Spanish 2 Quiz: Placing Object Pronouns
10 questions · exam conditions
0:00
Placing Object PronounsQuestion 1 of 10

Which of the following sentences correctly uses object pronoun placement when a present progressive construction ('estar + gerund') is involved, to mean 'She is explaining it (the lesson, feminine) to them'?

Está se la explicando. / Se la está explicándola.
Les la está explicando. / Está explicándoles la.
Se la está explicándosela. / La les está explicando.
Se la está explicando. / Está explicándosela.
← Back to quizzes

Spanish 2 Quiz

Spanish 2 Quiz: Placing Object Pronouns

Practice Placing Object Pronouns in Spanish 2 with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.

What this quiz covers

This quiz focuses on Placing Object Pronouns, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for Spanish 2.

How to use this quiz

Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.

All questions

Question 1

Which of the following sentences correctly uses object pronoun placement when a present progressive construction ('estar + gerund') is involved, to mean 'She is explaining it (the lesson, feminine) to them'?

  1. Está se la explicando. / Se la está explicándola.
  2. Les la está explicando. / Está explicándoles la.
  3. Se la está explicándosela. / La les está explicando.
  4. Se la está explicando. / Está explicándosela. (correct answer)
Explanation: When Spanish uses the estar + gerund construction (present progressive), object pronouns can be placed in two valid positions: directly before the conjugated verb estar, or attached to the end of the gerund. The key rules are that indirect object pronouns come before direct object pronouns, and when both a third-person indirect (le/les) and a direct object pronoun appear together, le/les must change to se. For "She is explaining it (the lesson, feminine) to them," you need se (indirect, replacing les) + la (direct, feminine for la lección). That gives you the pronoun pair se la. In the estar + gerund construction, the two correct placements are: se la está explicando (both pronouns before estar) or Está explicándosela (both pronouns attached to the gerund, written as one word with an accent mark added). That's exactly what D offers — making it the correct answer. A is wrong on both counts: "Está se la explicando" places pronouns between está and the gerund, which is never allowed in Spanish. The second option duplicates la unnecessarily and incorrectly. B uses les instead of converting it to se before la — a fundamental error in pronoun combination rules. You cannot say les la; it must become se la. C repeats the pronoun pair twice ("explicándosela" already contains both, so adding extra pronouns before está creates an illegal double-pronoun redundancy). A useful tip: remember the two legal "parking spots" for pronouns in progressive constructions — before estar or glued to the gerund — never in between, and never split between both positions.

Question 2

Carlos tells his roommate: 'No me lo puedes explicar ahora, ¿verdad?' His roommate responds affirmatively, confirming he cannot explain it to him right now.

If the roommate wanted to restate the original sentence as a negative construction with both object pronouns attached to the infinitive — rather than placed before the conjugated verb — which form would be correct?

  1. No puedes explicármelo ahora. (correct answer)
  2. No puedes me lo explicar ahora.
  3. No puedes explicar me lo ahora.
  4. No me lo puedes explicármelo ahora.
Explanation: When Spanish sentences have both a direct and indirect object pronoun alongside an infinitive, you have two valid placement options: attach both pronouns before the conjugated verb, or attach both pronouns directly to the infinitive as a single written unit. The key word here is "both" — the pronouns must travel together and land in one of these two legal positions, never split between them. This question asks you to move the pronouns from their pre-conjugated position (No me lo puedes...) onto the infinitive instead. To do this correctly, you attach the indirect object pronoun first, then the direct object pronoun, directly to the end of the infinitive — giving you explicármelo. The full sentence becomes No puedes explicármelo ahora, which is answer A. Notice that the accent mark on explicár- is required to preserve the original stress of the verb when syllables are added. Answer B (No puedes me lo explicar) is incorrect because it places the pronouns before the infinitive but after the conjugated verb — this is not a grammatically accepted position in Spanish. Answer C (No puedes explicar me lo) is wrong for a similar reason: you cannot insert a space and separate the pronouns from the infinitive; they must be fused directly onto it with no breaks. Answer D doubles up both placements simultaneously — No me lo puedes explicármelo — which is redundant and grammatically impossible. A useful rule of thumb: think of attached pronouns as a "suffix train" — they board the infinitive in order (indirect first, direct second) and the train has no gaps.

Question 3

A student wants to say 'Don't tell it to me now' (negative tú command, direct object = 'it' referring to 'el secreto'). Which option is correct?

  1. No digasmelo ahora.
  2. No lo me digas ahora.
  3. No me lo digas ahora. (correct answer)
  4. No me lo dices ahora.
Explanation: When using negative tú commands with two object pronouns, you need to get two things right simultaneously: the verb form and the pronoun order. This question tests both at once. In negative tú commands, the verb takes the present subjunctive form, and all object pronouns are placed before the verb (unlike affirmative commands, where pronouns attach to the end). When you have both an indirect object pronoun (me, te, le) and a direct object pronoun (lo, la, los, las), Spanish requires a fixed order: indirect before direct — always. So the structure is: No + [indirect] + [direct] + [subjunctive verb]. That makes C — No me lo digas ahora — the correct answer. "Me" (indirect) comes before "lo" (direct), and "digas" is the correct negative tú subjunctive form of decir. Looking at why the others fail: A (No digasmelo) tries to attach the pronouns to the end of the verb, which is only allowed in affirmative commands, not negative ones. B (No lo me digas) places the pronouns in the wrong order — direct before indirect — which violates Spanish grammar rules. D (No me lo dices) uses the present indicative "dices" instead of the subjunctive "digas," making it a statement ("you don't tell me") rather than a command. A handy memory trick: think "I.D." — Indirect before Direct. And remember, negative commands always keep pronouns in front of the verb, while affirmative commands attach them to the back.

Question 4

Marta le está explicando a su amiga cómo preparar una receta. Ella dice: '  los ingredientes antes de empezar, por favor.'

Marta wants to tell her friend to 'prepare them (the ingredients) before starting.' Which option correctly uses a direct object pronoun with the affirmative tú imperative?

  1. Prepáralos antes de empezar, por favor. (correct answer)
  2. Los prepara antes de empezar, por favor.
  3. Prepara los antes de empezar, por favor.
  4. Los prepáralos antes de empezar, por favor.
Explanation: When using direct object pronouns with affirmative tú commands in Spanish, you need to remember one critical rule: the pronoun must be attached directly to the end of the verb, and an accent mark is added to preserve the original stress. Here's the logic: the affirmative tú imperative of preparar is prepara. The direct object pronoun los (referring to los ingredientes) must be glued onto the verb, giving you prepáralos. The accent mark on the a keeps the stress where it naturally falls in prepara, preventing it from shifting when the syllable count increases. Answer A — Prepáralos antes de empezar, por favor — follows this rule perfectly and is correct. Looking at the distractors, B places los before the conjugated verb (Los prepara), which is only acceptable with indicative or subjunctive forms — not with affirmative commands. Moving the pronoun before the verb is actually the rule for negative commands, so this reflects a common mix-up. C writes Prepara los as two separate words, which is never grammatically acceptable; pronouns must be written as one unit with the imperative, no space allowed. D doubles the pronoun (Los prepáralos), placing it both before and after the verb — this is redundant and grammatically incorrect in any context. A useful trick: think of affirmative commands and their pronouns as a single word you "build" by attaching the pronoun to the back of the verb. If the question ever involves a negative command (like no prepares), the pronoun flips to the front — that's the key contrast to keep straight.

Question 5

A student wants to say 'I want to give it (the book, masculine) to her.' She produces the sentence: 'Quiero dárselo.' Her classmate argues the correct form is 'Se lo quiero dar.' Which of the following best describes the grammatical situation?

  1. Both sentences are grammatically correct; Spanish allows object pronouns to attach to the infinitive or precede the conjugated verb in a verb + infinitive construction. (correct answer)
  2. Only 'Quiero dárselo' is correct because object pronouns must always attach to the infinitive when one is present in the sentence.
  3. Only 'Se lo quiero dar' is correct because indirect object pronouns must always precede the conjugated verb and cannot be attached to an infinitive.
  4. Neither sentence is correct; the proper form requires separating the pronouns: 'Le lo quiero dar' with the indirect object pronoun 'le' placed before the verb.
Explanation: When Spanish has a conjugated verb followed by an infinitive (like quiero + dar), object pronouns have two equally valid homes: attached to the end of the infinitive, or placed before the conjugated verb. This "pronoun placement flexibility" is one of the most practical — and frequently tested — features of Spanish grammar. In this sentence, the speaker wants to express dar + indirect object le (to her) + direct object lo (the book). Because le before lo would create the awkward clash le lo, Spanish automatically substitutes se for le, giving you the pronoun pair se lo. Both Quiero dárselo (attached to the infinitive) and Se lo quiero dar (before the conjugated verb) are perfectly correct — making A the right answer. B is wrong because it invents a rule that doesn't exist. There is no requirement forcing pronouns onto the infinitive; the preverbal position is always available in a verb + infinitive construction. C makes the opposite error — claiming pronouns must precede the conjugated verb and can never attach to an infinitive. This is equally false and contradicts standard Spanish grammar. D introduces a real concept (the le → se substitution rule) but applies it incorrectly. Le lo is actually the ungrammatical form; se lo is the required substitution. "Neither sentence is correct" is entirely wrong since both are textbook-valid. Study tip: Whenever you see le + lo/la/los/las together, always swap le for se — and remember, in a conjugated verb + infinitive construction, you can place the pronouns either way.

Question 6

Which pair of sentences correctly translates 'She is going to send them (the letters, feminine) to us,' showing both valid pronoun placements in the 'ir a + infinitive' construction?

  1. Nos las va a enviar. / Va a enviárnoslas. (correct answer)
  2. Las nos va a enviar. / Va a enviárnoslas.
  3. Nos va a enviar las. / Va a nos enviárlas.
  4. Va a nos las enviar. / Nos las va a enviando.
Explanation: When working with double object pronouns in the ir a + infinitive construction, you need to know two things: the correct pronoun order, and the two valid placement positions. In Spanish, when combining an indirect object pronoun (IOP) with a direct object pronoun (DOP), the IOP always comes first: IOP + DOP. Here, "to us" = nos (IOP) and "them/the letters" = las (DOP), giving you nos las. The ir a + infinitive structure offers two legal placements: both pronouns go before the conjugated verb (va), or both pronouns attach to the infinitive as a single unit. That makes A correct: Nos las va a enviar places both pronouns before va in the right order, and Va a enviárnoslas attaches both to the infinitive with the required written accent to preserve stress. Both sentences are grammatically valid translations. B fails because Las nos va a enviar reverses the required IOP + DOP order — the DOP (las) cannot precede the IOP (nos). C is wrong on both counts: you cannot split the pronouns by placing las alone after the infinitive (enviar las), and in the second option Va a nos enviárlas, the IOP is incorrectly placed between va a and the infinitive instead of attaching to it. D is doubly flawed: Va a nos las enviar illegally inserts pronouns between va a and the infinitive, and Nos las va a enviando misuses the gerund (enviando) — the construction requires the infinitive, not the present participle. Your study tip: always remember the pronoun order IOP → DOP and that in ir a + infinitive, pronouns must go either all before va or all onto the infinitive — never split between the two.

Question 7

A Spanish professor writes four sentences on the board and asks students to identify which one contains an error in object pronoun placement.

Which of the following sentences contains an error in object pronoun placement?

  1. Debes decírselo esta tarde si puedes.
  2. Se lo debes decir esta tarde si puedes.
  3. Lo se debes decir esta tarde si puedes. (correct answer)
  4. ¿No se lo puedes decir esta tarde?
Explanation: When working with object pronouns in Spanish, one of the most important rules to master is where those pronouns can legally appear in a sentence. Spanish allows two valid positions for object pronouns with conjugated verbs followed by infinitives: either before the conjugated verb or attached to the infinitive. What it does not allow is placing pronouns between the conjugated verb and the infinitive as if they were floating in the middle. Option C — "Lo se debes decir esta tarde" — commits exactly this error. The direct object pronoun lo is incorrectly placed before the conjugated verb debes while se awkwardly follows it, creating a construction that breaks Spanish grammar rules entirely. The pronouns are split and misordered, making the sentence both structurally and logically broken. Options A and B are both correct sentences and represent the two valid pronoun placement patterns. In A, "Debes decírselo," the pronouns are attached to the infinitive — perfectly acceptable. In B, "Se lo debes decir," both pronouns appear before the conjugated verb debes — also perfectly acceptable. These two options exist to remind you that both positions are valid, so neither can be the error. Option D, "¿No se lo puedes decir?", also correctly places both pronouns before the conjugated verb puedes in a question format — no error there. A helpful study habit: when you see double object pronouns (se lo, se la, etc.), always check that they appear together, in the correct order (indirect before direct), and in one of the two legal positions — never split or floating mid-sentence.

Question 8

Pedro says: 'Tengo que comprarle un regalo a mi madre.' His friend asks him to rephrase the sentence so that the indirect object pronoun appears before the conjugated verb instead of attached to the infinitive.

Which rephrasing correctly moves the indirect object pronoun to the proclitic position before the conjugated verb while keeping the rest of the sentence grammatically intact?

  1. Me tengo que comprar un regalo a mi madre.
  2. Le tengo que comprarle un regalo a mi madre.
  3. Tengo que le comprar un regalo a mi madre.
  4. Le tengo que comprar un regalo a mi madre. (correct answer)
Explanation: When Spanish uses a verb phrase like tener que + infinitive, indirect object pronouns have two valid homes: attached to the end of the infinitive, or placed before the conjugated verb (called the proclitic position). This question tests whether you can perform that shift correctly. The original sentence, Tengo que comprarle, has le clinging to the infinitive comprar. To move it to proclitic position, you simply detach le from the infinitive and place it directly before tengo — giving you Le tengo que comprar un regalo a mi madre, which is answer D. The infinitive loses its attached pronoun and returns to its base form comprar, while le now precedes the conjugated verb. Everything else stays the same. Here's why the other options fail: A swaps le for me, which changes the meaning entirely — me refers to the speaker (first person), not Pedro's mother (third person). That's a pronoun person error, not just a placement error. B actually doubles the pronoun by keeping le attached to the infinitive and adding another le before tengo — Spanish does not permit this kind of duplication; you move the pronoun, you don't clone it. C places le between que and the infinitive (tengo que le comprar), which looks intuitive but is grammatically incorrect in Spanish — the pronoun cannot sit in that middle slot in a tener que construction. A handy rule to remember: with conjugated verb + infinitive combinations, the pronoun is either on the infinitive or before the conjugated verb — never sandwiched in between, and never duplicated in both spots.

Question 9

A student writes the following in a composition: 'Mi profesora quiere explicarnos los conceptos. Ella va a explicar nos los mañana en clase.'

The student's second sentence — 'Ella va a explicar nos los mañana en clase' — contains an error in pronoun placement. What is the correct version, and why?

  1. 'Ella va a explicar los nos mañana en clase' — in an 'ir a + infinitive' construction, the direct object pronoun must come before the indirect object pronoun when both are placed after the infinitive.
  2. 'Ella nos los va a explicar' or 'Ella va a explicárnoslos' — pronouns must either both precede the conjugated verb or both attach to the infinitive; they cannot be left as floating separate words after the infinitive. (correct answer)
  3. 'Ella se los va a explicar mañana en clase' — in any 'ir a + infinitive' structure, the indirect object pronoun must always change to 'se' when a direct object pronoun is also present, regardless of person.
  4. 'Ella nos va a explicarlos mañana en clase' — in an 'ir a + infinitive' construction, it is acceptable to place the indirect object pronoun before the conjugated verb while attaching only the direct object pronoun to the infinitive.
Explanation: When you see a question involving pronouns with an ir a + infinitive construction, the key rule to remember is this: the two pronouns must stay together as a unit — you cannot split them up or leave them floating awkwardly between words. In Spanish, when you have both an indirect object pronoun (nos) and a direct object pronoun (los), you have exactly two valid placement options: place both before the conjugated verb (nos los va a explicar), or both attached to the infinitive (va a explicárnoslos). Notice that when you attach them, the infinitive also needs a written accent to preserve the original stress. The student's version — explicar nos los — incorrectly separates the pronouns from the verb with spaces, as if they were independent floating words. That simply isn't grammatically valid in Spanish. A is wrong because reversing the order to los nos doesn't fix the real problem (the pronouns are still separated and floating), and indirect object pronouns always precede direct object pronouns — not the other way around. C is wrong because se only replaces le/les, not nos. The rule about converting to se applies when a third-person indirect object pronoun (le/les) appears alongside a direct object pronoun — it doesn't apply here since nos is first person. D is wrong because, although it sounds plausible, splitting the pronouns across the two verbs (nos before va a, los after explicar) is not standard or acceptable — both pronouns must travel together. Your study tip: always think of nos los (or any pronoun pair) as a locked unit. They move together or not at all.

Question 10

A student is asked to convert the sentence 'Voy a mostrarte las fotos' so that the object pronoun 'te' is in the proclitic position (before the conjugated verb). The student produces: 'Te voy a mostrar las fotos.' Her teacher marks it partially correct but notes that the direct object 'las fotos' should also be pronominalized. Which complete sentence correctly pronominalizES BOTH objects and places them before the conjugated verb?

  1. Las te voy a mostrar.
  2. Te las voy a mostrar. (correct answer)
  3. Se las voy a mostrar.
  4. Te voy a mostrártelas.
Explanation: When Spanish sentences use a periphrastic construction like ir a + infinitive, object pronouns can attach to the infinitive or move before the conjugated verb (the proclitic position). When you move them before the conjugated verb, all pronouns must move together as a unit — you can't split them between positions. The sentence needs two pronouns: the indirect object te (to you) and the direct object las (the photos). In Spanish, when an indirect object pronoun and a direct object pronoun appear together, the indirect object always comes first: IO before DO. That gives you te + las, producing "Te las voy a mostrar." — which is choice B, the correct answer. Choice A (Las te voy a mostrar) reverses the required order, placing the direct object before the indirect object. Spanish grammar strictly forbids this sequence. Choice C (Se las voy a mostrar) replaces te with se, which only happens when both pronouns begin with the letter l (e.g., le + las → se las). Since te does not begin with l, no substitution is needed here. Choice D (Te voy a mostrártelas) is a mixed construction — it places te before the conjugated verb but attaches las to the infinitive, splitting the pronouns across two positions, which is grammatically unacceptable. A reliable study tip: memorize the phrase "IO before DO" and remember that when you move pronouns to proclitic position, they travel as a complete package — no splitting allowed.