Statics and Dynamics Quiz: Dynamic Free Body Diagrams
8 questions · exam conditions
0:00
Dynamic Free Body DiagramsQuestion 1 of 8

A thin-walled hollow cylinder (mass mm, radius rr, moment of inertia IG=mr2I_G = mr^2) and a solid disk (mass mm, radius rr, moment of inertia IG=12mr2I_G = \frac{1}{2}mr^2) both roll without slipping down the same incline from rest. An engineer draws kinetic diagrams for each body.

On the kinetic diagrams, the engineer writes the translational inertial term as mama (down the incline) and the rotational couple as IGαI_G\alpha for each body. After applying the rolling constraint a=rαa = r\alpha, which statement correctly describes how the magnitudes of the kinetic diagram inertial couples compare, and what this implies about the friction forces shown on the respective FBDs?

The cylinder's kinetic couple IGα=mr2αI_G\alpha = mr^2\alpha is larger than the disk's IGα=12mr2αI_G\alpha = \frac{1}{2}mr^2\alpha for the same α\alpha, but since the actual friction force is set by the surface condition f=μsmgcosθf = \mu_s mg\cos\theta, the friction forces on both FBDs are equal regardless of the body's rotational inertia.
Both bodies have the same mama term and the same IGαI_G\alpha couple on their kinetic diagrams because they share identical mass and radius; the differing accelerations arise only from the incline angle, which affects both bodies equally.
The cylinder has a larger IGαI_G\alpha couple than the disk for equal α\alpha; applying the equations of motion with the rolling constraint shows that a larger rotational couple requires a larger friction force on the FBD, consistent with the cylinder having a lower linear acceleration down the incline.
The cylinder's kinetic couple is larger; solving F=ma\sum F = ma and MG=IGα\sum M_G = I_G\alpha with the rolling constraint yields f=13mgsinθf = \frac{1}{3}mg\sin\theta for both bodies, so the friction magnitudes are equal even though the accelerations differ.
← Back to quizzes

Statics and Dynamics Quiz

Statics and Dynamics Quiz: Dynamic Free Body Diagrams

Practice Dynamic Free Body Diagrams in Statics and Dynamics with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.

What this quiz covers

This quiz focuses on Dynamic Free Body Diagrams, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for Statics and Dynamics.

How to use this quiz

Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.

All questions

Question 1

A thin-walled hollow cylinder (mass mm, radius rr, moment of inertia IG=mr2I_G = mr^2) and a solid disk (mass mm, radius rr, moment of inertia IG=12mr2I_G = \frac{1}{2}mr^2) both roll without slipping down the same incline from rest. An engineer draws kinetic diagrams for each body.

On the kinetic diagrams, the engineer writes the translational inertial term as mama (down the incline) and the rotational couple as IGαI_G\alpha for each body. After applying the rolling constraint a=rαa = r\alpha, which statement correctly describes how the magnitudes of the kinetic diagram inertial couples compare, and what this implies about the friction forces shown on the respective FBDs?

  1. The cylinder's kinetic couple IGα=mr2αI_G\alpha = mr^2\alpha is larger than the disk's IGα=12mr2αI_G\alpha = \frac{1}{2}mr^2\alpha for the same α\alpha, but since the actual friction force is set by the surface condition f=μsmgcosθf = \mu_s mg\cos\theta, the friction forces on both FBDs are equal regardless of the body's rotational inertia.
  2. Both bodies have the same mama term and the same IGαI_G\alpha couple on their kinetic diagrams because they share identical mass and radius; the differing accelerations arise only from the incline angle, which affects both bodies equally.
  3. The cylinder has a larger IGαI_G\alpha couple than the disk for equal α\alpha; applying the equations of motion with the rolling constraint shows that a larger rotational couple requires a larger friction force on the FBD, consistent with the cylinder having a lower linear acceleration down the incline. (correct answer)
  4. The cylinder's kinetic couple is larger; solving F=ma\sum F = ma and MG=IGα\sum M_G = I_G\alpha with the rolling constraint yields f=13mgsinθf = \frac{1}{3}mg\sin\theta for both bodies, so the friction magnitudes are equal even though the accelerations differ.
Explanation: When analyzing rolling bodies on an incline, your kinetic diagram links translational and rotational inertia together through the rolling constraint a=rαa = r\alpha. The key insight is that a body's rotational inertia directly determines how much friction the surface must supply to maintain that rolling condition. For a body rolling without slipping, applying Fx=ma\sum F_x = ma (along the incline) and MG=IGα\sum M_G = I_G\alpha simultaneously with a=rαa = r\alpha yields the friction force: f=IGαr=IGar2f = \frac{I_G \alpha}{r} = \frac{I_G a}{r^2}. For the hollow cylinder, IG=mr2I_G = mr^2, giving fcyl=maf_{cyl} = ma. For the solid disk, IG=12mr2I_G = \frac{1}{2}mr^2, giving fdisk=12maf_{disk} = \frac{1}{2}ma. Because the cylinder demands more friction to spin its larger rotational inertia, it accelerates more slowly down the incline. This is exactly what C describes — larger IGαI_G\alpha couple, larger required friction, lower linear acceleration. C is correct. A is wrong because it confuses kinetic (rolling) friction with maximum static friction. The friction force here is determined by the equations of motion, not by μsmgcosθ\mu_s mg\cos\theta; it's whatever value the rolling constraint demands, up to that maximum. B is wrong because identical mass and radius do not produce identical kinetic diagram couples — the moment of inertia coefficient differs, so IGαI_G\alpha differs. The differing accelerations come from rotational inertia, not the incline angle. D is wrong because substituting IG=mr2I_G = mr^2 and IG=12mr2I_G = \frac{1}{2}mr^2 into the equations gives different friction fractions (12mgsinθ\frac{1}{2}mg\sin\theta vs. 13mgsinθ\frac{1}{3}mg\sin\theta), not equal values. Study tip: Always derive friction from the equations of motion for rolling problems — never assume it equals μsN\mu_s N unless the problem explicitly asks about the slip condition.

Question 2

A particle of mass mm moves along a curved path in the vertical plane. At a given instant, the particle's speed is vv, the radius of curvature of the path is ρ\rho, and the tangent to the path makes angle β\beta with the horizontal. The particle is decelerating (speed decreasing).

On the kinetic diagram of the particle, the inertial terms are expressed in normal-tangential (nn-tt) coordinates. Which of the following correctly describes both the magnitudes and directions of the inertial terms, accounting for the fact that the particle is decelerating?

  1. Normal inertial term: mv2ρ\frac{mv^2}{\rho} toward the center of curvature. Tangential inertial term: mv˙m|\dot{v}| directed opposite to the direction of motion (i.e., in the t-t direction), because deceleration means v˙<0\dot{v} < 0 and the inertial term must explicitly reflect the backward physical direction.
  2. Normal inertial term: mv2ρ\frac{mv^2}{\rho} directed away from the center of curvature (outward centrifugal direction). Tangential inertial term: mv˙m|\dot{v}| directed opposite to motion. Both terms are treated as d'Alembert inertia forces opposing the acceleration.
  3. Normal inertial term: mv2ρ\frac{mv^2}{\rho} toward the center of curvature. Tangential inertial term: mv˙m\dot{v} drawn in the +t+t direction (the direction of motion), where v˙\dot{v} is negative for deceleration; the algebra then yields a negative value, indicating the term physically points backward — consistent with decelerating motion. (correct answer)
  4. Normal inertial term: mv2ρ\frac{mv^2}{\rho} toward the center of curvature. Tangential inertial term: zero, because the net tangential deceleration is produced entirely by the external forces shown on the FBD, and placing mv˙m\dot{v} on the kinetic diagram would count that effect twice.
Explanation: When working with kinetic diagrams in normal-tangential coordinates, your goal is to represent the inertial terms manma_n and matma_t correctly — both in magnitude and physical direction. The key insight is understanding how signed quantities interact with assumed positive directions. The normal inertial term is always mv2ρ\frac{mv^2}{\rho}, directed toward the center of curvature (the positive nn-direction by convention). This is always positive and always centripetal — no ambiguity there. The tangential inertial term is mv˙m\dot{v}, where v˙\dot{v} is the signed scalar rate of speed change. For a decelerating particle, v˙<0\dot{v} < 0. The standard approach — and what makes C correct — is to draw the tangential inertial term in the +t+t direction (the direction of motion) and assign it the value mv˙m\dot{v}. Because v˙\dot{v} is negative, the algebra automatically tells you the term physically acts in the t-t direction. The sign does the work; you don't need to manually flip the arrow. A is tempting but subtly wrong: manually drawing the arrow in the t-t direction and labeling it mv˙m|\dot{v}| forces you to pre-judge direction. This breaks the systematic sign convention and can cause errors when you set up equations of motion. B describes d'Alembert inertia forces, where the normal term is flipped outward (centrifugal). This is a different method entirely — mixing it with standard Newton's-law kinetic diagrams creates inconsistency and double-counting errors. D incorrectly claims mv˙m\dot{v} should be omitted. The tangential inertial term absolutely belongs on the kinetic diagram; that's the entire point of separating ΣF=ma\Sigma F = ma into components. Study tip: Always draw inertial terms in the assumed positive coordinate direction and let the sign of the scalar value reveal the true physical direction — never pre-flip arrows based on physical intuition.

Question 3

A uniform disk of mass mm and radius rr slides on a frictionless horizontal surface. A string wrapped around the disk's rim is pulled with a horizontal force FF tangent to the rim, causing the disk's center G to accelerate and the disk to spin with angular acceleration α\alpha.

On the kinetic diagram of the disk, a student places maGma_G at the center of mass directed in the direction of FF, and also a couple IGαI_G\alpha consistent with the string pull. A second student argues that since the only horizontal external force is FF, the equation F=maGF = ma_G fully describes the kinetics, and adding the couple IGαI_G\alpha to the kinetic diagram double-counts the effect of FF. Which assessment is correct?

  1. The second student is correct: F=maGF = ma_G fully determines the motion. The couple IGαI_G\alpha is only needed when writing the rotational scalar equation separately, and placing it on the kinetic diagram is redundant for bodies where a single force drives the motion.
  2. The first student is correct: the kinetic diagram must always show both maGma_G at G and IGαI_G\alpha as a couple about G for any rigid body in general planar motion. The two terms serve separate equations (F=maG\sum F = ma_G and MG=IGα\sum M_G = I_G\alpha); the second student confuses the kinetic diagram with a single scalar equation of motion. (correct answer)
  3. The first student is correct in placing both terms, but the couple IGαI_G\alpha should be drawn about the contact point with the surface rather than about G, because the frictionless surface makes the contact point the natural moment center for the rotational equation.
  4. The second student is correct: because the surface is frictionless, there is no torque about G from the surface, so the rotational inertia IGαI_G\alpha is zero and only the translational term maGma_G needs to appear on the kinetic diagram.
Explanation: Whenever you see a rigid body undergoing general planar motion, remember that the kinetic diagram is not just a picture of one equation — it is a complete representation of all the inertial terms needed to build the full set of equations of motion. For a rigid body, that always means two distinct vector/scalar quantities: a resultant force maGma_G at the center of mass, and a couple IGαI_G\alpha about G. These correspond to two separate equations: Fx=maGx\sum F_x = ma_{G_x}, Fy=maGy\sum F_y = ma_{G_y}, and MG=IGα\sum M_G = I_G\alpha. The disk here translates and rotates simultaneously, so both terms are physically real and independently nonzero. B is correct because the first student's kinetic diagram is exactly right. The force FF drives translation (F=maGF = ma_G) and creates a torque about G that produces angular acceleration (Fr=IGαFr = I_G\alpha). These are two independent consequences of the same applied force — not double-counting. The kinetic diagram captures both, allowing you to write either equation by inspection. A is wrong because F=maGF = ma_G alone tells you nothing about α\alpha. Ignoring the couple would leave the rotational equation unrepresented, giving an incomplete kinetic description. C is wrong because IGαI_G\alpha is always drawn as a couple about G by definition. The choice of moment center affects which moment equation you write, not where the couple appears on the kinetic diagram. D is wrong because "frictionless surface" means no friction force, not zero angular acceleration. The string's tension still creates a nonzero torque about G, so IGα0I_G\alpha \neq 0. Study tip: On kinetics problems, always ask: is the body translating and rotating? If yes, your kinetic diagram needs both maGma_G and IGαI_G\alpha — no exceptions.

Question 4

A block of mass mm sits on a flat cart of mass MM. The cart accelerates to the right at aa on a frictionless floor. The coefficient of static friction between the block and cart is μs\mu_s, and the block does not slip.

An engineer draws a dynamic free-body diagram of the block alone. Which statement correctly identifies ALL forces on the block's FBD and the corresponding inertial term on its kinetic diagram?

  1. Forces on FBD: weight mgmg downward, normal force NN upward from cart, and friction ff to the right from cart. Kinetic diagram inertial term: mama to the right at the block's center of mass, no couple because the block translates without rotation. (correct answer)
  2. Forces on FBD: weight mgmg downward, normal force NN upward from cart, friction ff to the right from cart, and a pseudo-force mama to the left representing the inertia of the block. Kinetic diagram inertial term: zero, because the pseudo-force already accounts for dynamics.
  3. Forces on FBD: weight mgmg downward, normal force NN upward from cart, friction ff to the right from cart, and a normal force from the floor acting upward on the block. Kinetic diagram inertial term: mama to the right at the block's center of mass.
  4. Forces on FBD: weight mgmg downward and normal force NN upward from the cart only, because friction is an internal force between the block-cart system. Kinetic diagram inertial term: (m+M)a(m+M)a to the right representing the system's inertia.
Explanation: When analyzing a dynamic system using Newton-Euler methods, you must keep two diagrams conceptually separate: the free-body diagram (FBD), which shows only real, external forces acting on the isolated body, and the kinetic diagram, which shows the resulting inertial term (mama) at the center of mass. For the block alone, isolate it mentally and ask: what physical objects touch it? Only the cart touches the block — through a normal force NN upward and static friction ff to the right (friction is what accelerates the block rightward along with the cart). Gravity mgmg acts downward. These three real forces appear on the FBD. Since the block undergoes pure translation (no rotation), the kinetic diagram shows a single inertial term mama to the right at the center of mass, with no couple. This makes A correct. B is a common and dangerous trap: it mixes the pseudo-force (d'Alembert) approach with the Newtonian kinetic-diagram approach. In the Newtonian method, pseudo-forces never appear on the FBD — they belong to an entirely different analytical framework. The kinetic term is never zero for an accelerating body. C incorrectly places the floor's normal force on the block's FBD. The floor contacts the cart, not the block, so it exerts no force directly on the block. D confuses system-level analysis with single-body analysis. Friction is only "internal" when you treat the block and cart together as one system — once you isolate the block, friction from the cart becomes a real external force on it, and the inertial term uses only mm, not m+Mm+M. Study tip: Before drawing any FBD, physically trace the boundary of your isolated body and list only the objects that cross that boundary — that discipline alone eliminates most FBD errors.

Question 5

A uniform slender rod of mass mm and length LL is pinned at one end (point O) and released from rest in a horizontal position. At the instant of release, the angular velocity ω=0\omega = 0 but the angular acceleration α0\alpha \neq 0.

When drawing the dynamic free-body diagram (kinetic diagram) of the rod at the instant of release, which of the following correctly describes the inertial terms that must appear on the kinetic diagram?

  1. A single resultant force maˉm\bar{a} acting at the center of mass directed straight downward, plus a couple IGαI_G \alpha about the center of mass, where aˉ\bar{a} has only a tangential component because ω=0\omega = 0. (correct answer)
  2. A single resultant force maˉm\bar{a} acting at the center of mass directed straight downward, plus a couple IOαI_O \alpha about pin point O, because the parallel-axis theorem allows the rotational inertia to be expressed about any convenient point.
  3. A force maˉtm\bar{a}_t tangent to the path of the center of mass acting at the center of mass, with no normal component (since ω=0\omega = 0) and no couple term, because a slender rod's rotational inertia is negligible compared to its translational inertia.
  4. A couple IGαI_G \alpha about the center of mass only, with no translational inertial force, because the pin at O fully constrains translation so the net translational acceleration of the center of mass is zero at the instant of release.
Explanation: When analyzing rigid-body dynamics problems, your first instinct should be to recall Newton-Euler equations: the kinetic diagram must show both a translational inertial term maˉm\bar{a} at the center of mass and a rotational inertial couple IGαI_G \alpha about the center of mass. These two terms together fully represent the inertial response of the body. At the instant of release, ω=0\omega = 0, which means the normal (centripetal) acceleration of the center of mass is aˉn=ωˉ2(L/2)=0\bar{a}_n = \bar{\omega}^2 (L/2) = 0. However, α0\alpha \neq 0, so the tangential acceleration aˉt=α(L/2)\bar{a}_t = \alpha(L/2) is directed straight downward. The kinetic diagram therefore shows a downward force maˉtm\bar{a}_t at the center of mass plus a couple IGαI_G \alpha. This is exactly what A describes, making it correct. B is wrong because the rotational inertia couple on a kinetic diagram must always be expressed as IGαI_G \alpha about the center of mass — not IOαI_O \alpha about the pin. You may use IOI_O when summing moments directly about O in your equations of motion, but that is an algebraic step, not something you draw on the kinetic diagram. C is wrong because it omits the couple IGαI_G \alpha. A slender rod absolutely has rotational inertia (IG=112mL2I_G = \frac{1}{12}mL^2); you cannot neglect it simply because the rod is "slender." D is wrong because pinning point O constrains the position of O, not the translational acceleration of the center of mass. The center of mass absolutely accelerates (tangentially), so a translational inertial term must appear. Study tip: On kinetic diagram questions, always draw both maˉm\bar{a} at the center of mass and IGαI_G \alpha as a couple — the only thing that changes with conditions like ω=0\omega = 0 is which components of aˉ\bar{a} survive, never whether the couple exists.

Question 6

A rigid bar of mass mm is supported horizontally by two vertical wires, one at each end (A and B). Wire A is suddenly cut. At the instant of cutting, the bar begins to rotate about end B, which is still supported.

Immediately after wire A is cut, a student draws a kinetic diagram for the bar and claims: 'Since B is the instantaneous pivot, I can use IBαI_B\alpha as the sole inertial term on the kinetic diagram, just as I would for a body pinned at B.' Identify the specific error in this claim and the correct approach.

  1. The student's claim is correct: because wire B still holds end B fixed at this instant, the bar rotates about B, and IBαI_B\alpha is the legitimate single inertial term on the kinetic diagram. The error would only arise if the student tried to use IBαI_B\alpha after B begins to move.
  2. The error is that wire B constrains only vertical translation at B, not horizontal translation, so B is not a truly fixed point. Because the bar does not rotate about a fixed axis, the kinetic diagram must show maˉGm\bar{a}_G at G plus IGαI_G\alpha about G rather than any single term about B.
  3. The error is a sign convention issue: IBαI_B\alpha is acceptable as the sole kinetic diagram term, but the student must use the parallel-axis theorem IB=IG+m(L/2)2I_B = I_G + m(L/2)^2 and define α\alpha as positive clockwise; using counterclockwise positive produces an incorrect sign for the tension in wire B.
  4. The error is that IBαI_B\alpha belongs in the moment equation, not on the kinetic diagram itself. The kinetic diagram must always show maˉGm\bar{a}_G at G plus IGαI_G\alpha about G. Even for a true fixed pin at B, these two separate terms appear on the kinetic diagram; IBαI_B\alpha emerges only when the moment equation is summed about B algebraically. (correct answer)
Explanation: Whenever you see a kinetic diagram question in dynamics, pause and ask yourself: what exactly goes on a kinetic diagram versus what appears in an equation? This distinction is the heart of what's being tested here. A kinetic diagram is a free-body-diagram counterpart that displays the inertial terms representing a body's resistance to acceleration. By the Newton-Euler formulation, those terms are always two: a force vector maˉGm\bar{a}_G applied at the center of mass G, and a couple IGαI_G\alpha about G. These two terms are the universal representation for any rigid body undergoing general plane motion — pinned, rolling, or freely flying. The kinetic diagram itself never changes form based on where you sum moments. What does change based on your choice of moment point is the moment equation you write afterward. When you sum moments about a fixed pin B, the maˉGm\bar{a}_G term contributes a moment arm of L/2L/2, and after algebraic combination with IGαI_G\alpha, the result simplifies to IBαI_B\alpha via the parallel-axis theorem. That combined expression lives in the equation, not on the diagram. Answer D captures this precisely — IBαI_B\alpha is a computational shortcut in the moment sum, not a standalone kinetic diagram term. Answer A is wrong because even if B were truly fixed (which it isn't — see below), IBαI_B\alpha still belongs only in the equation. Answer B raises a valid physics point — wire B cannot prevent horizontal motion at B, so B isn't truly fixed — but it misidentifies this as the error in the student's claim; the deeper, more fundamental error is misplacing IBαI_B\alpha on the diagram. Answer C is a distractor about sign conventions that has nothing to do with the actual conceptual mistake. Study tip: Always draw kinetic diagrams with maˉGm\bar{a}_G at G plus IGαI_G\alpha — no exceptions. Shortcuts like IBαI_B\alpha are equation-level tools only.

Question 7

Two identical uniform slender rods, each of mass mm and length LL, are connected end-to-end and pinned together at point B. Rod AB is pinned at A (fixed wall), and rod BC hangs from B. The system is released from rest with both rods horizontal.

When drawing separate kinetic diagrams for rod AB and rod BC at the instant of release, which of the following correctly describes the inertial term situation for rod BC specifically?

  1. Rod BC has inertial terms maˉGBCm\bar{a}_{G_{BC}} at its center of mass and couple IGBCαBCI_{G_{BC}}\alpha_{BC}, where aˉGBC\bar{a}_{G_{BC}} has only a downward tangential component (no normal component) because ω=0\omega = 0 at release, and αBC0\alpha_{BC} \neq 0 so the couple is nonzero.
  2. Rod BC has inertial terms maˉGBCm\bar{a}_{G_{BC}} at its center of mass and couple IGBCαBCI_{G_{BC}}\alpha_{BC}, but since B itself is accelerating (not fixed), the acceleration of the center of mass of BC must account for both the motion of B and the rotation of BC relative to B, making aˉGBC\bar{a}_{G_{BC}} different in magnitude and direction from that of a simple pendulum pinned at a fixed point. (correct answer)
  3. Rod BC has only the couple IBαBCI_B\alpha_{BC} about pin B as its single inertial term, since B is the instantaneous center of rotation for BC at this instant, allowing the translational and rotational inertia to be combined into one moment-of-inertia term.
  4. Rod BC has inertial terms maˉGBCm\bar{a}_{G_{BC}} at its center of mass and couple IGBCαBCI_{G_{BC}}\alpha_{BC}, and since B is a pin joint (not a fixed support), rod BC behaves identically to an independent rod pinned at a fixed point B, so aˉGBC=L2αBC\bar{a}_{G_{BC}} = \frac{L}{2}\alpha_{BC} directed straight downward.
Explanation: When analyzing multi-body systems in dynamics, the critical skill is tracking how acceleration transmits through connected bodies. The key question to ask yourself is: is the reference point for this body's motion fixed or moving? For rod BC, point B is not anchored to a wall — it's the free end of rod AB, which is itself accelerating downward at the moment of release. This means the center of mass of BC, located at L/2L/2 from B, has an acceleration that depends on two contributions: the acceleration of point B itself (inherited from rod AB's rotation), plus the acceleration of GBCG_{BC} relative to B due to BC's own rotation. Using the relative acceleration equation, aˉGBC=aˉB+αˉBC×rˉG/BωBC2rˉG/B\bar{a}_{G_{BC}} = \bar{a}_B + \bar{\alpha}_{BC} \times \bar{r}_{G/B} - \omega_{BC}^2 \bar{r}_{G/B}, and since ω=0\omega = 0 at release, there's no normal component, but aˉB0\bar{a}_B \neq 0, so the total acceleration of GBCG_{BC} is not simply L2αBC\frac{L}{2}\alpha_{BC} directed downward. This makes B correct. A is partially right — the zero-ω\omega reasoning is valid — but it incorrectly ignores that aˉB0\bar{a}_B \neq 0, meaning the center of mass acceleration of BC isn't purely L2αBC\frac{L}{2}\alpha_{BC} downward. C confuses kinematics with kinetics. Even if B were an instantaneous center of zero velocity, you cannot simply replace the kinetic diagram with a single moment IBαBCI_B \alpha_{BC} unless B is a fixed pivot, which it is not. D is the most tempting trap: a pin joint does not mean the pivot is stationary. BC is not independent — it's being dragged by AB's acceleration at B. Study tip: Whenever a body's reference point is itself moving, always compute aˉG\bar{a}_{G} using the full relative-acceleration chain — never assume a pin joint implies a fixed pivot.

Question 8

A crate of mass mm is being pulled across a rough floor by a force PP applied at an angle ϕ\phi above the horizontal. The crate does not tip and does not leave the floor. The coefficient of kinetic friction is μk\mu_k. The crate's center of mass G is at height hh above the floor, and the crate has width 2w2w.

On the kinetic diagram of the crate (which translates without rotation), the inertial terms are placed correctly. When setting up the moment equation MA=Σ(Mk)A\sum M_A = \Sigma(\mathcal{M}_k)_A about the front-bottom corner A (in the direction of motion) to find the normal force distribution, what term(s) must appear on the right-hand side (the kinetic side) of this moment equation?

  1. Only the couple IGα=0I_G\alpha = 0 appears on the right-hand side, because the crate translates without rotating (α=0\alpha = 0), so the moment of the inertial terms about any point is zero and the right-hand side vanishes entirely.
  2. The term IAαI_A \alpha appears on the right-hand side, where IAI_A is the moment of inertia about corner A, because summing moments about A for a body that could potentially rotate about A requires using the moment of inertia about that point.
  3. The terms maGhma_G \cdot h and maGwma_G \cdot w both appear on the right-hand side, representing the moments of the horizontal and vertical components of maˉGm\bar{a}_G about corner A, because maˉGm\bar{a}_G has both horizontal and vertical components due to the inclined applied force PP.
  4. The term maGhm a_G \cdot h appears on the right-hand side, representing the moment of the translational inertial force maGma_G (acting horizontally at G) about point A. The rotational term IGα=0I_G\alpha = 0 vanishes, but the translational inertial force still has a nonzero moment arm about A equal to hh. (correct answer)
Explanation: When you write a moment equation for a translating (non-rotating) rigid body using the kinetic diagram approach, the right-hand side isn't zero just because α=0\alpha = 0 — it equals the moment of the inertial vector maˉGm\bar{a}_G about your chosen point. Think of maˉGm\bar{a}_G as a force vector "applied" at G; it creates a moment about any point that isn't on its line of action. For this crate, the only acceleration is horizontal (the floor is flat, the crate doesn't leave it, and it translates). The vertical component of aˉG\bar{a}_G is zero, so maˉGm\bar{a}_G points purely horizontally. Taking moments about corner A, this horizontal inertial force acts at height hh above the floor, giving a moment of maGhma_G \cdot h on the right-hand side. The rotational term IGαI_G\alpha vanishes since α=0\alpha = 0. This confirms D is correct. Choice A is the most tempting trap: students assume "no rotation means the kinetic moment is zero," but IGα=0I_G\alpha = 0 only eliminates the spin contribution. The translational inertial force maˉGm\bar{a}_G still has a nonzero moment arm about A. Choice B confuses this with fixed-axis rotation, where IAαI_A\alpha is valid. Here the crate isn't pivoting about A — it's translating — so that formula doesn't apply. Choice C is wrong because the crate's center of mass has no vertical acceleration. The applied force PP is inclined, but the normal force and friction adjust so that aˉG\bar{a}_G remains purely horizontal, leaving no vertical inertial component to create a moment. Study tip: Always ask, "What is the direction of aˉG\bar{a}_G?" first, then compute the moment of maˉGm\bar{a}_G about your point geometrically. Never assume a zero right-hand side just because α=0\alpha = 0.