Compounds and Molecules - AP Chemistry
Card 0 of 1960
Put the following in order from greatest to least intermolecular forces:
I. H2O
II. LiOH
III. CO2
Put the following in order from greatest to least intermolecular forces:
I. H2O
II. LiOH
III. CO2
Tap to see back →
LiOH displays ion-dipole IMF, H2O displays hydrogen bonding, and CO2 displays dipole-dipole. Ion-dipole is greater than hydrogen bonding as an IMf, and hydrogen bonding is greater than dipole-dipole.
LiOH displays ion-dipole IMF, H2O displays hydrogen bonding, and CO2 displays dipole-dipole. Ion-dipole is greater than hydrogen bonding as an IMf, and hydrogen bonding is greater than dipole-dipole.
Which of the following best explains hydrogen bonding?
Which of the following best explains hydrogen bonding?
Tap to see back →
Electronegative atoms disproportionately pull covalently bonded electrons toward themselves, which leaves hydrogen with partial positive character.
Electronegative atoms disproportionately pull covalently bonded electrons toward themselves, which leaves hydrogen with partial positive character.
What is the molecular shape of the following molecule?
SF6
What is the molecular shape of the following molecule?
SF6
Tap to see back →
when a central atom of a molecule has 6 electron domains coming off of it (none of which are lone pairs of electrons), it is considered octahedral
when a central atom of a molecule has 6 electron domains coming off of it (none of which are lone pairs of electrons), it is considered octahedral

How many yellow spheres and green spheres are there per unit cell shown?

How many yellow spheres and green spheres are there per unit cell shown?
Tap to see back →
For a unit cell, the corners count as 1/8 of a sphere and atoms completely within the unit cell count as 1. This gives us 1 yellow and 1 green sphere in the unit cell shown above.
For a unit cell, the corners count as 1/8 of a sphere and atoms completely within the unit cell count as 1. This gives us 1 yellow and 1 green sphere in the unit cell shown above.
is an example of what type of molecular geometry?
is an example of what type of molecular geometry?
Tap to see back →
SF4 has 6 electron domains coming off of it- 4 F molecules and 2 lone pairs of e–. This is an example of see-saw shape.
SF4 has 6 electron domains coming off of it- 4 F molecules and 2 lone pairs of e–. This is an example of see-saw shape.
What is/are the approximate bond angle(s) in the following molecule?
COH2
What is/are the approximate bond angle(s) in the following molecule?
COH2
Tap to see back →
COH2:
:O:
||
H—C—H
This is a trigonal planar molecule, which only has bond angles of 120o
COH2:
:O:
||
H—C—H
This is a trigonal planar molecule, which only has bond angles of 120o

Based upon the above image, what type of packing is this?

Based upon the above image, what type of packing is this?
Tap to see back →
The figure above represents ABCABC packing which is cubic close packing.
The figure above represents ABCABC packing which is cubic close packing.

Based upon the above image, what type of packing is this?

Based upon the above image, what type of packing is this?
Tap to see back →
The figure above represents ABABA packing which is hexagonal close packing.
The figure above represents ABABA packing which is hexagonal close packing.

Zinc Sulfide can be described as a cubic close packed arrangement of Zn with sulfur occupying one-half of the tetrahedral holes. Based upon that description and the figure above, what is the formula for zinc sulfide?

Zinc Sulfide can be described as a cubic close packed arrangement of Zn with sulfur occupying one-half of the tetrahedral holes. Based upon that description and the figure above, what is the formula for zinc sulfide?
Tap to see back →
The figure above has 8 Zn atoms on the corners (counting as 1/8) and 6 Zn atoms on the faces (counting as ½). This gives 4 Zn atoms in the unit cell. The Sulfur atoms are completely within the unit cell and count as 1 each for a total of 4 S atoms. This gives the formula Zn4S4 which reduces down to ZnS.
The figure above has 8 Zn atoms on the corners (counting as 1/8) and 6 Zn atoms on the faces (counting as ½). This gives 4 Zn atoms in the unit cell. The Sulfur atoms are completely within the unit cell and count as 1 each for a total of 4 S atoms. This gives the formula Zn4S4 which reduces down to ZnS.

What are the names of the alloy types shown in the figure above:

What are the names of the alloy types shown in the figure above:
Tap to see back →
An interstitial alloy has a smaller atom inserted into the unit cell, a substitutional alloy has another atom substitute for the main element, and a pure metal is only composed of a single atom type.
An interstitial alloy has a smaller atom inserted into the unit cell, a substitutional alloy has another atom substitute for the main element, and a pure metal is only composed of a single atom type.
What is the strongest intermolecular force in the following compound?
CH3CH2CH2CH2OH
What is the strongest intermolecular force in the following compound?
CH3CH2CH2CH2OH
Tap to see back →
This is butanol. It is an alcohol; OH is the prime example of hydrogen bonding, which is the strongest intermolecular force.
This is butanol. It is an alcohol; OH is the prime example of hydrogen bonding, which is the strongest intermolecular force.
Which of the following has the highest boiling point?
Which of the following has the highest boiling point?
Tap to see back →
Ionic bonds are the strongest type of bonds, followed by covalent bonds, hydrogen bonds, and lastly, van Der waals forces.
Ionic bonds are the strongest type of bonds, followed by covalent bonds, hydrogen bonds, and lastly, van Der waals forces.
Which of the following intermolecular forces is the strongest?
Which of the following intermolecular forces is the strongest?
Tap to see back →
Ion-dipole forces are the strongest of the intermolecular forces.
Hydrogen bonding is a specific term for a particularly strong dipole-dipole interaction between a hydrogen atom and a very electronegative atom (oxygen, fluorine, or nitrogen). However, hydrogen bonds are still not as strong as ion-dipole interactions.
In order from strongest to weakest, the intermolecular forces given in the answer choices are: ion-dipole, hydrogen bonding, dipole-dipole, and Van der Waals forces.
Ionic bonding is stronger than any of the given intermolecular forces, but is itself NOT an intermolecular force. Ionic bonds are a permanent chemical connection between two atoms, whereas intermolecular forces as a more transient and temporary attraction between independent molecules.
Ion-dipole forces are the strongest of the intermolecular forces.
Hydrogen bonding is a specific term for a particularly strong dipole-dipole interaction between a hydrogen atom and a very electronegative atom (oxygen, fluorine, or nitrogen). However, hydrogen bonds are still not as strong as ion-dipole interactions.
In order from strongest to weakest, the intermolecular forces given in the answer choices are: ion-dipole, hydrogen bonding, dipole-dipole, and Van der Waals forces.
Ionic bonding is stronger than any of the given intermolecular forces, but is itself NOT an intermolecular force. Ionic bonds are a permanent chemical connection between two atoms, whereas intermolecular forces as a more transient and temporary attraction between independent molecules.
Which of the following is the strongest intermolecular force?
Which of the following is the strongest intermolecular force?
Tap to see back →
Ionic and covalent bonds are not intermolecular forces;
Ion-dipole>hydrogen bonds>dipole-dipole>van Der Waals forces
Ionic and covalent bonds are not intermolecular forces;
Ion-dipole>hydrogen bonds>dipole-dipole>van Der Waals forces
Which of the following compounds experiences the greatest intermolecular forces
Which of the following compounds experiences the greatest intermolecular forces
Tap to see back →
IMF strength is in the order of ion-ion>h-bond>dipole-dipole>van der waals. Of the listed compounds there aren't any that display ion-ion IMF, and only ammonia has h-bonding, making it the one with the strongest forces.
IMF strength is in the order of ion-ion>h-bond>dipole-dipole>van der waals. Of the listed compounds there aren't any that display ion-ion IMF, and only ammonia has h-bonding, making it the one with the strongest forces.
Order the following compounds from lowest boiling point to highest:
He2 (helium gas)
Isobutyl alcohol
Acetone
Water
Order the following compounds from lowest boiling point to highest:
He2 (helium gas)
Isobutyl alcohol
Acetone
Water
Tap to see back →
Helium gas will have the lowest boiling point since it is a noble gas and the only intermolecular forces present are dispersion forces, which are the weakest. Acetone has a dipole, so dipole-dipole forces will be present. Water has a dipole and can also hydrogen bond, as can isobutyl alcohol. However, isobutyl alcohol is heavier than water, and will thus have the highest boiling point.
Helium gas will have the lowest boiling point since it is a noble gas and the only intermolecular forces present are dispersion forces, which are the weakest. Acetone has a dipole, so dipole-dipole forces will be present. Water has a dipole and can also hydrogen bond, as can isobutyl alcohol. However, isobutyl alcohol is heavier than water, and will thus have the highest boiling point.
Put the following intermolecular forces in order of decreasing strength:
London dispersion forces; hydrogen bonds; dipole-dipole interactions; ion-dipole interactions
Put the following intermolecular forces in order of decreasing strength:
London dispersion forces; hydrogen bonds; dipole-dipole interactions; ion-dipole interactions
Tap to see back →
Ion-dipole forces are the forces responsible for the solvation of ionic compounds in aqueous solutions, and are the strongest of the intermolecular foces. Hydrogen bonding is the second strongest intermolecular force, followed by dipole-dipole interactions. London dispersion forces are present in all solutions, but are very small and the weakest of the intermolecular forces.
Ion-dipole forces are the forces responsible for the solvation of ionic compounds in aqueous solutions, and are the strongest of the intermolecular foces. Hydrogen bonding is the second strongest intermolecular force, followed by dipole-dipole interactions. London dispersion forces are present in all solutions, but are very small and the weakest of the intermolecular forces.
Which of the following intermolecular forces account for the fact that noble gases can liquefy?
Which of the following intermolecular forces account for the fact that noble gases can liquefy?
Tap to see back →
Noble gases are uncharged and do not have polar covalent bonds or dipole moments. The only force that could apply to them are dispersion forces.
Noble gases are uncharged and do not have polar covalent bonds or dipole moments. The only force that could apply to them are dispersion forces.
List the following bond types in order of increasing strength: nonpolar covalent bonds, ionic bonds, hydrogen bonds, polar covalent bonds
List the following bond types in order of increasing strength: nonpolar covalent bonds, ionic bonds, hydrogen bonds, polar covalent bonds
Tap to see back →
A hydrogen bond is not a proper chemical bond, but the result of dipole-dipole interactions. While they are very chemically important, hydrogen bonds are dynamic, rather than stagnant. This is the least stable type of bond listed.
Covalent bonds are inherently more stable than ionic bonds as electrons are shared between both bound atoms, so the next stronges bond type is the ionic bond.
Chemists distinguish between covalent and ionic bonds for the sake of simplicity, but there is actually a continuum. Polar covalent bonds are on the continuum between pure ionic bonds and pure covalent bonds, so polar covalent bonds have more ionic character than nonpolar covalent bonds, and thus are less stable than nonpolar covalent bonds.
A hydrogen bond is not a proper chemical bond, but the result of dipole-dipole interactions. While they are very chemically important, hydrogen bonds are dynamic, rather than stagnant. This is the least stable type of bond listed.
Covalent bonds are inherently more stable than ionic bonds as electrons are shared between both bound atoms, so the next stronges bond type is the ionic bond.
Chemists distinguish between covalent and ionic bonds for the sake of simplicity, but there is actually a continuum. Polar covalent bonds are on the continuum between pure ionic bonds and pure covalent bonds, so polar covalent bonds have more ionic character than nonpolar covalent bonds, and thus are less stable than nonpolar covalent bonds.
Which of the following is most similar to hydrogen bonding?
Which of the following is most similar to hydrogen bonding?
Tap to see back →
The choice "The slightly negatively charged sulfur atoms in H_2S are attracted to the slightly positively charged hydrogen atom of a nearby H_2S molecule" is exactly analogous to hydrogen bonding in water.
"Two methane molecules are attracted to one another because of temporary dipoles" describes London dispersion forces.
While "A negatively charged chlorine anion in solution will attract nearby positively charged Lithium cations" may sound like hydrogen bonding, it is more descriptive of interactions between any charged particles, not charged particles within the same molecule.
"Water completely dissolves certain salts, like NaCl" does not describe bonding at all.
While "The chlorine bound to carbon in dichloromethane will slightly attract positive charged particles" sounds promising, the slight charges are not on the same molecule.
The choice "The slightly negatively charged sulfur atoms in H_2S are attracted to the slightly positively charged hydrogen atom of a nearby H_2S molecule" is exactly analogous to hydrogen bonding in water.
"Two methane molecules are attracted to one another because of temporary dipoles" describes London dispersion forces.
While "A negatively charged chlorine anion in solution will attract nearby positively charged Lithium cations" may sound like hydrogen bonding, it is more descriptive of interactions between any charged particles, not charged particles within the same molecule.
"Water completely dissolves certain salts, like NaCl" does not describe bonding at all.
While "The chlorine bound to carbon in dichloromethane will slightly attract positive charged particles" sounds promising, the slight charges are not on the same molecule.