Statics and Dynamics Quiz: Cable Systems
5 questions · exam conditions
0:00
Cable SystemsQuestion 1 of 5

Three cables meet at a common frictionless ring (joint). Cable 1 runs to the left at 30° above horizontal and carries tension T1T_1. Cable 2 runs to the right at 60° above horizontal and carries tension T2T_2. Cable 3 hangs vertically downward and supports a weight W=20 kNW = 20 \text{ kN}.

Which of the following correctly expresses both T1T_1 and T2T_2 obtained by applying equilibrium at the joint?

T1=10317.3 kNT_1 = 10\sqrt{3} \approx 17.3 \text{ kN} and T2=10 kNT_2 = 10 \text{ kN}, found by resolving horizontal and vertical equilibrium with the sine rule applied to the triangle of forces.
T1=10 kNT_1 = 10 \text{ kN} and T2=10317.3 kNT_2 = 10\sqrt{3} \approx 17.3 \text{ kN}, found by resolving horizontal and vertical equilibrium with the sine rule applied to the triangle of forces.
T1=20/sin30°=40 kNT_1 = 20/\sin 30° = 40 \text{ kN} and T2=20/sin60°23.1 kNT_2 = 20/\sin 60° \approx 23.1 \text{ kN}, found by projecting each cable tension directly onto the vertical axis and setting each equal to WW.
T1=20cos60°=10 kNT_1 = 20\cos 60° = 10 \text{ kN} and T2=20cos30°17.3 kNT_2 = 20\cos 30° \approx 17.3 \text{ kN}, found by decomposing WW into components along each cable direction using cosine projections.
← Back to quizzes

Statics and Dynamics Quiz

Statics and Dynamics Quiz: Cable Systems

Practice Cable Systems in Statics and Dynamics with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.

What this quiz covers

This quiz focuses on Cable Systems, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for Statics and Dynamics.

How to use this quiz

Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.

All questions

Question 1

Three cables meet at a common frictionless ring (joint). Cable 1 runs to the left at 30° above horizontal and carries tension T1T_1. Cable 2 runs to the right at 60° above horizontal and carries tension T2T_2. Cable 3 hangs vertically downward and supports a weight W=20 kNW = 20 \text{ kN}.

Which of the following correctly expresses both T1T_1 and T2T_2 obtained by applying equilibrium at the joint?

  1. T1=10317.3 kNT_1 = 10\sqrt{3} \approx 17.3 \text{ kN} and T2=10 kNT_2 = 10 \text{ kN}, found by resolving horizontal and vertical equilibrium with the sine rule applied to the triangle of forces.
  2. T1=10 kNT_1 = 10 \text{ kN} and T2=10317.3 kNT_2 = 10\sqrt{3} \approx 17.3 \text{ kN}, found by resolving horizontal and vertical equilibrium with the sine rule applied to the triangle of forces. (correct answer)
  3. T1=20/sin30°=40 kNT_1 = 20/\sin 30° = 40 \text{ kN} and T2=20/sin60°23.1 kNT_2 = 20/\sin 60° \approx 23.1 \text{ kN}, found by projecting each cable tension directly onto the vertical axis and setting each equal to WW.
  4. T1=20cos60°=10 kNT_1 = 20\cos 60° = 10 \text{ kN} and T2=20cos30°17.3 kNT_2 = 20\cos 30° \approx 17.3 \text{ kN}, found by decomposing WW into components along each cable direction using cosine projections.
Explanation: When three cables meet at a frictionless joint in static equilibrium, the net force in every direction must be zero. Your tool is two scalar equations: Fx=0\sum F_x = 0 and Fy=0\sum F_y = 0. Set up a coordinate system, decompose each tension into horizontal and vertical components using the cable's angle from horizontal, then solve the resulting system. Cable 1 pulls left at 30° above horizontal, so its components are (T1cos30°,  +T1sin30°)(-T_1\cos30°,\; +T_1\sin30°). Cable 2 pulls right at 60° above horizontal: (+T2cos60°,  +T2sin60°)(+T_2\cos60°,\; +T_2\sin60°). Cable 3 pulls straight down: (0,  20)(0,\; -20). Horizontal equilibrium (Fx=0\sum F_x = 0): T2cos60°=T1cos30°    T22=T132    T2=T13T_2\cos60° = T_1\cos30° \implies \frac{T_2}{2} = \frac{T_1\sqrt{3}}{2} \implies T_2 = T_1\sqrt{3} Vertical equilibrium (Fy=0\sum F_y = 0): T1sin30°+T2sin60°=20    T12+T1332=20    2T1=20    T1=10 kN,  T2=10317.3 kNT_1\sin30° + T_2\sin60° = 20 \implies \frac{T_1}{2} + \frac{T_1\sqrt{3}\cdot\sqrt{3}}{2} = 20 \implies 2T_1 = 20 \implies T_1 = 10\text{ kN},\; T_2 = 10\sqrt{3} \approx 17.3\text{ kN} This confirms B is correct. A swaps the two values. Because Cable 2 makes the steeper angle (60° vs 30°), it carries more vertical load, so it must have the larger tension — that's T2T_2, not T1T_1. C treats each cable as if it independently supports the entire weight WW, ignoring the coupling between them through horizontal equilibrium. You cannot set each vertical component equal to WW separately. D invents a decomposition of WW along cable directions using cosines, which has no physical basis in Cartesian equilibrium. A useful habit: before solving, ask which cable is steeper. The steeper cable always carries the greater tension — a quick sanity check to catch swapped answers like A.

Question 2

A horizontal platform of weight W=40 kNW = 40 \text{ kN} is supported by three cables attached to a ceiling. Cable 1 is vertical and attached at the center of the platform. Cable 2 makes an angle of 20° with the vertical and is attached at the left edge. Cable 3 makes an angle of 20° with the vertical and is attached at the right edge. The platform is rigid and horizontal. All cables lie in the same vertical plane containing the platform's centerline.

Assuming the system is in equilibrium and all cables are taut, which of the following correctly characterizes the static determinacy of this system?

  1. The system is statically indeterminate to the second degree because the three cables introduce three unknown tension forces and rigid-body equilibrium in 2D provides only two scalar equations, leaving two degrees of indeterminacy regardless of symmetry.
  2. The system is statically indeterminate to the first degree. After applying symmetry (T2=T3T_2 = T_3), two unknowns remain but only one independent equilibrium equation exists, because the moment equation is automatically satisfied for any cable tension values when the geometry is symmetric.
  3. The system is statically determinate. Symmetry forces T2=T3T_2 = T_3, reducing the problem to two unknowns. The vertical force equation ΣFy = 0 and the moment equation ΣM = 0 about the left edge then provide two independent equations sufficient to uniquely solve for T1T_1 and T2T_2. (correct answer)
  4. The system is statically determinate because the horizontal equilibrium equation ΣFx = 0 provides an additional independent equation beyond ΣFy = 0 and ΣM = 0, yielding three equations for three unknowns and a unique solution.
Explanation: When analyzing a suspended platform problem, your first move should always be to count unknowns versus independent equations — but don't stop there. Look for geometric conditions like symmetry that reduce the unknown count before declaring indeterminacy. Here, three cables create three unknown tensions: T1T_1, T2T_2, and T3T_3. In 2D, rigid-body equilibrium gives you three scalar equations: ΣFx=0\Sigma F_x = 0, ΣFy=0\Sigma F_y = 0, and ΣM=0\Sigma M = 0. Naively, three unknowns and three equations sounds determinate — but notice that ΣFx=0\Sigma F_x = 0 yields T2sin20°=T3sin20°T_2 \sin 20° = T_3 \sin 20°, which simply confirms T2=T3T_2 = T_3. This isn't a new independent equation; it's just the mathematical expression of symmetry. So you effectively have two unknowns (T1T_1 and T2T_2) and two genuinely independent equationsΣFy=0\Sigma F_y = 0 and ΣM=0\Sigma M = 0 about any convenient point. That's exactly determined, making C correct. Choice A overcounts the degrees of indeterminacy by ignoring how symmetry eliminates one unknown, leaving the system over-constrained in its analysis. Choice B correctly identifies that symmetry reduces unknowns but wrongly claims the moment equation is automatically satisfied regardless of tension values — it's not; taking moments about, say, the left edge still gives a real constraint that uniquely determines T1T_1. Choice D makes the subtle but critical error of treating ΣFx=0\Sigma F_x = 0 as an independent third equation, when in fact it merely restates the symmetry condition already used to set T2=T3T_2 = T_3. Your study takeaway: whenever symmetry is present, use it to reduce unknowns first, then count truly independent equations. Don't double-count symmetry as both a simplification and an equation.

Question 3

A pin-jointed frame has a joint P where four members meet. Three members are rigid bars (can carry tension or compression), and one member is a cable (tension only). The cable runs at 50° above horizontal toward the upper-right. The three rigid bars run: (1) horizontally to the left, (2) vertically downward, and (3) at 30° below horizontal to the lower-left. An unknown external force F\mathbf{F} is applied at P.

A pin-jointed frame has a joint P where four members meet. Three members are rigid bars (can carry tension or compression), and one member is a cable (tension only). The cable runs at 50° above horizontal toward the upper-right. The three rigid bars run: (1) horizontally to the left, (2) vertically downward, and (3) at 30° below horizontal to the lower-left. An unknown external force F\mathbf{F} is applied at P.

A student argues that because the cable is a tension-only member, if analysis of joint P — ignoring the cable — results in a net force pointing away from the upper-right at joint P, the cable must be slack (zero tension). Under what condition is this reasoning correct?

  1. The reasoning is correct only when the external force F\mathbf{F} has no component along the cable direction; when F\mathbf{F} has a component along the cable axis, the cable force cannot be determined by inspecting the residual from the bars alone.
  2. The reasoning is always correct for any joint configuration, because a cable can only pull along its axis; if the remaining members produce a residual force in the cable's compression direction, the cable is necessarily slack regardless of how many bars are present.
  3. The reasoning is never correct at a joint with four or more members, because such joints are always statically indeterminate and the cable force cannot be isolated without invoking compatibility equations involving member stiffnesses.
  4. The reasoning is correct only if the three rigid bars are statically determinate on their own — that is, the three bar forces can be uniquely found from the two equilibrium equations at P without the cable — and the resulting net residual force at P points in the direction the cable would need to push (compress) rather than pull. (correct answer)
Explanation: Whenever you encounter a tension-only member at a joint, your first instinct should be to ask: can I solve for all other member forces independently? That question is the heart of this problem. At joint P, you have two equilibrium equations (Fx=0\sum F_x = 0 and Fy=0\sum F_y = 0) and four unknowns. If the cable is removed temporarily, you're left with three bar forces and one external force F — still potentially more unknowns than equations. The student's reasoning only works if those three bar forces are uniquely determinable from the two equations without the cable. This happens when the geometry of the three bars and the known external load make the system statically determinate by themselves — for example, if one bar's orientation directly isolates a force, allowing back-substitution. Once you've uniquely solved for all three bar forces, you can compute the net residual force that the cable would need to supply. If that residual points in the cable's compression direction (pushing rather than pulling), the cable cannot provide it and must be slack. That's exactly what D states, making it correct. A is wrong because the cable's direction relative to F is irrelevant — what matters is whether the three bars alone are statically determinate, not whether F has a component along the cable axis. B is wrong because the reasoning is not always valid for any joint; if the bars themselves are indeterminate, you can't isolate the residual force without additional information. C is wrong because four-member joints are not automatically indeterminate — the specific geometry can still allow a determinate sub-system when one member is removed. Study tip: When analyzing tension-only members, always verify determinacy of the remaining structure first. If removing the cable leaves a determinate system, check the residual's direction — compression demand means the cable is slack.

Question 4

A rigid horizontal beam AB (length 6 m, weight negligible) is supported at A by a pin and at point C (4 m from A) by a cable that makes 35° with the horizontal. A vertical load of 24 kN is applied at B. A student attempts to find the cable tension TT by resolving the vertical component of TT directly: Tsin35°=24 kNT\sin35° = 24 \text{ kN}, giving T=41.8 kNT = 41.8 \text{ kN}. What error has the student made, and what is the correct cable tension?

  1. The student ignored the pin reaction at A. Taking moments about A: Tsin35°×4=24×6T\sin35° \times 4 = 24 \times 6, giving T=62.7 kNT = 62.7 \text{ kN}. The pin at A carries the remaining vertical and horizontal forces. (correct answer)
  2. The student forgot to include the horizontal component of TT in the vertical equilibrium equation. The correct equation is Tsin35°+Tcos35°=24T\sin35° + T\cos35° = 24, giving T=14.0 kNT = 14.0 \text{ kN}, with the horizontal component adding to the vertical equilibrium.
  3. The student applied force equilibrium instead of moment equilibrium, and also used the wrong angle. The perpendicular distance from A to the cable line of action must be computed using cos35°\cos35°, giving T=24×6/(4cos35°)=44.0 kNT = 24 \times 6/(4\cos35°) = 44.0 \text{ kN}.
  4. The student correctly identified the vertical equilibrium equation but applied it to the wrong free body. The full vertical equilibrium of the beam is Ay+Tsin35°=24A_y + T\sin35° = 24; since Ay=0A_y = 0 for a pin support on a horizontal beam with no vertical load at A, the student's answer of 41.8 kN is actually correct.
Explanation: When analyzing a beam with multiple supports, your first instinct should be to use moment equilibrium, not force equilibrium alone. A pin support at A can provide both vertical and horizontal reactions, meaning vertical force balance alone gives you one equation with two unknowns (AyA_y and TT) — you need more information. The smart move is to take moments about A, which eliminates the pin reactions entirely (they act at A, so their moment arm is zero). The cable at C applies an upward vertical force of Tsin35°T\sin35° at 4 m from A, and the 24 kN load acts downward at 6 m from A. Setting the sum of moments about A equal to zero: Tsin35°×4=24×6T\sin35° \times 4 = 24 \times 6 T=1444sin35°=1442.29462.7 kNT = \frac{144}{4\sin35°} = \frac{144}{2.294} \approx 62.7 \text{ kN} This confirms A is correct. Once you have TT, you can return to force equilibrium to find the pin reactions at A. The student's error was treating the beam as if the cable were the only support — essentially ignoring the pin at A. The vertical forces don't have to balance between just the cable and the load; the pin contributes too. B is wrong because horizontal force components never appear in vertical equilibrium — mixing them creates a physically meaningless equation. C introduces an incorrect angle substitution; the moment arm for a vertical cable component on a horizontal beam is simply the horizontal distance, not adjusted by cos35°\cos35°. D falsely claims Ay=0A_y = 0; a pin on a beam with an offset load absolutely carries vertical reaction. Study tip: Whenever a beam has a pin support, take moments about that pin first — it's almost always the fastest path to finding unknown forces.

Question 5

A cable system consists of a main cable anchored at two supports at the same elevation 30 m apart, with a horizontal tension component H=50 kNH = 50 \text{ kN}. A secondary cable is attached to the main cable at its lowest point and runs vertically downward to support an equipment load WW. The lowest point of the main cable is not at the midspan — it is located 10 m horizontally from the left support.

If the sag of the main cable at the lowest point is 4 m below the chord, what is the load WW suspended from the lowest point?

  1. W=H×(tanθL+tanθR)W = H \times (\tan\theta_L + \tan\theta_R) where θL\theta_L and θR\theta_R are the slopes of the left and right cable segments at the low point; numerically W=50(4/10+4/20)=50(0.4+0.2)=30 kNW = 50(4/10 + 4/20) = 50(0.4 + 0.2) = 30 \text{ kN}. (correct answer)
  2. W=H×2×tanθW = H \times 2 \times \tan\theta, where θ\theta is computed using the midspan geometry; numerically W=50×2×(4/15)26.7 kNW = 50 \times 2 \times (4/15) \approx 26.7 \text{ kN}, since the lowest point must be at midspan for a single concentrated load.
  3. W=H×tanθLW = H \times \tan\theta_L alone, since at the lowest point the right cable segment is horizontal and contributes no vertical force; numerically W=50×(4/10)=20 kNW = 50 \times (4/10) = 20 \text{ kN}.
  4. W=2H×sinθW = 2H \times \sin\theta, where θ\theta is the angle of either cable segment; numerically W=2×50×sin(arctan(4/15))25.9 kNW = 2 \times 50 \times \sin(\arctan(4/15)) \approx 25.9 \text{ kN}, since by symmetry both cable segments contribute equally to vertical equilibrium.
Explanation: When analyzing a cable with a concentrated load at its lowest point, the key is vertical equilibrium at that point. The horizontal tension component HH remains constant throughout the cable, and the vertical force components from each cable segment must together balance the applied load WW. Each segment contributes a vertical force equal to H×tanθH \times \tan\theta, where θ\theta is that segment's slope angle. Here, the lowest point sits 10 m from the left support and 20 m from the right, with a 4 m sag. The left segment rises 4 m over 10 m horizontally, giving tanθL=4/10=0.4\tan\theta_L = 4/10 = 0.4. The right segment rises 4 m over 20 m, giving tanθR=4/20=0.2\tan\theta_R = 4/20 = 0.2. Vertical equilibrium then yields W=H(tanθL+tanθR)=50(0.4+0.2)=30 kNW = H(\tan\theta_L + \tan\theta_R) = 50(0.4 + 0.2) = 30 \text{ kN}, confirming answer A. Answer B incorrectly assumes the lowest point must be at midspan, forcing a symmetric geometry that doesn't exist here. Midspan placement only occurs when the load is centered between symmetric supports — a special case, not a general rule. Answer C makes the error of assuming the right cable segment is horizontal at the low point, contributing zero vertical force. In reality, both segments slope upward away from the lowest point, so both carry vertical components. Answer D uses 2Hsinθ2H\sin\theta with a single averaged angle, incorrectly assuming symmetry. It also mixes up when to use sine versus tangent — since HH is the horizontal component, you multiply by tanθ\tan\theta, not sinθ\sin\theta. As a study tip: whenever a cable's low point is off-center, always compute separate slope angles for each segment and sum both vertical contributions.