The table below gives values of function near :
| 4.8 | 4.9 | 4.99 | 5.01 | 5.1 | 5.2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23.04 | 24.01 | 24.9801 | 25.0201 | 26.01 | 27.04 |
The best estimate for is:
AP Calculus AB Quiz
Practice Estimating Limit Values From Tables in AP Calculus AB with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.
Question 1 / 19
0 of 19 answered
The table below gives values of function r(x) near x=5:
| x | 4.8 | 4.9 | 4.99 | 5.01 | 5.1 | 5.2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| r(x) | 23.04 | 24.01 | 24.9801 | 25.0201 | 26.01 | 27.04 |
The best estimate for limx→5r(x) is:
This quiz focuses on Estimating Limit Values From Tables, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for AP Calculus AB.
Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.
The table below gives values of function r(x) near x=5:
| x | 4.8 | 4.9 | 4.99 | 5.01 | 5.1 | 5.2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| r(x) | 23.04 | 24.01 | 24.9801 | 25.0201 | 26.01 | 27.04 |
The best estimate for limx→5r(x) is:
Explanation: The table shows values approaching 25 from both sides: from the left (23.04 → 24.01 → 24.9801) and from the right (25.0201 → 26.01 → 27.04). The values closest to x=5 are very close to 25. Choice B confuses the input with the output value. Choices C and D incorrectly select specific table values rather than recognizing the limiting value that both sides approach.
The following table gives values of s(x) as x approaches 4:
| x | 3.5 | 3.9 | 3.99 | 4.01 | 4.1 | 4.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s(x) | -1.5 | -1.9 | -1.99 | -1.99 | -1.9 | -1.5 |
Based on this information, what is limx→4s(x)?
Explanation: The function values approach -2 as x approaches 4. From both sides, the pattern shows: -1.5 → -1.9 → -1.99 (approaching -2). The symmetry in the table confirms this convergence pattern. Choice B incorrectly focuses on the outer values rather than the limiting behavior. Choice C confuses input with output. Choice D selects a table value rather than recognizing the limit that the values approach.
Function v(x) has these values near x=−3:
| x | -3.2 | -3.1 | -3.01 | -2.99 | -2.9 | -2.8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| v(x) | 10.24 | 9.61 | 9.0601 | 8.9401 | 8.41 | 7.84 |
The limit limx→−3v(x) is best estimated as:
Explanation: The values converge to 9 as x approaches -3. From the left: 10.24 → 9.61 → 9.0601, and from the right: 8.9401 → 8.41 → 7.84. The values closest to x=−3 are 9.0601 and 8.9401, both near 9. Choice A confuses input with output. Choices C and D select specific table values from one side rather than identifying where both sides converge.
The table below shows values of f(x) near x=1.5:
| x | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.49 | 1.51 | 1.6 | 1.8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| f(x) | 1.44 | 1.96 | 2.2201 | 2.2801 | 2.56 | 3.24 |
What is limx→1.5f(x)?
Explanation: The function values approach 2.25 as x approaches 1.5 from both directions. From the left: 1.44 → 1.96 → 2.2201, and from the right: 2.2801 → 2.56 → 3.24. The values 2.2201 and 2.2801 are both very close to 2.25. Choice A confuses the input with the output. Choices C and D select specific table values rather than the common limit value both sides approach.
The table shows values of d(x) as x approaches 0.2:
| x | 0.1 | 0.19 | 0.199 | 0.201 | 0.21 | 0.3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| d(x) | 0.01 | 0.0361 | 0.039601 | 0.040401 | 0.0441 | 0.09 |
From this data, limx→0.2d(x) can be estimated as:
Explanation: The function values approach 0.04 as x approaches 0.2 from both sides. From the left: 0.01 → 0.0361 → 0.039601, and from the right: 0.040401 → 0.0441 → 0.09. The values closest to x=0.2 are 0.039601 and 0.040401, both very close to 0.04. Choice A confuses the input value with the limit. Choices C and D select specific table values rather than the common limit value.
Function t(x) has the following values approaching x=−0.5:
| x | -0.7 | -0.6 | -0.51 | -0.49 | -0.4 | -0.3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| t(x) | 0.49 | 0.36 | 0.2601 | 0.2401 | 0.16 | 0.09 |
What is limx→−0.5t(x)?
Explanation: The function values approach 0.25 as x approaches -0.5 from both directions. From the left: 0.49 → 0.36 → 0.2601, and from the right: 0.2401 → 0.16 → 0.09. The values nearest to x=−0.5 are 0.2601 and 0.2401, both very close to 0.25. Choice A confuses input with output. Choices B and D select specific table values from one side rather than the common limiting value.
Function b(x) has the following values near x=0.8:
| x | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.79 | 0.81 | 0.9 | 1.0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| b(x) | 0.36 | 0.49 | 0.6241 | 0.6561 | 0.81 | 1.0 |
What is limx→0.8b(x)?
Explanation: The function values approach 0.64 as x approaches 0.8 from both sides. From the left: 0.36 → 0.49 → 0.6241, and from the right: 0.6561 → 0.81 → 1.0. The values nearest to x=0.8 are 0.6241 and 0.6561, both very close to 0.64. Choice A confuses input with output values. Choices B and D select specific table entries rather than identifying the common limit value.
Function z(x) has these values near x=−1.5:
| x | -1.8 | -1.6 | -1.51 | -1.49 | -1.4 | -1.2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| z(x) | 3.24 | 2.56 | 2.2801 | 2.2201 | 1.96 | 1.44 |
Based on this data, what is limx→−1.5z(x)?
Explanation: The values approach 2.25 as x approaches -1.5 from both sides. From the left: 3.24 → 2.56 → 2.2801, and from the right: 2.2201 → 1.96 → 1.44. The values nearest x=−1.5 are 2.2801 and 2.2201, both very close to 2.25. Choice A confuses input with output. Choices C and D select specific table values rather than recognizing the common limit value both sides approach.
The following table shows values of a(x) approaching x=3.2:
| x | 3.0 | 3.1 | 3.19 | 3.21 | 3.3 | 3.4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| a(x) | 9.0 | 9.61 | 10.1761 | 10.2241 | 10.89 | 11.56 |
The limit limx→3.2a(x) can be estimated as:
Explanation: The function values approach 10.2 as x approaches 3.2 from both directions. From the left: 9.0 → 9.61 → 10.1761, and from the right: 10.2241 → 10.89 → 11.56. The values closest to x=3.2 are 10.1761 and 10.2241, both very near 10.2. Choice A confuses input with output. Choices B and D select specific table values from one side rather than the common limiting value.
Consider function q(x) with values near x=6:
| x | 5.7 | 5.9 | 5.99 | 6.01 | 6.1 | 6.3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| q(x) | 32.49 | 34.81 | 35.8801 | 36.1201 | 37.21 | 39.69 |
Based on the table, limx→6q(x) equals:
Explanation: The values show convergence to 36 as x approaches 6. From the left: 32.49 → 34.81 → 35.8801, and from the right: 36.1201 → 37.21 → 39.69. The values nearest x=6 are 35.8801 and 36.1201, both very close to 36. Choice A confuses input with output. Choices B and D select specific table entries rather than recognizing the value that both sides approach.
A function g(x) has the following values near x=−2:
| x | -2.1 | -2.01 | -2.001 | -1.999 | -1.99 | -1.9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| g(x) | 4.21 | 4.0201 | 4.002001 | 3.997999 | 3.9801 | 3.81 |
What is limx→−2g(x)?
Explanation: The table shows that as x approaches -2 from both directions, g(x) approaches 4. From the left: 4.21 → 4.0201 → 4.002001, and from the right: 3.997999 → 3.9801 → 3.81. Both one-sided limits approach 4. Choice A confuses the input with the output. Choice C incorrectly selects a specific table value rather than the limit. Choice D is wrong because the values show smooth convergence to the same value from both sides.
The table below shows values of a function f(x) near x=3.
| x | 2.9 | 2.99 | 2.999 | 3.001 | 3.01 | 3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| f(x) | 7.41 | 7.9401 | 7.994001 | 8.006001 | 8.0601 | 8.61 |
Based on the table, what is the best estimate for limx→3f(x)?
Explanation: As x approaches 3 from both sides, the function values approach 8. From the left: 7.41 → 7.9401 → 7.994001, and from the right: 8.006001 → 8.0601 → 8.61. The values are getting closer to 8 as x gets closer to 3. Choice B incorrectly averages boundary values rather than examining the limit behavior. Choice C confuses the input value with the limit value. Choice D is incorrect because the values show clear convergence, not oscillation.
Values of function y(x) as x approaches 2.5 are shown:
| x | 2.3 | 2.4 | 2.49 | 2.51 | 2.6 | 2.7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| y(x) | 5.29 | 5.76 | 6.2001 | 6.3001 | 6.76 | 7.29 |
From this table, limx→2.5y(x) is:
Explanation: The function values approach 6.25 as x approaches 2.5 from both directions. From the left: 5.29 → 5.76 → 6.2001, and from the right: 6.3001 → 6.76 → 7.29. The values nearest to x=2.5 are 6.2001 and 6.3001, both very close to 6.25. Choice A confuses input with output values. Choices B and D select specific table entries rather than the value both sides approach.
Values of function w(x) near x=0.5 are shown below:
| x | 0.4 | 0.49 | 0.499 | 0.501 | 0.51 | 0.6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| w(x) | 1.6 | 1.96 | 1.996 | 2.004 | 2.04 | 2.4 |
From this table, limx→0.5w(x) can be estimated as:
Explanation: The table shows convergence to 2 from both sides. As x approaches 0.5 from the left: 1.6 → 1.96 → 1.996, and from the right: 2.004 → 2.04 → 2.4. The values closest to x=0.5 are 1.996 and 2.004, both very near 2. Choices A and C select specific table entries rather than the limiting value. Choice D confuses the input value with the function's limit value.
Function k(x) has the following values approaching x=−1:
| x | -1.3 | -1.1 | -1.01 | -0.99 | -0.9 | -0.7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| k(x) | 8.69 | 9.21 | 9.9801 | 10.0201 | 10.81 | 12.49 |
Based on this data, limx→−1k(x) equals:
Explanation: The values show clear convergence to 10 as x approaches -1. From the left: 8.69 → 9.21 → 9.9801, and from the right: 10.0201 → 10.81 → 12.49. The values closest to x=−1 are 9.9801 and 10.0201, which both approach 10. Choices A and C incorrectly select specific table values rather than the limit. Choice D is wrong because the data clearly shows convergent behavior toward 10.
The table shows values of h(x) as x approaches 1:
| x | 0.9 | 0.99 | 0.999 | 1.001 | 1.01 | 1.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| h(x) | -0.526 | -0.503 | -0.500 | 0.500 | 0.503 | 0.526 |
Based on this information, limx→1h(x) is:
Explanation: The left-hand limit is limx→1−h(x)=−0.5 (values approach -0.5 from the left), while the right-hand limit is limx→1+h(x)=0.5 (values approach 0.5 from the right). Since these one-sided limits are different, the two-sided limit does not exist. Choice A incorrectly assumes symmetry implies a limit of zero. Choices B and C only consider one-sided behavior and ignore the requirement that both sides must agree for the limit to exist.
The table shows values of m(x) near x=2:
| x | 1.7 | 1.9 | 1.99 | 2.01 | 2.1 | 2.3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| m(x) | 2.89 | 3.61 | 3.9601 | 4.0401 | 4.41 | 5.29 |
What is the most reasonable estimate for limx→2m(x)?
Explanation: The function values approach 4 as x approaches 2 from both directions. From the left: 2.89 → 3.61 → 3.9601, and from the right: 4.0401 → 4.41 → 5.29. The values nearest to x=2 are 3.9601 and 4.0401, both very close to 4. Choice A confuses input and output values. Choices B and D select specific table values from one side rather than identifying the common limit value.
The table below gives values of u(x) near x=7:
| x | 6.5 | 6.9 | 6.99 | 7.01 | 7.1 | 7.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| u(x) | 42.25 | 47.61 | 48.8601 | 49.1401 | 50.41 | 56.25 |
The best estimate for limx→7u(x) is:
Explanation: The values converge to 49 as x approaches 7 from both sides. From the left: 42.25 → 47.61 → 48.8601, and from the right: 49.1401 → 50.41 → 56.25. The values closest to x=7 are 48.8601 and 49.1401, both very close to 49. Choice A confuses input with output. Choices B and D select specific table values from one side rather than identifying the common limit value.
Consider the following table of values for function p(x) near x=0:
| x | -0.1 | -0.01 | -0.001 | 0.001 | 0.01 | 0.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| p(x) | 0.9950 | 0.9999 | 1.0000 | 1.0000 | 0.9999 | 0.9950 |
What can be concluded about limx→0p(x)?
Explanation: As x approaches 0 from both sides, the function values approach 1. The pattern shows 0.9950 → 0.9999 → 1.0000 from the left, and 1.0000 → 0.9999 → 0.9950 from the right, indicating convergence to 1. Choice A incorrectly focuses on the boundary values rather than the limiting behavior. Choice C confuses the input value with the limit value. Choice D is incorrect because the precision shown is sufficient to determine the limit approaches 1.