Statics and Dynamics Quiz: 2d Rigid Body Equilibrium
5 questions · exam conditions
0:00
2d Rigid Body EquilibriumQuestion 1 of 5

A simply supported beam AB of length 8 m8\text{ m} has a pin at A and a roller at B. A distributed load increases linearly from 0 kN/m0\text{ kN/m} at A to w0 kN/mw_0\text{ kN/m} at the midpoint (x=4 mx = 4\text{ m}), then decreases linearly back to 0 kN/m0\text{ kN/m} at B, forming a triangular (tent) distribution symmetric about the midpoint. The total load is Ptotal=w0×4 kNP_{total} = w_0 \times 4\text{ kN} (area of two triangles).

For w0=6 kN/mw_0 = 6\text{ kN/m}, what are the vertical reactions at A and B, and what is the correct reasoning for their values?

RA=RB=12 kNR_A = R_B = 12\text{ kN}, because the symmetric tent distribution has its resultant at the midpoint of the beam, and by symmetry both reactions must be equal and each carries half the total load of 24 kN24\text{ kN}.
RA=16 kNR_A = 16\text{ kN} and RB=8 kNR_B = 8\text{ kN}, because the resultant of the left triangle acts at x=8/3 mx = 8/3\text{ m} from A, which is closer to A, so A carries more load than B.
RA=RB=12 kNR_A = R_B = 12\text{ kN}, but only because the roller at B cannot exert a horizontal reaction, forcing A to carry all horizontal components while vertical components split evenly regardless of load shape.
RA=8 kNR_A = 8\text{ kN} and RB=16 kNR_B = 16\text{ kN}, because the distributed load's peak is at the midpoint and the roller at B is a more rigid support than the pin at A, attracting more of the load.
← Back to quizzes

Statics and Dynamics Quiz

Statics and Dynamics Quiz: 2d Rigid Body Equilibrium

Practice 2d Rigid Body Equilibrium in Statics and Dynamics with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.

What this quiz covers

This quiz focuses on 2d Rigid Body Equilibrium, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for Statics and Dynamics.

How to use this quiz

Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.

All questions

Question 1

A simply supported beam AB of length 8 m8\text{ m} has a pin at A and a roller at B. A distributed load increases linearly from 0 kN/m0\text{ kN/m} at A to w0 kN/mw_0\text{ kN/m} at the midpoint (x=4 mx = 4\text{ m}), then decreases linearly back to 0 kN/m0\text{ kN/m} at B, forming a triangular (tent) distribution symmetric about the midpoint. The total load is Ptotal=w0×4 kNP_{total} = w_0 \times 4\text{ kN} (area of two triangles).

For w0=6 kN/mw_0 = 6\text{ kN/m}, what are the vertical reactions at A and B, and what is the correct reasoning for their values?

  1. RA=RB=12 kNR_A = R_B = 12\text{ kN}, because the symmetric tent distribution has its resultant at the midpoint of the beam, and by symmetry both reactions must be equal and each carries half the total load of 24 kN24\text{ kN}. (correct answer)
  2. RA=16 kNR_A = 16\text{ kN} and RB=8 kNR_B = 8\text{ kN}, because the resultant of the left triangle acts at x=8/3 mx = 8/3\text{ m} from A, which is closer to A, so A carries more load than B.
  3. RA=RB=12 kNR_A = R_B = 12\text{ kN}, but only because the roller at B cannot exert a horizontal reaction, forcing A to carry all horizontal components while vertical components split evenly regardless of load shape.
  4. RA=8 kNR_A = 8\text{ kN} and RB=16 kNR_B = 16\text{ kN}, because the distributed load's peak is at the midpoint and the roller at B is a more rigid support than the pin at A, attracting more of the load.
Explanation: Whenever you see a distributed load problem on a simply supported beam, your first instinct should be to find the resultant force and its location, then apply equilibrium. For a symmetric load distribution, symmetry alone can do most of the work. Here, the tent-shaped load is perfectly symmetric about the midpoint at x=4 mx = 4\text{ m}. The resultant of the entire load equals the total area under the distribution: two triangles, each with base 4 m4\text{ m} and height w0=6 kN/mw_0 = 6\text{ kN/m}, giving Ptotal=2×12(4)(6)=24 kNP_{total} = 2 \times \frac{1}{2}(4)(6) = 24\text{ kN}. Because the load is symmetric, the resultant acts exactly at x=4 mx = 4\text{ m} — the midpoint of the 8 m beam. Summing moments about either support confirms RA=RB=12 kNR_A = R_B = 12\text{ kN}, which is answer A, and the reasoning is sound: symmetry places the resultant at mid-span, so each support carries exactly half. Answer B is a classic trap — it correctly locates the centroid of the left triangle alone at x=83 mx = \frac{8}{3}\text{ m}, but ignores the right triangle entirely. You must account for the combined resultant of the full load, not just one piece of it. Answer C arrives at the right numbers but for a completely wrong reason. The roller's inability to resist horizontal forces has no bearing on how vertical reactions split; that split depends solely on moment equilibrium. Answer D introduces a fictional concept — support rigidity does not appear in static equilibrium. Statics assumes rigid supports; relative stiffness only matters in statically indeterminate (structural analysis) problems. Study tip: Always combine all load components into one resultant before taking moments — splitting a symmetric load and analyzing only half is a common and costly mistake.

Question 2

A rigid plate of negligible weight is supported in a vertical plane by two links: link AB (pin-connected at both ends) oriented at 45°45° above horizontal, and link CD (pin-connected at both ends) oriented horizontally. Both links connect the plate to a fixed wall. A force F=100 NF = 100\text{ N} is applied to the plate at a known point, directed at 30°30° below the horizontal.

Which of the following statements correctly characterizes the reactions that link AB and link CD can each exert on the plate, and why?

  1. Link CD exerts only a horizontal force, but link AB can exert both a force along its axis and a perpendicular force because the rigid plate allows the pin at A or B (on the plate side) to develop a transverse reaction through bending of the link itself.
  2. Each link is a two-force member, but since the plate is a rigid body (not a particle), the moment equation M=0\sum M = 0 must also be satisfied; this introduces a third equilibrium equation that, combined with the two force equations, may over-constrain the system if the lines of action of the two link forces and F are concurrent.
  3. The links can exert both force and moment reactions because they are pin-connected to a rigid plate, which behaves differently from a truss joint; therefore the reactions are statically indeterminate without additional information about the plate's stiffness.
  4. Each link is a two-force member and can only exert a force along its own axis; link AB exerts a force along its 45°45° direction and link CD exerts a purely horizontal force. Together with the applied FF, these three concurrent forces must satisfy Fx=0\sum F_x = 0 and Fy=0\sum F_y = 0 for equilibrium of the plate. (correct answer)
Explanation: Whenever you see links (or bars) that are pin-connected at both ends with no load applied between the pins, recognize them immediately as two-force members. A two-force member can only exert a force directed along the line connecting its two pins — no moment, no transverse force, just a single axial force (tension or compression). That principle is the key to this problem. Link AB is pinned at A and B with nothing in between, so it can only push or pull along its 45° axis. Link CD is pinned at C and D and oriented horizontally, so it can only exert a purely horizontal force. Both forces pass through the plate at known directions, giving you two unknowns (the magnitude of each link force). With the applied F=100 NF = 100\text{ N} at 30° below horizontal, you have three concurrent forces, and equilibrium requires Fx=0\sum F_x = 0 and Fy=0\sum F_y = 0 — exactly two equations for two unknowns. The system is statically determinate. D is correct. Choice A is wrong because being pin-connected to a rigid plate does not allow a link to develop a transverse reaction — that would require the link itself to resist bending, which a two-force member (pin-pin, no intermediate load) cannot do. Choice B contains a true statement about rigid-body equilibrium having a moment equation, but it incorrectly implies this creates an over-constraint problem. When forces are concurrent, M=0\sum M = 0 about the concurrent point is automatically satisfied and adds no new information. Choice C confuses pin-connected links with fixed-support members. Pins carry no moment, so stiffness is irrelevant — the reactions are statically determinate, not indeterminate. Study tip: Always check first whether a member is a two-force member (pin-pin, no intermediate loads). If it is, the reaction direction is known immediately, which dramatically simplifies your free-body diagram.

Question 3

A rigid body in 2D is subjected to three forces: F1=(3i^4j^) kN\mathbf{F}_1 = (3\hat{i} - 4\hat{j})\text{ kN} applied at point (2,0) m(2, 0)\text{ m}; F2=(3i^+2j^) kN\mathbf{F}_2 = (-3\hat{i} + 2\hat{j})\text{ kN} applied at point (0,3) m(0, 3)\text{ m}; and an unknown force F3\mathbf{F}_3 applied at point (1,1) m(1, 1)\text{ m}. All coordinates are in meters.

If the net force on the rigid body must be zero (force equilibrium satisfied), what must F3\mathbf{F}_3 be, and what moment does F3\mathbf{F}_3 alone produce about the origin?

  1. F3=(0i^+2j^) kN\mathbf{F}_3 = (0\hat{i} + 2\hat{j})\text{ kN}, and it produces a moment of 0 kN\cdotpm0\text{ kN·m} about the origin because its purely vertical line of action passes through a point whose horizontal coordinate equals its vertical coordinate, creating a self-canceling moment.
  2. F3=(0i^+2j^) kN\mathbf{F}_3 = (0\hat{i} + 2\hat{j})\text{ kN}, and it produces a moment of +2 kN\cdotpm+2\text{ kN·m} (counterclockwise) about the origin, computed as rxF3yryF3x=1(2)1(0)=+2 kN\cdotpmr_x F_{3y} - r_y F_{3x} = 1(2) - 1(0) = +2\text{ kN·m}. (correct answer)
  3. F3=(0i^2j^) kN\mathbf{F}_3 = (0\hat{i} - 2\hat{j})\text{ kN}, and it produces a moment of 2 kN\cdotpm-2\text{ kN·m} (clockwise) about the origin, computed as rxF3yryF3x=1(2)1(0)=2 kN\cdotpmr_x F_{3y} - r_y F_{3x} = 1(-2) - 1(0) = -2\text{ kN·m}.
  4. F3=(0i^+2j^) kN\mathbf{F}_3 = (0\hat{i} + 2\hat{j})\text{ kN}, and it produces a moment of 2 kN\cdotpm-2\text{ kN·m} (clockwise) about the origin, because even though rxF3yryF3x=+2 kN\cdotpmr_x F_{3y} - r_y F_{3x} = +2\text{ kN·m}, equilibrium of the whole body requires the net moment to be zero, so F3\mathbf{F}_3's contribution must be taken as negative to balance the other forces.
Explanation: When a rigid body is in force equilibrium, the vector sum of all forces must equal zero. This gives you a straightforward way to find any unknown force, and it's a separate calculation from finding the moment that force produces. Start by summing the known forces: F1+F2=(33)i^+(4+2)j^=(0i^2j^) kN\mathbf{F}_1 + \mathbf{F}_2 = (3-3)\hat{i} + (-4+2)\hat{j} = (0\hat{i} - 2\hat{j})\text{ kN}. For equilibrium, F3\mathbf{F}_3 must cancel this resultant, so F3=(0i^+2j^) kN\mathbf{F}_3 = (0\hat{i} + 2\hat{j})\text{ kN}. Once you have F3\mathbf{F}_3, its moment about the origin is computed using the 2D cross product formula: M=rxFyryFxM = r_x F_y - r_y F_x, where (rx,ry)=(1,1)(r_x, r_y) = (1, 1) is the point of application. Plugging in: M=(1)(2)(1)(0)=+2 kN\cdotpmM = (1)(2) - (1)(0) = +2\text{ kN·m}, which is counterclockwise. Choice B captures both results correctly. Choice A finds the right F3\mathbf{F}_3 but claims the moment is zero, inventing a false "self-canceling" rule. No such rule exists — a vertical force applied off the origin always produces a moment unless its line of action passes directly through the reference point. Choice C gets the force backwards (2j^-2\hat{j} instead of +2j^+2\hat{j}), which would actually double the imbalance rather than restore equilibrium, and its moment calculation follows from that initial error. Choice D finds the correct force and even computes +2 kN\cdotpm+2\text{ kN·m} correctly, but then contradicts itself by reassigning the sign to satisfy a separate moment-equilibrium condition — a trap that confuses finding F3\mathbf{F}_3's individual moment with checking overall moment balance. Key tip: Always treat force equilibrium and moment calculations as two independent steps. Finding F3\mathbf{F}_3 uses F=0\sum \mathbf{F} = 0; computing its moment is a separate cross product. Never adjust a calculated moment to force a global equilibrium condition — that's a different equation entirely.

Question 4

A rigid bar of negligible weight is supported by three vertical wires: wire 1 at the left end (x = 0), wire 2 at x = a, and wire 3 at the right end (x = 2a). A single downward load P is applied at x = a/2. All three wires have the same cross-section and material. The system is statically indeterminate to the first degree.

A student claims that the equilibrium equations alone (without compatibility) yield a unique solution for all three wire tensions. Which statement best identifies the error in this claim and the correct approach?

  1. The claim is incorrect: with three unknowns (T1,T2,T3T_1, T_2, T_3) and only two independent equilibrium equations (Fy=0\sum F_y = 0 and M=0\sum M = 0), the system is indeterminate, and a compatibility condition based on the bar's deformation geometry must supplement equilibrium to solve for all three tensions uniquely. (correct answer)
  2. The claim is incorrect: the system has four unknowns because the bar can also translate horizontally, requiring an additional equilibrium equation Fx=0\sum F_x = 0 that introduces a fourth unknown reaction, making the system indeterminate to the second degree.
  3. The claim is correct for this specific loading case: because the load P is applied at x = a/2 (between wires 1 and 2), the bar rotates so that wire 3 goes slack, reducing the problem to two unknowns and two equations, which equilibrium alone can solve.
  4. The claim is incorrect: equilibrium gives a unique solution only if the bar is rigid and all supports are pins; since wires are flexible tension-only members, a plastic analysis using limit loads is required instead of standard equilibrium equations.
Explanation: Whenever you encounter a problem with multiple unknown support reactions, your first instinct should be to count unknowns versus independent equilibrium equations — this tells you immediately whether the system is statically determinate or indeterminate. Here, you have three unknown wire tensions: T1T_1, T2T_2, and T3T_3. For a rigid bar in a plane with only vertical forces, you get exactly two independent equilibrium equations: Fy=0\sum F_y = 0 and M=0\sum M = 0. Two equations, three unknowns — the system is statically indeterminate to the first degree. To solve it, you must introduce a compatibility condition: since the bar is rigid, its deformed shape is a straight line (it can only translate and rotate). This means the elongations of the three wires are geometrically constrained, giving you a third equation that, combined with each wire's force-deformation relationship (δ=TL/AE\delta = TL/AE), closes the system. Answer A correctly captures this entire reasoning chain. Answer B is wrong because horizontal translation is irrelevant — all forces and wires are vertical, so Fx=0\sum F_x = 0 is trivially satisfied and introduces no new unknowns. The system is indeterminate to the first degree, not the second. Answer C is a tempting trap: you might assume the geometry forces wire 3 slack, but that conclusion itself requires a compatibility analysis to verify. You cannot assume slackness from load position alone without checking deformations. Answer D confuses flexibility of members with the need for plastic analysis. Wires being tension-only members doesn't invalidate equilibrium equations — plastic (limit) analysis applies to ductile structures at collapse, not to elastic indeterminate systems. Study tip: Always count unknowns minus equilibrium equations first. If the difference is n, you need exactly n compatibility equations — one for each degree of indeterminacy.

Question 5

A rigid frame consists of a vertical column pinned at its base A and connected at its top B to a horizontal beam BC of length 3 m3\text{ m}. The column AB has height 4 m4\text{ m}. End C of the beam is supported by a vertical roller (which provides only a vertical reaction). A horizontal force H=80 NH = 80\text{ N} is applied to the right at the midpoint M of the beam BC (i.e., at 1.5 m1.5\text{ m} from B). There is no other loading.

What is the horizontal component of the pin reaction at A?

  1. Ax=80 NA_x = 80\text{ N} directed to the right, because the pin at A must push in the same direction as the applied force HH to maintain moment equilibrium of the column about its base, balancing the overturning tendency.
  2. Ax=40 NA_x = 40\text{ N} directed to the left, because the horizontal force HH is applied at the midpoint of BC and is shared equally between supports A and C by symmetry, so each takes half of the 80 N80\text{ N}.
  3. Ax=80 NA_x = 80\text{ N} directed to the left, because the roller at C provides no horizontal resistance, so applying Fx=0\sum F_x = 0 to the whole frame requires the pin at A to supply all 80 N80\text{ N} of horizontal resistance. (correct answer)
  4. Ax=0A_x = 0 because HH is applied to beam BC and transmitted to the column only through the internal pin at B; since the beam is horizontal, pin B transfers only a vertical force to the column, leaving no horizontal reaction required at A.
Explanation: When analyzing rigid frames, your first instinct should be to apply global equilibrium to the entire structure treated as a single free body. Identify every external reaction — only then does the internal force distribution matter. Here, the frame's external supports are the pin at A (which can provide both horizontal and vertical reactions) and the vertical roller at C (which provides only a vertical reaction — no horizontal component by definition). The single external horizontal force is H=80 NH = 80\text{ N} applied to the right. Applying global horizontal equilibrium: Fx=0:Ax+H=0    Ax=80 N\sum F_x = 0: \quad A_x + H = 0 \implies A_x = -80\text{ N} The negative sign means AxA_x acts to the left. Since the roller at C cannot resist any horizontal load, the pin at A must single-handedly balance the entire 80 N80\text{ N}. That confirms C is correct. Choice A reaches the right magnitude but the wrong direction — claiming A "pushes in the same direction as H" violates equilibrium entirely; the reactions must oppose applied loads, not reinforce them. Choice B applies a false symmetry argument. Symmetry in load position might affect vertical reactions, but horizontal equilibrium isn't about sharing — it's about which supports are even capable of providing horizontal resistance. The roller at C cannot, so A carries all of it. Choice D misunderstands structural continuity. A rigid frame transmits forces in all directions through its joints; an internal connection at B passes both horizontal and vertical components to the column, so horizontal equilibrium of the column absolutely requires a horizontal reaction at A. Study tip: Always catalog support types first — pins resist forces in any direction, rollers resist in only one. Then apply Fx=0\sum F_x = 0 globally before analyzing individual members.