Coevolution is a process by which two or more species evolve in response to one another, and generally describes competing species. While the hummingbird and the flower may evolve due to this relationship, coevolution more freqeucntly describes the evolution of defense mechanisms in response to a predator-prey relationship. Parasitism is the relationship in which one species benefits at the expense of the host. This can sometimes lead to coevolution, depending on how the host reacts. Neither species is being harmed in the given scenario, so this is incorrect. Commensalism is when one species benefits, but the other species is not impacted. In this case, both the hummingbird and the flower are benefiting, so this is not our answer. Resource partitioning is when species evolve together to share resources in a sustainable way. The hummingbird is using a resource that the flower provides, but they are not "sharing" in the sense of the definition of resource partitioning. Competitive exclusion describes the phenomenon when two species share the same niche, and the stronger one forces out the weaker competitor.

Mutualism, the correct answer, describes a relationship wherein species exploit each other mutually. In this case, the hummingbird gains nutrition from the flower, and the flower gains a reproductive advantage from the hummingbird.

Coevolution is a process by which two or more species evolve in response to one another, and generally describes competing species. While the hummingbird and the flower may evolve due to this relationship, coevolution more freqeucntly describes the evolution of defense mechanisms in response to a predator-prey relationship. Parasitism is the relationship in which one species benefits at the expense of the host. This can sometimes lead to coevolution, depending on how the host reacts. Neither species is being harmed in the given scenario, so this is incorrect. Commensalism is when one species benefits, but the other species is not impacted. In this case, both the hummingbird and the flower are benefiting, so this is not our answer. Resource partitioning is when species evolve together to share resources in a sustainable way. The hummingbird is using a resource that the flower provides, but they are not "sharing" in the sense of the definition of resource partitioning. Competitive exclusion describes the phenomenon when two species share the same niche, and the stronger one forces out the weaker competitor.

Mutualism, the correct answer, describes a relationship wherein species exploit each other mutually. In this case, the hummingbird gains nutrition from the flower, and the flower gains a reproductive advantage from the hummingbird.

Eusociality is defined by options I, II, and III. A species must cooperate on brood care (think ants bringing food back to the colony), labor is divided by reproductive ability (think sterile worker bees and queens) and the generations must overlap so that the colony is maintained properly.

K-strategist populations are more commonly regulated by density-dependent limiting factors. Their population sizes hover around a carrying capacity that is dependent on factors that increase in severity with the density of the population. On the other hand, r-strategist populations are regulated by density-independent limiting factors. They reproduce rapidly until a density-independent factor causes many of them to die.

K-strategist populations are more commonly regulated by density-dependent limiting factors. Their population sizes hover around a carrying capacity that is dependent on factors that increase in severity with the density of the population. On the other hand, r-strategist populations are regulated by density-independent limiting factors. They reproduce rapidly until a density-independent factor causes many of them to die.

Eusociality is defined by options I, II, and III. A species must cooperate on brood care (think ants bringing food back to the colony), labor is divided by reproductive ability (think sterile worker bees and queens) and the generations must overlap so that the colony is maintained properly.

Detritivores are successful because it is much more efficient to digest dung because it doesn't require much extra digesting, as another animal has already done it. Detritivores can generally have a much less complicated digestive system and save themselves the energetically expensive process of digesting new plants or animals. Detritivores are also important to the ecosystem because they cycle the nutrients in dung back into the food chain. There is no evidence that detritivores experience less competition, nor that detritus is in excess to live organisms.

A deme is defined as a group of individuals more genetically similar to each other than to other individuals, even if spatially isolated. A group of conspecific individuals separated demographically, genetically, or spatially from other groups is a population**.** A set of spatially disjunct populations in which some immigration still occurs is a metapopulation**.** The other options are not well-defined in population ecology.

A deme is defined as a group of individuals more genetically similar to each other than to other individuals, even if spatially isolated. A group of conspecific individuals separated demographically, genetically, or spatially from other groups is a population**.** A set of spatially disjunct populations in which some immigration still occurs is a metapopulation**.** The other options are not well-defined in population ecology.

Detritivores are successful because it is much more efficient to digest dung because it doesn't require much extra digesting, as another animal has already done it. Detritivores can generally have a much less complicated digestive system and save themselves the energetically expensive process of digesting new plants or animals. Detritivores are also important to the ecosystem because they cycle the nutrients in dung back into the food chain. There is no evidence that detritivores experience less competition, nor that detritus is in excess to live organisms.