Representative Viewpoints in U.S. Political History from Pre-Columbian to 1789

Help Questions

AP U.S. History › Representative Viewpoints in U.S. Political History from Pre-Columbian to 1789

Questions 1 - 10
1

According to the Connecticut Compromise .

Slaves would count for three-fifths a person when appropriating representation

Congress would be divided into a bicameral legislature with proportional representation in the lower house and equal representation for each state in the upper house

Congress would be divided into a bicameral legislature with proportional representation in the upper house and equal representation in the lower house

Slavery was to be outlawed above the Missouri line, except in the proposed state of Missouri, and legal below the Missouri line

Maine was to be admitted to the Union as a free state and Alabama was to be admitted to the Union as a slave state

Explanation

The Connecticut Compromise was proposed, in 1787, as a solution to a disagreement between the larger and smaller states as to how representation should be appropriated in the newly formed United States. The smaller states desired that representation should be equal for all states, regardless of population size. The larger states desired that representation should be proportional to population. As a compromise the Union enacted a bicameral legislature whereby the lower house (House of Representatives) was to have proportional representation and the upper house (Senate) was to have equal representation for all states. The agreement persists to this day.

2

In order to vote in the Plymouth Colony, under the Mayflower Compact, an individual had to be .

white

white and male

white, male, and a land owner

white, male, a land owner, and a member of the church

white, male, a land owner, a member of the church, and married

Explanation

The Mayflower Compact was signed by some of the original settlers of the Plymouth Colony, Massachusetts, in 1620. Having been bound for Virginia, their ship was forced to change direction by a violent storm, ending up in Massachusetts. The Pilgrims took this as a sign from God that this place was where they were to make their new community. They signed the Mayflower Compact shortly after arriving and dictated that the government of this new territory would adhere to majority rule of the members of the church (despite the fact that slightly less than half of the people on board were Pilgrims). In order to vote, an individual needed to be white and male, own land, and be a recognized member of the church community.

3

In the early years of the United States, how were slave populations divided for the purposes of Congressional representation?

Slaves were not counted as members of the population

Slaves were considered equal to free men

Two slaves were equivalent to one free man

The slave population was counted as three-fifths its actual number

Three slaves were equivalent to one free man

Explanation

At the Constitutional Convention, the Northern and Southern states could not decide on how to account for the slave populations when considering how Congressional representatives should be divided. The North favored a system where slaves did not count at all, conversely the South favored a system where each slave was equivalent to one free man. In an attempt at compromise, the Convention passed the Three-Fifths Compromise - which stated that, for the purposes of representation, a slave was to be equal to three-fifths of a free man.

4

What two reasons were responsible for the Anti-Federalist’s objections to the ratification of the United States Constitution?

The increased power of the Federal Government over the states and the omission of a Bill of Rights guaranteeing individual liberty

The election of the Chief Executive by electors, as opposed to via popular vote and the omission of a Bill of Rights guaranteeing individual liberty

The election of the Chief Executive by electors, as opposed to via popular vote and The increased power of the Federal Government over the states

The insufficient establishment of checks and balances to contain the Judiciary Branch and the omission of a Bill of Rights guaranteeing individual liberty

The insufficient establishment of checks and balances to contain the Judiciary Branch and The election of the Chief Executive by electors, as opposed to via popular vote

Explanation

The Anti-Federalists opposed ratification of the Constitution on a number of issues that centered on the fear that the power of the Federal government had been increased too heavily, at the expense of the States, and would lead the power of the centralized government to keep growing and growing. Further, to the point of preventing a possible rise of tyranny the Anti-Federalist demanded that prior to ratification the Constitution have included a Bill of Rights that would forever codify into law the individual freedoms and liberties of all Americans. The central argument of the Anti-Federalists was that, as written, the Constitution did not do enough to prevent the possibility of an autocratic President, or Congress, gaining power and using it to subjugate the people.

5

What was the primary stumbling block between the colonies and the British government?

The Townshend Acts

The Boston Massacre

The British belief that all colonists were subjects of the Crown

The British policy of leniency towards Native Americans encroaching on Colonial lands

The British Parliament’s insistence on the legitimacy of the theory of virtual representation

Explanation

Parliament’s insistence that virtual representation was sufficient to adequately represent the interests of the colonists in British policy making was a major ideological problem for the colonies. Virtual representation rested on the theory that since Parliament protected the interests of all British citizens and subjects, it was not necessary for colonists to directly elect representatives. Colonists, on the other hand, believed that such a policy meant their interests were second to those of the actual electorate and, in the years leading up to revolution, demanded fair and equal representation.

6

The British government viewed the passage of the Stamp Act primarily as?

A punishment directed against rebellious and treasonous colonists

The debt that the United States colonists owed the British crown for protection during the French-Indian war

Reinforcement of the position of the Crown’s dominion over the colonies

A means to rile up colonists in attempt to promote a rebellion that could then be crushed to demonstrate the consequences of rebellion.

A means to raise revenue for the government in the wake of costly wars

Explanation

The British government, and Prime Minister George Greenville, issued the Stamp Act to help raise revenue for the indebted Crown. Although many in British society felt that the colonists owed a debt to the British public for protecting them during the French-Indian wars, and many in the colonies felt that this was meant as a demonstration of the Crown’s ultimate dominion the primary reason was simple “dollars and cents”. The government needed more money and was willing to incur the colonists’ wrath in order to get it. The Stamp Act was passed in 1765 and required colonists to purchase heavily taxed stamps for all post and newspapers. The passage of the Act promoted widespread indignation and some protests in the colonies.

7

Which of the following men is correctly paired with his viewpoint?

George Washington: believed in a strong national government and national bank

Thomas Jefferson: believed in the divinity of Jesus Christ and the Bible

Benjamin Franklin: co-authored The Federalist Papers

Alexander Hamilton: believed federal government should not absorb the debts of the states

James Madison: believed the United States should have a standing army

Explanation

Here the information on George Washington is correct. He strongly supported Alexander Hamilton in his creation of a national government and national bank.

Thomas Jefferson rejected the divinity of Jesus Christ and the Bible, and argued for laws to protect religious freedom.

Benjamin Franklin did not write the Federalist Papers, which were written by James Madison, John Jay, and Alexander Hamilton.

Alexander Hamilton did believe the federal government should assume the war debts of the states, and as secretary of the Treasury pushed Congress to form a national bank for this purpose.

Finally, James Madison did not believe the US should have a standing army. In fact, he feared that the United States would become an oppressive government if such a thing happened.

8

The New Jersey Plan primarily favored .

small states

big states

wealthy land owners

merchants and bankers

farmers and day laborers

Explanation

The New Jersey Plan was one of two plans put forward at the Constitutional Convention in 1787. The other was the Virginia plan. The Virginia plan called for two houses of Congress, both elected with proportional representation. This plan would place the majority of influence in the hands of the more populated states. The New Jersey Plan was an attempt by the smaller states to counter this proposal. It argued that representation should be left how it had been under the Articles of Confederation—namely that each state, regardless of size, get an equal share of representation. The controversy was eventually solved by the Great Compromise, which created a bicameral legislature. The upper house was to follow the New Jersey Plan, the lower house the Virginia Plan.

9

The colonists believed in the inherent fairness of “virtual representation” ______________.

None of these, the colonists did not believe that virtual representation was inherently unfair.

at the state level

at the federal level

at all levels of government

Explanation

In order to answer this question, you must have remembered the meaning of virtual representation—the belief held by Grenville and others in the British political elite that the members of parliament accurately represented all citizens of the Empire, regardless of their actual physical representation (or lack thereof). This, of course, was one of the biggest matters of disagreement in between the Brits and colonists: the colonists disagreed with the so-called virtual representation—the colonists believed that the only fair representation would be actual, physical, representation in Parliament (hence “no taxation without representation”).

10

The main difference between the Virginia Plan and the New Jersey Plan was that __________.

the Virginia Plan called for a legislature that was based on state population and the New Jersey Plan called for a legislature in which each state had a single vote.

the Virginia Plan gave more federal aid to farmers than to merchants and artisans, while the New Jersey Plan favored merchants and artisans over farmers.

the Virginia Plan would allow slavery in every new state, whereas the New Jersey Plan would prohibit slavery in every new northern state.

the Virginia Plan gave suffrage to all male citizens, whereas the New Jersey Plan only granted suffrage to land owning citizens.

the Virginia Plan delegated the task of presidential selection to congress, but the New Jersey Plan gave that power to the people.

Explanation

The Virginia Plan was written by James Madison, a Virginia farmowner himself. In it, a lot of the legislative power was give to the southern, farming states. This was done through population based apportionment, the southern states where larger both in size and population, so they would very easily control Congress.

In response, William Patterson penned the New Jersey Plan, in which each state got a single vote in Congress.

These plans were resolved by the Great Compromise penned by Roger Sherman. The Great Compromise, or Connecticut Plan, called for a bicameral legislature with a population based House of Representatives, and a Senate in which each state had equal representation.

Page 1 of 2
Return to subject