Logic, Sets, and Counting
Help Questions
Finite Mathematics › Logic, Sets, and Counting
Try without a calculator:
Which of the following is equal to ?
Explanation
For any whole numbers , where
,
Setting :
.
Consider the conditional statements:
"If Mickey is a Freemason, then Nelson is a Freemason."
"If Oscar is not a Freemason, then Nelson is not a Freemason."
Nelson is a Freemason. What can be concluded about whether or not Mickey and Oscar are Freemasons?
Oscar is a Freemason; no conclusion can be drawn about Mickey.
Mickey is a Freemason; no conclusion can be drawn about Oscar.
Mickey and Oscar are both Freemasons.
No conclusion can be drawn about either Mickey or Oscar.
Mickey is a Freemason; Oscar is not a Freemason.
Explanation
Consider the second conditional "If Oscar is not a Freemason, then Nelson is not a Freemason.". It is known that Nelson is a Freemason, making the consequent of this conditional false. By a modus tollens argument, it follows that the antecedent is also false, and Oscar is a Freemason.
No conclusion can be drawn about Mickey, however. If Mickey is a Freemason, then by the first conditional, it follows that Nelson is a Freemason, which is already known; if Mickey is not a Freemason, no conclusion can be drawn that is inconsistent with what is known. Thus, either status is consistent with Nelson and Oscar both being Freemasons.
True or false: has more than one million subsets.
True
False
Explanation
denotes the Cartesian product of
and
, the set of all ordered pairs comprising an element of
followed by an element of
. The number of elements in
is equal to the product of the numbers of elements in
and
:
.
The number of subsets of a set with elements is
, so
has
subsets total. The statement is true.
Let be the set of all persons who died in 1941.
True or false: is a well-defined set.
True
False
Explanation
A set is well-defined if it is clear which elements are in the set and which elements are not. There is a clear distinction between the people who died in 1941 and people who did not, so
is well-defined.
Consider the statement
If , then
.
Which is true - its converse or its contrapositive?
The converse is false, and the contrapositive is true.
The converse is true, and the contrapositive is false.
Both the converse and the contrapositive are true.
Both the converse and the contrapositive are false.
Explanation
The converse of a conditional statement reverses the antecedent and the consequent; the contrapositive reverses and negates both. That is, for a conditional
If , then
,"
the converse of the statement is
"If , then
"
and the contrapositive of the statement is
"If (not ), then (not
)."
The converse of the given conditional is
"If , then
."
This is false, since this quadratic equation has two solutions - and
- so if
, it does not follow that
.
The contrapositive of the conditional is
"If , then
."
This is a bit harder to prove, but it can be made easier by remembering that the contrapositive is actually logically equivalent to the original conditional - that is, one is true if and only the other is. The original statement
"If , then
,"
is true, as can easily be proved through substitution in the latter equation. It follows that the contrapositive is also true.
Consider the statement
"If , then
"
Which is true - its converse or its inverse?
Both the converse and the inverse are true.
The converse is true, but the inverse is false.
The converse is false, but the inverse is true.
Both the converse and the inverse are false.
Explanation
The converse of a conditional statement reverses the antecedent and the consequent; the inverse negates both. That is, for a conditional
If , then
,"
the converse of the statement is
"If , then
,"
and the inverse is
"If (not ), then (not
)."
This problem becomes easier if you know that the converse and the inverse of any conditional are logically equivalent - that is, one is true if and only the other is. It suffices to determine the truth value of one of them. The converse of the given conditional is the statement
"If , then
."
This is easily proved true; if , then
, as proved through some algebra, and, by substitution,
. Since the converse is true, the inverse is also true.
Define to be the set of all smart Australians.
True or false: is an example of a well-defined set.
False
True
Explanation
A set is well-defined if it can be determined with no ambiguity which elements are and are not in the set. In the case of , the word "smart" is ambiguous, since the definition can change according to who is deciding who is "smart" and who is not.
is therefore not a well-defined set.
.
Which of the following could be the set ?
None of the other choices gives a correct answer.
Explanation
denotes the Cartesian product of
and
, the set of all ordered pairs comprising an element of
followed by an element of
. The number of elements in
is equal to the product of the numbers of elements in
and
:
and
, so
.
Therefore, must be a set with two elements; of the choices, only
fits that description.
The state of A has passed a law stating that all license plate numbers must adhere to the following rules:
-
There must be seven characters, each a numeral or a letter.
-
The first character may be a numeral or a letter, but either way, letters and numerals must alternate.
-
Repetition is allowed.
How many license plate numbers are possible under these rules?
Explanation
Let L stand for a letter and N stand for a numeral. One of two events will happen - the selection of a license plate with the pattern LNLNLNL, or the selection of a license plate with pattern NLNLNLN. These events are mutually exclusive, so we can count the number of ways to obtain them separately, then add.
There are no restrictions as to which letters or numerals can be chosen, or how many times each can be chosen, so the number of ways to choose a license plate number with the pattern LNLNLNL is
.
The number of ways to choose a license plate number with the pattern NLNLNLN is
.
Add these to get
,
the total number of license plates possible.
The state of X has passed a law stating that all license plate numbers must adhere to the following rules:
-
A prefix of one or two letters must precede a string of five digits.
-
"X" can only appear in the prefix if it is the second letter of a two-letter group.
-
Repetition is allowed.
How many license plate numbers are possible under these rules?
Explanation
The selection of a license plate number can be seen as a series of independent events, as follows:
First, a prefix of one or two letters must be chosen. One way to look at this is that the prefix can be any one of 25 letters ("X" is excluded) followed by either any of 26 letters or a blank. By the multiplication principle, there are
possible prefixes.
The remaining characters must comprise five numeral; since there are no restrictions on the digits, by the multiplication principle, the number of possible numeral strings is
Applying the multiplication principle one more time, there will be