All questions
Question 1
In 2022, linguist Haruto Sato wrote in a commentary on translation that readers often ask for a "perfectly faithful" version of a poem. Sato notes that even choosing a synonym can shift rhythm, and preserving a rhyme scheme may require altering an image. He gives an example of a line whose literal meaning is simple but whose sound suggests hesitation; a strictly literal translation loses that effect. Sato concludes that fidelity in translation is not a single target but a set of trade-offs among meaning, music, and cultural resonance.
Which choice best states the main idea of the text?
- A perfectly faithful translation is possible if the translator chooses the right synonyms.
- Poetry should not be translated because rhyme schemes cannot be preserved.
- Translation fidelity involves balancing competing goals like meaning, sound, and cultural context. (correct answer)
- Literal translation is always superior to creative translation in conveying a poem's effects.
Explanation: The main idea is that translation fidelity involves balancing competing goals like meaning, sound, and cultural context. Sato demonstrates how "even choosing a synonym can shift rhythm" and how preserving rhyme may require "altering an image," using the example of a line whose literal translation would lose its hesitant sound. His conclusion that "fidelity in translation is not a single target but a set of trade-offs among meaning, music, and cultural resonance" captures the complex nature of translation. Choice A's claim that perfect translation is possible contradicts Sato's entire argument about inevitable trade-offs. Understanding translation as negotiation rather than perfect transfer helps appreciate both its possibilities and limitations.
Question 2
In 2008, ecologist Marisol Chen reported in Field Notes from the Salt Marsh that a restored wetland did not immediately attract the rare rail bird the project had aimed to protect. Volunteers worried the effort had failed, especially after a storm flattened new grasses. Chen observed, however, that insect diversity doubled within a year and that small fish returned to channels that had been dry for decades. By the third spring, rails appeared briefly during migration, even if they did not nest. Chen argues that restoration should be judged by the rebuilding of food webs and habitat functions, not by the instant return of a single charismatic species.
Which choice best states the main idea of the text?
- Wetland restoration can succeed even without an immediate return of a target species. (correct answer)
- Storms are the primary reason restored wetlands fail to attract rare birds.
- Volunteer concerns can undermine ecological projects more than environmental conditions do.
- Rail birds migrate through salt marshes only when insect diversity has doubled.
Explanation: The passage argues that ecological restoration should be measured by ecosystem recovery, not the immediate return of a single species. Chen describes initial disappointment when the rail bird didn't appear, then shows how the wetland actually succeeded in other ways (doubled insect diversity, returning fish). The passage concludes that judging restoration by "food webs and habitat functions" is more appropriate than expecting instant results for one "charismatic species." Choice B incorrectly makes storms the primary focus when they're mentioned only as one challenge, missing Chen's broader argument about how we should evaluate restoration success.
Question 3
In 2007, architect Dana Svensson wrote in a journal on urban design about a plaza that residents called "empty." City leaders proposed filling it with kiosks, arguing that commerce would create life. Svensson notes, however, that the plaza was busiest at lunchtime, when office workers sat on its low steps to eat and talk; the problem was not lack of activity but lack of recognition. After the city added shade trees and movable chairs—without adding shops—use increased and complaints fell. Svensson's purpose is to show that diagnosing a space as "empty" can lead to the wrong fix if planners ignore how people already use it.
Which choice best states the main purpose of the text?
- To show that planners should study existing uses before prescribing commercial solutions for public spaces. (correct answer)
- To argue that kiosks are always the most effective way to revitalize a plaza.
- To explain why office workers prefer eating lunch outdoors rather than indoors.
- To describe how movable chairs are manufactured and maintained in city plazas.
Explanation: The main purpose is to show that planners should study existing uses before prescribing commercial solutions for public spaces. Svensson reveals that a plaza labeled "empty" was actually "busiest at lunchtime, when office workers sat on its low steps," and that simple additions like shade trees and chairs increased use more effectively than the proposed kiosks. Her point that "diagnosing a space as 'empty' can lead to the wrong fix if planners ignore how people already use it" advocates for observation-based rather than assumption-based planning. Choice B contradicts Svensson's argument against reflexively adding commerce to public spaces. Successful urban design requires understanding actual use patterns, not imposing preconceived solutions.
Question 4
In 2009, neuroscientist Helen Ryu wrote in a review of memory studies that many experiments treat forgetting as a failure. Ryu points out that participants who forget irrelevant details often perform better on later tasks requiring generalization, such as recognizing a pattern across different images. She also notes that the brain's energy budget is limited, making constant storage costly. Ryu's purpose is to reframe forgetting as an adaptive process that can support learning, even if it frustrates people who want perfect recall.
Which choice best states the main purpose of the text?
- To argue that forgetting can be beneficial because it supports efficient learning and generalization. (correct answer)
- To claim that memory experiments are invalid because participants rarely try their hardest.
- To explain why recognizing patterns requires storing every detail of prior images.
- To show that the brain's energy budget is unlimited during demanding cognitive tasks.
Explanation: The main purpose is to argue that forgetting can be beneficial because it supports efficient learning and generalization. Ryu challenges the common view of forgetting as failure by showing that "participants who forget irrelevant details often perform better on later tasks requiring generalization" and noting that constant storage would be costly given the brain's limited energy budget. Her purpose to "reframe forgetting as an adaptive process that can support learning" represents a paradigm shift in how we understand memory. Choice C contradicts Ryu's point—she argues that forgetting details actually helps with pattern recognition. When an author explicitly states they want to "reframe" something, that reframing is typically their main purpose.
Question 5
In 2016, public health researcher Nikhil Batra wrote about a campaign to reduce sugary drinks. The posters featured startling images of teeth and warning labels, and sales briefly dipped near the subway stations where ads were placed. But Batra's follow-up interviews found many people already knew the health risks and felt nagged rather than helped. The biggest sustained change occurred where corner stores offered cheaper unsweetened options at eye level. Batra concludes that information alone rarely shifts habits without altering the choices people encounter daily.
Which choice best states the main idea of the text?
- Graphic posters reduced sugary drink sales permanently across the entire city.
- People ignored health campaigns because they did not understand the risks of sugar.
- Lasting behavior change came from reshaping everyday options, not just providing warnings. (correct answer)
- Corner stores resisted offering unsweetened drinks despite public pressure.
Explanation: The main idea is that lasting behavior change came from reshaping everyday options, not just providing warnings. While graphic health posters caused only a brief sales dip, "the biggest sustained change occurred where corner stores offered cheaper unsweetened options at eye level." Batra's conclusion that "information alone rarely shifts habits without altering the choices people encounter daily" captures the key insight about behavior change requiring environmental modification. Choice A overstates the poster campaign's impact, claiming permanent city-wide reduction when the text describes only brief, localized effects. Effective public health interventions must change the choice architecture, not just provide information.
Question 6
In 2018, journalist Mina Okafor wrote in an essay on public libraries: When the city announced a "modernization," officials highlighted new self-checkout kiosks and a café. Yet the branch's most-used service wasn't books or coffee; it was the quiet, heated room where job seekers filled out applications and seniors escaped summer heat. After renovations, the café thrived, but the number of available seats shrank, and conversations grew louder. Okafor argues that measuring success by revenue-friendly amenities misses what many residents actually depend on: a reliably public space that asks for nothing in return.
Which choice best states the main purpose of the text?
- To explain why library renovations often increase noise and reduce seating.
- To argue that libraries should be evaluated by their role as unconditional public space. (correct answer)
- To describe how self-checkout kiosks changed the way patrons borrow books.
- To praise city officials for funding upgrades that attract new library visitors.
Explanation: The passage's main purpose is to argue that libraries should be evaluated by their role as unconditional public space. The text begins by describing a library renovation that added revenue-generating amenities like cafés and self-checkout kiosks, but then reveals that the library's most-used service was actually its function as a quiet, heated public space where people could work on job applications or escape extreme weather. The passage builds to Okafor's central argument that measuring library success by "revenue-friendly amenities" misses what residents truly depend on—a public space that "asks for nothing in return." Choice A focuses only on the negative effects of renovations (noise and reduced seating) without capturing Okafor's broader argument about how we should evaluate libraries. When tackling main purpose questions, look for the author's ultimate argument or conclusion, not just the examples used to support it.
Question 7
In 1954, educator Thomas Ekwueme argued in The Classroom Voice that silent reading time was being treated as a reward rather than a skill. He observed that students who read most at home were given more freedom, while struggling readers were assigned extra drills that left them fewer chances to practice sustained reading. Ekwueme does not dismiss phonics or drills; he says they matter. But he insists that schools should protect time for all students to read independently, because practice, not punishment, is what builds endurance.
Which choice best states the main idea of the text?
- Silent reading should be reserved for advanced students who already read at home.
- Drills and phonics should replace independent reading time in most classrooms.
- All students need protected independent reading time to build reading stamina. (correct answer)
- Extra drills are the best way to motivate struggling readers to read more.
Explanation: The main idea is that all students need protected independent reading time to build reading stamina. Ekwueme observes that schools treat silent reading as a reward for advanced students while giving struggling readers "extra drills that left them fewer chances to practice sustained reading." His central argument that "practice, not punishment, is what builds endurance" advocates for universal access to independent reading time. Choice A contradicts Ekwueme's position by suggesting silent reading should be limited to advanced students, exactly the practice he criticizes. Educational equity often requires giving all students access to the same growth opportunities.
Question 8
From an essay by L. Patel (2017). Alexander Fleming returned from vacation in 1928 to find that a mold had invaded one of his petri dishes, killing the surrounding bacteria. Most researchers would have tossed the contaminated plate; Fleming looked more closely. His curiosity about that "ruined" experiment led to the isolation of penicillin, the first widely used antibiotic. I do not cite this episode to romanticize lab mishaps, but to emphasize that apparent failures often contain information we can use, if only we pause to examine them. A culture that treats every deviation from plan as waste squeezes out the very moments that can change a field. In research, as in life, we move forward not only by perfecting our methods but by noticing what surprises us.
Which choice best states the main purpose of the text?
- To provide a detailed biography of Alexander Fleming.
- To outline laboratory procedures that prevent contamination.
- To explain how antibiotics transformed modern medicine.
- To argue that unexpected results can drive discovery. (correct answer)
Explanation: The author uses Fleming's story to argue that surprises and apparent failures can be productive. The other choices misstate the focus by narrowing it to biography or procedures or broadening it to the full impact of antibiotics.
Question 9
In 1995, linguist Peter Halberg wrote about a small island community where younger speakers were replacing traditional terms for fishing tools with loanwords from a nearby trading hub. Elders interpreted the shift as cultural loss and began organizing "language purity" lessons in the school. Halberg reports, though, that the same students were also reviving older storytelling formulas during festivals, using them to invent new jokes and songs. The community was not simply abandoning its language but rearranging it, keeping certain forms for ceremony while adopting new vocabulary for commerce. Halberg's analysis suggests that language change can reflect strategic adaptation rather than simple decline.
Which choice best states the main purpose of the text?
- To argue that borrowing words can coexist with preserving traditional language practices. (correct answer)
- To explain why schools should enforce language purity to prevent cultural loss.
- To describe how trading hubs cause island communities to stop telling stories at festivals.
- To show that elders misunderstand the meanings of modern loanwords for fishing tools.
Explanation: The main purpose is to argue that adopting loanwords can coexist with preserving and revitalizing traditional language practices. Halberg's analysis shows the community wasn't simply abandoning their language but "rearranging it"—adopting new vocabulary for commerce while simultaneously reviving old storytelling formulas for cultural expression. Choice B about enforcing language purity represents what the elders attempted but not what Halberg advocates; his observation of students using traditional forms creatively suggests a more nuanced view. The conclusion that "language change can reflect strategic adaptation rather than simple decline" captures how communities can selectively modernize while maintaining cultural practices. This challenges simplistic narratives about language loss by showing how speakers actively manage linguistic resources for different domains.
Question 10
In 1889, novelist R. K. Ellery wrote in "Harbor Ledger": Mara keeps two notebooks—one for the fish she sells and one for the debts she is owed—because her father taught her that memory flatters those who borrow. When a storm ruins the week's catch, the town's mayor offers to "forgive" her license fee in exchange for a public thank-you at the next meeting. Mara calculates that the fee is small, but the speech would make future refusals harder; gratitude, she realizes, can be a contract written in air. She pays the fee, then quietly lends the mayor's cousin a coin, recording it in ink.
Which choice best states the main idea of the text?
- Mara's careful recordkeeping helps her manage debts in a fishing town.
- A storm forces Mara to make difficult financial choices about her business.
- Mara recognizes that public gratitude can create obligations she wants to avoid. (correct answer)
- The mayor uses license fees to control fishermen after a poor catch.
Explanation: The passage centers on Mara's realization that accepting public gratitude creates future obligations that limit her freedom to refuse. When offered a fee waiver in exchange for a public thank-you, she calculates that while the fee is small, the speech would make future refusals harder—gratitude becomes "a contract written in air." Choice A mentions her recordkeeping, but that's background context rather than the main point about how public displays of gratitude can trap recipients into ongoing obligations. The passage uses this specific incident to illustrate a broader insight about the hidden costs of accepting favors that require public acknowledgment.
Question 11
In 2020, economist Daniel Rees examined a city's pilot program that offered free bus rides on weekends. Initial reports highlighted crowded buses and praised the program for helping service workers reach jobs, and critics complained it would reduce fare revenue permanently. Rees found that fare revenue did drop on weekends, but weekday ridership rose as new riders became comfortable with routes, and some households delayed buying a second car. He concludes that the program's value cannot be assessed by weekend fares alone, because the policy's main effect was changing habits and expectations about public transit.
Which choice best states the main purpose of the text?
- To argue that evaluating free-transit pilots requires considering longer-term shifts in rider behavior. (correct answer)
- To explain why critics believe free weekend rides will permanently eliminate fare revenue.
- To describe how crowded buses can make weekend travel uncomfortable for regular commuters.
- To argue that households should avoid buying second cars until bus routes improve.
Explanation: The passage argues that free-transit pilot programs must be evaluated by their long-term effects on rider behavior, not just immediate revenue changes. Rees shows that while weekend fares dropped, the program created positive ripple effects: weekday ridership increased as people learned routes, and some households delayed car purchases. The conclusion explicitly states that "the program's value cannot be assessed by weekend fares alone" because its main impact was "changing habits and expectations." Choice B misrepresents the critics' concern as permanent elimination of all fare revenue, when the passage focuses on the need to look beyond immediate weekend losses to broader behavioral changes.
Question 12
In 2019, chemist Laura Vance wrote in a lab blog about a failed attempt to create a brighter pigment. She starts by describing the goal and the initial recipe, which produced a dull color. She then details two modifications—changing the solvent and lowering the temperature—that still did not work. Finally, she explains that the breakthrough came only after she questioned an assumption about purity and tested an older, "contaminated" batch, which unexpectedly intensified the hue. The text traces repeated setbacks leading to a revised approach and success.
Which choice best describes the overall structure of the text?
- It states an objective, recounts unsuccessful trials, and then explains the insight that solved the problem. (correct answer)
- It compares two pigments, lists their uses, and then recommends one for artists.
- It presents a theory, summarizes prior research, and then calls for more funding.
- It describes a discovery, explains its history, and then critiques its ethical implications.
Explanation: The text structure states an objective (create a brighter pigment), recounts unsuccessful trials (changing solvent and temperature), and then explains the insight that solved the problem (questioning purity assumptions and testing "contaminated" batch). Vance systematically documents her failures before revealing that success came from challenging a fundamental assumption about purity. Choice B incorrectly suggests comparison and recommendation, when the text actually traces one researcher's problem-solving journey. This structure of repeated failure leading to paradigm shift is common in scientific discovery narratives.
Question 13
In 2001, poet-critic Hana Saeed wrote about translating a classic poem known for its strict rhyme. Some translators, she notes, preserve rhyme at all costs, producing lines that sound ornate but distort the poem's plain diction. Others abandon rhyme entirely and claim fidelity through literal meaning, yet their versions lose the poem's forward momentum. Saeed proposes a third approach: keep occasional echoes of sound while prioritizing the poem's pacing and emotional turns. She illustrates this with two sample stanzas, though she admits no solution fully reproduces the original. Saeed's argument is that translation requires choosing which effects matter most rather than chasing an impossible total equivalence.
Which choice best states the main purpose of the text?
- To argue that translators must prioritize certain poetic effects because full equivalence is impossible. (correct answer)
- To explain why strict rhyme should always be preserved when translating classic poetry.
- To describe how literal translations best capture a poem's diction and emotional turns.
- To show that providing sample stanzas is the only way to judge a translation's quality.
Explanation: The main purpose is to argue that translation requires prioritizing certain poetic effects since complete equivalence is impossible. Saeed presents three translation approaches—preserving rhyme at all costs, literal meaning without rhyme, or her preferred middle path of "occasional echoes of sound while prioritizing the poem's pacing and emotional turns." Choice B advocating always preserving strict rhyme represents one flawed extreme Saeed critiques for producing "ornate" lines that "distort the poem's plain diction." Her conclusion that "translation requires choosing which effects matter most rather than chasing an impossible total equivalence" acknowledges the fundamental trade-offs in literary translation. This teaches that good translation involves strategic choices about what to preserve rather than futile attempts at perfect replication.
Question 14
In 1986, critic Samuel Ortega wrote in a review of a debut film that the director's style seemed inconsistent. Ortega begins by listing jarring shifts: a comedic scene after a funeral, then a sudden documentary-like interview. He then explains how these shifts mirror the protagonist's attempts to control a chaotic life, making the audience feel the same instability. Ortega ends by revisiting the "inconsistencies" and arguing they are purposeful rather than careless. The review moves from complaint to reinterpretation.
Which choice best describes the overall structure of the text?
- It catalogs apparent flaws, interprets them as meaningful, and then reevaluates the initial judgment. (correct answer)
- It summarizes the plot, compares it to earlier films, and then rates the acting performances.
- It defines a cinematic technique, provides examples, and then offers production history.
- It presents two critics' opinions, contrasts them, and then leaves the disagreement unresolved.
Explanation: The text structure catalogs apparent flaws (jarring shifts between comedy and funeral, documentary-style interruptions), interprets them as meaningful (these shifts mirror the protagonist's chaotic life), and then reevaluates the initial judgment (the "inconsistencies" are purposeful, not careless). Ortega systematically transforms his initial complaints into appreciation, moving "from complaint to reinterpretation" as he recognizes the director's intentional choices. Choice B incorrectly suggests plot summary and performance ratings, which don't appear in this critical analysis. This structure of initial criticism followed by deeper understanding is common in thoughtful criticism that discovers method in apparent madness.
Question 15
In 1978, botanist Pavel Ionescu wrote in Alpine Flora that a certain wildflower seemed to vanish from lower slopes as temperatures rose. He first describes his initial hypothesis: the plant could not tolerate heat. He then reports transplant experiments showing the flower survived warmth when watered, but failed in drier soil. Finally, he links this result to earlier snowmelt, arguing that moisture loss, not temperature alone, explained the retreat. The text moves from a simple explanation to a revised one supported by experiments.
Which choice best describes the overall structure of the text?
- It presents a hypothesis, tests it experimentally, then replaces it with a better explanation. (correct answer)
- It lists several species, compares their traits, then classifies them into groups.
- It describes a discovery, celebrates its importance, then predicts future profits.
- It introduces a debate, summarizes both sides, then refuses to take a position.
Explanation: The text structure presents a hypothesis (the wildflower cannot tolerate heat), tests it experimentally (transplant experiments showing survival with water but failure in dry soil), then replaces it with a better explanation (moisture loss from earlier snowmelt, not temperature alone, causes retreat). Ionescu systematically moves from his "initial hypothesis" through experimental evidence to a "revised" explanation, demonstrating the scientific method in action. Choice C incorrectly mentions predictions and profits, which never appear in this botanical study. This hypothesis-experiment-revision structure is common in scientific writing and shows how understanding develops through testing and refinement.
Question 16
Op-ed by L. Ortega, 2021.
Conventional wisdom says library late fees teach responsibility, but the evidence suggests they simply keep people away. After Chicago and San Francisco eliminated fines, both systems reported higher circulation and the return of patrons who had long avoided the library over small debts. Critics worry that materials will vanish without penalties; yet neither city saw a sustained spike in losses, and both invested in reminder systems that proved more effective than threats. Libraries exist to expand access, not to police it. If the goal is getting books into people's hands and back again, then fines are a blunt tool that miss the mark. Municipalities should follow these examples and replace fees with policies that encourage borrowing and returning rather than punishing it.
Which choice best describes the overall structure of the text?
- Introduces a policy debate, presents evidence addressing a concern, and recommends a course of action (correct answer)
- Advocates for a change in policy that will improve the financial position of public libraries
- Defines a technical term, traces its historical evolution over centuries, and predicts its usage in the future
- Presents two unrelated case studies and compares their differing circumstances and results
Explanation: The op-ed sets up a claim, counters a concern with evidence, and ends with a recommendation. The other choices mischaracterize the content or its cohesiveness.
Question 17
In 2010, psychologist Mira Feld reported on a study of goal-setting in students: those who wrote detailed plans studied longer than those who wrote only vague intentions. School administrators quickly adopted "planning worksheets," assuming the extra study time explained everything. Feld notes, however, that the strongest improvement in exam scores occurred when students also predicted obstacles and wrote alternative actions, such as moving to a quieter room if roommates were loud. Students who planned without considering obstacles often studied longer but repeated ineffective habits. Feld concludes that planning helps most when it includes contingencies, not merely when it increases effort.
Which choice best states the main idea of the text?
- Goal planning improves performance most when students anticipate obstacles and prepare alternatives. (correct answer)
- Planning worksheets raise exam scores primarily by forcing students to study longer hours.
- Roommates are the main reason students fail to follow through on their study intentions.
- Vague intentions are more motivating than detailed plans because they feel less restrictive.
Explanation: The main idea is that goal planning improves performance most effectively when students anticipate potential obstacles and prepare contingency plans. Feld's research shows that while detailed planning increased study time, "the strongest improvement in exam scores occurred when students also predicted obstacles and wrote alternative actions." Choice B attributing success primarily to longer study hours represents the administrators' oversimplified interpretation that Feld's analysis refutes—students who planned without considering obstacles "studied longer but repeated ineffective habits." The conclusion that "planning helps most when it includes contingencies, not merely when it increases effort" establishes an important principle about effective goal-setting. This demonstrates that quality of planning (including obstacle anticipation) matters more than quantity of effort.
Question 18
In 1993, historian Leena Farouk wrote in River Kingdoms about a once-prosperous port city. She opens with a popular legend that the city fell overnight after a single flood. Farouk then introduces shipping records showing trade declining decades earlier and tax rolls indicating gradual population loss. She also notes a brief rebound when a new canal opened, which the legend ignores. She concludes by arguing that the city's "sudden" collapse was actually a slow transformation punctuated by dramatic events. The text replaces a simple story with a more complex timeline.
Which choice best describes the overall structure of the text?
- It presents a common legend, introduces records that complicate it, and then revises the overall interpretation. (correct answer)
- It describes a flood, explains its meteorological causes, and then recommends safety policies.
- It lists archeological finds, explains excavation methods, and then catalogs museum donations.
- It argues for one cause of decline, dismisses all others, and then restates the argument.
Explanation: The text structure presents a common legend (city fell overnight after one flood), introduces records that complicate it (shipping decline decades earlier, gradual population loss, ignored canal rebound), and then revises the overall interpretation (slow transformation punctuated by dramatic events). Farouk systematically dismantles the "popular legend" using historical evidence to show that "the city's 'sudden' collapse was actually a slow transformation." Choice D incorrectly suggests Farouk dismisses all other causes, when she actually presents multiple contributing factors. Historical revision often involves replacing dramatic single-cause narratives with complex, multi-factor explanations.
Question 19
In 1903, naturalist Ida Holm wrote in "Marsh Notes": Holm describes watching reeds bend in wind and assumes the plants are merely passive. Later, she returns after a flood and finds the same patch thriving while nearby saplings have toppled, their roots exposed. Holm learns from a local harvester that reeds spread by underground stems that knit the soil, making the marsh more resilient. She ends by revising her initial impression: what looks like fragility can be an adaptive strategy that stabilizes an entire landscape.
Which choice best describes the overall structure of the text?
- It states an initial assumption, then presents observations that lead to a revised view. (correct answer)
- It summarizes competing theories, then evaluates which is best supported by experiments.
- It narrates a flood, then provides step-by-step instructions for harvesting reeds safely.
- It contrasts two landscapes, then argues that marshes should be replaced by forests.
Explanation: The text follows a clear progression from initial assumption (reeds are passive) through contradicting observations (reeds thriving while trees toppled) to revised understanding (apparent fragility is actually an adaptive strategy). Holm's journey from superficial impression to deeper ecological insight exemplifies how careful observation challenges preconceptions about natural systems. Choice C incorrectly suggests the text provides harvesting instructions, when it actually uses the harvester's knowledge to explain ecological principles. The structure demonstrates scientific thinking: hypothesis, observation, revision based on evidence.
Question 20
From "Counting What Counts," by DeShawn Price, 2021.
Nonprofits measure what they can: tutoring hours logged, meals served, beds filled. These numbers help donors and boards see progress, but they can also bend an organization's behavior toward what is easiest to count. One tutoring program, praised for its soaring total of hours, later realized students' reading levels had barely moved. The staff was hitting the target and missing the point. Metrics are not the villain; they are tools. Yet tools need context. Pairing quantitative goals with periodic qualitative checks—classroom observations, student interviews, teacher feedback—can keep attention fixed on learning rather than on tallies. Before celebrating a metric, leaders should ask: What does this number leave out, and how do we know? Accountability should illuminate the mission, not replace it.
Which choice best states the main purpose of the text?
- To caution that focusing solely on metrics can distort a nonprofit's mission and to propose a balanced approach (correct answer)
- To prove that measuring outcomes is inherently unethical and ineffective and should be abandoned
- To demonstrate that qualitative stories are generally more persuasive than numerical data
- To criticize nonprofits that emphasize quantitative metrics for failing to see the bigger picture
Explanation: The author warns against metric-only thinking and suggests combining quantitative and qualitative measures. The other choices exaggerate, narrow, or misrepresent the scope of the discussion.