Statics and Dynamics Quiz: Rigid Body Force Equation
9 questions · exam conditions
0:00
Rigid Body Force EquationQuestion 1 of 9

A uniform cylinder of mass m=10 kgm = 10 \text{ kg} and radius R=0.4 mR = 0.4 \text{ m} sits on a rough inclined plane (angle θ=30°\theta = 30°) and is released from rest. The static friction coefficient is μs=0.40\mu_s = 0.40 and kinetic friction coefficient is μk=0.30\mu_k = 0.30.

Before assuming rolling without slipping, a student must verify whether slipping occurs. Using F\sum F along the incline and MG\sum M_G about the center, what is the required friction force for no-slip rolling, and does the cylinder actually roll without slipping?

Required friction f=mgsinθ/2=24.5 Nf = mg\sin\theta/2 = 24.5 \text{ N}; maximum static friction =μsmgcosθ=33.97 N= \mu_s mg\cos\theta = 33.97 \text{ N}. Since the required friction is less than the maximum, the cylinder rolls without slipping and the correct acceleration is aG=12gsinθ=2.45 m/s2a_G = \tfrac{1}{2}g\sin\theta = 2.45 \text{ m/s}^2.
Required friction f=mgsinθ/3=16.35 Nf = mg\sin\theta/3 = 16.35 \text{ N}; maximum static friction =μsmgcosθ=33.97 N= \mu_s mg\cos\theta = 33.97 \text{ N}. Since the required friction is less than the maximum, the cylinder rolls without slipping and the correct acceleration is aG=23gsinθ=3.27 m/s2a_G = \tfrac{2}{3}g\sin\theta = 3.27 \text{ m/s}^2.
Required friction f=mgsinθ/3=16.35 Nf = mg\sin\theta/3 = 16.35 \text{ N}; maximum static friction =μsmg=39.24 N= \mu_s mg = 39.24 \text{ N}. Since the required friction is less than the maximum, the cylinder rolls without slipping and the correct acceleration is aG=23gsinθ=3.27 m/s2a_G = \tfrac{2}{3}g\sin\theta = 3.27 \text{ m/s}^2.
Required friction f=mgsinθ/3=16.35 Nf = mg\sin\theta/3 = 16.35 \text{ N}; maximum static friction =μsmgcosθ=33.97 N= \mu_s mg\cos\theta = 33.97 \text{ N}. Since the required friction is less than the maximum, the cylinder rolls without slipping and the correct acceleration is aG=13gsinθ=1.63 m/s2a_G = \tfrac{1}{3}g\sin\theta = 1.63 \text{ m/s}^2.
← Back to quizzes

Statics and Dynamics Quiz

Statics and Dynamics Quiz: Rigid Body Force Equation

Practice Rigid Body Force Equation in Statics and Dynamics with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.

What this quiz covers

This quiz focuses on Rigid Body Force Equation, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for Statics and Dynamics.

How to use this quiz

Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.

All questions

Question 1

A uniform cylinder of mass m=10 kgm = 10 \text{ kg} and radius R=0.4 mR = 0.4 \text{ m} sits on a rough inclined plane (angle θ=30°\theta = 30°) and is released from rest. The static friction coefficient is μs=0.40\mu_s = 0.40 and kinetic friction coefficient is μk=0.30\mu_k = 0.30.

Before assuming rolling without slipping, a student must verify whether slipping occurs. Using F\sum F along the incline and MG\sum M_G about the center, what is the required friction force for no-slip rolling, and does the cylinder actually roll without slipping?

  1. Required friction f=mgsinθ/2=24.5 Nf = mg\sin\theta/2 = 24.5 \text{ N}; maximum static friction =μsmgcosθ=33.97 N= \mu_s mg\cos\theta = 33.97 \text{ N}. Since the required friction is less than the maximum, the cylinder rolls without slipping and the correct acceleration is aG=12gsinθ=2.45 m/s2a_G = \tfrac{1}{2}g\sin\theta = 2.45 \text{ m/s}^2.
  2. Required friction f=mgsinθ/3=16.35 Nf = mg\sin\theta/3 = 16.35 \text{ N}; maximum static friction =μsmgcosθ=33.97 N= \mu_s mg\cos\theta = 33.97 \text{ N}. Since the required friction is less than the maximum, the cylinder rolls without slipping and the correct acceleration is aG=23gsinθ=3.27 m/s2a_G = \tfrac{2}{3}g\sin\theta = 3.27 \text{ m/s}^2. (correct answer)
  3. Required friction f=mgsinθ/3=16.35 Nf = mg\sin\theta/3 = 16.35 \text{ N}; maximum static friction =μsmg=39.24 N= \mu_s mg = 39.24 \text{ N}. Since the required friction is less than the maximum, the cylinder rolls without slipping and the correct acceleration is aG=23gsinθ=3.27 m/s2a_G = \tfrac{2}{3}g\sin\theta = 3.27 \text{ m/s}^2.
  4. Required friction f=mgsinθ/3=16.35 Nf = mg\sin\theta/3 = 16.35 \text{ N}; maximum static friction =μsmgcosθ=33.97 N= \mu_s mg\cos\theta = 33.97 \text{ N}. Since the required friction is less than the maximum, the cylinder rolls without slipping and the correct acceleration is aG=13gsinθ=1.63 m/s2a_G = \tfrac{1}{3}g\sin\theta = 1.63 \text{ m/s}^2.
Explanation: When a cylinder rolls on an inclined plane, you need two equations: Newton's second law along the incline and the rotational equation about the center of mass. For a uniform cylinder, the moment of inertia is IG=12mR2I_G = \tfrac{1}{2}mR^2. The rolling constraint links linear and angular acceleration: aG=Rαa_G = R\alpha. Setting up the equations: along the incline, mgsinθf=maGmg\sin\theta - f = ma_G, and rotationally, fR=IGα=12mR2(aG/R)fR = I_G\alpha = \tfrac{1}{2}mR^2\cdot(a_G/R), giving f=12maGf = \tfrac{1}{2}ma_G. Substituting back, mgsinθ12maG=maGmg\sin\theta - \tfrac{1}{2}ma_G = ma_G, so aG=23gsinθ=3.27 m/s2a_G = \tfrac{2}{3}g\sin\theta = 3.27\ \text{m/s}^2, and the required friction is f=13mgsinθ=16.35 Nf = \tfrac{1}{3}mg\sin\theta = 16.35\ \text{N}. The maximum static friction is μsmgcosθ=0.40×10×9.81×cos30°=33.97 N\mu_s mg\cos\theta = 0.40\times10\times9.81\times\cos30° = 33.97\ \text{N}. Since 16.35<33.9716.35 < 33.97, the cylinder rolls without slipping. This confirms B is correct. Choice A uses f=mgsinθ/2f = mg\sin\theta/2 and aG=12gsinθa_G = \tfrac{1}{2}g\sin\theta, which corresponds to a hollow cylinder (IG=mR2I_G = mR^2), not a uniform solid cylinder — a classic mix-up of moment of inertia formulas. Choice C gets the required friction and acceleration right but computes maximum static friction as μsmg\mu_s mg instead of μsmgcosθ\mu_s mg\cos\theta, forgetting that the normal force on an incline is reduced by the cosine factor. Choice D finds the correct friction force but then states aG=13gsinθa_G = \tfrac{1}{3}g\sin\theta, which is simply an algebra error in solving for acceleration. Study tip: Always write both F\sum F and MG\sum M_G explicitly before solving — verify the no-slip assumption by checking frequiredμsNf_{\text{required}} \leq \mu_s N, where N=mgcosθN = mg\cos\theta on an incline, not mgmg.

Question 2

A rigid rectangular plate of mass M=12 kgM = 12 \text{ kg} is suspended horizontally by two vertical cables, one at each end. The plate is in equilibrium. One cable is suddenly cut.

Immediately after one cable is cut, before the plate has rotated appreciably, applying Fy=maG\sum F_y = m a_G to find the acceleration of the center of mass requires knowing the tension in the remaining cable. Using M\sum M about the attachment point of the remaining cable to eliminate that tension, what is the magnitude of aGa_G immediately after the cut, expressed as a fraction of gg?

  1. aG=34ga_G = \tfrac{3}{4}g, because the moment equation about the remaining support gives a constraint that, combined with Fy=MaG\sum F_y = M a_G, yields the remaining cable tension as Mg/4Mg/4, so the net downward force is 34Mg\tfrac{3}{4}Mg. (correct answer)
  2. aG=ga_G = g, because once a cable is cut the plate is in free fall and the remaining cable instantaneously loses tension, making the net force equal to the full weight MgMg.
  3. aG=12ga_G = \tfrac{1}{2}g, because by symmetry the remaining cable still carries half the weight, leaving a net downward force of Mg/2Mg/2 and thus aG=g/2a_G = g/2.
  4. aG=14ga_G = \tfrac{1}{4}g, because the remaining cable tension drops to 34Mg\tfrac{3}{4}Mg immediately after the cut, leaving a net downward force of only Mg/4Mg/4 on the plate.
Explanation: When a rigid body is suddenly released from one support while another remains, you're dealing with constrained motion, not free fall. The plate can only rotate about the remaining cable's attachment point (at least instantaneously), so you must apply both Newton's second law and the rotational equation simultaneously. Here's the key setup: let the plate have length 2L2L, with the remaining cable at one end and the center of mass at distance LL from it. Taking moments about the remaining cable's attachment point eliminates the unknown tension TT entirely. The only moment comes from gravity acting at the center: M=MgL=Iendα\sum M = MgL = I_{\text{end}} \cdot \alpha where Iend=13M(2L)2=43ML2I_{\text{end}} = \frac{1}{3}M(2L)^2 = \frac{4}{3}ML^2. Solving gives α=3g4L\alpha = \frac{3g}{4L}. The acceleration of the center of mass (at distance LL) is aG=αL=3g4a_G = \alpha L = \frac{3g}{4}. Applying Fy=MaG\sum F_y = Ma_G confirms the tension: MgT=M3g4Mg - T = M\cdot\frac{3g}{4}, so T=Mg4T = \frac{Mg}{4}. This confirms A is correct. B is wrong because the remaining cable doesn't instantly go slack — the rotational constraint means it still pulls upward, just with reduced force. C applies static reasoning (half the weight) to a dynamic situation, ignoring the rotational acceleration entirely. D gets the tension and net force backwards: it correctly finds T=3Mg4T = \frac{3Mg}{4}, but then mistakenly applies that tension value as the net force rather than computing MgTMg - T. Your study tip: whenever a support is suddenly removed, resist the instinct to use static equilibrium. Set up M\sum M about the remaining support first — it's your fastest path to eliminating the unknown reaction and finding α\alpha.

Question 3

A uniform slender bar of mass m=5 kgm = 5 \text{ kg} and length L=2 mL = 2 \text{ m} is pinned at end AA to a slider that accelerates horizontally at a0=4 m/s2a_0 = 4 \text{ m/s}^2 to the right. The bar hangs vertically downward from the pin in the initial configuration. At the instant described, the bar has zero angular velocity (ω=0\omega = 0) but has angular acceleration α\alpha (defined positive counterclockwise).

Applying Fx=maGx\sum F_x = m a_{Gx} in an inertial frame, where aGxa_{Gx} is the horizontal acceleration of the bar's center of mass, which expression correctly relates the horizontal pin force AxA_x to the system parameters? (Take rightward as positive; α\alpha is positive counterclockwise; treat the bar as a free body.)

  1. Ax=m(a0+αL/2)A_x = m(a_0 + \alpha L/2), because the weight mgmg acts downward and produces a restoring torque, so the angular acceleration always assists the forward motion of GG, making the tangential contribution add to a0a_0 regardless of the direction of α\alpha.
  2. Ax=ma0A_x = m a_0, because the center of mass must have the same horizontal acceleration as the pin (a0a_0) since the bar is rigid and the pin constrains horizontal motion of end AA, leaving no additional contribution from rotation.
  3. Ax=m(a0αL/2)A_x = m(a_0 - \alpha L/2), because the center of mass acceleration is aGx=a0+(αrel)(L/2)a_{Gx} = a_0 + (\alpha_{rel})(L/2), where for a bar hanging vertically a counterclockwise α\alpha swings GG to the left relative to AA, so the tangential contribution is αL/2-\alpha L/2 in the rightward-positive convention, giving Ax=m(a0αL/2)A_x = m(a_0 - \alpha L/2). (correct answer)
  4. Axmg=maGxA_x - mg = m a_{Gx}, giving Ax=m(g+a0)A_x = m(g + a_0), because the horizontal equation must include the weight component and the inertial resistance to the imposed acceleration a0a_0 of the pin.
Explanation: When a rigid body moves in a plane, the acceleration of any point on it equals the acceleration of a reference point plus the relative acceleration of that point with respect to the reference. For the bar's center of mass GG, located a distance L/2L/2 below pin AA: aG=aA+α×rG/Aω2rG/A\vec{a}_G = \vec{a}_A + \vec{\alpha} \times \vec{r}_{G/A} - \omega^2 \vec{r}_{G/A} Since ω=0\omega = 0, the centripetal term vanishes. With the bar hanging vertically, rG/A=L2j^\vec{r}_{G/A} = -\frac{L}{2}\hat{j}. A counterclockwise α\alpha gives α×rG/A=αk^×(L2j^)=αL2i^\vec{\alpha} \times \vec{r}_{G/A} = \alpha\hat{k} \times (-\frac{L}{2}\hat{j}) = -\frac{\alpha L}{2}\hat{i}. So the horizontal component of GG's acceleration is aGx=a0αL2a_{Gx} = a_0 - \frac{\alpha L}{2}. Applying Newton's second law horizontally: Ax=m ⁣(a0αL2)A_x = m\!\left(a_0 - \frac{\alpha L}{2}\right), confirming C is correct. Choice A is wrong because it claims the tangential contribution always adds to a0a_0. The sign depends entirely on geometry — the cross product shows it subtracts here. Choice B ignores rotation entirely, treating GG as if it were pinned directly to the slider; since the bar can rotate, GG does not share AA's acceleration. Choice D mixes up the equations of motion: weight mgmg acts vertically and belongs in the yy-equation, not the horizontal xx-equation. Study tip: Always compute aG\vec{a}_G explicitly using the relative-acceleration formula before writing Newton's law. The direction of the tangential term is determined by the cross product α×rG/A\vec{\alpha} \times \vec{r}_{G/A} — never assume it simply adds or subtracts without working through the geometry.

Question 4

A rigid body of mass mm undergoes planar motion. At a particular instant, the acceleration of its center of mass GG is known to be zero (aG=0\mathbf{a}_G = 0).

Which of the following statements about the forces and motion of this rigid body is necessarily true at that instant?

  1. The net force is zero and therefore the body must be either stationary or moving with constant velocity in a straight line, while angular velocity must also be constant because α\alpha is coupled to aGa_G through the rigid-body kinematic equations.
  2. Both the net force and the net moment about every point must be zero, because if aG=0\mathbf{a}_G = 0 the body is in static equilibrium and no angular acceleration is possible without a translational acceleration of GG.
  3. The net force on the body is zero (F=0\sum \mathbf{F} = 0), but the net moment about GG may be nonzero, allowing the body to have a nonzero angular acceleration α\alpha about its center of mass at that instant. (correct answer)
  4. The net force on the body is zero (F=0\sum \mathbf{F} = 0), and consequently the net moment about any point other than GG must also be zero, because moment equilibrium at any off-center point would otherwise imply a nonzero F\sum \mathbf{F} by the moment-force relationship.
Explanation: When analyzing a rigid body in planar motion, you should immediately reach for Newton's second law in both translational and rotational forms: F=maG\sum \mathbf{F} = m\mathbf{a}_G and MG=IGα\sum M_G = I_G \alpha. The critical insight is that these are independent equations — one governs translation, the other governs rotation, and neither forces the other to be zero. Since aG=0\mathbf{a}_G = 0, the translational equation directly gives F=m(0)=0\sum \mathbf{F} = m(0) = 0. That's definitive. But the rotational equation MG=IGα\sum M_G = I_G \alpha stands completely on its own — a nonzero net moment about GG can still produce angular acceleration α0\alpha \neq 0 regardless of what's happening translationally. Think of a figure skater with zero translational acceleration who is still spinning and changing spin rate: net force zero, net torque nonzero. Answer C correctly captures this independence. Answer A is wrong because it claims α\alpha is "coupled" to aGa_G through kinematics, implying α=0\alpha = 0. This confuses kinematics of a point on the body (where α\alpha does affect accelerations of non-G points) with the independent rotational equation of motion — they are not the same thing. Answer B goes further astray by concluding the body must be in full static equilibrium. aG=0\mathbf{a}_G = 0 says nothing about α\alpha, and "static equilibrium" requires both F=0\sum \mathbf{F} = 0 and M=0\sum M = 0 to be imposed simultaneously — that's an assumption here, not a consequence. Answer D is subtly wrong because it incorrectly concludes that moments about off-center points must also be zero. The moment about an arbitrary point PP includes a term involving rPG×maG\mathbf{r}_{PG} \times m\mathbf{a}_G, which vanishes when aG=0\mathbf{a}_G = 0, but the remaining term IGαI_G\alpha can still be nonzero. Your study tip: always keep the two Newton's law equations for rigid bodies mentally separate. Zero translational acceleration \Rightarrow zero net force. It says nothing about torque or angular acceleration.

Question 5

A crate of mass m=50 kgm = 50 \text{ kg} (modeled as a uniform rectangular block of height h=1.2 mh = 1.2 \text{ m} and width w=0.8 mw = 0.8 \text{ m}) sits on a flatbed truck. The truck decelerates at a=5 m/s2a = 5 \text{ m/s}^2. The coefficient of static friction between crate and truck bed is μs=0.6\mu_s = 0.6.

Applying Fx=maG\sum F_x = m a_G and Fy=maGy=0\sum F_y = m a_{Gy} = 0 to the crate, along with a moment equation, a student must determine whether the crate slides, tips, or remains stationary. Which outcome is correct, and what is the critical check that distinguishes tipping from sliding?

  1. The crate tips before sliding. The friction required to prevent sliding is f=ma=250 Nf = ma = 250 \text{ N}, which is less than μsN=294 N\mu_s N = 294 \text{ N}, so sliding does not occur. However, the tipping check (moment about the front bottom edge) shows the normal force would need to act at x=h/(2)(a/g)w/2=0.3060.4=0.094 mx = h/(2) \cdot (a/g) - w/2 = 0.306 - 0.4 = -0.094 \text{ m} from center, which is within the base, so the crate does not tip either — it remains stationary.
  2. The crate slides without tipping. The friction required is f=ma=250 Nf = ma = 250 \text{ N}, which exceeds μsN=μsmg=0.6(50)(9.81)=294 N\mu_s N = \mu_s mg = 0.6(50)(9.81) = 294 \text{ N}, so the friction demand exceeds the maximum and sliding occurs before any tipping can develop.
  3. The crate tips before sliding. The friction required is f=ma=250 N<μsmg=294 Nf = ma = 250 \text{ N} < \mu_s mg = 294 \text{ N}, so sliding is prevented. For the tipping check, the moment equation about the forward bottom edge gives the normal force location as x=w/2(a/g)(h/2)=0.40.306=0.094 mx = w/2 - (a/g)(h/2) = 0.4 - 0.306 = 0.094 \text{ m} from the forward edge, which is within the base (positive), confirming the crate does not tip and remains stationary.
  4. The crate tips before sliding. Since f=ma=250 N<μsmg=294 Nf = ma = 250 \text{ N} < \mu_s mg = 294 \text{ N}, sliding is prevented. The tipping condition requires the normal force to reach the forward bottom edge; the critical deceleration for tipping is atip=g(w/h)=9.81(0.8/1.2)=6.54 m/s2a_{tip} = g(w/h) = 9.81(0.8/1.2) = 6.54 \text{ m/s}^2. Since a=5 m/s2<6.54 m/s2a = 5 \text{ m/s}^2 < 6.54 \text{ m/s}^2, tipping does not occur and the crate remains stationary. (correct answer)
Explanation: When a crate sits on a decelerating truck, you face a two-part check: can friction prevent sliding, and does the inertial overturning moment cause tipping? Work through both systematically. Sliding check first. The friction force required to accelerate the crate with the truck is f=ma=50(5)=250 Nf = ma = 50(5) = 250 \text{ N}. The maximum static friction available is μsmg=0.6(50)(9.81)=294 N\mu_s mg = 0.6(50)(9.81) = 294 \text{ N}. Since 250<294250 < 294, friction is sufficient — the crate does not slide. Tipping check next. As the truck decelerates, the inertial tendency shifts the normal force toward the forward (front) edge. Tipping occurs when the normal force reaches exactly that edge, meaning it can no longer create a restoring moment. Taking moments about the forward bottom edge, the critical deceleration at which tipping begins is: atip=gwh=9.810.81.2=6.54 m/s2a_{\text{tip}} = g\frac{w}{h} = 9.81\frac{0.8}{1.2} = 6.54 \text{ m/s}^2 Since the actual deceleration a=5 m/s2<6.54 m/s2a = 5 \text{ m/s}^2 < 6.54 \text{ m/s}^2, tipping does not occur. The crate remains stationary — answer D. A is wrong because it reaches the correct conclusion (no sliding, no tipping) but uses a garbled formula with an incorrect sign and messy logic for the normal force location. B is wrong because it incorrectly claims 250 N>294 N250 \text{ N} > 294 \text{ N}, a straightforward arithmetic error. C correctly identifies that sliding doesn't occur and correctly places the normal force inside the base, but never computes or compares a critical tipping acceleration — it checks only the current state without establishing the general tipping criterion. Your strategy: always separate the two checks — sliding (force comparison) and tipping (moment or critical-acceleration comparison) — and solve them independently before drawing a conclusion.

Question 6

Two blocks, AA (mass 2m2m) on a frictionless horizontal surface and BB (mass mm) hanging vertically, are connected by a massless inextensible cord over a solid uniform cylindrical pulley of mass MM and radius RR. The cord does not slip on the pulley.

A student writes the equation of motion for block AA as TA=2maT_A = 2m \cdot a and for block BB as mgTB=mamg - T_B = m \cdot a. She then applies F=MaG\sum F = M a_G to the pulley's center and writes TBTA=MaGT_B - T_A = M a_G. What is the fundamental error in her analysis of the pulley, and what is the correct system acceleration?

  1. The error is treating the pulley as a particle; the correct approach replaces MaGM a_G with the effective mass Meff=M/2M_{eff} = M/2 in a modified translational equation TBTA=MeffaT_B - T_A = M_{eff} \cdot a, which is algebraically identical to the moment equation and yields a=mg/(3m+M/2)a = mg/(3m + M/2).
  2. The error is using MaGM a_G instead of MaG/2M a_G/2 for a rotating cylinder; the corrected translational equation for the pulley is TBTA=MaG/2T_B - T_A = M a_G/2, and since the pulley's center moves with acceleration aa, the system acceleration is a=mg/(2m+m+M/2)a = mg/(2m + m + M/2).
  3. The error is neglecting the bearing reaction at the pulley axle; once included, the net force on the pulley is zero regardless of TAT_A and TBT_B, so TA=TBT_A = T_B and the system acceleration simplifies to a=mg/(3m)=g/3a = mg/(3m)= g/3, independent of MM.
  4. The pulley's center does not translate, so aG=0a_G = 0 for the pulley and F=MaG=0\sum F = M a_G = 0 is satisfied by bearing forces, not by TBTAT_B - T_A. The pulley requires a moment equation MG=IGα\sum M_G = I_G \alpha, giving (TBTA)R=(MR2/2)α=(MR2/2)(a/R)(T_B - T_A)R = (MR^2/2)\alpha = (MR^2/2)(a/R), so TBTA=Ma/2T_B - T_A = Ma/2. The correct acceleration is a=mg/(2m+m+M/2)a = mg/(2m + m + M/2). (correct answer)
Explanation: When a pulley has mass and the cord doesn't slip, you must treat it as a rigid body in rotation, not a translating particle. The key question to ask yourself: does the pulley's center move? In this classic Atwood-with-pulley setup, the axle is fixed — the pulley spins in place, so its center of mass has zero acceleration. This is exactly what makes D correct. Since aG=0a_G = 0, writing F=MaG\sum F = Ma_G for the pulley gives zero — that equation is satisfied by the bearing (axle) reaction forces, which absorb the net cord tension difference. It tells you nothing useful about the dynamics. Instead, you need the rotational equation about the fixed axle: MG=IGα\sum M_G = I_G \alpha. For a solid cylinder, IG=MR2/2I_G = MR^2/2, and the no-slip condition gives α=a/R\alpha = a/R. So (TBTA)R=MR22aR(T_B - T_A)R = \frac{MR^2}{2} \cdot \frac{a}{R}, which simplifies to TBTA=Ma2T_B - T_A = \frac{Ma}{2}. Combining with block A (TA=2maT_A = 2ma) and block B (mgTB=mamg - T_B = ma), you get a=mg3m+M/2a = \frac{mg}{3m + M/2}. A is mathematically equivalent in its final answer but frames the fix as an "effective mass" translational equation — this obscures the actual physics and misidentifies the error as treating the pulley as a particle rather than misapplying the translational equation to a non-translating body. B makes a similar structural mistake: it applies a modified F\sum F equation to the pulley as if the center translates, which is physically wrong even if the algebra accidentally resembles the correct result. C correctly identifies that bearing forces exist but draws the wrong conclusion — bearing forces do not force TA=TBT_A = T_B; that would only be true for a massless pulley. M0M \neq 0 means the tensions differ. Your study tip: whenever a pulley has mass and a fixed axle, immediately switch to a moment equation — the translational equation for the pulley is useless (or just gives you the bearing force).

Question 7

A rigid body of mass mm undergoes general planar motion. A student sets up the equations of motion and, for convenience, writes MA=IAα\sum M_A = I_A \alpha, where AA is an arbitrary point on the body that is neither the center of mass GG nor a fixed point.

Under what condition is the equation MA=IAα\sum M_A = I_A \alpha valid for an arbitrary body-fixed point AA in planar motion, and what is the general correct form if that condition is not met?

  1. MA=IAα\sum M_A = I_A \alpha is valid only when AA is the center of mass or a fixed pivot. For a general body-fixed point, the correct form is MA=IGα+rG/A×maG\sum M_A = I_G \alpha + \mathbf{r}_{G/A} \times m\mathbf{a}_G, which equals IAαI_A \alpha only in the special case that aG\mathbf{a}_G is directed along rG/A\mathbf{r}_{G/A} (i.e., the two vectors are parallel, so their cross product vanishes).
  2. MA=IAα\sum M_A = I_A \alpha is valid only when AA is the center of mass or a fixed pivot (aA=0\mathbf{a}_A = 0). The general correct form for any body-fixed point is MA=IAαmrG/A×aA\sum M_A = I_A \alpha - m\,\mathbf{r}_{G/A} \times \mathbf{a}_A, where the correction term accounts for the acceleration of point AA; this reduces to IAαI_A \alpha precisely when aA=0\mathbf{a}_A = 0. (correct answer)
  3. MA=IAα\sum M_A = I_A \alpha is always valid for any body-fixed point AA, because the parallel-axis theorem guarantees that IAI_A already accounts for the geometric offset from GG, making additional correction terms unnecessary regardless of how point AA is accelerating.
  4. MA=IAα\sum M_A = I_A \alpha is valid whenever AA is the instantaneous center of zero velocity, because at that instant AA momentarily acts as a fixed pivot and the standard fixed-point equation applies exactly, with no inertia correction required.
Explanation: Whenever you encounter moment equations for rigid bodies in planar motion, the critical question is: about which point are you summing moments, and is that point accelerating? The clean form MA=IAα\sum M_A = I_A \alpha is only guaranteed when the moment center has zero acceleration. The general equation of motion for moments about an arbitrary body-fixed point AA is derived by combining the rotational and translational equations. The result is: MA=IGα+rG/A×maG\sum M_A = I_G \alpha + \mathbf{r}_{G/A} \times m\mathbf{a}_G Using the parallel-axis theorem (IA=IG+mrG/A2I_A = I_G + mr_{G/A}^2) and expanding aG\mathbf{a}_G in terms of aA\mathbf{a}_A, this simplifies to: MA=IAαmrG/A×aA\sum M_A = I_A \alpha - m\,\mathbf{r}_{G/A} \times \mathbf{a}_A The correction term mrG/A×aAm\,\mathbf{r}_{G/A} \times \mathbf{a}_A vanishes only when aA=0\mathbf{a}_A = 0 — meaning AA is a fixed pivot or the center of mass (where rG/A=0\mathbf{r}_{G/A} = \mathbf{0}). This confirms B is correct. A is wrong because it states the correction term vanishes when aGrG/A\mathbf{a}_G \parallel \mathbf{r}_{G/A}, which misidentifies which acceleration matters — it's aA\mathbf{a}_A, not aG\mathbf{a}_G, that drives the correction. C is wrong because the parallel-axis theorem is purely geometric — it accounts for spatial offset but says nothing about the kinetics of an accelerating point. Acceleration of AA always introduces extra terms. D is wrong because the instantaneous center has zero velocity, not zero acceleration. An accelerating instantaneous center still requires the correction term, making MIC=IICα\sum M_{IC} = I_{IC}\alpha generally invalid. Study tip: Memorize the rule — "fixed point or center of mass only." Any other moment center requires a correction for its acceleration.

Question 8

A slender uniform rod of mass m=6 kgm = 6 \text{ kg} and length L=1.2 mL = 1.2 \text{ m} is pinned at one end to a fixed wall and held horizontal. When released from rest, the pin exerts both horizontal and vertical reaction forces on the rod.

Immediately after release, which of the following correctly applies Fy=maGy\sum F_y = m a_{Gy} to determine the vertical pin reaction AyA_y? (Take downward as positive; aGya_{Gy} is the vertical acceleration of the center of mass.)

  1. mgAy=maGymg - A_y = m a_{Gy}, with aGy=3g4a_{Gy} = \tfrac{3g}{4} (downward) from the rotational kinematics, giving Ay=mg/4A_y = mg/4 upward, meaning the pin supports only one-quarter of the rod's weight at the instant of release. (correct answer)
  2. mgAy=maGymg - A_y = m a_{Gy}, with aGy=g2a_{Gy} = \tfrac{g}{2} (downward) because the center moves in a circular arc and the centripetal acceleration is zero at the instant of release while the tangential component equals αL/2=g/2\alpha L/2 = g/2, giving Ay=mg/2A_y = mg/2 upward.
  3. Aymg=maGyA_y - mg = m a_{Gy}, with aGy=3g4a_{Gy} = \tfrac{3g}{4} (upward) because the pin must accelerate the rod upward to keep the pin end fixed, giving Ay=mg+m(3g/4)=7mg4A_y = mg + m(3g/4) = \tfrac{7mg}{4} upward.
  4. mgAy=maGymg - A_y = m a_{Gy}, with aGy=0a_{Gy} = 0 because the rod starts from rest and has no velocity, so the center of mass has zero acceleration at the instant of release, giving Ay=mgA_y = mg upward.
Explanation: When a rigid body rotates about a fixed pin, you must find the acceleration of the center of mass using rotational kinematics — not intuition about "starting from rest." The key steps are: (1) find angular acceleration α\alpha from the moment equation, (2) find aGa_{G} from kinematics, then (3) apply Newton's second law. Taking moments about the pin immediately after release: MA=IAα\sum M_A = I_A \alpha gives mgL2=13mL2αmg\cdot\frac{L}{2} = \frac{1}{3}mL^2\,\alpha, so α=3g2L\alpha = \frac{3g}{2L}. The center of mass sits at L/2L/2 from the pin and moves in a circle. At the instant of release the rod has zero angular velocity, so the centripetal acceleration is zero. Only the tangential (downward) component exists: aGy=αL2=3g2LL2=3g4a_{Gy} = \alpha\cdot\frac{L}{2} = \frac{3g}{2L}\cdot\frac{L}{2} = \frac{3g}{4}. Applying Fy=maGy\sum F_y = ma_{Gy} with downward positive: mgAy=m3g4mg - A_y = m\cdot\frac{3g}{4}, so Ay=mg4A_y = \frac{mg}{4} upward. This is exactly what A describes — the correct answer. B is wrong because it uses aGy=g/2a_{Gy} = g/2, which comes from incorrectly computing the tangential acceleration (using g/Lg/L rather than 3g/(2L)3g/(2L) for α\alpha). C flips the sign convention, claiming the center accelerates upward, which contradicts the physics — gravity pulls the free end down. D confuses zero velocity with zero acceleration. Starting from rest means ω=0\omega = 0, not α=0\alpha = 0; the rod is still acted on by gravity, producing nonzero angular acceleration immediately. As a strategy, always distinguish velocity from acceleration. "Released from rest" only tells you ω=0\omega = 0 at that instant — you must still compute α\alpha from the moment equation to find the true acceleration of the center of mass.

Question 9

A uniform thin disk of mass m=8 kgm = 8 \text{ kg} and radius r=0.3 mr = 0.3 \text{ m} rolls without slipping on a horizontal surface. A horizontal force P=40 NP = 40 \text{ N} is applied at the center of the disk. The coefficient of static friction between the disk and surface is μs=0.25\mu_s = 0.25.

Applying Fx=maG\sum F_x = m a_G to the disk, which of the following correctly identifies the net horizontal force equation, and what is the resulting acceleration of the center of mass?

  1. Pf=maGP - f = m a_G, giving aG=3.33 m/s2a_G = 3.33 \text{ m/s}^2, where ff is the friction force found from the rolling constraint and the moment equation to be P/3=13.33 NP/3 = 13.33 \text{ N}. (correct answer)
  2. P=maGP = m a_G, giving aG=5.0 m/s2a_G = 5.0 \text{ m/s}^2, because friction acts perpendicular to motion for rolling contact and therefore does not appear in the horizontal force equation.
  3. Pf=maGP - f = m a_G, giving aG=1.67 m/s2a_G = 1.67 \text{ m/s}^2, where friction is taken as the maximum static value f=μsmg=19.6 Nf = \mu_s m g = 19.6 \text{ N} regardless of the rolling constraint.
  4. P+f=maGP + f = m a_G, giving aG=6.67 m/s2a_G = 6.67 \text{ m/s}^2, because the friction force at the contact point acts in the same direction as PP to oppose relative slip and thereby assists the forward motion of the center.
Explanation: When a disk rolls without slipping, friction is a real horizontal force that appears in your equations — it's what enforces the rolling constraint. The key is finding its actual value through the combined translational and rotational equations, not assuming it equals its maximum value. For a disk rolling without slipping, you have two governing equations. Translating: Pf=maGP - f = ma_G, and rotating about the contact point (or center): Pr=IGαPr = I_G \alpha, where IG=12mr2I_G = \frac{1}{2}mr^2 and the rolling constraint gives aG=rαa_G = r\alpha. Substituting, the moment equation yields f=P/3=40/313.33 Nf = P/3 = 40/3 \approx 13.33 \text{ N}. Plugging back: aG=(Pf)/m=(4013.33)/83.33 m/s2a_G = (P - f)/m = (40 - 13.33)/8 \approx 3.33 \text{ m/s}^2. This confirms A is correct. You should also verify f<μsmg=0.25(8)(9.8)=19.6 Nf < \mu_s mg = 0.25(8)(9.8) = 19.6 \text{ N}, confirming rolling without slipping is valid. B is wrong because it ignores friction entirely, treating the disk like a particle sliding on a frictionless surface. Friction absolutely acts horizontally at the contact point for a rolling body. C uses f=μsmgf = \mu_s mg as if the disk is on the verge of slipping — but the problem doesn't state that condition. You must derive ff from the rolling constraint, not assume maximum friction. D gets the direction of friction backwards; friction acts opposite to PP (backward) to prevent the contact point from sliding forward, so it reduces, not increases, aGa_G. Your study tip: for any rolling-without-slipping problem, always write both Fx=maG\sum F_x = ma_G and M=Iα\sum M = I\alpha with the constraint aG=rαa_G = r\alpha — only then can you correctly solve for the unknown friction force.