CERTIFIED EKG TECHNICIAN (CET) • EKG ACQUISITION

Artifact Resolution — Identify and resolve artifacts (e.g., wandering baseline, AC interference)

Learn to recognize and eliminate EKG artifacts that compromise diagnostic accuracy and patient care.

Historical Context & Motivation

From the earliest days of electrocardiography, clinicians struggled with the problem of unwanted electrical signals contaminating the cardiac waveform. When Willem Einthoven developed the string galvanometer in 1901, the instrument was so sensitive that any extraneous electrical activity — from the patient's skeletal muscles, nearby power lines, or even the galvanometer's own wiring — would overlay on the cardiac tracing and obscure diagnostic morphology. These unwanted signals became known as artifacts, and from the very inception of the EKG, resolving them has been an essential technical competency. The history of artifact resolution is, in many ways, the history of EKG technology itself — each generation of equipment introduced new solutions while also creating new sources of interference.

1901
Einthoven's String Galvanometer
Willem Einthoven's device captured cardiac electrical signals but was profoundly susceptible to environmental and patient-generated artifacts. Early recordings required patients to immerse their limbs in saline buckets, introducing motion artifact from even minor movements.
1930s
Portable EKG Machines Emerge
As EKG machines moved from laboratories to bedsides, new artifact sources appeared. Alternating current (AC) from hospital electrical systems at 60 Hz (50 Hz in Europe) introduced a distinctive sinusoidal interference pattern that remains one of the most common artifacts encountered today.
1960s
Introduction of Adhesive Electrodes
Disposable pregelled electrodes replaced metal plates and suction cups for limb and precordial leads. While this dramatically reduced electrode-skin impedance issues, improper skin preparation became a new source of wandering baseline artifact.
1980s–1990s
Digital Filtering Technology
Computerized EKG systems incorporated digital filters — baseline wander filters, notch filters for AC interference, and high-frequency filters for muscle tremor. These tools provided powerful artifact mitigation but also introduced the risk of distorting true cardiac waveforms if improperly configured.
2000s–Present
Advanced Signal Processing & AI
Modern EKG systems employ adaptive filtering algorithms and machine learning to distinguish artifacts from genuine cardiac abnormalities in real time, yet technician expertise remains essential because no algorithm can replace proper electrode application, patient preparation, and clinical judgment.

Despite over a century of technological advancement, the fundamental challenge remains unchanged: how do we separate the heart's electrical signal from all other electrical activity reaching the electrodes? This question defines the core competency of artifact resolution — the ability to identify the type and source of an artifact and apply the appropriate corrective action, whether that involves adjusting the patient, the electrodes, the equipment, or the environment.

Core Principles of Artifact Identification

An EKG artifact is any deflection or distortion on the tracing that does not originate from the heart's electrical conduction system. Understanding artifact resolution requires mastery of a few foundational principles that guide both recognition and remediation. The EKG technician must internalize the concept that the electrocardiograph is an exquisitely sensitive voltmeter — it measures potential differences on the order of millivolts (typically 0.5–3.0 mV for the QRS complex), meaning that even minute extraneous electrical signals can produce visible deflections on the tracing. The overarching goal is to maximize the signal-to-noise ratio — the amplitude of the cardiac signal relative to the amplitude of all non-cardiac electrical activity.

1

Signal-to-Noise Ratio

The cardiac signal must dominate the tracing. Artifacts reduce the signal-to-noise ratio, making P waves, ST segments, and other low-amplitude features uninterpretable. The technician's primary mission is to maximize this ratio through proper technique.
2

Electrode-Skin Interface

High impedance at the electrode-skin interface is the single most common root cause of artifacts. Skin oils, dead epithelial cells, and body hair increase electrical resistance, degrading signal quality and making the system vulnerable to environmental interference.
3

Systematic Troubleshooting

Artifact resolution follows a logical sequence: identify the artifact type by its morphology, determine whether it is patient-generated or equipment/environment-generated, and then apply the targeted corrective action — never begin by adjusting digital filters.
4

Artifact Classification

Artifacts are categorized by source: patient-related (muscle tremor, movement, respiration), equipment-related (loose leads, faulty cables), and environmental (AC interference, electromagnetic devices).
5

Documentation & Clinical Impact

Artifacts that cannot be eliminated must be documented. An artifact mistaken for pathology — such as muscle tremor mimicking atrial fibrillation or a wandering baseline simulating ST elevation — can lead to misdiagnosis and inappropriate treatment.
✦ KEY TAKEAWAY
Think of artifact resolution like tuning a radio. The cardiac signal is the station you want to hear, and artifacts are static from competing stations, engine noise, and loose antenna connections. A skilled EKG technician is essentially a signal engineer — adjusting the antenna (electrodes), eliminating interference sources (environment), and calming the patient (reducing biological noise) so that the heart's electrical broadcast comes through crystal clear.

Visual Guide to Common EKG Artifacts

Recognizing artifacts begins with pattern recognition. Each artifact type produces a characteristic morphology on the EKG tracing that, with experience, becomes immediately identifiable. The following diagram illustrates the four most commonly encountered artifacts alongside a clean, artifact-free tracing for comparison. Note how each artifact has a distinct visual signature that provides clues about its source and the appropriate corrective action.

Panel A shows a clean tracing with stable baseline. Panel B demonstrates wandering baseline with gradual undulation. Panel C shows the regular, fine sinusoidal pattern of 60 Hz AC interference. Panel D illustrates the irregular, high-frequency fuzziness of somatic tremor. Panel E reveals the abrupt, large-amplitude deflections of motion artifact.

Notice that each artifact has a characteristic frequency and amplitude pattern. The wandering baseline in Panel B produces a slow, sinusoidal drift (typically less than 0.5 Hz) that shifts the entire waveform above and below the isoelectric line. In contrast, AC interference in Panel C creates a perfectly regular, fine oscillation at exactly 60 Hz (in North America), giving the tracing a characteristic 'fuzzy' or thickened appearance. Somatic tremor in Panel D is irregular and varies in amplitude, often concentrated in specific leads corresponding to the trembling limb. Motion artifact in Panel E produces sudden, large-amplitude deflections that are clearly non-physiologic in morphology and timing.

Mechanisms Behind Common Artifacts

Understanding the electrical and physiological mechanisms that generate artifacts is essential for effective troubleshooting. Rather than memorizing corrective steps in isolation, a technician who understands why an artifact occurs can reason through novel situations and apply appropriate interventions even in unfamiliar clinical environments.

Wandering Baseline — The Low-Frequency Drift

Wandering baseline occurs when the isoelectric line shifts vertically over time. The most common cause is respiratory movement, which changes the thoracic impedance and electrode position relative to the heart with each breath cycle. Because normal respiration occurs at approximately 12–20 breaths per minute, this produces a slow oscillation in the 0.2–0.35 Hz range. Other causes include poor electrode adhesion (where the gel dries and impedance fluctuates), patient movement on the exam table, and diaphoresis (excessive sweating), which alters the conductivity of the electrode-skin interface. The clinical danger of wandering baseline is that it can mimic ST-segment elevation or depression, potentially leading to a false diagnosis of myocardial ischemia or injury.

AC (Powerline) Interference — The 60 Hz Signal

Alternating current interference results from electromagnetic fields generated by nearby electrical equipment operating at 60 Hz (50 Hz in European countries). The human body acts as an antenna, and when electrode impedance is elevated or asymmetric between leads, the common-mode rejection circuitry of the EKG machine cannot fully cancel the interference signal. The result is a superimposed sinusoidal waveform with a very consistent period of approximately 16.7 milliseconds (1 ÷ 60 Hz). Sources include power cables running beneath or near the patient, IV pumps, fluorescent lighting ballasts, and electric beds. Notably, the artifact's amplitude is directly proportional to the impedance mismatch between electrodes — which is why proper, uniform skin preparation is the first and most effective intervention.

AC INTERFERENCE PERIOD
T = 1 / f = 1 / 60 Hz ≈ 16.7 ms
Where T is the period of the AC cycle, and f is the frequency of the local power supply (60 Hz in North America, 50 Hz in much of Europe and Asia). This period is far shorter than most cardiac intervals, creating the characteristic 'thickened baseline' appearance.

Somatic Tremor — Skeletal Muscle Noise

Skeletal muscle generates electrical depolarizations in the same millivolt range as the heart. When a patient is shivering (due to cold or anxiety), has a neurological tremor (e.g., Parkinson's disease), or is simply tensing muscles, the resulting electromyographic (EMG) signals are picked up by the surface electrodes. Somatic tremor typically manifests as irregular, high-frequency deflections in the 20–300 Hz range. Unlike AC interference, which is perfectly regular, somatic tremor varies in amplitude and frequency, giving the tracing a rough, jagged appearance. This artifact most frequently appears in limb leads because limb muscles are large and close to the electrodes.

Motion Artifact — Electrode Displacement

Motion artifact occurs when an electrode is physically displaced relative to the skin, causing abrupt changes in the half-cell potential at the electrode-skin interface. This generates large, sharp deflections that are often easily distinguished from cardiac waveforms by their non-physiologic morphology and lack of regularity. Common causes include patient movement (turning, coughing, adjusting position), cable tension pulling on electrodes, and electrode detachment. In telemetry and ambulatory (Holter) monitoring, motion artifact is particularly problematic because the patient is moving continuously.

Artifact Classification & Resolution Strategies

Effective artifact resolution requires a systematic approach. The following diagram presents a decision-tree flowchart that guides the technician from initial artifact identification through root cause analysis to the appropriate corrective action. This troubleshooting algorithm should become second nature for every EKG technician.

This flowchart guides systematic troubleshooting. Begin by characterizing the artifact's morphology — regular sinusoidal patterns point to AC interference, slow undulations suggest wandering baseline, and irregular high-frequency fuzz indicates somatic tremor. Each pathway leads to specific, prioritized corrective actions.
Comprehensive artifact classification with morphology, causes, and primary resolution strategies
Artifact TypeMorphologyCommon CausesPrimary Resolution
Wandering BaselineSlow, sinusoidal undulation of the isoelectric line; frequency < 0.5 HzRespiratory movement, poor electrode contact, diaphoresis, patient movementInstruct shallow breathing; clean and prep skin; replace dried electrodes; secure cables
AC InterferenceFine, regular sinusoidal at 60 Hz (or 50 Hz); uniform 'fuzzy' thickening of all waveformsNearby electrical equipment, power cables under bed, high/unequal electrode impedance, improper groundingCheck electrode adhesion; unplug non-essential equipment; verify RL ground electrode; apply 60 Hz notch filter
Somatic TremorIrregular, high-frequency (20–300 Hz), variable-amplitude deflections; often localized to specific leadsShivering, anxiety, neurological tremor (Parkinson's), muscle tension, cold roomWarm the patient; provide reassurance; support limbs on pillows; allow relaxation time before recording
Motion ArtifactAbrupt, large-amplitude, irregular deflections; non-physiologic morphology; may include abrupt baseline shiftsPatient movement (coughing, turning), cable tension, electrode detachment, hiccupsInstruct patient to remain still; relieve cable tension; reapply loose electrodes; wait for hiccups to subside
Electrode PopSudden, brief spike followed by rapid return to baseline; may occur singly or in clustersIntermittent loss of electrode-skin contact, cracked electrode gel, defective lead wireReplace electrode; check lead wire connections; test with spare cable

Worked Example — Systematic Artifact Resolution

The following scenario demonstrates a systematic approach to identifying and resolving an artifact encountered during a standard 12-lead EKG acquisition. This mirrors a real-world clinical situation and applies the troubleshooting algorithm presented in Section 5.

Case: 68-Year-Old Patient with Multiple Artifacts
1
Step 1 — Observe the Tracing and Identify the ArtifactYou are performing a resting 12-lead EKG on a 68-year-old patient who was referred for evaluation of chest pain. Upon reviewing the initial tracing, you observe two distinct abnormalities: leads II, III, and aVF show a fine, regular sinusoidal pattern superimposed on the cardiac waveform, while leads I and aVL display irregular, high-frequency jagged deflections. Begin by classifying each artifact by its morphology.
Leads II, III, aVF: AC interference (60 Hz). Leads I, aVL: Somatic tremor.
2
Step 2 — Determine the Affected ElectrodesSince AC interference appears in leads II, III, and aVF — all of which involve the left leg (LL) electrode — the LL electrode is the likely source of the high impedance causing the AC artifact. Somatic tremor in leads I and aVL — both of which involve the left arm (LA) electrode — suggests that the patient's left arm is the source of muscle artifact. Recall that Einthoven's triangle defines which electrodes contribute to each lead, enabling you to localize the problem electrode.
Problem electrodes: LL electrode (AC issue) and LA electrode (tremor issue)
3
Step 3 — Address the AC Interference FirstInspect the LL electrode. You discover that it has partially detached from the patient's left ankle, and the gel pad has dried out. Clean the skin at the LL site using an alcohol prep pad and mild abrasion with a gauze pad to remove dead skin cells. Apply a new electrode with fresh conductive gel. Additionally, you notice that the bed's power cord runs directly beneath the patient's left leg — reposition the cord away from the patient. Verify that the right leg (RL) ground electrode is firmly attached.
After electrode replacement and cord repositioning, reacquire the tracing. AC interference in leads II, III, and aVF is resolved.
4
Step 4 — Address the Somatic TremorObserve the patient's left arm and note visible trembling. Ask the patient if they are cold or anxious. The patient reports feeling cold and nervous about the test. Provide a warm blanket and a brief, reassuring explanation of the procedure. Place a pillow under the patient's left arm to support it and reduce muscular effort. Allow the patient 2–3 minutes to relax before reacquiring the tracing. If the tremor persists due to a neurological condition, consider repositioning the LA electrode to a more proximal location on the upper arm where muscle activity is reduced.
After warming and reassurance, the patient relaxes. Somatic tremor in leads I and aVL is resolved.
5
Step 5 — Final Quality CheckReview the final 12-lead tracing in its entirety. Verify that all 12 leads display a stable baseline, clear P waves, sharp QRS complexes, and identifiable ST segments and T waves. Confirm that no artifact mimics or obscures pathology. In this case, the tracing now clearly reveals 1 mm of ST depression in leads V5 and V6, which was previously obscured by the artifacts — a finding consistent with the patient's presenting complaint of chest pain and warranting physician review.
Clean, diagnostic-quality 12-lead EKG obtained. Clinically significant ST depression identified.
⚕ Clinical Pearl
Always resolve artifacts before applying digital filters. A 60 Hz notch filter can mask the artifact without eliminating its root cause, and baseline wander filters can attenuate low-frequency cardiac components such as ST segments — the very segments most critical in evaluating ischemia. Filters are a last resort, not a first response.

Artifacts vs. True Cardiac Abnormalities

One of the most critical skills for an EKG technician is distinguishing artifacts from genuine cardiac pathology. Several artifacts can closely mimic dangerous arrhythmias or ischemic changes, and misidentification in either direction carries significant clinical consequences. The following table compares commonly confused artifact-pathology pairs and identifies the distinguishing features that allow accurate differentiation.

Artifact patterns that may mimic cardiac pathology and their distinguishing characteristics
Artifact PatternMimics This PathologyKey Distinguishing Features
Somatic tremor (irregular, high-frequency baseline deflections)Atrial fibrillation (irregular fibrillatory baseline)In tremor, QRS complexes remain regular (R-R intervals constant); true A-fib has irregularly irregular R-R intervals. Tremor is often lead-specific; A-fib affects all leads.
Wandering baseline (slow undulation shifting the isoelectric line)ST elevation/depression (myocardial ischemia/injury)Baseline wander oscillates cyclically (often with respiration); true ST changes are sustained and present consistently across complexes when referenced to a stable PR segment.
Motion artifact (large, abrupt deflections)Ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillationMotion artifact lacks the organized, repetitive morphology of V-tach and is usually brief. V-fib produces a chaotic but continuous undulation. Always check the patient clinically — in true V-fib, the patient will be unresponsive.
Electrode pop (brief spikes)Premature ventricular complexes (PVCs)Electrode pops are very brief (< 20 ms), lack a T wave, and have no compensatory pause. PVCs are wider (≥ 120 ms), have an associated T wave, and are typically followed by a compensatory pause.
60 Hz AC interference (uniform thickening)Atrial flutter (sawtooth pattern)AC interference has a fixed 60 Hz frequency (16.7 ms period), producing uniform thickening; flutter waves occur at approximately 300 bpm (~200 ms period) and have a characteristic sawtooth morphology best seen in inferior leads.
✦ KEY TAKEAWAY
When in doubt, apply the 'clinical correlation' principle: always look at the patient, not just the monitor. If the EKG shows what appears to be ventricular fibrillation but the patient is sitting up, alert, and conversing with you, you are almost certainly looking at an artifact — most likely motion artifact or a loose lead. Conversely, if the tracing looks normal but the patient is symptomatic, a repeat acquisition with meticulous technique is warranted to ensure subtle findings are not being obscured by artifact.

Digital Filtering & Advanced Signal Processing

While proper electrode technique and patient preparation should always be the first line of artifact resolution, modern EKG machines provide digital filters that can further refine signal quality. Understanding how these filters work — and their limitations — is increasingly important as EKG technology advances. Digital filters selectively attenuate signals within specific frequency ranges, but because cardiac waveform components span a wide frequency spectrum (0.05–150 Hz for diagnostic-quality EKGs), any filter that removes artifact frequencies risks simultaneously distorting true cardiac data.

Digital filter types used in modern EKG machines
Filter TypeFunctionTypical SettingRisk of Waveform Distortion
High-Pass (Baseline Wander) FilterRemoves frequencies below a cutoff point, eliminating slow baseline drift while preserving higher-frequency cardiac components0.05 Hz (diagnostic mode) or 0.5 Hz (monitor mode)At 0.5 Hz: can distort ST segments and T waves, reducing diagnostic accuracy for ischemia evaluation
Low-Pass (Muscle Artifact) FilterRemoves frequencies above a cutoff point, reducing high-frequency muscle tremor while preserving lower-frequency components150 Hz (diagnostic) or 40 Hz (monitor mode)At 40 Hz: can reduce QRS amplitude, smooth notching patterns, and mask pacemaker spikes
Notch Filter (60/50 Hz)Selectively attenuates a narrow band around the powerline frequency (60 Hz in N. America, 50 Hz in Europe)60 Hz ± 2 Hz bandwidthMinimal distortion when narrowband; can attenuate real cardiac signals near 60 Hz in rare cases
Adaptive Filter (AI-based)Uses algorithms to distinguish cardiac signals from noise in real time; adjusts filter parameters dynamicallyMachine-determined, varies by manufacturerGenerally low risk but not transparent; clinician cannot always verify what was filtered
📋 AHA/ACC Standards Reminder
The American Heart Association recommends that diagnostic 12-lead EKGs be recorded with a bandwidth of 0.05 to 150 Hz for adults. Using more restrictive filter settings (e.g., monitor mode with 0.5–40 Hz bandwidth) is acceptable only for rhythm monitoring and should never be used when ST-segment analysis is clinically indicated. Always verify your machine's filter settings before acquisition.

As you progress to advanced cardiac monitoring, Holter analysis, and stress testing, you will encounter more sophisticated signal processing techniques, including wavelet denoising and template matching algorithms. These tools are powerful, but the foundational principle remains: no digital algorithm can substitute for a properly prepared patient and correctly applied electrodes. The EKG technician's role as the primary defense against artifacts will remain essential even as technology continues to evolve.

Practice Problems

PROBLEM 1 — CONCEPTUAL
Explain why the right leg (RL) electrode is sometimes called the 'ground' electrode. How does it contribute to artifact reduction, and what would you expect to observe on the EKG tracing if the RL electrode became detached during acquisition?
PROBLEM 2 — BASIC CALCULATION
A patient's EKG tracing shows a fine, regular sinusoidal artifact superimposed on the cardiac signal. You count 3 complete artifact cycles spanning a distance of 2.5 small boxes on standard EKG paper (paper speed 25 mm/s). Calculate the frequency of the artifact and identify its most likely source.
PROBLEM 3 — INTERMEDIATE
During a 12-lead EKG, you observe wandering baseline in leads V1 through V3 only. The limb leads and lateral precordial leads appear clean. The patient is breathing quietly and cooperatively. Describe your systematic approach to resolving this artifact, including at least four specific actions in order of priority.
PROBLEM 4 — APPLIED
You are called to perform an emergent EKG on a patient in the ICU who is intubated, mechanically ventilated, connected to multiple IV pumps, and has visible body tremors from hypothermia. The clinical team needs a diagnostic-quality 12-lead EKG to evaluate for acute myocardial infarction. Describe how you would approach this challenging acquisition environment, prioritizing your artifact mitigation strategies.
PROBLEM 5 — CRITICAL THINKING
A 72-year-old patient's EKG shows what appears to be atrial fibrillation with a rapid ventricular response in the limb leads, but the precordial leads show clear, regularly spaced P waves with a normal sinus rhythm. The attending physician is about to order anticoagulation therapy based on the limb lead interpretation. As the EKG technician, what should you do, and what is the most likely explanation for this discrepancy?

Artifact Resolution — Summary & Key Concepts

EKG artifact resolution is the systematic process of identifying and eliminating non-cardiac electrical signals that contaminate the EKG tracing. The four most common artifacts are wandering baseline (slow, low-frequency drift caused by respiration, poor electrode contact, or patient movement), AC interference (a regular 60/50 Hz sinusoidal pattern from nearby electrical equipment and high electrode impedance), somatic tremor (irregular, high-frequency EMG noise from shivering, anxiety, or neurological conditions), and motion artifact (abrupt, large-amplitude deflections from patient or electrode movement). Each artifact type has a characteristic morphology that guides the technician to the correct root cause and corrective action.

The cornerstone of artifact resolution is maximizing the signal-to-noise ratio through proper skin preparation, correct electrode application, environmental management, and patient comfort measures. Digital filters (high-pass, low-pass, and notch filters) should be used as a last resort because they can distort true cardiac waveforms, particularly ST segments and QRS morphology. Critically, technicians must be able to distinguish artifacts from true cardiac pathology — somatic tremor can mimic atrial fibrillation, wandering baseline can simulate ST changes, and motion artifact can resemble ventricular arrhythmias. Always correlate the tracing with the patient's clinical presentation, and communicate technical quality concerns to the interpreting physician.

Varsity Tutors • Certified EKG Technician (CET) • Artifact Resolution — Identify and resolve artifacts (e.g., wandering baseline, AC interference)