All questions
Question 1
Escucha el siguiente relato: 'Para preparar su jardín en primavera, la señora Gómez siguió varios pasos. Primero, limpió las hojas secas del invierno. A continuación, removió la tierra con una pala. Luego, añadió abono para enriquecer la tierra. Después de abonar, plantó semillas de tomate y lechuga. Mientras esperaba que crecieran, instaló un sistema de riego. Finalmente, la primera semana de cosecha, recogió los tomates maduros antes que la lechuga, ya que los tomates estaban listos primero.'
¿Qué hizo la señora Gómez INMEDIATAMENTE DESPUÉS de plantar las semillas?
- Removió la tierra con una pala para prepararla adecuadamente antes de sembrar.
- Recogió los tomates maduros porque estuvieron listos antes que la lechuga.
- Añadió abono a la tierra para enriquecerla antes de la siembra.
- Instaló un sistema de riego mientras esperaba que las semillas crecieran. (correct answer)
Explanation: When a question asks what happened immediately after a specific event, your job is to track the sequence of steps carefully — not just find an answer that sounds related to the topic. Sequence questions test whether you can follow the order of events precisely, so pay attention to transition words like primero, a continuación, luego, después de, and mientras.
In the passage, la señora Gómez follows this order: (1) cleaned dry leaves, (2) turned the soil with a shovel, (3) added fertilizer, (4) planted seeds, and (5) installed an irrigation system while waiting for the seeds to grow. That phrase — mientras esperaba que crecieran — tells you directly that installing the irrigation system happened right after planting, as she waited. That makes D the correct answer.
Now let's look at why the other options fail. A describes turning the soil with a shovel, which happened before adding fertilizer and long before planting seeds — it belongs at step 2, not after step 4. C describes adding fertilizer, which also occurred before planting, not after — it's a step she completed to prepare the soil for seeding, making it a prior action, not a subsequent one. B describes harvesting the tomatoes, which was the very last thing that happened in the entire story, during the first week of harvest — placing it immediately after planting seeds completely ignores the timeline.
As a strategy, when you see inmediatamente después de, mentally number each event in the passage before choosing. Distractors often describe real events from the story — just placed in the wrong position in the sequence.
Question 2
Escucha el siguiente relato: 'El estudiante Marcos tenía un examen importante. La noche anterior, estudió durante tres horas y luego durmió temprano. Por la mañana, desayunó bien y repasó sus apuntes brevemente. Al llegar a la universidad, habló con su compañera Elena sobre los temas del examen. Después de esa conversación, entró al salón y entregó su identificación al profesor. Finalmente, comenzó a responder el examen.'
Según el relato, ¿cuál fue el TERCER evento en orden cronológico desde que comenzó la mañana del examen?
- Marcos repasó sus apuntes brevemente después de desayunar por la mañana.
- Marcos habló con su compañera Elena sobre los temas del examen. (correct answer)
- Marcos desayunó bien para prepararse para el día del examen.
- Marcos entregó su identificación al profesor antes de comenzar el examen.
Explanation: When a question asks you to identify events in chronological order, your job is to mentally sequence everything on a timeline — especially when the passage jumps between different time periods (the night before, the morning, arriving at school, etc.). Here, the question specifically asks for the third event starting from the morning of the exam, so you need to filter out anything that happened the night before.
The morning sequence in the passage goes like this: first, Marcos desayunó (had breakfast); second, he repasó sus apuntes (reviewed his notes briefly); third, upon arriving at the university, he habló con Elena about exam topics; fourth, he entered the classroom; fifth, he handed over his ID; finally, he began the exam. Counting from the start of the morning, the third event is clearly Marcos speaking with Elena — making B the correct answer.
Here's where each distractor misleads you: C describes breakfast, which is the first morning event, not the third. A describes reviewing notes, which is the second morning event — a very easy trap since it comes right after breakfast and feels "early." D describes handing over his ID to the professor, which is actually the fifth event — much later in the sequence.
Notice how A and C are especially tempting because they appear early in the morning routine, and D sounds like an official "exam moment." Always re-read the passage and number the events on paper before answering sequence questions — it takes ten extra seconds and prevents these ordering mistakes entirely.
Question 3
Escucha el siguiente relato: 'El viernes por la noche, Diego y sus amigos planearon salir. Primero, se reunieron en casa de Diego. Después de reunirse, caminaron hasta el restaurante del barrio. Comieron durante casi una hora. Luego, fueron a ver una película en el cine que estaba a dos cuadras. Después de la película, tomaron un taxi a casa de Sofía para continuar la noche. Por último, alrededor de la medianoche, cada uno regresó a su propia casa.'
¿Cuántos eventos ocurrieron ENTRE la cena en el restaurante y el regreso de cada persona a su propia casa?
- Dos eventos: fueron al cine a ver una película y luego tomaron un taxi a casa de Sofía. (correct answer)
- Un evento: tomaron un taxi a casa de Sofía para continuar reunidos esa noche.
- Tres eventos: vieron la película, tomaron el taxi a casa de Sofía y escribieron mensajes a sus familias.
- Un evento: fueron al cine, que fue la única actividad entre la cena y regresar a sus casas.
Explanation: When a listening or reading comprehension question asks you to count specific events within a sequence, your job is to act like a detective — identify the exact starting and ending boundaries mentioned in the question, then carefully count only what falls between them.
Here, the question asks what happened between the dinner at the restaurant and each person returning home. That means you exclude the dinner itself and exclude the final return home, focusing only on what comes in between. Scanning the passage, you find two events in that middle zone: (1) they went to the movie theater to watch a film, and (2) after the movie, they took a taxi to Sofía's house to continue the night. That gives you exactly two events, making A the correct answer — it accurately names both without adding or removing anything.
Choice B is wrong because it counts only the taxi ride to Sofía's house, completely omitting the movie. Reading too quickly can cause you to miss an entire step in a sequence. Choice C is a trap — it lists three events, but "escribieron mensajes a sus familias" (they wrote messages to their families) never appears anywhere in the passage. This is a classic distractor that invents details to test whether you truly listened or read carefully. Choice D is the opposite error from B: it acknowledges only the cinema and ignores the trip to Sofía's house, reducing two events to one.
Study tip: When counting sequence events, mentally underline each action verb in the passage and number them in order — it prevents you from accidentally skipping or inventing steps.
Question 4
Escucha el siguiente relato: 'La semana pasada, Laura inscribió a su hijo en un curso de natación. El primer día de clase, el instructor presentó las reglas de seguridad. Después, los niños practicaron cómo flotar. A mitad de la clase, hubo un descanso de diez minutos. Tras el descanso, aprendieron la patada básica. Al final de la sesión, los niños salieron de la piscina y se cambiaron de ropa.'
Según el relato, ¿qué actividad realizaron los niños JUSTO ANTES del descanso de diez minutos?
- Los niños aprendieron la patada básica como introducción a la técnica de nado.
- Los niños escucharon las reglas de seguridad presentadas por el instructor al inicio de la clase.
- Los niños practicaron cómo flotar en el agua durante la primera parte de la clase. (correct answer)
- Los niños salieron de la piscina y se cambiaron de ropa al terminar la sesión.
Explanation: When a question asks about sequence — especially phrases like "justo antes de" (just before) or "justo después de" (just after) — your job is to mentally map the order of events in the passage before looking at the answer choices.
The passage lays out the class in clear chronological order: (1) the instructor presented safety rules, (2) the children practiced floating, (3) there was a ten-minute break, (4) they learned the basic kick, and (5) they got out of the pool and changed clothes. Since the question asks what happened just before the break, you simply look at the step immediately preceding it — practicing how to float. That makes C the correct answer, and the passage directly supports it: "los niños practicaron cómo flotar" comes right before "hubo un descanso de diez minutos."
Now let's look at why the other options fail. A describes learning the basic kick ("la patada básica"), which actually happened after the break, not before it — this is a classic reversal trap. B mentions the safety rules presented by the instructor, which is the very first activity of the class, not the one immediately before the break. D refers to the children leaving the pool and changing clothes, which is the final event of the entire session — far removed from the break in the timeline.
As a study tip, whenever you see sequence-based questions in Spanish listening or reading, quickly jot down a simple numbered list of events as they appear. Distractors on these questions almost always swap the order of real events — they won't invent details, they'll just misplace them.
Question 5
Escucha el siguiente relato: 'El grupo de turistas llegó al pueblo a las diez de la mañana. Lo primero que hicieron fue registrarse en el hotel. Después, sin descansar, salieron a explorar el mercado local. Antes de volver al hotel para almorzar, visitaron la iglesia colonial que estaba cerca del mercado. Por la tarde, el guía los llevó a un mirador desde donde vieron toda la ciudad. Ya de noche, el grupo cenó en un restaurante típico. Antes de acostarse, algunos turistas escribieron postales para enviar a sus familias.'
Según el relato, ¿cuál de las siguientes afirmaciones sobre la secuencia de eventos es INCORRECTA?
- Los turistas visitaron la iglesia colonial antes de regresar al hotel para almorzar.
- Los turistas exploraron el mercado local antes de visitar la iglesia colonial.
- Los turistas cenaron en un restaurante típico antes de escribir postales por la noche.
- Los turistas visitaron el mirador antes de explorar el mercado local del pueblo. (correct answer)
Explanation: When a question asks you to identify an incorrect sequence claim, your job is to mentally reconstruct the timeline from the passage and check each option against it. This tests careful reading of sequence markers like después, antes de, primero, and ya de noche.
Here is the order of events from the passage: (1) arrive and check into hotel, (2) explore the market, (3) visit the colonial church, (4) return to hotel for lunch, (5) visit the mirador in the afternoon, (6) dinner at a typical restaurant, (7) write postcards before bed.
Option D claims the tourists visited the mirador before exploring the market — but the passage clearly places the market visit in the morning, well before the afternoon trip to the mirador. This reversal makes D the incorrect statement, and therefore the correct answer to the question.
Option A is accurate: the passage says they visited the church "antes de volver al hotel para almorzar" — before returning for lunch. Option B is also accurate: the market is explored first, then the church is visited on the way back. Option C is true as well: dinner happens earlier in the evening, and postcards are written just before bed.
A useful strategy here is to jot a quick numbered list as you read or listen to a narrative. Spanish sequence questions frequently test whether you can separate morning, afternoon, and evening activities — and trap students who mix up the order of closely related events like the market and the mirador, which both involve going out to explore.
Question 6
Escucha el siguiente relato: 'Primero, María se despertó y se duchó. Después de ducharse, preparó el desayuno. Mientras comía, escuchó las noticias. Luego, antes de salir, llamó a su madre por teléfono. Finalmente, cerró la puerta con llave y tomó el autobús al trabajo.'
Según el relato, ¿qué hizo María INMEDIATAMENTE DESPUÉS de ducharse?
- Llamó a su madre para hablar por teléfono antes de salir de casa.
- Preparó el desayuno para comer en la mañana. (correct answer)
- Escuchó las noticias mientras realizaba otra actividad.
- Tomó el autobús hacia su lugar de trabajo.
Explanation: When a question asks what happened "inmediatamente después" (immediately after) a specific action, your job is to track the sequence of events carefully using the transition words in the passage as your guide.
In this passage, the sequence is signaled clearly: primero (first), después de ducharse (after showering), mientras comía (while eating), luego, antes de salir (then, before leaving), and finalmente (finally). The phrase "después de ducharse" directly tells you what María did right after her shower — she prepared breakfast ("preparó el desayuno"). That makes B the correct answer, and the passage supports it word for word.
A is a trap because it describes something that really did happen — María called her mother — but this occurred luego, antes de salir, meaning later in the sequence, not immediately after the shower. Confusing "did happen" with "happened next" is a common mistake on sequence questions.
C is also true in context — María listened to the news — but again, this happened while she was eating, which was a step after preparing breakfast. It's the third action in the chain, not the second.
D describes the very last action in the story (finalmente), making it the furthest from the shower in the sequence, not the closest.
As a study strategy, always underline or mentally note the transition words (primero, después, luego, mientras, finalmente) whenever you read a narrative passage. These words are the skeleton of the story's timeline, and sequence questions almost always hinge on them.
Question 7
Escucha el siguiente relato: 'El sábado, Carlos primero fue al mercado a comprar frutas. De camino a casa, paró en la farmacia. Cuando llegó a casa, guardó las frutas y luego llamó a su amigo Tomás. Más tarde, Tomás vino a visitarlo y juntos cocinaron la cena. Al final de la noche, Carlos lavó los platos solo porque Tomás ya se había ido.'
¿Cuál de las siguientes describe CORRECTAMENTE el orden de los tres primeros eventos del relato de Carlos?
- Fue al mercado → paró en la farmacia → guardó las frutas en casa. (correct answer)
- Paró en la farmacia → fue al mercado → llamó a su amigo Tomás.
- Fue al mercado → llegó a casa → cocinó la cena con Tomás.
- Paró en la farmacia → guardó las frutas → llamó a su amigo Tomás.
Explanation: When a question asks you to identify the correct sequence of events from a spoken or written passage, your job is to track the chronological order of actions using transition words like primero, de camino, luego, más tarde, and al final. These signal words are your roadmap.
In Carlos's story, the narrator lays out events clearly: Carlos primero (first) went to the market, then de camino a casa (on the way home) he stopped at the pharmacy, and cuando llegó a casa (when he arrived home) he put away the fruit. That means the first three events are: market → pharmacy → storing the fruit — which is exactly what answer A describes, making it the correct choice.
Looking at the distractors: B reverses the first two events — Carlos went to the market before stopping at the pharmacy, not after, so this sequence is backwards. C skips the pharmacy stop entirely and jumps ahead to cooking dinner with Tomás, which is actually the fifth or sixth event in the story, not the third. D also starts with the pharmacy (wrong first event) and skips the market visit altogether, jumping directly to storing fruit and calling Tomás — mixing up both order and events.
A helpful strategy: when answering sequence questions, quickly jot down a numbered list of events as you read or listen, using the transition words as your guide. On Spanish exams, distractors often swap two events or skip one entirely, so verifying each step in the sequence — not just the first — is key to avoiding traps.
Question 8
Escucha el siguiente relato: 'Ayer, Ana empezó el día leyendo su correo electrónico. Después, tuvo una reunión de trabajo que duró dos horas. Al terminar la reunión, almorzó con una colega. Por la tarde, redactó un informe importante. Antes de irse a casa, imprimió el informe y lo dejó en el escritorio de su jefa.'
Según el relato, ¿qué evento ocurrió JUSTO ANTES de que Ana redactara el informe?
- Ana leyó su correo electrónico al comenzar la jornada laboral.
- Ana imprimió el informe y lo dejó en el escritorio de su jefa antes de salir.
- Ana almorzó con una colega al terminar la reunión de trabajo. (correct answer)
- Ana asistió a una reunión de trabajo que duró aproximadamente dos horas.
Explanation: When a question asks what happened "JUSTO ANTES" (just before) a specific event, you need to mentally reconstruct the chronological order of events and identify the one that came immediately before — not just any earlier event.
In this passage, Ana's day unfolds in a clear sequence: she read her email → attended a two-hour meeting → had lunch with a colleague → wrote the report → printed the report and left it on her boss's desk. The question zeroes in on what happened immediately before she drafted ("redactara") the report. Tracing the timeline, the lunch with her colleague comes directly before the afternoon report-writing, making C the correct answer.
Here's why the other options miss the mark: A describes reading email, which was the first event of the day — several steps removed from the report, not immediately before it. B describes printing the report and leaving it on her boss's desk, which actually happened after writing the report, making it a future event, not a prior one. D refers to the two-hour meeting, which is closer in sequence, but still one step too early — the lunch happened between the meeting and the report.
A useful strategy for sequence questions like this: quickly jot down or mentally number the events in order as you read or listen. Then, when asked about what came "just before" something, look at the event in the slot directly above it — not just any earlier event. On Spanish listening exams especially, distractors often bait you with events that are earlier but not immediately prior.
Question 9
Escucha el siguiente relato: 'Durante las vacaciones, la familia Pérez primero visitó un museo de arte. Al día siguiente, fueron a la playa por la mañana y por la tarde pasearon por el centro histórico. El tercer día, hicieron una excursión en barco. El último día, compraron recuerdos y tomaron el vuelo de regreso a casa.'
Un estudiante afirma que el paseo por el centro histórico ocurrió el TERCER día de las vacaciones. ¿Por qué está equivocado?
- El paseo por el centro histórico ocurrió el segundo día, por la tarde, después de ir a la playa por la mañana. (correct answer)
- El paseo por el centro histórico fue el primer día, combinado con la visita al museo de arte.
- El paseo por el centro histórico ocurrió el último día, junto con la compra de recuerdos antes del vuelo.
- El paseo por el centro histórico fue el tercer día, pero en la mañana, no en el contexto que el estudiante describe.
Explanation: When reading a passage that describes a sequence of events, your job is to track when each event occurs — not just what happens, but on which day and at what time of day. This question tests whether you followed the timeline carefully.
The passage lays out four days explicitly. Day one: the family visited an art museum. Day two: they went to the beach in the morning, then walked through the historic center in the afternoon. Day three: the boat excursion. Day four: souvenir shopping and the return flight. That means the walk through the historic center happened on the second day, in the afternoon — making answer A correct. The student confused the third-day activity (the boat excursion) with the second-day afternoon activity.
As for the wrong answers: B is incorrect because the historic center visit was never paired with the museum — those were on separate days entirely. C is wrong because the last day was reserved for buying souvenirs and catching the flight, not exploring the historic center. D is a tricky distractor — it technically keeps the walk on the third day but tries to shift the detail rather than correct the day itself. The real error isn't when during the third day something happened; the walk simply didn't occur on day three at all.
A good strategy here is to create a quick mental (or written) timeline as you read: Day 1 → Day 2 AM / Day 2 PM → Day 3 → Day 4. Passages like this often test whether you can separate events that share the same day into their correct time slots.
Question 10
Escucha el siguiente relato: 'Roberto quería hacer una torta. Primero, reunió todos los ingredientes en la mesa. Luego, mezcló la harina con los huevos y el azúcar. Antes de meter la mezcla al horno, engrasó el molde. Mientras la torta se horneaba, preparó el glaseado. Cuando la torta estuvo lista, la dejó enfriar y después aplicó el glaseado.'
¿Cuál acción realizó Roberto ENTRE mezclar los ingredientes y hornear la torta?
- Reunió todos los ingredientes y los colocó sobre la mesa de la cocina.
- Preparó el glaseado para decorar la torta una vez horneada.
- Engrasó el molde para poder verter la mezcla en él antes de hornear. (correct answer)
- Dejó enfriar la torta antes de cubrir toda la superficie con el glaseado.
Explanation: When a question asks what happened between two specific events, your job is to map out the sequence carefully and identify what falls in that exact middle window — not before the first event, and not after the second.
In the passage, the sequence goes: (1) Roberto gathered ingredients → (2) he mixed flour, eggs, and sugar → (3) he greased the pan → (4) he put the mixture in the oven → (5) he prepared the frosting while it baked → (6) he let it cool → (7) he applied the frosting. The question asks what happened between mixing the ingredients and baking the torta. Looking at that window, step 3 fits perfectly: Roberto greased the pan (engrasó el molde) specifically before putting the mixture in the oven. That makes C the correct answer — it's the action that bridges mixing and baking.
A is wrong because gathering the ingredients (reunió los ingredientes) happened before mixing — it was actually the very first step, well outside the window the question defines. B is wrong because preparing the frosting (preparó el glaseado) happened while the torta was already baking, not between mixing and baking. D is wrong because letting the torta cool and applying the frosting happened after baking was complete — these are the final steps of the story.
A useful strategy: when you see sequence words like primero, luego, antes de, mientras, and cuando, underline them mentally to build a timeline. Then place each answer choice on that timeline — if it falls outside the window the question describes, eliminate it.