Physics 2 Quiz: Superposition Electric Force
9 questions · exam conditions
0:00
Superposition Electric ForceQuestion 1 of 9

Four identical positive charges +Q+Q are placed at the corners of a square with side length aa. A fifth charge Q-Q is placed at the exact center of the square.

A physicist claims that adding a sixth charge +Q+Q directly on top of (at the same location as) the central charge Q-Q will cause the net force on the central charge to remain zero. Which of the following best evaluates this claim?

The claim is correct: placing +Q+Q at the center still yields a net force of zero on the combined central charge, because the four corner charges are symmetric and their contributions cancel by superposition regardless of the sign or magnitude of the central charge.
The claim is incorrect: the net force on the original Q-Q was zero by symmetry, but adding +Q+Q at the center creates a dipole pair whose induced field breaks the symmetry and produces a nonzero net force on the combined charge.
The claim is correct only if QQ is sufficiently small so that the approximation of point charges remains valid; for finite-sized charges the force would no longer be zero due to overlap effects that violate the superposition principle.
The claim is incorrect: while the net force on the original Q-Q was zero, the net force on the +Q+Q placed at the center is nonzero and directed outward, so the total force on the combined central system is nonzero.
← Back to quizzes

Physics 2 Quiz

Physics 2 Quiz: Superposition Electric Force

Practice Superposition Electric Force in Physics 2 with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.

What this quiz covers

This quiz focuses on Superposition Electric Force, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for Physics 2.

How to use this quiz

Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.

All questions

Question 1

Four identical positive charges +Q+Q are placed at the corners of a square with side length aa. A fifth charge Q-Q is placed at the exact center of the square.

A physicist claims that adding a sixth charge +Q+Q directly on top of (at the same location as) the central charge Q-Q will cause the net force on the central charge to remain zero. Which of the following best evaluates this claim?

  1. The claim is correct: placing +Q+Q at the center still yields a net force of zero on the combined central charge, because the four corner charges are symmetric and their contributions cancel by superposition regardless of the sign or magnitude of the central charge. (correct answer)
  2. The claim is incorrect: the net force on the original Q-Q was zero by symmetry, but adding +Q+Q at the center creates a dipole pair whose induced field breaks the symmetry and produces a nonzero net force on the combined charge.
  3. The claim is correct only if QQ is sufficiently small so that the approximation of point charges remains valid; for finite-sized charges the force would no longer be zero due to overlap effects that violate the superposition principle.
  4. The claim is incorrect: while the net force on the original Q-Q was zero, the net force on the +Q+Q placed at the center is nonzero and directed outward, so the total force on the combined central system is nonzero.
Explanation: When a question involves forces on a charge surrounded by a symmetric arrangement, your first instinct should be to apply the superposition principle: the net force on any charge equals the vector sum of all individual forces acting on it, completely independent of whatever else occupies that location. Here's the key insight: the four corner charges +Q+Q are arranged with perfect square symmetry around the center. By symmetry, the forces they exert on any charge sitting at the center must cancel — the force from each corner is exactly opposed by the force from the diagonally opposite corner. This cancellation holds regardless of the sign or magnitude of the central charge. Whether the central charge is Q-Q, +Q+Q, or Q+Q=0-Q + Q = 0, the four corner forces sum to zero. The central charge's value scales each force uniformly but never breaks the symmetry. So A is correct: the net force on the combined central charge remains zero. Choice B introduces a fictitious "dipole-induced field" that breaks symmetry — this is physically wrong. Two charges occupying the same point don't form a dipole (which requires separation), and no new asymmetry is introduced. Choice C incorrectly suggests superposition fails for finite-sized or overlapping charges. Superposition is a fundamental principle of electrostatics that doesn't break down this way — the question is about point charges, and even conceptually the overlap doesn't violate superposition. Choice D makes the subtle error of treating the +Q+Q as a separate object experiencing a nonzero force. The +Q+Q at the center does experience forces from the corners, but they cancel by the same symmetry argument — the net force on it is also zero. Your takeaway: symmetry + superposition = powerful tools. When charges are symmetrically arranged, the net force on anything at the center is zero, regardless of what that central charge is.

Question 2

Two charges, +3q+3q and q-q, are fixed on the x-axis at x=0x = 0 and x=Lx = L, respectively. A third charge +q+q is free to move along the x-axis.

At what position on the x-axis could the third charge +q+q be placed so that it experiences zero net electric force? Assume q>0q > 0 and L>0L > 0.

  1. At x=L13x = \frac{L}{1 - \sqrt{3}}, which is located to the left of the +3q+3q charge (at x<0x < 0), where the repulsion from +3q+3q and the attraction toward q-q are both directed in the same sense and therefore cannot produce a zero net force on a positive test charge.
  2. At x=L1+3x = \frac{L}{1 + \sqrt{3}}, which is located between the two charges (0<x<L0 < x < L), where the opposing forces from +3q+3q and q-q can balance if the distances are appropriately scaled.
  3. At x=3L31x = \frac{\sqrt{3}\,L}{\sqrt{3}-1}, which is located to the right of q-q (at x>Lx > L), where the repulsion from +3q+3q and the attraction toward q-q point in opposite directions and balance with the required distance ratio of 3:1\sqrt{3}:1. (correct answer)
  4. There is no position on the x-axis where the net force on +q+q is zero, because the charge magnitudes differ by a factor of 3 and the attractive and repulsive forces always point in the same direction along the axis.
Explanation: When finding where a test charge experiences zero net force, your first task is to identify which region of the axis allows the forces to oppose each other. For a positive test charge +q+q between a positive charge +3q+3q (at x=0x=0) and a negative charge q-q (at x=Lx=L), both forces point in the same direction (the repulsion from +3q+3q pushes right, and the attraction toward q-q also pulls right), so equilibrium is impossible there. To the left of +3q+3q, repulsion pushes left while attraction pulls right — again the same direction. Only to the right of q-q do the forces oppose: repulsion from +3q+3q pushes right, attraction toward q-q pulls left. Setting the magnitudes equal with the test charge at position x>Lx > L: k(3q)(q)x2=k(q)(q)(xL)2\frac{k(3q)(q)}{x^2} = \frac{k(q)(q)}{(x-L)^2} 3(xL)2=x2    3(xL)=x    x=3L313(x-L)^2 = x^2 \implies \sqrt{3}(x-L) = x \implies x = \frac{\sqrt{3}\,L}{\sqrt{3}-1} This confirms C is correct — the equilibrium point lies to the right of q-q, with the required distance ratio of 3:1\sqrt{3}:1 from the two charges. A is wrong because it claims the left region produces equilibrium, but as shown above, both forces point in the same direction there. B is wrong for the same reason applied to the region between the charges. D is simply false — unequal charge magnitudes don't prevent equilibrium; they just shift where it occurs. Strategy tip: Always sketch the force directions in each region before doing algebra. Equilibrium requires forces in opposite directions, so eliminate regions geometrically first, then solve only in the valid region.

Question 3

A linear charge distribution consists of NN equal charges +q+q placed at evenly spaced positions x=d,2d,3d,,Ndx = d, 2d, 3d, \ldots, Nd along the positive x-axis. A charge q-q is fixed at the origin.

For large NN, which expression best approximates the net force on the charge q-q at the origin due to all NN positive charges, assuming the total charge Nq=QNq = Q remains fixed as NN \to \infty?

  1. The net force approaches kQqd2π26\frac{kQq}{d^2}\cdot\frac{\pi^2}{6} in the +x+x direction, since the force is kQqn=1N1n2d2kQq\sum_{n=1}^{N}\frac{1}{n^2 d^2} and the Basel sum n=11n2=π26\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n^2} = \frac{\pi^2}{6} converges.
  2. The net force diverges to infinity as NN \to \infty with fixed QQ, because each additional charge added closer to the origin contributes an increasingly large Coulomb force that causes the partial sums to grow without bound.
  3. The net force approaches kQq(Nd)2\frac{kQq}{(Nd)^2} in the +x+x direction for large NN, because at large NN the distributed charge behaves like a single point charge QQ located at the centroid x=Nd/2x = Nd/2, which is far from the origin.
  4. The net force approaches zero as NN \to \infty with fixed QQ, because each individual charge q=Q/Nq = Q/N becomes infinitesimally small and the force from each vanishes, while the sum of vanishing forces also vanishes. (correct answer)
Explanation: When you see a question involving a sum of forces where both the number of charges and the charge per particle are changing simultaneously, you need to track how each term scales before worrying about the sum. Here, each positive charge has magnitude q=Q/Nq = Q/N, placed at position x=ndx = nd. The force on q-q from the charge at position ndnd is: Fn=k(Q/N)(Q/N)(nd)2F_n = \frac{k(Q/N)(Q/N)}{(nd)^2} Wait — let's be careful. The force on q-q from one positive charge q=Q/Nq = Q/N at distance ndnd is: Fn=k(Q/N)(Q/N)(nd)2F_n = \frac{k \cdot (Q/N) \cdot (Q/N)}{(nd)^2} No — the charge at the origin is q=Q/N-q = -Q/N, and it also scales with NN. So every individual force term scales as 1/N21/N^2, and summing NN such terms gives a total scaling as N(1/N2)=1/N0N \cdot (1/N^2) = 1/N \to 0. This confirms D: as NN \to \infty with fixed QQ, the net force vanishes. A is tempting but contains a hidden error: it treats qq in the force formula as the fixed charge QQ, not the shrinking Q/NQ/N. The Basel sum is mathematically real, but the coefficients in front are 1/N2\sim 1/N^2, collapsing the result to zero. B claims divergence, which would require adding charges closer to the origin — but the minimum distance here is always dd, so no charge ever approaches zero distance. C incorrectly applies a point-charge approximation at the centroid; that method estimates the field far from a distribution, not the force within it. The key strategy: when both NN and qq are changing, write every quantity explicitly in terms of NN before summing — never assume one change dominates without checking the full scaling.

Question 4

Four point charges are placed at the corners of a rectangle with width 2a2a (along the x-axis) and height aa (along the y-axis). The charges are: +q+q at (a,0)(-a, 0), +q+q at (+a,0)(+a, 0), q-q at (a,a)(-a, a), and q-q at (+a,a)(+a, a).

A fifth charge +q+q is placed at the center of the rectangle at (0,a/2)(0, a/2). What is the direction of the net electric force on this central charge?

  1. The net force is zero, because the rectangle has a vertical line of symmetry at x=0x = 0 that cancels all horizontal components, and a horizontal line of symmetry at y=a/2y = a/2 that causes the vertical components from the top and bottom charges to cancel as well.
  2. The net force points in the y-y direction (downward), because the two positive corner charges below the center repel it upward but the two negative corner charges above attract it upward — the bottom pair is closer to the center than the top pair, so the repulsive downward component from the asymmetry dominates.
  3. The net force points in the +y+y direction (upward), because the two negative charges above the center exert a stronger net attractive force than the two positive charges below exert a repulsive force, since the attractive Coulomb interaction between opposite charges scales more favorably with this rectangular geometry.
  4. The net force points in the +y+y direction (upward), because all four corner charges are equidistant from the center, so left-right symmetry cancels all xx-components; the positive charges below the center repel the central charge upward and the negative charges above attract it upward, so all four yy-components point in the +y+y direction and add constructively. (correct answer)
Explanation: When analyzing electric forces on a charge surrounded by a symmetric arrangement, your first move should always be to identify symmetry axes that cancel components — then carefully determine the direction of the remaining net force from each charge. Here, the rectangle has a vertical line of symmetry at x=0x = 0. Because the four corner charges are arranged symmetrically left-right, every horizontal (xx) force component cancels perfectly. That leaves only vertical (yy) components to consider. Now check the distances. The center is at (0,a/2)(0, a/2). The bottom corners (±a,0)(\pm a, 0) are each a distance a2+(a/2)2=a52\sqrt{a^2 + (a/2)^2} = \frac{a\sqrt{5}}{2} away. The top corners (±a,a)(\pm a, a) are the same distance: a2+(a/2)2=a52\sqrt{a^2 + (a/2)^2} = \frac{a\sqrt{5}}{2}. All four charges are equidistant from the center. This is the crucial geometric insight. Since all four are equidistant, force magnitudes are equal. The two positive charges below repel the central +q+q — pushing it upward (+y)(+y). The two negative charges above attract the central +q+q — pulling it upward (+y)(+y). All four vertical components point in the same direction and add together, making D correct. Answer A fails because it wrongly assumes a horizontal symmetry at y=a/2y = a/2 cancels vertical forces — it would if the top and bottom charges were identical, but they have opposite signs, so their vertical effects reinforce rather than cancel. Answer B incorrectly claims the bottom pair is closer, which geometry disproves. Answer C reaches the right direction but invents a false justification about Coulomb scaling rather than using the actual equidistance argument. Your strategy: always compute distances before assuming which charges dominate. Symmetry cancels components; distance and sign determine what remains.

Question 5

Five equal positive charges +q+q are placed at the vertices of a regular pentagon. A sixth charge 5q-5q is placed at the geometric center. Which of the following correctly describes the net electric force on the 5q-5q charge?

  1. The net force is zero, because the five corner charges are symmetrically arranged and their individual Coulomb force vectors on the central charge sum to zero by vector cancellation, regardless of the magnitude of the central charge. (correct answer)
  2. The net force is directed toward the nearest corner charge and has magnitude 5k(5q)(q)r2\frac{5k(5q)(q)}{r^2}, where rr is the circumradius, because the central charge experiences the greatest attraction to whichever vertex charge is labeled first.
  3. The net force is nonzero and directed outward away from the center of the pentagon, because the negative central charge is attracted to all five positive charges simultaneously and the resultant of five inward-directed attractive forces does not cancel for a regular pentagon.
  4. The net force is zero only if 5q2=(5q)25q^2 = (5q)^2, i.e., only when the product of the corner charge and the central charge equals the square of each individual charge, a condition that is not satisfied here, so the net force is nonzero.
Explanation: Whenever you see a charge placed at the center of a symmetric arrangement of other charges, your first instinct should be to analyze the symmetry of the force vectors, not the magnitudes involved. For a regular pentagon, the five corner charges are equally spaced at identical distances rr from the center. Each +q+q charge exerts an attractive Coulomb force on the central 5q-5q charge directed inward (toward that corner). Because the pentagon has perfect 5-fold rotational symmetry, these five force vectors are evenly distributed in angle — separated by 72°72° each. When you add five vectors of equal magnitude that point symmetrically in all directions around a full rotation, they cancel exactly. This is the same reason a charge at the center of any regular polygon experiences zero net force from equal charges at the vertices. The magnitude of the central charge is completely irrelevant to this cancellation — only the symmetry matters. So A is correct. B is wrong on two counts: there is no physical reason to favor a "first labeled" vertex, and the force formula shown incorrectly multiplies the distance squared as if all five charges act in the same direction. C contains a subtle but critical error — you're right that each force is directed inward (attractive), but five symmetrically inward-pointing vectors do cancel for a regular pentagon. The claim that they don't is false. D invents a nonsensical algebraic condition (5q2=(5q)25q^2 = (5q)^2) that has no basis in physics — symmetry, not charge algebra, determines cancellation. Your strategy: when charges are arranged with regular geometric symmetry, draw the force vectors and check for cancellation before doing any calculation. Symmetry almost always gives you the answer faster.

Question 6

An equilateral triangle has side length dd. Charge +2q+2q is placed at the top vertex, charge +2q+2q is placed at the bottom-left vertex, and charge 2q-2q is placed at the bottom-right vertex.

What is the magnitude of the net electric force on the charge at the top vertex due to the other two charges?

  1. 4kq2d23\frac{4kq^2}{d^2}\sqrt{3}, because both forces have the same magnitude 4kq2d2\frac{4kq^2}{d^2}, and since one force is repulsive (from +2q+2q at bottom-left) and one is attractive (toward 2q-2q at bottom-right), the horizontal components cancel while the vertical components add constructively, giving a net vertical force scaled by 3\sqrt{3}.
  2. 4kq2d22\frac{4kq^2}{d^2}\sqrt{2}, because the repulsive force from the bottom-left charge and the attractive force from the bottom-right charge are perpendicular to each other as seen from the top vertex, and combining two equal-magnitude perpendicular vectors gives a resultant scaled by 2\sqrt{2}.
  3. 4kq2d2\frac{4kq^2}{d^2}, because the two forces on the top charge have equal magnitude 4kq2d2\frac{4kq^2}{d^2} and their vertical (y) components cancel while their horizontal (x) components are equal and in the same direction, giving a net horizontal force equal in magnitude to a single force component. (correct answer)
  4. 8kq2d2\frac{8kq^2}{d^2}, because the repulsion from +2q+2q and the attraction toward 2q-2q both contribute full-magnitude forces that add directly since both forces are directed horizontally toward the right from the perspective of the top vertex, doubling the single-pair force magnitude.
Explanation: When tackling electric force problems with multiple charges, your first move should always be to draw the geometry carefully and decompose each force vector into components before combining them. In an equilateral triangle, every interior angle is 60°. From the top vertex, the bottom-left charge sits 60° below the horizontal to the left, and the bottom-right charge sits 60° below the horizontal to the right. Both charges are distance dd away, and both have magnitude 2q2q, so both forces on the top charge have the same magnitude: F=k(2q)(2q)d2=4kq2d2F = \frac{k(2q)(2q)}{d^2} = \frac{4kq^2}{d^2}. Now consider directions. The bottom-left charge is +2q+2q, so it repels the top +2q+2q charge — the force points upper-left (away from bottom-left). The bottom-right charge is 2q-2q, so it attracts the top charge — the force points lower-right (toward bottom-right). Both forces therefore point to the right in the horizontal direction, while one points upward and the other downward in the vertical direction. The vertical components are equal and opposite, so they cancel. The horizontal components are both Fcos(60°)=4kq2d212=2kq2d2F\cos(60°) = \frac{4kq^2}{d^2} \cdot \frac{1}{2} = \frac{2kq^2}{d^2}, and they add: Fnet=4kq2d2F_{net} = \frac{4kq^2}{d^2}. This confirms C. Choice A incorrectly claims the horizontal components cancel — it has the geometry backwards. Choice B assumes the two forces are perpendicular to each other, which is only true if the angle between them is 90°; here it's 60°. Choice D claims both forces point fully horizontally, ignoring that 60° below horizontal has a significant vertical component. Strategy tip: Always resolve forces into x- and y-components before adding. Never assume forces point in the same direction just because they act on the same charge — direction depends on both the sign of the charges and the geometry.

Question 7

Charge +Q+Q is fixed at the origin. Charge Q-Q is fixed at position (L,0)(L, 0). A third charge +Q+Q is released from rest at position (L/2,h)(L/2,\, h), where hLh \ll L.

In the limit h0h \to 0, what is the direction and approximate magnitude of the net force on the third charge +Q+Q immediately after release?

  1. The net force is approximately zero, because in the limit h0h \to 0 the third charge approaches the midpoint between the two fixed charges, and the repulsive force from +Q+Q at the origin and the attractive force from Q-Q at (L,0)(L, 0) are equal in magnitude and point in exactly opposite directions, so they cancel.
  2. The net force is directed in the +x+x direction with magnitude approximately 8kQ2L2\frac{8kQ^2}{L^2}, because the repulsion from +Q+Q at the origin pushes the third charge to the right, and the attraction toward Q-Q at (L,0)(L, 0) also pulls the third charge to the right; both xx-components act in the same direction and add, while the yy-components cancel by symmetry. (correct answer)
  3. The net force is directed in the y-y direction with magnitude approximately 8kQ2hL3\frac{8kQ^2 h}{L^3}, because the horizontal force components cancel by symmetry and the small vertical displacement hh produces unequal distances to the two fixed charges, resulting in a net downward force proportional to hh.
  4. The net force is directed in the +y+y direction with magnitude approximately 8kQ2hL3\frac{8kQ^2 h}{L^3}, because both the repulsive force from +Q+Q at the origin and the attractive force from Q-Q at (L,0)(L,0) have upward vertical components when the third charge is above the x-axis, producing a net upward force that vanishes as h0h \to 0.
Explanation: When a charge sits between two other charges, your first instinct might be to look for cancellation — but cancellation only occurs when forces point in opposite directions. Here, the geometry destroys that intuition entirely. Place the third charge +Q+Q at (L/2,h)(L/2, h). The fixed +Q+Q at the origin repels it, pushing it away from the origin — meaning the force points toward the upper-right, with a +x+x component. The fixed Q-Q at (L,0)(L, 0) attracts it, pulling it toward (L,0)(L,0) — meaning that force points toward the lower-right, also with a +x+x component. Both horizontal components point in the same direction (+x+x) and add together. Meanwhile, the yy-components are equal and opposite by the left-right symmetry of the configuration, so they cancel. As h0h \to 0, both charges are essentially at distance L/2L/2 from the third charge, giving each force magnitude kQ2(L/2)2=4kQ2L2\frac{kQ^2}{(L/2)^2} = \frac{4kQ^2}{L^2}. The two xx-components sum to 8kQ2L2\frac{8kQ^2}{L^2}, confirming B is correct. Choice A is the classic trap: students assume "midpoint = cancellation," forgetting that cancellation requires forces pointing in opposite directions. Here they don't — both horizontal components reinforce each other. Choice C incorrectly claims the xx-components cancel by symmetry; they absolutely do not, since both forces have rightward horizontal components. Choice D correctly identifies that yy-components don't cancel (they don't — wait, they do cancel), but then invents a net upward force; in reality the yy-components are equal and opposite and vanish. Strategy tip: Before invoking symmetry cancellation, always draw a vector diagram and check whether the relevant components actually point in opposite directions — same-sign components add, they don't cancel.

Question 8

Two identical conducting spheres, each carrying charge +Q+Q, are separated by a center-to-center distance of RR. A third identical uncharged conducting sphere is briefly touched to sphere 1 and then removed, and then briefly touched to sphere 2 and then removed.

After both touchings, what is the net electric force between spheres 1 and 2, expressed in terms of the original force F0=kQ2R2F_0 = \frac{kQ^2}{R^2}?

  1. 38F0\frac{3}{8}F_0, because after the first touch sphere 1 retains Q/2Q/2 and the third sphere carries Q/2Q/2; after the second touch sphere 2 and the third sphere each carry Q/2+Q2=3Q4\frac{Q/2 + Q}{2} = \frac{3Q}{4}, giving a force of k(Q/2)(3Q/4)R2=38F0\frac{k(Q/2)(3Q/4)}{R^2} = \frac{3}{8}F_0. (correct answer)
  2. 14F0\frac{1}{4}F_0, because each touching halves the charge on the sphere being touched, so sphere 1 ends up with Q/2Q/2 and sphere 2 ends up with Q/2Q/2, giving a force of k(Q/2)(Q/2)R2=14F0\frac{k(Q/2)(Q/2)}{R^2} = \frac{1}{4}F_0.
  3. 12F0\frac{1}{2}F_0, because the total charge 2Q2Q is conserved across all three spheres and ultimately distributes so that spheres 1 and 2 together retain charge QQ, each holding Q/2Q/2, but the force scales as Q2/2Q^2/2 relative to the original.
  4. 316F0\frac{3}{16}F_0, because the third sphere acts as a charge drain; after both contacts the charges on spheres 1 and 2 are reduced by successive halving and quartering, yielding a product of charges equal to 316Q2\frac{3}{16}Q^2.
Explanation: When identical conducting spheres touch, they share charge equally — this is the key principle being tested. Tracking charge step by step is essential here. First touch: The uncharged third sphere contacts sphere 1 (charge +Q+Q). The total charge QQ splits equally, so sphere 1 retains Q/2Q/2 and the third sphere carries Q/2Q/2. Second touch: The third sphere (carrying Q/2Q/2) contacts sphere 2 (carrying +Q+Q). The combined charge is Q/2+Q=3Q/2Q/2 + Q = 3Q/2, which splits equally, leaving sphere 2 with 3Q/43Q/4 and the third sphere with 3Q/43Q/4. Final force: Spheres 1 and 2 carry Q/2Q/2 and 3Q/43Q/4 respectively, so: F=k(Q/2)(3Q/4)R2=38kQ2R2=38F0F = \frac{k(Q/2)(3Q/4)}{R^2} = \frac{3}{8}\cdot\frac{kQ^2}{R^2} = \frac{3}{8}F_0 This confirms answer A is correct. Answer B incorrectly assumes both spheres get halved independently — it ignores that sphere 2 still has its original charge QQ when the third sphere (now carrying Q/2Q/2) touches it, so the split isn't simply Q/2Q/2. Answer C invokes charge conservation loosely but applies faulty reasoning about distribution; the total across all three spheres is 2Q2Q, but how it partitions matters, and sphere 1's charge isn't affected by the second touch at all. Answer D invents a "charge drain" narrative with no physical basis — the third sphere redistributes charge, it doesn't destroy it. Study tip: Always track each charge-sharing event sequentially and independently. Write down the charge on every sphere before and after each touch — careless bookkeeping is exactly what these distractors exploit.

Question 9

Three point charges are arranged along the x-axis: charge Q1=+4qQ_1 = +4q is at x=2dx = -2d, charge Q2=qQ_2 = -q is at x=0x = 0, and charge Q3=+4qQ_3 = +4q is at x=+2dx = +2d. A test charge QT=+qQ_T = +q is placed at position x=+dx = +d.

What is the direction and relative magnitude of the net electric force on QTQ_T?

  1. The net force points in the +x+x direction with magnitude kq2d2(4149)\frac{kq^2}{d^2}\left(4 - 1 - \frac{4}{9}\right), because the repulsion from Q3Q_3 at distance dd is taken to act in the +x+x direction and dominates over the attraction from Q2Q_2 and the repulsion from Q1Q_1, each at distances dd and 3d3d respectively.
  2. The net force is zero, because the symmetric placement of Q1Q_1 and Q3Q_3 about the origin creates equal and opposite contributions to the net force on QTQ_T, and the remaining force from Q2Q_2 is exactly balanced by the asymmetry in the distances from QTQ_T to the two charges Q1Q_1 and Q3Q_3.
  3. The net force points in the x-x direction, because the attraction toward Q2Q_2 at distance dd and the repulsion from Q3Q_3 at distance dd both push QTQ_T in the x-x direction, and together they outweigh the repulsion from Q1Q_1 at distance 3d3d, giving a net magnitude of kq2d2(1+449)\frac{kq^2}{d^2}\left(1 + 4 - \frac{4}{9}\right) in the negative direction. (correct answer)
  4. The net force points in the x-x direction, because the attraction from Q2Q_2 at distance dd combines with the repulsion from Q3Q_3 at distance dd to produce a large net force toward x-x, with the contribution from the distant Q1Q_1 at distance 3d3d being negligible and therefore ignored entirely in the calculation.
Explanation: When multiple charges act on a single test charge, your job is to calculate the force from each charge individually — including its direction — and then sum them as vectors. The sign of each source charge and the position of the test charge both matter for determining direction. Here, QT=+qQ_T = +q sits at x=+dx = +d. Let's identify each force:
  • From Q2=qQ_2 = -q at x=0x = 0 (distance dd): opposite charges attract, so the force pulls QTQ_T in the x-x direction. Magnitude: kq2d2(1)\frac{kq^2}{d^2}(1)
  • From Q3=+4qQ_3 = +4q at x=+2dx = +2d (distance dd): same-sign charges repel, pushing QTQ_T away from Q3Q_3, i.e., in the x-x direction. Magnitude: kq2d2(4)\frac{kq^2}{d^2}(4)
  • From Q1=+4qQ_1 = +4q at x=2dx = -2d (distance 3d3d): same-sign charges repel, pushing QTQ_T in the +x+x direction. Magnitude: kq2d2(49)\frac{kq^2}{d^2}\left(\frac{4}{9}\right)
Net force: kq2d2(1+449)\frac{kq^2}{d^2}\left(1 + 4 - \frac{4}{9}\right) in the x-x direction. This confirms C. A is wrong because it incorrectly assigns the repulsion from Q3Q_3 as pointing in the +x+x direction — a critical sign error. Q3Q_3 is to the right of QTQ_T, so repulsion pushes QTQ_T left. B is wrong because Q1Q_1 and Q3Q_3 are not equidistant from QTQ_T — they are at distances 3d3d and dd respectively, so their forces do not cancel. D contains correct directional reasoning but makes an unjustified physical approximation by ignoring Q1Q_1 entirely. On an exam, always include all contributions unless explicitly told a charge is negligible. The strategy to remember: always establish direction before calculating magnitude for each force. A common trap is misidentifying which way repulsion acts when the repelling charge is closer than you expect.