Opening subject page...
Loading your content
Learn to spot the difference between things that happen in order and things that make other things happen.
People have always tried to understand why things happen. But here's a tricky problem: just because one thing comes before another doesn't mean it caused it. For thousands of years, thinkers have worked on telling the difference between cause-and-effect (one thing making another happen) and sequence (things that simply happen one after another). On the SSAT Verbal section, you'll see analogy questions that test whether you can tell these two relationship types apart.
So here's the big question this lesson answers: when you see a pair of words on the SSAT, how do you figure out if the relationship is "A causes B" or just "A comes before B"? Let's find out.
Before we look at SSAT analogy questions, let's nail down the two key ideas. A cause-and-effect relationship means one thing directly makes another thing happen. Rain causes puddles. Practice causes improvement. A sequence relationship means things happen in a certain order, but neither one makes the other happen. Monday comes before Tuesday, but Monday doesn't cause Tuesday.
The diagram below shows both relationship types side by side. On the left you'll see a cause-and-effect chain where each event forces the next one to happen. On the right you'll see a sequence chain where events simply follow each other in time.
Notice the key difference in the connector words. The left side uses "causes" because rain actually produces a flood. The right side uses "then" because Monday simply comes before Tuesday without making it happen. On the SSAT, analogy answer choices may look similar, but the type of connection between words is what matters most.
On the SSAT, you won't see the words "cause-and-effect" or "sequence" written out. Instead, you'll see a pair of words, and you'll need to figure out the relationship between them. Then you'll find another pair that shares the same relationship. Let's look at how this works step by step.
An SSAT analogy question looks like this: SPARK is to FIRE as — and then you pick from five answer choices. The word "is to...as" means "has the same relationship as." Your job is to name the relationship in the first pair, then match it.
Let's put a bunch of real word pairs into two categories. Studying these examples will train your brain to spot the difference quickly on test day.
| Word Pair | Relationship Type | Why? |
|---|---|---|
| DROUGHT → FAMINE | Cause-and-Effect | A drought directly causes food shortages (famine). |
| JANUARY → FEBRUARY | Sequence | January comes before February, but it doesn't make February happen. |
| EXERCISE → FITNESS | Cause-and-Effect | Exercise produces fitness. No exercise, no fitness. |
| BREAKFAST → LUNCH | Sequence | Breakfast comes before lunch in your daily routine, but breakfast doesn't cause lunch. |
| SPARK → FIRE | Cause-and-Effect | A spark ignites a fire. Remove the spark and there's no fire. |
| FRESHMAN → SOPHOMORE | Sequence | Freshman year comes first, but being a freshman doesn't cause you to become a sophomore—passing your classes does. |
Let's walk through a full SSAT-style analogy question together. We'll use the strategies from the flowchart to pick the right answer.
Let's compare these two relationship types directly so you can see how they differ in every important way.
| Feature | Cause-and-Effect | Sequence |
|---|---|---|
| Connection | A forces B to happen | A simply comes before B |
| "Because" test | "B happens because of A" makes sense | "B happens because of A" sounds wrong |
| "Remove it" test | Without A, B won't happen | Without A, B still happens |
| Connector word | "causes," "leads to," "results in" | "then," "next," "followed by" |
| Example | NEGLECT → DECAY | EGG → LARVA (in life cycle) |
| Common trap | Confusing correlation with causation | Assuming time order means one event caused the other |
Some SSAT analogy questions include word pairs that seem to be both cause-and-effect and sequence at the same time. These are the tricky ones that test makers love to include. Let's look at how to handle them.
| Tricky Pair | Looks Like | Actually Is | How to Tell |
|---|---|---|---|
| SEED → PLANT | Sequence (seed comes first) | Cause-and-effect (seed grows into plant) | Without the seed, no plant grows. The seed causes the plant. |
| DAWN → NOON | Cause-and-effect (dawn leads to noon?) | Sequence (dawn simply comes earlier in the day) | Dawn doesn't make noon happen. Earth's rotation causes both independently. |
| STUDY → SUCCESS | Sequence (study, then succeed) | Cause-and-effect (studying produces success) | "Success happens because of studying" makes sense. Remove studying, and the success disappears. |
As you move into higher-level verbal reasoning (like the SSAT Upper Level or the SAT), you'll see even more relationship types beyond these two. You might encounter degree relationships (warm is to hot as drizzle is to downpour) or function relationships (hammer is to nail as saw is to wood). For now, mastering cause-and-effect versus sequence gives you a strong foundation for all of those.
Try these five problems on your own. Use the "because" test and the "remove it" test to figure out each relationship. Answers are provided after each question.
On the SSAT Verbal section, analogy questions test your ability to identify the relationship between two words and find a matching pair. Two of the most commonly confused relationship types are cause-and-effect (where one thing directly makes another happen, like SPARK → FIRE) and sequence (where things simply follow each other in time order, like MONDAY → TUESDAY).
Use two powerful tools to tell them apart. The "because" test: if you can say "B happens because of A" and it makes sense, you have cause-and-effect. The "remove it" test: if A never happened, would B still happen? If yes, it's sequence; if no, it's cause-and-effect. Watch out for tricky pairs that look like one type but are really the other — always run both tests before choosing your answer.