolarizes. When a recording electrode faces a region of full-thickness infarction, it "looks through" the dead tissue and records the depolarization of the opposite ventricular wall traveling away from the electrode. This retreating vector inscribes a negative deflection at the very beginning of the QRS complex, producing a pathological Q wave. To be classified as pathological, a Q wave must be ≥ 0.04 seconds (40 ms or one small box) wide and ≥ one-third the height of the R wave in that lead. Normal septal Q waves—small, narrow deflections in leads I, aVL, V5, and V6—do not meet these criteria and should not be mistaken for infarction.

💡 Clinical Pearl
During an acute myocardial infarction, you often see all three patterns simultaneously across different leads: pathological Q waves in the leads directly over the necrotic core, ST elevation in the leads over the surrounding zone of injury, and T-wave inversion in the leads overlying the outer zone of ischemia. This pattern is known as the concentric zone model of acute MI.

Detailed Classification — Localizing Ischemic Changes by Lead

Beyond recognizing whether an EKG pattern represents ischemia, injury, or infarction, the certified EKG technician must be able to localize the affected myocardial territory by identifying which leads show changes. Each coronary artery supplies a specific region of the heart, and the 12-lead EKG provides spatial information through contiguous lead groups. The table below maps lead groups to anatomical territories and their most commonly associated coronary arteries.

Contiguous lead groups, corresponding myocardial territories, and typical coronary artery supply
Lead GroupLeadsMyocardial TerritoryCoronary Artery
InferiorII, III, aVFInferior wall (diaphragmatic surface)Right coronary artery (RCA), ~85%
AnteriorV1–V4Anterior wall and septumLeft anterior descending (LAD)
LateralI, aVL, V5, V6Lateral wallLeft circumflex (LCx)
SeptalV1, V2Interventricular septumLAD (septal perforator branches)
PosteriorV7–V9 (reciprocal: V1–V3)Posterior wallRCA or LCx (posterior descending)
The concentric zone model shows how an acute MI creates three concentric regions around the occluded artery: a central zone of infarction (necrosis), surrounded by a zone of injury (active damage), which is surrounded by an outer zone of ischemia (reversible oxygen deprivation). Each zone produces its characteristic EKG finding.

The concept of reciprocal changes is clinically important and frequently tested. When ST elevation appears in one lead group, the leads on the opposite side of the heart typically show ST depression. For example, an acute inferior MI with ST elevation in leads II, III, and aVF will often show reciprocal ST depression in the lateral leads I and aVL. Recognizing these reciprocal changes increases diagnostic confidence and helps differentiate true injury patterns from pericarditis, which produces diffuse ST elevation without significant reciprocal changes.

Worked Example — Interpreting an Acute MI on a 12-Lead EKG

A 62-year-old male presents to the emergency department with crushing substernal chest pain radiating to the left arm, onset 45 minutes ago. A 12-lead EKG is obtained and reveals the following findings: ST elevation in leads V1 through V4, T-wave inversion in leads V5 and V6, small Q waves beginning to form in V2 and V3, and ST depression in leads II, III, and aVF. Systematically interpret this EKG.

Systematic EKG Interpretation for Acute MI
1
Step 1 — Identify the ST-Segment ChangesST elevation is present in leads V1 through V4. These are contiguous anterior and septal leads, indicating an acute current of injury affecting the anterior and septal walls of the left ventricle. Measure the degree of elevation: if ≥ 1 mm (0.1 mV) in limb leads or ≥ 2 mm (0.2 mV) in precordial leads at the J-point, this meets criteria for STEMI (ST-elevation myocardial infarction).
Finding: Acute injury pattern in the anterior/septal territory
2
Step 2 — Evaluate the T WavesT-wave inversions are noted in leads V5 and V6, which represent the lateral wall. These symmetric T-wave inversions suggest ischemia in the tissue surrounding the zone of active injury. The ischemic zone extends laterally beyond the region of ST elevation, consistent with the concentric zone model. The ischemia in V5–V6 indicates that the area at risk extends beyond V1–V4.
Finding: Ischemia in the lateral wall surrounding the injured territory
3
Step 3 — Assess for Pathological Q WavesSmall Q waves are beginning to form in leads V2 and V3. These are early markers of necrosis at the core of the infarct. Check the criteria: if these Q waves are ≥ 0.04 seconds wide (one small box on standard paper at 25 mm/s) and ≥ one-third the height of the R wave, they qualify as pathological. In this early presentation (45 minutes), Q waves may be subtle and not yet fully developed, but their presence suggests that some irreversible myocardial damage has already begun.
Finding: Early infarction (necrosis) developing in the septal territory
4
Step 4 — Identify Reciprocal ChangesST depression is present in leads II, III, and aVF (the inferior leads). These are reciprocal changes—mirror-image reflections of the anterior ST elevation seen from the opposite side of the heart. Reciprocal changes support the diagnosis of true STEMI and help differentiate it from pericarditis, which typically shows diffuse ST elevation without focal reciprocal depression.
Finding: Reciprocal ST depression confirms acute anterior STEMI
5
Step 5 — Synthesize and LocalizeCombining all findings: ST elevation in V1–V4 (injury), T-wave inversion in V5–V6 (ischemia), early Q waves in V2–V3 (infarction), and reciprocal ST depression in II, III, aVF. The contiguous leads V1–V4 correspond to the anterior wall and interventricular septum, supplied by the left anterior descending (LAD) artery. This patient is experiencing an acute anterior STEMI, most likely due to LAD occlusion, and requires emergent reperfusion therapy.
Final Interpretation: Acute anterior STEMI — LAD territory — all three zones present

Comparative Analysis — Ischemia vs. Injury vs. Infarction

Side-by-side comparison of ischemia, injury, and infarction across key clinical and electrocardiographic features
FeatureIschemiaInjuryInfarction
PathophysiologyReduced O₂ supply; altered repolarizationSevere O₂ deficit; current of injuryCell death (necrosis); electrical silence
EKG IndicatorT-wave changes (inversion or peaked)ST-segment elevation or depressionPathological Q waves (≥ 40 ms, ≥ ⅓ R wave)
ReversibilityFully reversible with restored perfusionPotentially reversible if reperfused within hoursIrreversible; permanent tissue loss
Affected WaveformT wave (repolarization)ST segment (early repolarization phase)Q wave / initial QRS (depolarization)
Temporal PersistenceResolves quickly with treatmentResolves over hours to daysQ waves often persist permanently
Clinical UrgencyWarrants evaluation; may represent unstable anginaEmergency — requires immediate interventionIndicates completed damage; focus on preventing extension
✦ KEY TAKEAWAY
A useful mnemonic for remembering the association between pathology and waveform is "I-S-Q" — Ischemia affects the T wave (the last part of the cardiac cycle to be affected, reflecting early repolarization changes), injury affects the ST segment (the bridge between depolarization and repolarization, where the current of injury is most apparent), and infarction produces Q waves (the very beginning of the QRS, where the absence of electrical activity in dead tissue is first detected). Think of it as reading the cardiac cycle backwards: the mildest problem appears at the end (T wave), the moderate problem in the middle (ST), and the most severe at the start (Q).

Connection to Advanced Theory — STEMI vs. NSTEMI and Evolving MI Patterns

The foundational distinction between ischemia, injury, and infarction serves as the basis for more advanced diagnostic classifications that you will encounter in clinical practice and on the CET examination. The most important of these is the classification of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) into STEMI (ST-elevation myocardial infarction) and NSTEMI (non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction), which have fundamentally different management pathways.

Key distinctions between STEMI and NSTEMI based on EKG findings and clinical management
FeatureSTEMINSTEMI
Occlusion TypeComplete coronary occlusion (100%)Partial occlusion or transient total occlusion
EKG PatternST elevation in ≥ 2 contiguous leads with reciprocal changesST depression, T-wave inversion, or both; no significant ST elevation
Injury DepthTransmural (full-thickness wall involvement)Subendocardial (inner wall only)
InterventionEmergent PCI or fibrinolysis (door-to-balloon < 90 min)Medical management; invasive strategy within 24–72 hours
Q-Wave DevelopmentCommon; often develops pathological Q wavesLess common; may remain non-Q-wave MI

Another advanced concept is the evolution of MI on serial EKGs. In the hyperacute phase (minutes after onset), you may see tall, peaked T waves before ST elevation develops. Over hours, ST elevation becomes prominent and T waves begin to invert. Over days to weeks, the ST segment returns to baseline, T-wave inversion may deepen and then gradually resolve, but pathological Q waves typically persist as permanent markers of the infarction. Understanding this temporal evolution is essential for dating an MI and determining whether findings represent an acute event versus a chronic scar from a prior infarction.

🔭 Looking Ahead
As you advance in your studies, you will learn to recognize additional EKG patterns such as Wellens' syndrome (specific T-wave patterns indicating critical LAD stenosis), de Winter T waves (an ST-elevation equivalent), and posterior MI patterns seen as reciprocal changes in V1–V3. Each of these builds directly on the foundational ischemia-injury-infarction framework covered in this lesson.

Practice Problems

PROBLEM 1 — CONCEPTUAL
A patient's EKG shows symmetric T-wave inversions in leads V3 through V6 with no ST-segment changes and no Q waves. Which of the three stages—ischemia, injury, or infarction—does this pattern represent, and what is the underlying electrophysiological mechanism?
PROBLEM 2 — BASIC CALCULATION
On a standard 12-lead EKG recorded at 25 mm/s, a Q wave in lead III measures 1.5 small boxes wide and the R wave in the same lead is 9 mm tall. The Q wave depth is 4 mm. Does this Q wave meet the criteria for a pathological Q wave? Show your reasoning.
PROBLEM 3 — INTERMEDIATE
A 12-lead EKG reveals ST elevation in leads II, III, and aVF, with reciprocal ST depression in leads I and aVL, and T-wave inversions in leads V5 and V6. Identify: (a) the type of acute coronary event, (b) the affected myocardial territory, (c) the most likely culprit artery, and (d) which EKG changes represent ischemia versus injury.
PROBLEM 4 — APPLIED
A patient has a prior history of anterior MI six months ago. Today's EKG shows deep Q waves in V1–V3 with a flat ST segment at baseline and upright T waves. A second patient presents acutely with chest pain, and their EKG shows Q waves in V1–V3 with persistent ST elevation and T-wave inversions. Compare these two EKGs and explain how you would differentiate an old infarction from an evolving acute event.
PROBLEM 5 — CRITICAL THINKING
A patient presents with diffuse ST elevation across multiple non-contiguous leads (I, II, III, aVF, V2–V6) with PR depression but no reciprocal ST depression and no Q waves. A colleague suggests this is a massive STEMI. Critically evaluate this interpretation and provide an alternative diagnosis, explaining how the ischemia-injury-infarction framework helps you distinguish between the two conditions.

Lesson Summary — Ischemia, Injury, and Infarction

The electrocardiographic recognition of coronary events depends on understanding the three progressive stages of myocardial oxygen deprivation. Ischemia is the earliest, most reversible stage, characterized by T-wave changes (inversion in subepicardial ischemia, tall/peaked in subendocardial ischemia) resulting from delayed repolarization. Injury represents more severe, potentially reversible damage, recognized by ST-segment elevation (transmural) or depression (subendocardial) caused by the current of injury between damaged and healthy tissue. Infarction is irreversible necrosis, producing pathological Q waves (≥ 40 ms wide, ≥ ⅓ of R-wave height) through the electrical window effect.

These three stages coexist during an acute MI as concentric zones around the occluded artery, and their EKG signatures can be localized to specific coronary territories using contiguous lead groups (inferior: II, III, aVF; anterior: V1–V4; lateral: I, aVL, V5, V6). Reciprocal changes—ST depression in leads opposite to the ST elevation—support the diagnosis of true STEMI and help differentiate it from pericarditis. Mastering the I-S-Q mnemonic (Ischemia → T wave, injury → ST segment, infarction → Q wave) and the temporal evolution of EKG changes from hyperacute T waves through ST elevation, T inversion, and Q-wave formation provides the interpretive framework for every acute coronary syndrome you will encounter.

Varsity Tutors • Certified EKG Technician (CET) • Ischemia Recognition — Differentiate ischemia, injury, and infarction