What this deck covers
This deck focuses on Support Claims With Logical Reasoning, giving you a quick way to review the definitions, rules, and examples that matter most for 8th Grade Writing.
Study Support Claims With Logical Reasoning in 8th Grade Writing with focused flashcards that help you recognize the idea, recall the key rule, and apply it in practice-style prompts.
0% Complete
Which option is the best evidence for a claim about a novel's theme: plot summary or cited quote?
Tap card or press Space to flip
A cited quotation that illustrates the theme. Direct textual evidence beats general plot summary.
How well did you know it?
Card 1 / 73
Space to flip · ← / → to move · once flipped, → Got it · ← Still learning
This deck focuses on Support Claims With Logical Reasoning, giving you a quick way to review the definitions, rules, and examples that matter most for 8th Grade Writing.
Work through these flashcards in short sessions. Try to answer each prompt before flipping the card, then revisit any cards you miss until the explanation feels automatic.
Answer: A cited quotation that illustrates the theme. Direct textual evidence beats general plot summary.
Answer: Facts and statistics. Objective data provides verifiable support for claims.
Answer: Exact words from a source; use when wording is especially precise or powerful. Preserves author's unique phrasing for impact.
Answer: According to [author/source],. Properly attributes the source before quoting.
Answer: A trustworthy source with expertise and reliable information. Sources must be authoritative and factually accurate.
Answer: Claim = position; evidence = facts/examples supporting it. Claims state your stance; evidence provides proof.
Answer: Enough evidence to make the claim convincing. Multiple pieces of evidence strengthen your argument.
Answer: To credit the source and allow readers to verify information. Prevents plagiarism and builds trust with readers.
Answer: The explanation of how evidence proves or supports the claim. It connects evidence to claim by showing the logical relationship.
Answer: An analysis or interpretation of primary information. Builds on primary sources with expert analysis.
Answer: "Uniforms reduce teasing about clothes". It's a logical point; the percentage is the proof.
Answer: Compare methods, check dates, and use the most supported evidence. Critical evaluation helps resolve conflicting information.
Answer: A firsthand record from the time of the event. Created during the historical period being studied.
Answer: It directly relates to and helps prove the claim. Evidence must connect to and support your specific claim.
Answer: Author credentials. Expert qualifications show the source is knowledgeable.
Answer: A response that refutes the counterclaim with reasons and evidence. Disproves the counterclaim to defend your original position.
Answer: Proof that directly supports the specific claim or reason. Must relate directly to your argument, not just the general topic.
Answer: Ad hominem fallacy. Attacks character instead of addressing the argument.
Answer: Relevant evidence from credible sources. Personal belief isn't proof; facts are needed.
Answer: Specific facts, data, examples, or quotations that support a claim. These concrete details prove your argument is valid.
Answer: A firsthand record from the time of the event or study. Original documents provide direct, unfiltered information.
Answer: Clear explanation connecting evidence to the claim. Shows how evidence proves your claim through analysis.
Answer: Evidence that directly supports the claim and matches the topic. Must connect to both claim and topic to be useful.
Answer: To credit evidence and allow readers to verify information. Citations prove you're not plagiarizing and build trust.
Answer: Evidence = proof; reasoning = explanation linking proof to claim. Evidence provides facts; reasoning connects those facts to your argument.
Answer: Paraphrase accurately and keep the original meaning. Shows comprehension through accurate rewording.
Answer: Survey data. Quantitative data from many students provides strong support.
Answer: Statistic from a study. Numbers and data provide objective, verifiable proof.
Answer: Paraphrase with citation. Proper citation gives credit; copying is plagiarism.
Answer: An analysis or interpretation of primary sources. Written after the event by someone studying primary sources.
Answer: Commentary (reasoning) that explains how the evidence supports the claim. Evidence needs context and analysis to support claims.
Answer: This shows that. Explains significance; the others indicate sequence or time.
Answer: A clear, sensible point that supports the claim without fallacies. Based on facts and reasoning, not emotions or errors in logic.
Answer: Restate the idea in your own words while keeping the original meaning. Avoids plagiarism while showing you understand the source.
Answer: Author credentials. Qualified authors have expertise; ads and anonymous posts lack credibility.
Answer: Author, date, and purpose. Font style is irrelevant to credibility assessment.
Answer: This shows. Connects evidence to claim by explaining its importance.
Answer: Survey data. Data directly measures the bullying claim being made.
Answer: Evidence that directly supports the claim. Relevant evidence must connect to and prove your specific claim.
Answer: Diary entry. Written by someone experiencing the event; textbooks analyze events later.
Answer: Bandwagon (appeal to popularity). Assumes popularity equals truth, which is illogical.
Answer: Study on teen sleep. Evidence must match the specific topic being argued.
Answer: This shows that. This phrase introduces analysis of evidence.
Answer: A trustworthy source with expertise, accuracy, and minimal bias. Combines knowledge, correctness, and objectivity.
Answer: Claim = position; reason = why the claim is true. Claims state what you believe; reasons explain why it's true.
Answer: For example,. Introduces specific proof to support your claim.
Answer: A response that refutes a counterclaim using reasons and evidence. Strengthens your position by dismantling opposition.
Answer: To credit evidence and show reliability. Citations prove your evidence comes from legitimate sources.
Answer: Clear, valid thinking that explains how evidence proves the claim. Connects evidence to claim through sound reasoning.
Answer: A response that refutes a counterclaim using reasoning and evidence. It disproves the counterclaim to defend your position.
Answer: Statistic from a credible source. Numbers from reliable sources beat rumors or opinions.
Answer: A peer-reviewed journal. Academic journals undergo expert review for accuracy.
Answer: A clear position on an issue that the writer argues for. It's the main argument the writer defends throughout the essay.
Answer: Quote with context and explanation. Context prevents confusion and shows understanding.
Answer: For example. This phrase introduces specific examples as proof.
Answer: A government website. Official sources provide accurate legal information.
Answer: Expert study. Research-based evidence outweighs unsupported personal views.
Answer: An opposing or alternative position to your claim. Acknowledges opposing viewpoints to strengthen your argument.
Answer: To explain how the evidence supports the claim and reason. Bridges the gap between raw evidence and your argument.
Answer: Enough evidence to make the reason convincing and specific. Quality matters more than quantity for persuasion.
Answer: Accurate summary/paraphrase that matches the source meaning. Shows you comprehend the source's actual meaning.
Answer: Accurate details that match the source's meaning and context. Shows you comprehend the source, not just copying blindly.
Answer: Peer-reviewed journal. Peer review ensures accuracy through expert verification.
Answer: Paraphrasing with citation. Proper citation gives credit to the original source.
Answer: Reasoning (analysis that connects evidence to the claim). Without reasoning, readers won't understand the connection.
Answer: Bandwagon fallacy. Appeals to popularity rather than logic or evidence.
Answer: For example,. Introduces specific proof; the others show time relationships.
Answer: Therefore. Shows logical consequence between evidence and claim.
Answer: Trustworthy, accurate, unbiased, and written by qualified authors. These qualities ensure the source provides reliable information.
Answer: A reason is a supporting point; evidence is proof for that point. Reasons explain why; evidence provides concrete proof.
Answer: An opposing position to the writer's claim. Acknowledges alternative viewpoints in fair debate.
Answer: Using trustworthy sources with expertise, accuracy, and reliability. Credible sources have proven knowledge and can be trusted.
Answer: Credentials. Author qualifications indicate expertise on the topic.