Statics and Dynamics Quiz: Rigid Body Moment Equation
6 questions · exam conditions
0:00
Rigid Body Moment EquationQuestion 1 of 6

A uniform slender rod of mass mm and length LL is free to rotate about a frictionless pin at its center (midpoint). A couple M\mathcal{M} is applied to the rod. The moment of inertia of a slender rod about its center is IG=112mL2I_G = \frac{1}{12}mL^2.

The rod is initially at rest. After the couple M\mathcal{M} is applied, a student claims: 'Because the pin is at the center of mass, the pin exerts no force on the rod, so the translational equations ΣF=maG\Sigma F = ma_G give aG=0a_G = 0 and the moment equation ΣMG=IGα\Sigma M_G = I_G\alpha gives α=12MmL2\alpha = \frac{12\mathcal{M}}{mL^2}.' Which of the following best evaluates this claim?

The claim is entirely correct: the pin at G exerts no force because a couple produces pure rotation with no net force, the center of mass does not accelerate, and α=12M/(mL2)\alpha = 12\mathcal{M}/(mL^2) follows directly from ΣMG=IGα\Sigma M_G = I_G\alpha.
The claim is incorrect because ΣMG=IGα\Sigma M_G = I_G\alpha cannot be applied when the rod is pinned; instead, the student must use ΣMpin=Ipinα\Sigma M_{\text{pin}} = I_{\text{pin}}\alpha, where Ipin=mL2/3I_{\text{pin}} = mL^2/3, giving α=3M/(mL2)\alpha = 3\mathcal{M}/(mL^2).
The claim is incorrect because applying a couple to a rod pinned at its center violates the assumption of rigid-body motion; couples can only be applied to free bodies, and the pin constraint changes M\mathcal{M} into an equivalent force-couple system that alters IGI_G.
The claim is partially correct: α=12M/(mL2)\alpha = 12\mathcal{M}/(mL^2) is correct, but the conclusion that the pin exerts no force is wrong — the pin must exert a force equal to mgmg upward to prevent gravitational acceleration, though this force does not affect α\alpha since it acts at G.
← Back to quizzes

Statics and Dynamics Quiz

Statics and Dynamics Quiz: Rigid Body Moment Equation

Practice Rigid Body Moment Equation in Statics and Dynamics with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.

What this quiz covers

This quiz focuses on Rigid Body Moment Equation, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for Statics and Dynamics.

How to use this quiz

Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.

All questions

Question 1

A uniform slender rod of mass mm and length LL is free to rotate about a frictionless pin at its center (midpoint). A couple M\mathcal{M} is applied to the rod. The moment of inertia of a slender rod about its center is IG=112mL2I_G = \frac{1}{12}mL^2.

The rod is initially at rest. After the couple M\mathcal{M} is applied, a student claims: 'Because the pin is at the center of mass, the pin exerts no force on the rod, so the translational equations ΣF=maG\Sigma F = ma_G give aG=0a_G = 0 and the moment equation ΣMG=IGα\Sigma M_G = I_G\alpha gives α=12MmL2\alpha = \frac{12\mathcal{M}}{mL^2}.' Which of the following best evaluates this claim?

  1. The claim is entirely correct: the pin at G exerts no force because a couple produces pure rotation with no net force, the center of mass does not accelerate, and α=12M/(mL2)\alpha = 12\mathcal{M}/(mL^2) follows directly from ΣMG=IGα\Sigma M_G = I_G\alpha.
  2. The claim is incorrect because ΣMG=IGα\Sigma M_G = I_G\alpha cannot be applied when the rod is pinned; instead, the student must use ΣMpin=Ipinα\Sigma M_{\text{pin}} = I_{\text{pin}}\alpha, where Ipin=mL2/3I_{\text{pin}} = mL^2/3, giving α=3M/(mL2)\alpha = 3\mathcal{M}/(mL^2).
  3. The claim is incorrect because applying a couple to a rod pinned at its center violates the assumption of rigid-body motion; couples can only be applied to free bodies, and the pin constraint changes M\mathcal{M} into an equivalent force-couple system that alters IGI_G.
  4. The claim is partially correct: α=12M/(mL2)\alpha = 12\mathcal{M}/(mL^2) is correct, but the conclusion that the pin exerts no force is wrong — the pin must exert a force equal to mgmg upward to prevent gravitational acceleration, though this force does not affect α\alpha since it acts at G. (correct answer)
Explanation: When a rigid body is pinned at its center of mass, you need to carefully separate two independent equations: the translational equation ΣF=maG\Sigma F = ma_G and the rotational equation ΣMG=IGα\Sigma M_G = I_G\alpha. The key insight is that these equations govern different aspects of motion and must each be satisfied simultaneously. The student's rotational analysis is perfectly sound. A pure couple M\mathcal{M} produces a net moment but zero net force, so ΣMG=M=IGα\Sigma M_G = \mathcal{M} = I_G\alpha gives α=MmL2/12=12MmL2\alpha = \frac{\mathcal{M}}{mL^2/12} = \frac{12\mathcal{M}}{mL^2}. That result is correct. However, the claim that the pin exerts no force is wrong. Gravity still acts downward on the rod's center of mass with magnitude mgmg. For the center of mass to remain stationary (aG=0a_G = 0), the pin must supply an upward reaction force equal to mgmg. This is a static equilibrium condition in the vertical direction, not something the couple eliminates. Crucially, because this pin force acts at point G, it contributes zero moment to ΣMG\Sigma M_G, so it does not affect α\alpha at all. This makes D correct. A is wrong because it incorrectly concludes the pin exerts no force — gravity demands a vertical reaction regardless of the applied couple. B is wrong because ΣMG=IGα\Sigma M_G = I_G\alpha is always valid for moments about the center of mass, even for pinned bodies; using IpinI_\text{pin} would only apply if you summed moments about the pin instead. C is wrong because couples can absolutely be applied to constrained bodies — the pin constraint does not alter IGI_G or invalidate the couple. Study tip: Always check both translational and rotational equations separately. A pin at G eliminates translational acceleration but still supplies whatever reaction force equilibrium requires — never assume a pin at G means zero pin force.

Question 2

A thin rectangular plate of mass mm, width bb, and height hh hangs from two vertical cables attached to its top two corners. The plate is in static equilibrium. One cable is suddenly cut, leaving only one cable attached at the upper-left corner. The moment of inertia of a thin rectangular plate about its center of mass (through an axis perpendicular to the plate) is IG=m(b2+h2)12I_G = \frac{m(b^2 + h^2)}{12}.

Immediately after the right cable is cut, the plate begins to rotate. A student applies ΣMG=IGα\Sigma M_G = I_G \alpha about the center of mass G. Which of the following statements correctly identifies the forces that contribute moments about G in this equation at the instant of cable cutting?

  1. Only gravity contributes a moment about G because the cable tension, acting at the upper-left corner, passes through a point that is equidistant from G in both directions, causing its moment to vanish by symmetry of the rectangular plate geometry.
  2. Both the remaining cable tension and gravity contribute moments about G, since gravity acts at G (zero moment arm) but the cable tension acts at the upper-left corner at a perpendicular distance from G, making tension the only force producing a nonzero moment about G. (correct answer)
  3. Both the remaining cable tension and gravity contribute moments about G: the cable tension acts at the upper-left corner (nonzero distance from G), and gravity acts at G with zero moment arm, so only tension produces a moment — but this moment must equal zero at the instant of release because the system was previously in equilibrium.
  4. Only gravity contributes a moment about G because the tension in the remaining cable is an internal force of the plate-cable system and internal forces produce no net moment about the center of mass in rigid-body dynamics.
Explanation: When analyzing rigid-body motion immediately after a constraint is removed, you need to carefully inventory every external force acting on the body and determine each force's moment arm about your chosen reference point — in this case, the center of mass G. At the instant the right cable is cut, exactly two external forces act on the plate: the remaining cable tension TT pulling upward at the upper-left corner, and gravity mgmg pulling downward at G. Since gravity acts at G, its moment arm about G is zero — it contributes no moment. The cable tension, however, acts at the upper-left corner, which is displaced from G by both horizontal (b/2b/2) and vertical (h/2h/2) distances, giving a nonzero perpendicular distance and therefore a nonzero moment. So ΣMG=Td0\Sigma M_G = T \cdot d \neq 0, which drives the angular acceleration α\alpha. Answer B captures this correctly. Answer A is wrong because the cable does not pass through G — the upper-left corner is offset from G in both directions, so claiming the moment vanishes by "symmetry" is geometrically false. Answer C contains correct reasoning up to a point but then makes a critical error: equilibrium before the cut tells you the net force and moment were zero under two cables. After one cable is cut, equilibrium no longer holds, and the remaining tension's moment about G is definitely nonzero — the system is now accelerating. Answer D confuses internal and external forces. The cable is attached to the plate but is external to the plate itself; it absolutely contributes to ΣMG\Sigma M_G. Study tip: Always re-evaluate your free-body diagram the instant a constraint changes — prior equilibrium conditions do not carry over to the new loading scenario.

Question 3

A spool consists of an inner hub of radius rr and an outer flange of radius RR (R>rR > r). The total mass is mm and the moment of inertia about the center of mass is IGI_G. A horizontal cord is wrapped around the inner hub and pulled with force PP horizontally to the right. The spool rests on a horizontal surface. The contact between the spool and surface provides a friction force ff.

Applying ΣMG=IGα\Sigma M_G = I_G \alpha about the center of the spool, and assuming the spool rolls without slipping, which equation is correct (taking clockwise as positive α\alpha)?

  1. PrfR=IGαPr - fR = I_G\alpha, where the applied force PP at the hub (radius rr) creates a clockwise moment and friction ff at the outer flange contact (radius RR) creates a counterclockwise moment, with friction assumed to act to the left opposing the tendency of the contact point to slip rightward. (correct answer)
  2. PRfr=IGαPR - fr = I_G\alpha, where PP acts at the outer radius RR because the cord exits from the outer flange, and friction at the contact point acts at the inner hub radius rr, reversing the conventional radius assignments for this geometry.
  3. Pr+fR=IGαPr + fR = I_G\alpha, where both PP and ff contribute clockwise moments: PP at the hub pulls right creating clockwise rotation, and friction acts to the right at the contact point because the spool's base tends to slip backward, also producing a clockwise moment about G.
  4. fRPr=IGαfR - Pr = I_G\alpha, where friction at the outer contact radius RR drives clockwise rotation and PP at the inner hub radius rr resists it, reflecting an assumption that the spool rolls in the direction of friction rather than in the direction of the applied cord force.
Explanation: When analyzing the rotation of a spool about its center of mass, your first job is to identify each force, where it acts, and what rotational direction its moment creates. Treat clockwise as positive and carefully assign the correct moment arm (perpendicular distance from G to the line of action). The horizontal cord is wrapped around the inner hub, so force PP acts at radius rr. Pulling right on the top side of the hub produces a clockwise moment: +Pr+Pr. The friction force acts at the outer contact point, radius RR. Because the cord pulls the spool rightward, the base of the spool tends to slip to the right, so static friction acts to the left — which produces a counterclockwise moment about G: fR-fR. Applying Newton's second law for rotation gives PrfR=IGαPr - fR = I_G\alpha, confirming A is correct. Choice B incorrectly swaps the radii, assigning PP to RR and ff to rr — a straightforward geometry error that ignores where the cord is actually wrapped. Choice C claims both PP and ff produce clockwise moments. This is wrong because leftward friction at the bottom of the spool creates a counterclockwise moment about G, not clockwise. Getting the sign of the friction moment is the most common mistake on spool problems. Choice D reverses the roles entirely, treating friction as the driver and PP as the resistor — a misread of the physical setup that has no basis in the given geometry. Study tip: For any spool or disk problem, always sketch the force, mark its point of application, and use the right-hand rule (or your sign convention) to determine moment direction before writing the equation. Sign errors on friction are the #1 source of mistakes here.

Question 4

A uniform thin ring (hoop) of mass mm and radius RR rolls without slipping along a horizontal surface. A tangential force FF is applied at the top of the hoop, directed horizontally in the direction of motion. The moment of inertia of a hoop about its center is IG=mR2I_G = mR^2.

Using ΣMG=IGα\Sigma M_G = I_G\alpha and the no-slip constraint aG=Rαa_G = R\alpha, what is the acceleration aGa_G of the hoop's center?

  1. aG=F2ma_G = \frac{F}{2m}, found by applying ΣMG=IGα\Sigma M_G = I_G\alpha for a disk (using IG=12mR2I_G = \frac{1}{2}mR^2 instead of mR2mR^2): force FF at the top gives moment FRFR, friction ff at the bottom gives moment fRfR in the opposite direction, and solving with ΣFx=maG\Sigma F_x = ma_G yields aG=F/(2m)a_G = F/(2m).
  2. aG=2F3ma_G = \frac{2F}{3m}, calculated by using the moment of inertia of a disk (IG=12mR2I_G = \frac{1}{2}mR^2) and then applying the no-slip constraint incorrectly as aG=2Rα/3a_G = 2R\alpha/3, which underestimates the rotational inertia and gives an intermediate value between the disk and hoop results.
  3. aG=Fma_G = \frac{F}{m}, found by correctly applying ΣMG=IGα\Sigma M_G = I_G\alpha with IG=mR2I_G = mR^2: force FF at the top (moment FRFR) and friction ff at the bottom (moment fRfR, opposite direction) combine with ΣFx=F+f=maG\Sigma F_x = F + f = ma_G to give f=0f = 0 and aG=F/ma_G = F/m. (correct answer)
  4. aG=F3ma_G = \frac{F}{3m}, obtained by taking moments about the contact point using Icontact=2mR2I_{\text{contact}} = 2mR^2 and moment arm 2R2R for FF, giving F(2R)=2mR2αF(2R) = 2mR^2\alpha, but then incorrectly substituting α=aG/(2R)\alpha = a_G/(2R) instead of the correct no-slip relation α=aG/R\alpha = a_G/R.
Explanation: When a hoop rolls without slipping, you need two equations working together: the translational equation ΣFx=maG\Sigma F_x = ma_G and the rotational equation ΣMG=IGα\Sigma M_G = I_G\alpha, linked by the no-slip constraint aG=Rαa_G = R\alpha. For the hoop, force FF acts at the top (moment arm RR, producing moment FRFR clockwise), and friction ff acts at the contact point (moment arm RR, producing moment fRfR counterclockwise). The rotational equation gives FRfR=mR2αFR - fR = mR^2\alpha. The translational equation gives F+f=maGF + f = ma_G. Substituting α=aG/R\alpha = a_G/R into the first equation: FRfR=mR2(aG/R)=mRaGFR - fR = mR^2(a_G/R) = mRa_G, which simplifies to Ff=maGF - f = ma_G. Adding this to F+f=maGF + f = ma_G gives 2F=2maG2F = 2ma_G, so aG=F/ma_G = F/m and f=0f = 0. This is answer C, and the striking result is that friction vanishes entirely for a hoop under this loading. Choice A uses IG=12mR2I_G = \frac{1}{2}mR^2, which is the moment of inertia for a disk, not a hoop — a critical substitution error. Choice B compounds two mistakes: wrong IGI_G (disk value) and a fabricated no-slip constraint, neither of which applies here. Choice D attempts a moment-about-contact-point approach correctly at first (Icontact=2mR2I_\text{contact} = 2mR^2, moment arm 2R2R), but then corrupts the no-slip relation by writing α=aG/(2R)\alpha = a_G/(2R) instead of α=aG/R\alpha = a_G/R. Your go-to strategy: always confirm which body you're analyzing (hoop vs. disk vs. sphere) and write down the correct IGI_G before setting up any moment equation — that single substitution determines your entire solution.

Question 5

A uniform slender rod of mass m=3 kgm = 3\text{ kg} and length L=0.8 mL = 0.8\text{ m} is pinned at end A. The rod hangs vertically at rest. A horizontal impulse J^\hat{J} is applied at the midpoint of the rod (at distance L/2L/2 from A), giving the rod an initial angular velocity ω0\omega_0. The moment of inertia about A is IA=13mL2I_A = \frac{1}{3}mL^2 and about G (midpoint) is IG=112mL2I_G = \frac{1}{12}mL^2.

After the impulse, the rod swings. At the instant when the rod has rotated 90°90° from vertical to horizontal, a student applies ΣMG=IGα\Sigma M_G = I_G\alpha to find the angular acceleration α\alpha at that instant. Which expression correctly gives α\alpha at this horizontal position (taking counterclockwise as positive, with the rod extending to the right from pin A)?

  1. α=6gL\alpha = -\frac{6g}{L}, found by taking the moment of gravity (acting downward at G, located L/2L/2 from A) about G using moment arm L/2L/2, giving mg(L/2)=IGα-mg(L/2) = I_G\alpha, so α=mg(L/2)/(mL2/12)=6g/L\alpha = -mg(L/2)/(mL^2/12) = -6g/L.
  2. α=3g2L\alpha = -\frac{3g}{2L}, obtained by applying ΣMA=IAα\Sigma M_A = I_A\alpha about the pin at A instead of about G: gravity acts at G, which is L/2L/2 from A horizontally when the rod is horizontal, giving mg(L/2)=13mL2α-mg(L/2) = \frac{1}{3}mL^2\alpha, so α=3g/(2L)\alpha = -3g/(2L).
  3. α=3g2L\alpha = -\frac{3g}{2L}, found by applying ΣMG=IGα\Sigma M_G = I_G\alpha where only the vertical pin reaction AyA_y at A (located L/2L/2 from G) contributes a moment about G; gravity acts at G and contributes no moment. After solving ΣFy=maGy\Sigma F_y = ma_{Gy} for AyA_y and substituting, one obtains α=3g/(2L)\alpha = -3g/(2L). (correct answer)
  4. α=gL\alpha = -\frac{g}{L}, found by applying ΣMG=IGα\Sigma M_G = I_G\alpha and including both the vertical pin reaction AyA_y and the horizontal pin reaction AxA_x as moment contributors about G, with AxA_x assigned a moment arm of L/2L/2 equal to the vertical distance from G to the line of action of AxA_x, which overcounts the pin's contribution.
Explanation: When a rigid body rotates about a fixed pin, you can apply Newton's second law for rotation about any point — but your choice of reference point changes which forces appear as moment contributors. This question tests whether you understand that taking moments about the center of mass G eliminates gravity (which acts at G) but keeps pin reactions in play. When the rod is horizontal, gravity acts downward at G and produces zero moment about G (zero moment arm). The pin at A, located L/2L/2 from G, exerts reactions AxA_x (horizontal) and AyA_y (vertical). With the rod horizontal and extending rightward, AyA_y acts vertically at a horizontal distance L/2L/2 from G, so it does create a moment. AxA_x acts horizontally at A, which is at the same height as G — zero vertical moment arm, zero moment contribution. Applying ΣFy=maGy\Sigma F_y = ma_{Gy}, where aGy=α(L/2)a_{Gy} = -\alpha(L/2) (centripetal terms vanish at ω=0\omega=0 if we consider the instant after impulse dies, but in general you solve for AyA_y), substitution into ΣMG=IGα\Sigma M_G = I_G\alpha yields α=3g2L\alpha = -\frac{3g}{2L}. That's C, the correct answer. A is wrong because it applies ΣMG=IGα\Sigma M_G = I_G\alpha but incorrectly treats gravity as having a moment arm of L/2L/2 about G — gravity acts at G, so its moment arm is zero. B uses ΣMA=IAα\Sigma M_A = I_A\alpha, which is valid and gives the same α=3g2L\alpha = -\frac{3g}{2L}, but the question asks specifically about applying the ΣMG=IGα\Sigma M_G = I_G\alpha formulation — so B arrives at a correct numerical answer through a method that doesn't answer what's being asked. D incorrectly assigns AxA_x a nonzero moment arm about G. Since A and G are at the same height when the rod is horizontal, AxA_x is parallel to the rod with no perpendicular distance to G — its moment is zero. Your study tip: always identify the moment arm geometrically before plugging in. Forces acting through your reference point or parallel to the position vector contribute zero moment — don't let their magnitudes tempt you into including them.

Question 6

A rigid L-shaped body lies in the horizontal plane. It consists of two uniform slender rods welded at right angles: rod AB of mass mm and length LL along the x-axis, and rod BC of mass mm and length LL along the y-axis, with B at the origin. The body is free to rotate about a frictionless vertical pin at point B. A horizontal force F=Fx^\vec{F} = F\hat{x} is applied at point C (the tip of BC).

A student wants to find α\alpha using ΣMG=IGα\Sigma M_G = I_G\alpha. The center of mass G of the L-shaped body is located at (L/4,L/4)(L/4, L/4) from B. Which of the following correctly states why it is more efficient (and less error-prone) to apply ΣMB=IBα\Sigma M_B = I_B\alpha about the fixed pin B instead of ΣMG=IGα\Sigma M_G = I_G\alpha?

  1. Taking moments about B eliminates the unknown pin reaction forces from the moment equation, since the pin forces act at B and have zero moment arm about B. By contrast, ΣMG=IGα\Sigma M_G = I_G\alpha requires the pin reaction forces explicitly — they act at B, which is offset from G, so they contribute moments about G that must first be found from the translational equations ΣF=maG\Sigma F = ma_G. (correct answer)
  2. Taking moments about B is simpler because IB<IGI_B < I_G for any rigid body by the parallel-axis theorem, so the rotational inertia is minimized at the fixed pin, reducing the magnitude of the right-hand side and making the algebra easier to check numerically.
  3. Taking moments about B is only valid when B coincides with the center of mass. Since G is at (L/4,L/4)(L/4, L/4) and not at B, ΣMB=IBα\Sigma M_B = I_B\alpha is an approximation, whereas ΣMG=IGα\Sigma M_G = I_G\alpha is the exact form of Newton's second law for rotation and should always be preferred.
  4. Taking moments about B avoids computing the location of G, since no formula for the position of G is needed to write ΣMB=IBα\Sigma M_B = I_B\alpha. The method about G also has this advantage, so both approaches are equally efficient; the real benefit of using B is simply that IBI_B is tabulated directly for common shapes.
Explanation: Whenever you see a rigid body rotating about a fixed pin, your first instinct should be to ask: "Can I take moments directly about that pin?" The answer is almost always yes — and the payoff is enormous. When you apply ΣMB=IBα\Sigma M_B = I_B\alpha about the fixed pin B, the unknown reaction forces at the pin (which can have both x- and y-components) act at B. Because their moment arm about B is zero, they vanish from the equation entirely. You're left with only the applied force FF contributing a moment, and you can solve for α\alpha in one clean step. This is exactly what answer A captures: the pin reactions are eliminated automatically, making the equation self-contained. Contrast this with ΣMG=IGα\Sigma M_G = I_G\alpha. Here, G is offset from B at (L/4,L/4)(L/4, L/4), so the pin reaction forces do have a nonzero moment arm about G — they produce moments you must account for. That forces you to first solve the translational equations ΣF=maG\Sigma \vec{F} = m\vec{a}_G to find those reaction components, then substitute them into the moment equation. It's solvable, but it's a two-step process with more algebra and more opportunities for sign errors. Answer B is wrong because the parallel-axis theorem actually guarantees IB>IGI_B > I_G (not less), since B is not the center of mass. Answer C is a dangerous misconception — ΣMB=IBα\Sigma M_B = I_B\alpha is perfectly exact for any fixed pivot, not an approximation. Answer D is wrong because using G does require locating G, and the two methods are decidedly not equally efficient. The study tip here: whenever a problem has a fixed pivot, go straight to ΣMpivot=Ipivotα\Sigma M_{\text{pivot}} = I_{\text{pivot}}\alpha. Reaction forces at a fixed point always have zero moment arm about that point — exploit that to bypass the translational equations entirely.