Statics and Dynamics Quiz: Parallel Axis Theorem
15 questions · exam conditions
0:00
Parallel Axis TheoremQuestion 1 of 15

An L-shaped (angle) section is formed by two rectangular legs: a horizontal leg (width 100 mm, thickness 10 mm) and a vertical leg (width 10 mm, height 90 mm), joined at their inner corner so that the section's outer corner is at the origin. The centroid of the composite section is located at xˉ=17.4\bar{x} = 17.4 mm and yˉ=22.4\bar{y} = 22.4 mm from the outer corner (origin). A student needs the moment of inertia about the vertical centroidal axis (the axis parallel to y, passing through xˉ=17.4\bar{x} = 17.4 mm). She computes IyˉI_{\bar{y}} for each leg about its own centroidal vertical axis and then applies the parallel-axis theorem. The horizontal leg's own centroid is at x=50x = 50 mm from the origin; the vertical leg's own centroid is at x=5x = 5 mm from the origin. Which parallel-axis distances dd are correct for shifting each leg's inertia to the composite vertical centroidal axis at xˉ=17.4\bar{x} = 17.4 mm?

dhoriz leg=22.45=17.4d_{\text{horiz leg}} = |22.4 - 5| = 17.4 mm and dvert leg=22.450=27.6d_{\text{vert leg}} = |22.4 - 50| = 27.6 mm, because the parallel-axis theorem for the vertical centroidal axis uses the vertical (y-direction) offsets between each part's centroid and the composite centroid.
dhoriz leg=5017.4=32.6d_{\text{horiz leg}} = |50 - 17.4| = 32.6 mm and dvert leg=517.4=12.4d_{\text{vert leg}} = |5 - 17.4| = 12.4 mm, since the parallel-axis distance for a vertical axis is the horizontal offset between each part's centroid and the composite centroidal vertical axis.
dhoriz leg=(5017.4)2+(522.4)2d_{\text{horiz leg}} = \sqrt{(50-17.4)^2 + (5-22.4)^2} mm and dvert leg=(517.4)2+(4522.4)2d_{\text{vert leg}} = \sqrt{(5-17.4)^2 + (45-22.4)^2} mm, because the parallel-axis theorem requires the full Euclidean distance between each part's centroid and the composite centroid.
dhoriz leg=50d_{\text{horiz leg}} = 50 mm and dvert leg=5d_{\text{vert leg}} = 5 mm, because the parallel-axis distances must be measured from the origin (outer corner datum) rather than from the composite centroidal axis, since the composite centroid location already accounts for the section geometry.
← Back to quizzes

Statics and Dynamics Quiz

Statics and Dynamics Quiz: Parallel Axis Theorem

Practice Parallel Axis Theorem in Statics and Dynamics with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.

What this quiz covers

This quiz focuses on Parallel Axis Theorem, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for Statics and Dynamics.

How to use this quiz

Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.

All questions

Question 1

An L-shaped (angle) section is formed by two rectangular legs: a horizontal leg (width 100 mm, thickness 10 mm) and a vertical leg (width 10 mm, height 90 mm), joined at their inner corner so that the section's outer corner is at the origin. The centroid of the composite section is located at xˉ=17.4\bar{x} = 17.4 mm and yˉ=22.4\bar{y} = 22.4 mm from the outer corner (origin). A student needs the moment of inertia about the vertical centroidal axis (the axis parallel to y, passing through xˉ=17.4\bar{x} = 17.4 mm). She computes IyˉI_{\bar{y}} for each leg about its own centroidal vertical axis and then applies the parallel-axis theorem. The horizontal leg's own centroid is at x=50x = 50 mm from the origin; the vertical leg's own centroid is at x=5x = 5 mm from the origin. Which parallel-axis distances dd are correct for shifting each leg's inertia to the composite vertical centroidal axis at xˉ=17.4\bar{x} = 17.4 mm?

  1. dhoriz leg=22.45=17.4d_{\text{horiz leg}} = |22.4 - 5| = 17.4 mm and dvert leg=22.450=27.6d_{\text{vert leg}} = |22.4 - 50| = 27.6 mm, because the parallel-axis theorem for the vertical centroidal axis uses the vertical (y-direction) offsets between each part's centroid and the composite centroid.
  2. dhoriz leg=5017.4=32.6d_{\text{horiz leg}} = |50 - 17.4| = 32.6 mm and dvert leg=517.4=12.4d_{\text{vert leg}} = |5 - 17.4| = 12.4 mm, since the parallel-axis distance for a vertical axis is the horizontal offset between each part's centroid and the composite centroidal vertical axis. (correct answer)
  3. dhoriz leg=(5017.4)2+(522.4)2d_{\text{horiz leg}} = \sqrt{(50-17.4)^2 + (5-22.4)^2} mm and dvert leg=(517.4)2+(4522.4)2d_{\text{vert leg}} = \sqrt{(5-17.4)^2 + (45-22.4)^2} mm, because the parallel-axis theorem requires the full Euclidean distance between each part's centroid and the composite centroid.
  4. dhoriz leg=50d_{\text{horiz leg}} = 50 mm and dvert leg=5d_{\text{vert leg}} = 5 mm, because the parallel-axis distances must be measured from the origin (outer corner datum) rather than from the composite centroidal axis, since the composite centroid location already accounts for the section geometry.
Explanation: Whenever you encounter a moment of inertia problem involving composite sections, the key question to ask is: which direction does the axis run, and which coordinate offset matters? For a vertical centroidal axis (parallel to y), the parallel-axis theorem states Iyˉ=Iy,own+Ad2I_{\bar{y}} = I_{y,\text{own}} + A d^2, where dd is the horizontal (x-direction) distance between the part's own centroidal vertical axis and the composite's vertical centroidal axis. This is because shifting a vertical axis left or right requires measuring that horizontal gap — not any vertical distance. For the horizontal leg, its centroid sits at x=50x = 50 mm, so its distance from the composite centroidal axis at xˉ=17.4\bar{x} = 17.4 mm is d=5017.4=32.6d = |50 - 17.4| = 32.6 mm. For the vertical leg, its centroid sits at x=5x = 5 mm, giving d=517.4=12.4d = |5 - 17.4| = 12.4 mm. That confirms B as correct. Choice A swaps the logic entirely — it uses the y-coordinate offsets (17.4 mm and 27.6 mm) to shift a vertical axis, which is backward. Those y-distances would be relevant for shifting a horizontal axis, not a vertical one. Choice C uses full Euclidean (diagonal) distances, which have no place in the parallel-axis theorem; the theorem always requires the perpendicular distance between two parallel axes, not a 2D diagonal. Choice D measures from the origin rather than from the composite centroidal axis — this conflates the centroid-location calculation with the parallel-axis shift, producing the wrong reference point. Study tip: Before applying Ad2Ad^2, always identify the axis direction first. Vertical axis → use horizontal (x) offsets. Horizontal axis → use vertical (y) offsets. Writing this as a two-column rule on your formula sheet can prevent the axis-confusion trap that makes A so tempting.

Question 2

A 2 kg body has I=5I=5 kg·m² about its center and 88 kg·m² about parallel axis B. Find distance from B to center.

  1. 1.50 m
  2. 0.87 m
  3. 1.22 m (correct answer)
  4. 6.00 m
Explanation: Use the parallel-axis theorem: I about B equals I about center plus m d^2. Subtract the center value: 8 - 5 = 3 kg m^2, then divide by mass 2 kg: 3 / 2 = 1.5 m^2. Taking the square root gives d = 1.22 m. The tempting error is 1.50 m, which is d^2, not the distance d.

Question 3

Disk mass mm, radius RR; II about a diameter is mR2/4mR^2/4. Find II about a parallel tangent in the disk plane.

  1. 3mR2/23mR^2/2
  2. 5mR2/45mR^2/4 (correct answer)
  3. mR2mR^2
  4. mR2/4mR^2/4
Explanation: The tangent line in the disk plane is a distance R from the center, so you add mR^2 to the given diameter moment. Thus I = mR^2/4 + mR^2 = 5mR^2/4. A tempting wrong answer is 3mR^2/2, which comes from using a tangent perpendicular to the plane instead of one in the disk plane.

Question 4

Rod mass mm, length LL; II about one end is mL2/3mL^2/3. Find II about a parallel axis L/3L/3 from that end.

  1. mL2/9mL^2/9 (correct answer)
  2. 4mL2/94mL^2/9
  3. 13mL2/3613mL^2/36
  4. 7mL2/367mL^2/36
Explanation: The new axis is L/3 from the end, so it is L/6 from the rod's center. Use the parallel-axis theorem from the center: I = mL^2/12 + m(L/6)^2 = mL^2/12 + mL^2/36 = mL^2/9. The tempting error is adding m(L/3)^2 to the given mL^2/3, but that shifts from the end axis instead of the center, giving 4mL^2/9.

Question 5

3 kg rod (center I=4I=4 kg·m², length 2 m) with a 2 kg particle at one end; find II for parallel axis at other end.

  1. 7 kg·m²
  2. 15 kg·m² (correct answer)
  3. 9 kg·m²
  4. 12 kg·m²
Explanation: Move the rod from its center to the end axis using parallel axis: 4 + 3(1)^2 = 7 kg m^2. The 2 kg particle is 2 m from that end axis, so it adds 2(2)^2 = 8. Total 15. A common mistake is stopping at 7 and forgetting the particle.

Question 6

A 4 kg body has I=3.0I=3.0 kg·m² about a parallel axis 0.5 m from its center. Find II about its center.

  1. 3.0 kg·m²
  2. 4.0 kg·m²
  3. 1.0 kg·m²
  4. 2.0 kg·m² (correct answer)
Explanation: The parallel-axis theorem says I about a shifted axis equals I about the center plus m d^2. Here m d^2 = 4(0.5)^2 = 1.0 kg m^2, so the center value is 3.0 - 1.0 = 2.0 kg m^2. The tempting wrong answer is 4.0 kg m^2, from adding 1.0 instead of subtracting; the shifted axis always has the larger moment of inertia.

Question 7

Three identical thin disks, each of mass mm and radius rr, are arranged with their centers equally spaced at 120°120° intervals on a circle of radius RR (i.e., each disk center is a distance RR from the central axis of the assembly). Each disk's face is perpendicular to the central axis.

Using the parallel-axis theorem, what is the total moment of inertia of the three-disk assembly about the central axis of the assembly (the axis equidistant from all three disk centers, perpendicular to all disk faces)?

  1. Itotal=3(12mr2)=32mr2I_{\text{total}} = 3\left(\frac{1}{2}mr^2\right) = \frac{3}{2}mr^2, because the three parallel-axis terms mR2mR^2 cancel by symmetry since the displacement vectors of the three disk centers sum to zero for a symmetric 120°120° arrangement.
  2. Itotal=3(14mr2+mR2)=34mr2+3mR2I_{\text{total}} = 3\left(\frac{1}{4}mr^2 + mR^2\right) = \frac{3}{4}mr^2 + 3mR^2, because the relevant centroidal moment for a disk about a diameter axis is 14mr2\frac{1}{4}mr^2, which applies when the spin axis is perpendicular to the disk's own axis.
  3. Itotal=3(12mr2+mR2)=32mr2+3mR2I_{\text{total}} = 3\left(\frac{1}{2}mr^2 + mR^2\right) = \frac{3}{2}mr^2 + 3mR^2, because each disk contributes its own centroidal polar moment 12mr2\frac{1}{2}mr^2 plus the parallel-axis shift mR2mR^2, and the three shifts add rather than cancel due to the symmetric but non-collinear arrangement. (correct answer)
  4. Itotal=12(3m)(3r)2=272mr2I_{\text{total}} = \frac{1}{2}(3m)(3r)^2 = \frac{27}{2}mr^2, because the assembly can be treated as a single equivalent disk of total mass 3m3m and effective radius 3r3r about the central axis, leveraging the rotational symmetry.
Explanation: When a problem asks for the moment of inertia of an assembly of objects about a common axis, your go-to tool is the parallel-axis theorem: I=Icm+md2I = I_{cm} + md^2, where IcmI_{cm} is the object's moment of inertia about its own center of mass, and dd is the distance from that center to the new axis. For a system of objects, you simply sum each contribution. For a thin disk spinning about its own central axis (perpendicular to the face), the centroidal moment of inertia is 12mr2\frac{1}{2}mr^2. Here, the assembly's central axis is parallel to each disk's own axis, so this formula applies directly. Each disk center sits a distance RR from the central axis, contributing a parallel-axis term of mR2mR^2. One disk contributes 12mr2+mR2\frac{1}{2}mr^2 + mR^2, and since all three disks are identical with the same RR, the total is 3(12mr2+mR2)=32mr2+3mR23\left(\frac{1}{2}mr^2 + mR^2\right) = \frac{3}{2}mr^2 + 3mR^2, confirming C. A is a common and tempting trap: the displacement vectors of the three disk centers do sum to zero by symmetry, but moment of inertia uses d2d^2, a scalar distance — not a vector. Squared distances are always positive and never cancel. B uses 14mr2\frac{1}{4}mr^2 as the centroidal term, which is correct only for rotation about a diameter of the disk, not about the axis perpendicular to its face — a completely different geometry. D invents a fictional "equivalent single disk" with no physical basis; you cannot combine radius and mass this way. Your key takeaway: the parallel-axis shift mR2mR^2 always adds — it can never be negative or cancel, because d20d^2 \geq 0 always. If symmetry is tempting you to cancel these terms, that's your signal to slow down and check whether you're working with vectors or scalars.

Question 8

A uniform semicircular area of radius RR has its diameter along the x-axis. Its centroid is located at yˉ=4R3π\bar{y} = \frac{4R}{3\pi} above the diameter. The moment of inertia of the full circle about the diameter axis is Icircle, diam=πR44I_{\text{circle, diam}} = \frac{\pi R^4}{4}, so the semicircle's moment of inertia about its own diameter axis (x-axis) is Ix=πR48I_{x} = \frac{\pi R^4}{8}.

A student needs the moment of inertia of the semicircular area about its own centroidal axis (parallel to the diameter, passing through yˉ=4R3π\bar{y} = \frac{4R}{3\pi}). She correctly applies the parallel-axis theorem in reverse: Ixˉ=IxAd2I_{\bar{x}} = I_x - A d^2, where A=πR22A = \frac{\pi R^2}{2} and d=4R3πd = \frac{4R}{3\pi}. Which of the following correctly evaluates this expression?

  1. Ixˉ=πR48πR22(4R3π)2=πR484R49πI_{\bar{x}} = \frac{\pi R^4}{8} - \frac{\pi R^2}{2}\left(\frac{4R}{3\pi}\right)^2 = \frac{\pi R^4}{8} - \frac{4R^4}{9\pi}, because the Ad2Ad^2 term evaluates to πR2216R29π2=4R49π\frac{\pi R^2}{2} \cdot \frac{16R^2}{9\pi^2} = \frac{4R^4}{9\pi} after canceling one factor of π\pi.
  2. Ixˉ=πR48+πR22(4R3π)2=πR48+8R49πI_{\bar{x}} = \frac{\pi R^4}{8} + \frac{\pi R^2}{2}\left(\frac{4R}{3\pi}\right)^2 = \frac{\pi R^4}{8} + \frac{8R^4}{9\pi}, because shifting from a non-centroidal axis to the centroidal axis always adds the Ad2Ad^2 term rather than subtracting it.
  3. Ixˉ=πR48πR22(4R3π)=πR482R33I_{\bar{x}} = \frac{\pi R^4}{8} - \frac{\pi R^2}{2}\left(\frac{4R}{3\pi}\right) = \frac{\pi R^4}{8} - \frac{2R^3}{3}, because the parallel-axis correction for a reverse shift uses AdAd (first power) rather than Ad2Ad^2.
  4. Ixˉ=πR48πR22(4R3π)2=πR488R49πI_{\bar{x}} = \frac{\pi R^4}{8} - \frac{\pi R^2}{2}\left(\frac{4R}{3\pi}\right)^2 = \frac{\pi R^4}{8} - \frac{8R^4}{9\pi}, which simplifies to Ixˉ=R4(π889π)I_{\bar{x}} = R^4\left(\frac{\pi}{8} - \frac{8}{9\pi}\right). (correct answer)
Explanation: Whenever you see a moment of inertia problem involving a non-standard axis, your first instinct should be the parallel-axis theorem: I=Ixˉ+Ad2I = I_{\bar{x}} + Ad^2, where IxˉI_{\bar{x}} is the centroidal moment of inertia, AA is the area, and dd is the perpendicular distance between the two axes. Here, you already know IxI_x about the diameter (a non-centroidal axis), so you rearrange to find the centroidal value: Ixˉ=IxAd2I_{\bar{x}} = I_x - Ad^2. Plugging in, the Ad2Ad^2 correction term becomes πR22(4R3π)2=πR2216R29π2=16R418π=8R49π\frac{\pi R^2}{2} \cdot \left(\frac{4R}{3\pi}\right)^2 = \frac{\pi R^2}{2} \cdot \frac{16R^2}{9\pi^2} = \frac{16R^4}{18\pi} = \frac{8R^4}{9\pi}. Therefore Ixˉ=πR488R49π=R4 ⁣(π889π)I_{\bar{x}} = \frac{\pi R^4}{8} - \frac{8R^4}{9\pi} = R^4\!\left(\frac{\pi}{8} - \frac{8}{9\pi}\right), confirming D is correct. Choice A makes an arithmetic error when squaring: it writes 16R29π2\frac{16R^2}{9\pi^2} but then cancels only one factor of π\pi, leaving 4R49π\frac{4R^4}{9\pi} instead of the correct 8R49π\frac{8R^4}{9\pi}. The student forgot the factor of 2 from the area term. Choice B reverses the sign, adding Ad2Ad^2 instead of subtracting it — this would be correct if you were shifting away from the centroid, but here you're shifting toward it, so you subtract. Choice C misapplies the theorem entirely by using dd to the first power instead of d2d^2; the parallel-axis theorem always involves the square of the distance. As a study tip, always track the direction of your axis shift: moving away from the centroid means you add Ad2Ad^2; moving toward it means you subtract. Writing the standard form Ifar=Ixˉ+Ad2I_{\text{far}} = I_{\bar{x}} + Ad^2 and solving for what you need prevents sign errors every time.

Question 9

A structural T-section is formed by a horizontal flange (width 200 mm, thickness 20 mm) sitting atop a vertical web (width 20 mm, height 100 mm). The centroid of the composite section is located 34.6 mm from the bottom of the web (i.e., 65.4 mm from the top of the flange). Individual centroidal moments of inertia: flange Ixˉ,F=200(20)312I_{\bar{x},F} = \frac{200(20)^3}{12}, web Ixˉ,W=20(100)312I_{\bar{x},W} = \frac{20(100)^3}{12}. The centroid of the flange is 110 mm from the bottom; the centroid of the web is 50 mm from the bottom.

A student computes the moment of inertia of the T-section about the centroidal axis of the composite section (34.6 mm from the bottom). She correctly identifies the parallel-axis distances as dF=11034.6=75.4d_F = 110 - 34.6 = 75.4 mm for the flange and dW=5034.6=15.4d_W = 50 - 34.6 = 15.4 mm for the web. However, she then writes: Ix=Ixˉ,F+AF(75.4)2+Ixˉ,W+AW(15.4)2I_x = I_{\bar{x},F} + A_F(75.4)^2 + I_{\bar{x},W} + A_W(15.4)^2 where AF=200(20)=4000 mm2A_F = 200(20) = 4000 \text{ mm}^2 and AW=20(100)=2000 mm2A_W = 20(100) = 2000 \text{ mm}^2. Is this expression correct, and what result does it yield (approximately)?

  1. The expression is correct. It yields approximately Ix2.41×107 mm4I_x \approx 2.41 \times 10^7 \text{ mm}^4, obtained by adding each part's own centroidal inertia to the parallel-axis term Ad2A d^2, with distances measured from each part's centroid to the composite centroid. (correct answer)
  2. The expression is incorrect because the parallel-axis distances should be measured from the bottom of the section (datum), not from the composite centroid. The correct distances are dF=110d_F = 110 mm and dW=50d_W = 50 mm, yielding Ix5.62×107 mm4I_x \approx 5.62 \times 10^7 \text{ mm}^4.
  3. The expression is incorrect because the parallel-axis theorem requires squaring the sum of the individual offsets: Ix=Ixˉ,F+AF(75.4+15.4)2+Ixˉ,WI_x = I_{\bar{x},F} + A_F(75.4 + 15.4)^2 + I_{\bar{x},W}, which gives Ix3.54×107 mm4I_x \approx 3.54 \times 10^7 \text{ mm}^4.
  4. The expression is correct in form but numerically incorrect because the composite centroid is at 34.6 mm, so dFd_F should be 11034.6=75.4110 - 34.6 = 75.4 mm and dWd_W should be 34.650=15.434.6 - 50 = -15.4 mm; since dWd_W is negative, it should not be squared, yielding Ix2.28×107 mm4I_x \approx 2.28 \times 10^7 \text{ mm}^4.
Explanation: When computing the moment of inertia of a composite section about its centroidal axis, you apply the parallel-axis theorem to each part independently: Ix=(Ixˉ,i+Aidi2)I_x = \sum\left(I_{\bar{x},i} + A_i d_i^2\right), where did_i is the distance from each part's own centroid to the composite centroid. The key insight is that each part gets its own IxˉI_{\bar{x}} plus its own Ad2Ad^2 term — they're simply summed together. The student's expression is exactly this. For the flange: Ixˉ,F+AFdF2=200(20)312+4000(75.4)2133,333+22,740,64022.87×106 mm4I_{\bar{x},F} + A_F d_F^2 = \frac{200(20)^3}{12} + 4000(75.4)^2 \approx 133{,}333 + 22{,}740{,}640 \approx 22.87 \times 10^6 \text{ mm}^4. For the web: Ixˉ,W+AWdW2=20(100)312+2000(15.4)21,666,667+474,3202.14×106 mm4I_{\bar{x},W} + A_W d_W^2 = \frac{20(100)^3}{12} + 2000(15.4)^2 \approx 1{,}666{,}667 + 474{,}320 \approx 2.14 \times 10^6 \text{ mm}^4. Summing gives approximately 2.41×107 mm42.41 \times 10^7 \text{ mm}^4, confirming A is correct. Choice B mistakes the reference point — distances in the parallel-axis theorem must be measured to the composite centroid, not to an arbitrary datum like the bottom. Using raw datum distances would double-count offsets already embedded in the centroid calculation. Choice C commits a classic error of combining the two offsets into a single squared term, as if both parts share one displacement — they don't; each part has its own independent dd. Choice D wrongly treats a negative dd as a special case requiring different handling. Since dd is always squared, its sign is irrelevant — (15.4)2=(15.4)2(-15.4)^2 = (15.4)^2. Your study tip: always square each part's distance independently, and remember that sign never matters in Ad2Ad^2 — negative distances contribute positively to inertia just like positive ones.

Question 10

For a uniform slender rod of mass mm and length LL, the moment of inertia about its centroidal axis (perpendicular to the rod, through its midpoint) is Ixˉ=112mL2I_{\bar{x}} = \frac{1}{12}mL^2. An engineer uses the parallel-axis theorem to find the moment of inertia about an axis located at distance dd from the centroid and obtains I=112mL2+md2I = \frac{1}{12}mL^2 + md^2. She then applies the theorem a second time from this new (non-centroidal) axis to another axis a distance ss further away, writing I=I+ms2I' = I + ms^2. Under what condition, if any, is this second step valid?

  1. The second step is valid only if sds \geq d, because the parallel-axis theorem requires the destination axis to be farther from the centroid than the starting axis, ensuring the moment of inertia increases monotonically with distance.
  2. The second step is always valid because the parallel-axis theorem is a general shift theorem between any two parallel axes, provided the shift distance ss is measured correctly between the two parallel axes in question.
  3. The second step is valid only if d=0d = 0, meaning the intermediate axis coincidentally passes through the centroid, in which case the two-step procedure reduces to the standard single application of the theorem.
  4. The second step is never valid in this form, because the parallel-axis theorem requires the starting axis to be centroidal. To find II', one must return to the centroid: I=112mL2+m(d+s)2I' = \frac{1}{12}mL^2 + m(d+s)^2, using the total distance from the centroid to the final axis. (correct answer)
Explanation: Whenever you encounter the parallel-axis theorem, the single most important rule to memorize is this: the starting axis must always be centroidal. The theorem states I=Ixˉ+md2I = I_{\bar{x}} + md^2, where IxˉI_{\bar{x}} is specifically the moment of inertia about the center of mass. It is not a general "shift by any distance" formula between arbitrary axes. This is exactly why D is correct. Once the engineer has moved to a non-centroidal axis and obtained I=112mL2+md2I = \frac{1}{12}mL^2 + md^2, she cannot treat that axis as a new starting point for a second application. The theorem's derivation relies on the cross-product term vanishing — which only happens when the reference axis passes through the centroid. To find II', she must return to the centroid and apply the theorem once using the total distance: I=112mL2+m(d+s)2I' = \frac{1}{12}mL^2 + m(d+s)^2. You can verify this is different from I+ms2=112mL2+md2+ms2I + ms^2 = \frac{1}{12}mL^2 + md^2 + ms^2, which is missing the cross term 2mds2mds. A is wrong because the parallel-axis theorem has no requirement about the destination axis being farther from the centroid than the starting axis — that condition is invented and meaningless. B is the classic trap: the theorem is not a general shift theorem between any two parallel axes. It only works when one axis is centroidal. C is partially insightful — if d=0d = 0 the intermediate axis is centroidal and the second step would be valid — but this is a special case, not the condition that makes the procedure generally valid. Your study tip: always ask yourself, "Is my starting axis through the centroid?" before applying the parallel-axis theorem. If not, go back to the centroid first.

Question 11

The moment of inertia of a solid circular disk of radius RR and mass mm about its central axis (perpendicular to the disk face) is Ic=12mR2I_c = \frac{1}{2}mR^2. A second, identical disk is placed such that its center is a distance 2R2R from the first disk's center, and the two disks are rigidly connected. Using the parallel-axis theorem, an analyst computes the combined system's moment of inertia about an axis through the midpoint between the two centers (perpendicular to both disks). Which expression is correct?

  1. Itotal=2(12mR2)+2m(R)2=mR2+2mR2=3mR2I_{\text{total}} = 2\left(\frac{1}{2}mR^2\right) + 2m(R)^2 = mR^2 + 2mR^2 = 3mR^2, because each disk's center is RR from the midpoint axis, so each parallel-axis term contributes m(R)2m(R)^2. (correct answer)
  2. Itotal=2(12mR2)+2m(2R)2=mR2+8mR2=9mR2I_{\text{total}} = 2\left(\frac{1}{2}mR^2\right) + 2m(2R)^2 = mR^2 + 8mR^2 = 9mR^2, because the parallel-axis distance for each disk is the full center-to-center separation 2R2R, not the half-distance.
  3. Itotal=2(12mR2)=mR2I_{\text{total}} = 2\left(\frac{1}{2}mR^2\right) = mR^2, because the midpoint axis is equidistant from both disk centers and the parallel-axis corrections for the two disks cancel each other out by symmetry.
  4. Itotal=12(2m)(2R)2=4mR2I_{\text{total}} = \frac{1}{2}(2m)(2R)^2 = 4mR^2, because the combined system can be treated as a single equivalent disk of total mass 2m2m and effective radius 2R2R about the midpoint axis.
Explanation: Whenever you encounter a moment of inertia problem involving multiple bodies, the parallel-axis theorem is your framework: I=Ic+md2I = I_c + md^2, where dd is the distance from each body's own center of mass to the new axis of rotation. The key is identifying that distance correctly. Here, the two disk centers are separated by 2R2R, so the midpoint axis sits exactly RR from each disk's center. Applying the parallel-axis theorem to each disk: Ieach=12mR2+m(R)2I_{\text{each}} = \frac{1}{2}mR^2 + m(R)^2. Summing both disks gives Itotal=2(12mR2)+2m(R)2=mR2+2mR2=3mR2I_{\text{total}} = 2\left(\frac{1}{2}mR^2\right) + 2m(R)^2 = mR^2 + 2mR^2 = 3mR^2, confirming that A is correct. B is tempting because 2R2R appears prominently in the problem, but that's the center-to-center distance between the disks — not the distance from either disk's center to the midpoint axis. Each disk's center is only RR from the midpoint, so using 2R2R in the parallel-axis term double-counts the separation. C reflects a fundamental misunderstanding: the parallel-axis corrections don't "cancel" because both terms are positive (md2md^2 is always additive). Symmetry means the two disks contribute equally, not that their corrections eliminate one another. D incorrectly treats the two-disk system as a single solid disk with radius 2R2R. That formula only applies to a uniform disk's own central axis — you cannot simply substitute an arbitrary effective radius for a composite system. Study tip: Always sketch the geometry and label the distance dd explicitly before plugging into I=Ic+md2I = I_c + md^2. The most common mistake on parallel-axis problems is confusing total separation with the distance to the specific reference axis.

Question 12

A hollow square tube has outer side length aa and inner side length bb (b<ab < a), with the centroid at its geometric center. Its area moment of inertia about the horizontal centroidal axis is Ixˉ=a4b412I_{\bar{x}} = \frac{a^4 - b^4}{12}. An engineer wants the moment of inertia about a horizontal axis located at the outer bottom edge of the tube (distance a/2a/2 below the centroid). She writes: Ibottom edge=a4b412+(a2b2)(a2)2I_{\text{bottom edge}} = \frac{a^4 - b^4}{12} + (a^2 - b^2)\left(\frac{a}{2}\right)^2 A colleague claims this is wrong because the parallel-axis distance should be ab2\frac{a-b}{2} (half the wall thickness), not a2\frac{a}{2}. Who is correct and why?

  1. Neither is correct. The parallel-axis distance should be a+b4\frac{a+b}{4}, which represents the average of the outer and inner half-dimensions and correctly locates the centroid of the hollow cross-section.
  2. The colleague is correct. The parallel-axis distance must reflect the centroid of the material (the hollow walls), which is located at the mid-thickness of the wall, a distance ab2\frac{a-b}{2} from the outer surface.
  3. The engineer is correct. The parallel-axis distance is measured from the composite section's centroid to the target axis. The centroid of the hollow tube lies at its geometric center, which is a/2a/2 from the outer bottom edge, regardless of the wall thickness or inner dimension bb. (correct answer)
  4. The engineer is correct in distance but uses the wrong area. The area of the hollow section is a2b2a^2 - b^2, but the parallel-axis theorem for a hollow section requires using the outer area a2a^2 and subtracting the inner contribution b2(b/2)2b^2(b/2)^2 separately.
Explanation: Whenever you apply the parallel-axis theorem, the single most important thing to nail down is what distance you're actually measuring. The theorem states I=Ixˉ+Ad2I = I_{\bar{x}} + Ad^2, where dd is the perpendicular distance from the section's centroid to the target axis — full stop. It has nothing to do with wall thickness, material distribution, or any average dimension. For a hollow square tube with outer side aa, the centroid sits at the geometric center by symmetry. The outer bottom edge is exactly a/2a/2 below that centroid — the inner dimension bb is irrelevant to this distance. The area of the hollow section is correctly a2b2a^2 - b^2. So the engineer's formula, a4b412+(a2b2)(a2)2\frac{a^4-b^4}{12} + (a^2-b^2)\left(\frac{a}{2}\right)^2, applies the theorem perfectly. C is correct. A is wrong because a+b4\frac{a+b}{4} has no geometric meaning here — it isn't the centroid location of any relevant axis or area. It's a fabricated distractor that sounds plausible by mixing inner and outer dimensions. B is wrong because the colleague confuses the centroid of the wall material alone with the centroid of the entire cross-section. The parallel-axis distance must reference the composite section's centroid, not the mid-thickness of the wall. ab2\frac{a-b}{2} is the wall thickness, not a centroidal distance. D is wrong because the engineer's area a2b2a^2 - b^2 is exactly right for the hollow section. You don't need to split the calculation into outer minus inner for the Ad2Ad^2 term — that's only necessary when computing IxˉI_{\bar{x}} using the subtraction method. Study tip: Always ask yourself "where is the centroid of the whole section?" before writing down dd. The parallel-axis distance is purely geometric — centroid to target axis.

Question 13

A composite cross-section consists of a solid rectangle 120 mm wide and 80 mm tall, with its centroid at the origin. A circular hole of radius 20 mm is cut out, with its center located 30 mm to the right and 20 mm above the rectangle's centroid. The moment of inertia of the full rectangle about its own centroidal axis (horizontal) is Ixˉ,rect=112(120)(80)3 mm4I_{\bar{x},\text{rect}} = \frac{1}{12}(120)(80)^3 \text{ mm}^4. The moment of inertia of the circle about its own centroidal axis is Ixˉ,circle=π4(20)4 mm4I_{\bar{x},\text{circle}} = \frac{\pi}{4}(20)^4 \text{ mm}^4.

What is the moment of inertia of the composite section about the centroidal horizontal axis of the full rectangle (i.e., the x-axis through the rectangle's centroid, before the hole is introduced)? Note that removing material subtracts its contribution, and the parallel-axis theorem must be applied to the circle's centroid, which is offset from this reference axis.

  1. Ix=112(120)(80)3[π4(20)4+π(20)2(20)2] mm4I_x = \frac{1}{12}(120)(80)^3 - \left[\frac{\pi}{4}(20)^4 + \pi(20)^2(20)^2\right] \text{ mm}^4, because the circular hole's centroid is 20 mm above the rectangle's centroid, so the parallel-axis shift uses d=20d = 20 mm. (correct answer)
  2. Ix=112(120)(80)3[π4(20)4+π(20)2(30)2] mm4I_x = \frac{1}{12}(120)(80)^3 - \left[\frac{\pi}{4}(20)^4 + \pi(20)^2(30)^2\right] \text{ mm}^4, because the horizontal-axis parallel-axis theorem requires using the full radial offset of 30 mm rather than only the vertical component.
  3. Ix=112(120)(80)3[π4(20)4+π(20)2(1300)] mm4I_x = \frac{1}{12}(120)(80)^3 - \left[\frac{\pi}{4}(20)^4 + \pi(20)^2(1300)\right] \text{ mm}^4, because the distance used in the parallel-axis theorem is the total distance d=302+202=1300d = \sqrt{30^2 + 20^2} = \sqrt{1300} mm from the rectangle's centroid to the circle's centroid.
  4. Ix=112(120)(80)3π4(20)4 mm4I_x = \frac{1}{12}(120)(80)^3 - \frac{\pi}{4}(20)^4 \text{ mm}^4, because the circle's own centroidal axis is already parallel to the x-axis and the parallel-axis theorem only applies when there is a vertical offset between centroids.
Explanation: Whenever you encounter a composite section with removed material, your go-to framework is: subtract the hole's contribution, applying the parallel-axis theorem correctly. The key insight is that the parallel-axis theorem for a horizontal (x-axis) moment of inertia only cares about the vertical distance between the hole's centroid and the reference axis — horizontal offsets are irrelevant. For the composite section, you start with the full rectangle's moment of inertia and subtract the circle's contribution about the same reference axis. The circle's centroid sits 20 mm above the rectangle's centroidal x-axis (the vertical component of its offset). Applying the parallel-axis theorem to the circle gives Ixˉ,circle+Acircled2=π4(20)4+π(20)2(20)2I_{\bar{x},\text{circle}} + A_{\text{circle}} \cdot d^2 = \frac{\pi}{4}(20)^4 + \pi(20)^2(20)^2, where d=20d = 20 mm is that vertical offset. Subtracting yields answer A, which is correct. B is wrong because it uses d=30d = 30 mm — the horizontal offset — in the parallel-axis theorem. The horizontal distance between centroids has zero effect on IxI_x; only vertical separation matters. C is wrong for a similar reason: it uses the total radial distance 302+202=1300\sqrt{30^2 + 20^2} = \sqrt{1300} mm. The parallel-axis theorem is not about radial distance — it's axis-specific. For a horizontal axis, only the perpendicular (vertical) distance applies. D is wrong because it ignores the parallel-axis shift entirely. Just because the circle has its own centroidal axis doesn't mean d=0d = 0; the circle's centroid is offset 20 mm from the reference axis, so the shift term Ad2Ad^2 is nonzero and must be included. Study tip: Always ask yourself, "What is the perpendicular distance from this sub-shape's centroid to my reference axis?" For IxI_x, that's the vertical gap — ignore horizontal offsets completely.

Question 14

The moment of inertia of a solid sphere of mass mm and radius RR about any axis through its center is Ic=25mR2I_c = \frac{2}{5}mR^2. A solid hemisphere (half the sphere, mass mh=m/2m_{h} = m/2) has its flat face in the xz-plane, with its centroid located at yˉ=3R8\bar{y} = \frac{3R}{8} above the flat face. An engineer needs the moment of inertia of the hemisphere about the flat-face diameter axis (the x-axis at y=0y = 0, lying in the flat face). She reasons: (1) the full sphere's II about this diametral axis is 25mR2\frac{2}{5}mR^2; (2) by symmetry, each hemisphere contributes half: Ihemi, flat face=15mR2I_{\text{hemi, flat face}} = \frac{1}{5}mR^2; (3) applying the reverse parallel-axis theorem with the hemisphere's own mass and centroid offset gives Ixˉ,hemi=15mR2m2(3R8)2I_{\bar{x},\text{hemi}} = \frac{1}{5}mR^2 - \frac{m}{2}\left(\frac{3R}{8}\right)^2. Is step (3) valid, and what is Ixˉ,hemiI_{\bar{x},\text{hemi}}?

  1. Step (3) is invalid because the reverse parallel-axis theorem subtracts AhemidA_{\text{hemi}}\,d, not Ahemid2A_{\text{hemi}}\,d^2, when converting from a boundary (flat-face) axis to the interior centroidal axis. The correct result is Ixˉ,hemi=mR25m23R8I_{\bar{x},\text{hemi}} = \frac{mR^2}{5} - \frac{m}{2}\cdot\frac{3R}{8}.
  2. Step (3) is valid. Ixˉ,hemi=mR259mR2128=mR2(12845640)=83mR2640I_{\bar{x},\text{hemi}} = \frac{mR^2}{5} - \frac{9mR^2}{128} = mR^2\left(\frac{128 - 45}{640}\right) = \frac{83mR^2}{640}, obtained by correctly subtracting Ahemid2A_{\text{hemi}}\,d^2 from the flat-face inertia. (correct answer)
  3. Step (3) is invalid because the centroid offset yˉ=3R/8\bar{y} = 3R/8 is measured from the flat face, but the parallel-axis theorem requires the distance from the sphere's center, which is R3R/8=5R/8R - 3R/8 = 5R/8. The correct expression is Ixˉ,hemi=mR25m2(5R8)2I_{\bar{x},\text{hemi}} = \frac{mR^2}{5} - \frac{m}{2}\left(\frac{5R}{8}\right)^2.
  4. Step (3) is valid in form but uses the wrong mass. The hemisphere's mass is m/2m/2, so the base inertia from step (2) should be expressed as 25m2R2=mR25\frac{2}{5}\cdot\frac{m}{2}\cdot R^2 = \frac{mR^2}{5} before applying the correction, giving Ixˉ,hemi=mR25m2(3R8)2=83mR2640I_{\bar{x},\text{hemi}} = \frac{mR^2}{5} - \frac{m}{2}\left(\frac{3R}{8}\right)^2 = \frac{83mR^2}{640}.
Explanation: Whenever you encounter moment-of-inertia problems involving composite or partial bodies, your go-to tool is the parallel-axis theorem: Iaxis=Ixˉ+md2I_{\text{axis}} = I_{\bar{x}} + md^2, where dd is the perpendicular distance between the centroidal axis and the parallel axis of interest. Running it in reverse — subtracting md2md^2 to find the centroidal inertia — is perfectly valid, as long as you correctly identify dd. Here, the flat-face x-axis passes directly through the sphere's center (the flat face lies in the xz-plane, which contains the sphere's center). The hemisphere's centroid sits at yˉ=3R8\bar{y} = \frac{3R}{8} above that flat face. So the distance from the flat-face axis to the hemisphere's centroidal axis is exactly d=3R8d = \frac{3R}{8} — no adjustment needed. The hemisphere's moment of inertia about the flat-face axis is 1225mR2=mR25\frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{2}{5}mR^2 = \frac{mR^2}{5} (half the full sphere's value, by symmetry). Applying the reverse parallel-axis theorem with the hemisphere's mass mh=m/2m_h = m/2: Ixˉ=mR25m2(3R8)2=mR259mR2128=128mR245mR2640=83mR2640I_{\bar{x}} = \frac{mR^2}{5} - \frac{m}{2}\left(\frac{3R}{8}\right)^2 = \frac{mR^2}{5} - \frac{9mR^2}{128} = \frac{128mR^2 - 45mR^2}{640} = \frac{83mR^2}{640} This confirms B is correct. A is wrong because it incorrectly subtracts mdmd (linear) instead of md2md^2 — the parallel-axis theorem always involves distance squared. C is wrong because it misidentifies dd: the flat-face axis already passes through the sphere's center, so d=3R/8d = 3R/8 directly, not R3R/8R - 3R/8. D suggests a mass error exists, but steps (2) and (3) already correctly use m/2m/2; it merely relabels B's valid reasoning without identifying a real flaw. Study tip: Always sketch the geometry and explicitly label which axis is the centroidal axis versus the reference axis — confusing these two is the most common source of parallel-axis errors on dynamics exams.

Question 15

An engineer needs the moment of inertia of a thin rectangular plate (width bb, height hh) about an axis parallel to its width and located a distance h/2h/2 below the bottom edge. The centroidal moment of inertia about the horizontal centroidal axis is Ixˉ=bh312I_{\bar{x}} = \frac{bh^3}{12}. She first applies the parallel-axis theorem with d=h/2d = h/2 to shift to the bottom edge, obtaining Iedge=bh312+bh(h2)2=bh33I_{\text{edge}} = \frac{bh^3}{12} + bh\left(\frac{h}{2}\right)^2 = \frac{bh^3}{3}. She then applies the theorem a second time from the bottom edge to the target axis (another h/2h/2 further away), writing Itarget=bh33+bh(h2)2I_{\text{target}} = \frac{bh^3}{3} + bh\left(\frac{h}{2}\right)^2. Which statement best describes the validity of her second application?

  1. The second application is invalid because the parallel-axis theorem must start from a centroidal axis. Since IedgeI_{\text{edge}} is not a centroidal value, using it as the base for another shift double-counts part of the centroid-to-edge distance. The correct result is found in one step: Itarget=bh312+bh(h)2=13bh312I_{\text{target}} = \frac{bh^3}{12} + bh(h)^2 = \frac{13bh^3}{12}, using the total distance d=hd = h from the centroid to the target axis. (correct answer)
  2. The second application is valid because the parallel-axis theorem can be applied repeatedly between any two parallel axes, regardless of whether the intermediate axis is centroidal, provided each incremental shift distance is measured correctly between the two axes in question.
  3. The second application is invalid because the target axis lies outside the cross-section, and the parallel-axis theorem only applies to axes that pass through or within the body's material boundaries.
  4. The second application is valid because once the moment of inertia about the edge is known, applying the theorem again with d=h/2d = h/2 correctly accounts for the additional shift, and the result bh33+bh(h/2)2=5bh312\frac{bh^3}{3} + bh(h/2)^2 = \frac{5bh^3}{12} is confirmed by the additive nature of area moments.
Explanation: Whenever you see the parallel-axis theorem applied in sequence, your first instinct should be to check whether each application starts from a centroidal axis — because that is a strict requirement of the theorem. The parallel-axis theorem states I=Ixˉ+Ad2I = I_{\bar{x}} + Ad^2, where IxˉI_{\bar{x}} must be the moment of inertia about the axis passing through the centroid. The distance dd is always measured from the centroid to the new axis. This means you cannot "chain" shifts by using a non-centroidal intermediate result as your new base — doing so double-counts the centroid-to-intermediate distance. The correct approach is always a single shift from the centroid to the final target, using the total distance. Here, the centroid is at the plate's midpoint, and the target axis is h/2h/2 below the bottom edge, so the centroid-to-target distance is d=h/2+h/2=hd = h/2 + h/2 = h. The correct result is: Itarget=bh312+bh(h)2=13bh312I_{\text{target}} = \frac{bh^3}{12} + bh(h)^2 = \frac{13bh^3}{12} This confirms A is correct. The engineer's second application is invalid because IedgeI_{\text{edge}} is not a centroidal moment of inertia. B is the key distractor — it sounds reasonable but is flatly wrong. The theorem is not valid between arbitrary parallel axes; the reference must always be centroidal. C is incorrect because the theorem imposes no restriction on whether the axis lies inside or outside the body. D is wrong on two counts: the method is invalid and the arithmetic produces the wrong answer (bh33+bh34=7bh312\frac{bh^3}{3} + \frac{bh^3}{4} = \frac{7bh^3}{12}, not 5bh312\frac{5bh^3}{12}). Study tip: Always return to the centroid. No matter how many axes you need, apply the parallel-axis theorem exactly once per target, using the direct centroid-to-target distance.