Physics 2 Quiz: Rc Circuit Time Constant
8 questions · exam conditions
0:00
Rc Circuit Time ConstantQuestion 1 of 8

In an RC charging circuit, a capacitor CC is connected in series with a resistor RR and an ideal battery of EMF E\mathcal{E}. The capacitor is initially uncharged. A student graphs ln ⁣(EVC(t))\ln\!\left(\mathcal{E} - V_C(t)\right) versus time tt and obtains a straight line.

Which of the following correctly identifies both the slope and the vertical intercept of this graph?

Slope =1/RC= -1/RC, vertical intercept =0= 0, because at t=0t = 0 the capacitor is uncharged so VC=0V_C = 0 and the quantity EVC=E\mathcal{E} - V_C = \mathcal{E}; however, ln(E0)=0\ln(\mathcal{E} - 0) = 0 only when E=1V\mathcal{E} = 1\,\text{V}, which is taken as the reference condition.
Slope =RC= -RC, vertical intercept =ln(E)= \ln(\mathcal{E}), because the time constant τ=RC\tau = RC appears in the denominator of the exponent, and linearizing the equation brings RCRC into the coefficient of tt.
Slope =1/RC= -1/RC, vertical intercept =ln(E)= \ln(\mathcal{E}), because EVC=Eet/RC\mathcal{E} - V_C = \mathcal{E}\,e^{-t/RC} and taking the natural log gives a linear function of tt with these parameters.
Slope =+1/RC= +1/RC, vertical intercept =ln(E)= \ln(\mathcal{E}), because EVC\mathcal{E} - V_C decreases over time, making the slope of its logarithm positive to compensate for the decreasing argument.
← Back to quizzes

Physics 2 Quiz

Physics 2 Quiz: Rc Circuit Time Constant

Practice Rc Circuit Time Constant in Physics 2 with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.

What this quiz covers

This quiz focuses on Rc Circuit Time Constant, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for Physics 2.

How to use this quiz

Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.

All questions

Question 1

In an RC charging circuit, a capacitor CC is connected in series with a resistor RR and an ideal battery of EMF E\mathcal{E}. The capacitor is initially uncharged. A student graphs ln ⁣(EVC(t))\ln\!\left(\mathcal{E} - V_C(t)\right) versus time tt and obtains a straight line.

Which of the following correctly identifies both the slope and the vertical intercept of this graph?

  1. Slope =1/RC= -1/RC, vertical intercept =0= 0, because at t=0t = 0 the capacitor is uncharged so VC=0V_C = 0 and the quantity EVC=E\mathcal{E} - V_C = \mathcal{E}; however, ln(E0)=0\ln(\mathcal{E} - 0) = 0 only when E=1V\mathcal{E} = 1\,\text{V}, which is taken as the reference condition.
  2. Slope =RC= -RC, vertical intercept =ln(E)= \ln(\mathcal{E}), because the time constant τ=RC\tau = RC appears in the denominator of the exponent, and linearizing the equation brings RCRC into the coefficient of tt.
  3. Slope =1/RC= -1/RC, vertical intercept =ln(E)= \ln(\mathcal{E}), because EVC=Eet/RC\mathcal{E} - V_C = \mathcal{E}\,e^{-t/RC} and taking the natural log gives a linear function of tt with these parameters. (correct answer)
  4. Slope =+1/RC= +1/RC, vertical intercept =ln(E)= \ln(\mathcal{E}), because EVC\mathcal{E} - V_C decreases over time, making the slope of its logarithm positive to compensate for the decreasing argument.
Explanation: Whenever you see a question involving a logarithmic graph of a circuit quantity, your first move should be to write down the original equation and apply the natural log algebraically — let the math tell you the slope and intercept directly. For an RC charging circuit, the voltage across the capacitor is VC(t)=E(1et/RC)V_C(t) = \mathcal{E}\left(1 - e^{-t/RC}\right). Subtracting from E\mathcal{E} gives EVC(t)=Eet/RC\mathcal{E} - V_C(t) = \mathcal{E}\,e^{-t/RC}. Taking the natural log of both sides: ln(EVC)=ln(E)+ln ⁣(et/RC)=ln(E)1RCt\ln(\mathcal{E} - V_C) = \ln(\mathcal{E}) + \ln\!\left(e^{-t/RC}\right) = \ln(\mathcal{E}) - \dfrac{1}{RC}\,t. This is exactly the form y=b+mxy = b + mx, where the slope is 1/RC-1/RC and the vertical intercept is ln(E)\ln(\mathcal{E}). That's answer C, and it follows directly from clean algebra — no guessing required. Answer A correctly identifies the slope but incorrectly claims the intercept is zero. At t=0t = 0, ln(EVC)=ln(E)\ln(\mathcal{E} - V_C) = \ln(\mathcal{E}), which equals zero only if E=1V\mathcal{E} = 1\,\text{V} — that's a special numerical coincidence, not a general result. Don't confuse "the capacitor is uncharged" with "the intercept is zero." Answer B flips the slope: the exponent is t/RC-t/RC, so the coefficient of tt is 1/RC-1/RC, not RC-RC. Mixing up τ\tau with 1/τ1/\tau is a classic error. Answer D inverts the sign of the slope. Because EVC\mathcal{E} - V_C is decreasing, its logarithm is also decreasing — the slope is negative, not positive. Study tip: When linearizing exponential equations, always take the log first and match the result to y=mx+by = mx + b term by term. Never guess the sign of the slope from physical intuition alone.

Question 2

A resistor RR and capacitor CC are in series with an ideal battery E\mathcal{E}. After many time constants, the switch is opened, disconnecting the battery but leaving RR and CC in a closed loop. Which of the following expressions correctly gives the total energy dissipated in the resistor during the charging phase only (i.e., from t=0t = 0 until the capacitor is fully charged)?

  1. WR=CE2W_R = C\mathcal{E}^2, because the battery delivers a total energy of CE2C\mathcal{E}^2 and all of it is eventually dissipated in the resistor once the capacitor fully charges and current drops to zero.
  2. WR=E22RτW_R = \frac{\mathcal{E}^2}{2R}\tau, where τ=RC\tau = RC, because the average power dissipated is E2/(2R)\mathcal{E}^2/(2R) and this persists for one time constant.
  3. WR=12CE2W_R = \frac{1}{2}C\mathcal{E}^2, because the energy stored in the capacitor at full charge equals 12CE2\frac{1}{2}C\mathcal{E}^2, and by energy conservation the battery supplies CE2C\mathcal{E}^2 total, so the resistor dissipates exactly half regardless of the value of RR. (correct answer)
  4. WR=12CE2(1e2)W_R = \frac{1}{2}C\mathcal{E}^2 \cdot (1 - e^{-2}), because the resistor only dissipates energy during the first two time constants when significant current flows, and the remainder is stored in the capacitor's electric field.
Explanation: Whenever you see an RC charging problem asking about energy, your instinct should be to apply energy conservation across the entire process rather than integrating complicated time-dependent functions. When a capacitor charges through a resistor from a battery of EMF E\mathcal{E}, the battery delivers a total charge Q=CEQ = C\mathcal{E} at voltage E\mathcal{E}, so the total energy supplied by the battery is Wbattery=QE=CE2W_{\text{battery}} = Q\mathcal{E} = C\mathcal{E}^2. At full charge, the capacitor stores UC=12CE2U_C = \frac{1}{2}C\mathcal{E}^2. Since energy must be conserved, the resistor dissipates the difference: WR=CE212CE2=12CE2W_R = C\mathcal{E}^2 - \frac{1}{2}C\mathcal{E}^2 = \frac{1}{2}C\mathcal{E}^2. This result is independent of R — a surprising but important fact. Answer C is correct. Answer A is wrong because it claims the battery supplies CE2C\mathcal{E}^2 and the resistor dissipates all of it — but this ignores the 12CE2\frac{1}{2}C\mathcal{E}^2 stored in the capacitor's electric field. That energy isn't dissipated; it's stored. Answer B constructs a plausible-looking formula, but the average power during charging is not simply E2/(2R)\mathcal{E}^2/(2R), and multiplying by one time constant doesn't correctly integrate the actual power dissipation curve. It's dimensional coincidence dressed as physics. Answer D incorrectly treats the charging process as if it terminates after two time constants. In reality, current flows (and energy dissipates) for all time from t=0t = 0 to tt \to \infty; cutting it off at 2τ2\tau underestimates the total dissipation. Study tip: When energy problems involve RC circuits, always use conservation: battery energy in = capacitor energy stored + resistor heat. The 50/50 split is a classic result worth memorizing.

Question 3

A capacitor with capacitance C=4μFC = 4\,\mu\text{F} is fully charged to a voltage V0=12VV_0 = 12\,\text{V} and then connected at t=0t = 0 to a network consisting of two resistors: R1=3kΩR_1 = 3\,\text{k}\Omega in series with a parallel combination of R2=6kΩR_2 = 6\,\text{k}\Omega and R3=6kΩR_3 = 6\,\text{k}\Omega. The capacitor discharges through this network.

What is the voltage across the capacitor at time t=2τt = 2\tau, where τ\tau is the time constant of the discharge circuit?

  1. V0e21.62VV_0 e^{-2} \approx 1.62\,\text{V}, because the effective resistance is 5kΩ5\,\text{k}\Omega, giving τ=20ms\tau = 20\,\text{ms}, and the voltage decays as V0et/τV_0 e^{-t/\tau}.
  2. V0e21.62VV_0 e^{-2} \approx 1.62\,\text{V}, because the effective resistance is 6kΩ6\,\text{k}\Omega, giving τ=24ms\tau = 24\,\text{ms}, and the voltage decays as V0et/τV_0 e^{-t/\tau}. (correct answer)
  3. V0e21.62VV_0 e^{-2} \approx 1.62\,\text{V}, because the effective resistance is 9kΩ9\,\text{k}\Omega, giving τ=36ms\tau = 36\,\text{ms}, and the voltage decays as V0et/τV_0 e^{-t/\tau}.
  4. V0e21.62VV_0 e^{-2} \approx 1.62\,\text{V}, because the effective resistance is 15kΩ15\,\text{k}\Omega, giving τ=60ms\tau = 60\,\text{ms}, and the voltage decays as V0et/τV_0 e^{-t/\tau}.
Explanation: When a capacitor discharges through a resistor network, the voltage decays as V(t)=V0et/τV(t) = V_0 e^{-t/\tau}, where τ=ReffC\tau = R_{\text{eff}} \cdot C. The critical skill here is correctly combining the resistors to find ReffR_{\text{eff}} — and remember, you find the effective resistance from the capacitor's "perspective," looking into the network with the capacitor removed. Here, R2R_2 and R3R_3 are in parallel: R23=6×66+6=3kΩR_{23} = \frac{6 \times 6}{6 + 6} = 3\,\text{k}\Omega. This parallel combination is in series with R1R_1, so Reff=3+3=6kΩR_{\text{eff}} = 3 + 3 = 6\,\text{k}\Omega. The time constant is then τ=ReffC=6000×4×106=24ms\tau = R_{\text{eff}} \cdot C = 6000 \times 4 \times 10^{-6} = 24\,\text{ms}. At t=2τt = 2\tau, the voltage is V(2τ)=12e21.62VV(2\tau) = 12 e^{-2} \approx 1.62\,\text{V}, confirming B is correct. Choice A uses Reff=5kΩR_{\text{eff}} = 5\,\text{k}\Omega, which has no valid circuit justification — it likely comes from adding resistors incorrectly or misreading the network. Choice C uses 9kΩ9\,\text{k}\Omega, the mistake of adding all three resistors in series (3+6+63 + 6 + 6) without recognizing that R2R_2 and R3R_3 are parallel. Choice D uses 15kΩ15\,\text{k}\Omega, which comes from treating all resistors as purely in series (3+6+63 + 6 + 6) and double-counting or misapplying the parallel rule entirely. A reliable strategy: always sketch the circuit and reduce it step by step — parallel branches first, then series combinations. Never add all resistors together before checking the topology.

Question 4

A capacitor CC is charged to voltage V0V_0 and discharges through resistance RR. A student claims: 'After three time constants, the capacitor has lost exactly 95%95\% of its initial stored energy.' Which of the following best evaluates this claim?

  1. The claim is correct, because after three time constants the voltage has fallen to e3V00.05V0e^{-3} V_0 \approx 0.05 V_0, meaning 95%95\% of the voltage — and therefore 95%95\% of the energy — has been lost.
  2. The claim is incorrect, because after three time constants the voltage is e3V0e^{-3} V_0, and since energy scales as V2V^2, the remaining energy fraction is e60.0025e^{-6} \approx 0.0025, so approximately 99.75%99.75\% of the energy has been lost, not 95%95\%. (correct answer)
  3. The claim is incorrect, because the energy lost after three time constants is 1e30.9501 - e^{-3} \approx 0.950, but this expression gives the fraction of charge lost, not energy lost; the energy lost is 1e3/20.7771 - e^{-3/2} \approx 0.777, which differs from 95%95\%.
  4. The claim is correct, because the power dissipated in RR integrates to exactly 95%95\% of 12CV02\frac{1}{2}CV_0^2 over the interval 00 to 3τ3\tau, a result that follows directly from the exponential decay of current.
Explanation: When analyzing RC discharge problems, the key is to track which quantity is decaying exponentially and remember that energy depends on the square of voltage — a distinction that trips up many students. In an RC circuit discharging from V0V_0, the voltage decays as V(t)=V0et/τV(t) = V_0 e^{-t/\tau}, where τ=RC\tau = RC. After three time constants, V=V0e30.050V0V = V_0 e^{-3} \approx 0.050 V_0. So far, so good. But since stored energy is U=12CV2U = \frac{1}{2}CV^2, the remaining energy fraction is: U(3τ)U0=V2V02=e60.0025\frac{U(3\tau)}{U_0} = \frac{V^2}{V_0^2} = e^{-6} \approx 0.0025 That means only about 0.25%0.25\% of the energy remains, so roughly 99.75%99.75\% has been lost — far more than the claimed 95%95\%. This makes B correct. A commits the critical error of assuming energy scales linearly with voltage. It doesn't — energy scales as V2V^2, so losing 95%95\% of the voltage does not mean losing 95%95\% of the energy. C introduces a plausible-sounding but fabricated correction. The expression 1e3/21 - e^{-3/2} has no physical basis here; it neither correctly represents energy nor charge loss in this context. D sounds rigorous by invoking integration of power, but its conclusion is wrong. Integrating the dissipated power correctly yields the same result as B — confirming that 99.75%\approx 99.75\% of energy is lost, not 95%95\%. Study tip: Whenever a problem involves energy in an RC circuit, immediately square the exponential decay factor. Energy goes as e2t/τe^{-2t/\tau}, which decays much faster than voltage alone.

Question 5

An RC circuit consists of a resistor R=10kΩR = 10\,\text{k}\Omega, a capacitor C=100μFC = 100\,\mu\text{F}, and a battery of EMF E=9V\mathcal{E} = 9\,\text{V}. The capacitor is initially uncharged. At t=0t = 0, the switch is closed. After the capacitor is fully charged, the battery is disconnected (with no other change to the circuit) and the capacitor discharges through the same resistor.

How does the time constant for the discharging phase compare to the time constant for the charging phase, and what is the numerical value of each?

  1. Both time constants are equal at τ=RC=1.0s\tau = RC = 1.0\,\text{s}, because the same RR and CC govern the exponential behavior in both phases regardless of whether the battery is present. (correct answer)
  2. The charging time constant is τcharge=RC=1.0s\tau_{\text{charge}} = RC = 1.0\,\text{s}, but the discharging time constant is τdischarge=RC/2=0.5s\tau_{\text{discharge}} = RC/2 = 0.5\,\text{s}, because without the battery the effective resistance driving the discharge is halved.
  3. The charging time constant is τcharge=RC/E=1.0s\tau_{\text{charge}} = RC/\mathcal{E} = 1.0\,\text{s} (independent of E\mathcal{E}), but the discharging time constant is τdischarge=2RC=2.0s\tau_{\text{discharge}} = 2RC = 2.0\,\text{s}, because the capacitor must discharge through twice the path length without the battery maintaining current flow.
  4. The charging time constant is τcharge=2RC=2.0s\tau_{\text{charge}} = 2RC = 2.0\,\text{s}, because the battery and the capacitor share the driving role during charging, effectively doubling the time scale; the discharging time constant is τdischarge=RC=1.0s\tau_{\text{discharge}} = RC = 1.0\,\text{s}.
Explanation: When analyzing RC circuits, the key question to ask is: what elements are in the loop when current flows? The time constant τ=RC\tau = RC depends only on the resistance and capacitance in the active loop — not on the EMF source, the initial charge, or which direction current flows. During charging, the battery drives current through resistor RR into capacitor CC. The governing equation yields a time constant τ=RC=(10,000Ω)(100×106F)=1.0s\tau = RC = (10{,}000\,\Omega)(100 \times 10^{-6}\,\text{F}) = 1.0\,\text{s}. During discharging, the battery is removed, and the capacitor drives current through the same resistor RR in the same loop. The governing equation is identical in form, giving τ=RC=1.0s\tau = RC = 1.0\,\text{s} again. The battery's EMF affects the final voltage the capacitor reaches, not the time scale of the exponential process. Answer A is correct. Answer B is wrong because it invents a "halved resistance" during discharge — removing the battery doesn't split or reduce RR; the same resistor carries the discharge current. Answer C is wrong on two counts: it incorrectly ties the charging time constant to E\mathcal{E} (EMF never appears in τ\tau), and it fabricates a "doubled path length" during discharge with no physical basis. Answer D is wrong because it claims the battery and capacitor share the driving role during charging in a way that doubles the time constant — in reality, both the battery and capacitor act through the same single resistor RR, so τ\tau remains RCRC. A useful rule of thumb: whenever a question tries to connect the time constant to voltage, EMF, or which device is "driving" the circuit, treat that as a red flag. τ=RC\tau = RC — full stop.

Question 6

An RC circuit with R=2kΩR = 2\,\text{k}\Omega and C=50μFC = 50\,\mu\text{F} is driven by a square wave that alternates between 0V0\,\text{V} and 10V10\,\text{V} with a period T=0.5sT = 0.5\,\text{s}. The square wave has been applied for a long time so the circuit is in a periodic steady state.

After many cycles, the capacitor voltage oscillates between a minimum value VminV_{\min} and a maximum value VmaxV_{\max}. Which of the following best characterizes VminV_{\min} and VmaxV_{\max}?

  1. Vmin=0VV_{\min} = 0\,\text{V} and Vmax=10VV_{\max} = 10\,\text{V}, because after many cycles the capacitor fully charges to 10V10\,\text{V} during each high phase and fully discharges to 0V0\,\text{V} during each low phase, since T/2τT/2 \gg \tau.
  2. Vmin=0VV_{\min} = 0\,\text{V} and Vmax=10(1e2.5)9.18VV_{\max} = 10(1 - e^{-2.5}) \approx 9.18\,\text{V}, because the capacitor fully discharges to 0V0\,\text{V} during each low phase and then charges for exactly T/2=2.5τT/2 = 2.5\tau during the high phase, as if starting from zero each cycle.
  3. Vmin>0VV_{\min} > 0\,\text{V} and Vmax<10VV_{\max} < 10\,\text{V}, but VminV_{\min} and VmaxV_{\max} are not symmetric about 5V5\,\text{V}; because charging occurs toward 10V10\,\text{V} while discharging occurs toward 0V0\,\text{V}, the exponential approach is inherently asymmetric, pushing VmaxV_{\max} significantly closer to 10V10\,\text{V} than VminV_{\min} is to 0V0\,\text{V}.
  4. Vmin>0VV_{\min} > 0\,\text{V} and Vmax<10VV_{\max} < 10\,\text{V}, with VminV_{\min} and VmaxV_{\max} symmetric about 5V5\,\text{V}, because the half-period T/2=0.25sT/2 = 0.25\,\text{s} is only about 2.52.5 time constants (τ=0.1s\tau = 0.1\,\text{s}), so the capacitor neither fully charges nor fully discharges, and the equal time constant in both half-cycles forces symmetry about 5V5\,\text{V}. (correct answer)
Explanation: When an RC circuit is driven by a periodic square wave long enough to reach steady state, the capacitor voltage settles into a repeating pattern — it neither fully charges nor fully discharges unless the half-period is much larger than the time constant τ=RC\tau = RC. Here, τ=(2kΩ)(50μF)=0.1s\tau = (2\,\text{k}\Omega)(50\,\mu\text{F}) = 0.1\,\text{s}, and the half-period is T/2=0.25s=2.5τT/2 = 0.25\,\text{s} = 2.5\tau. That's comparable to — not much greater than — τ\tau, so the capacitor partially charges and partially discharges each half-cycle. In steady state, whatever voltage is gained during the high phase must be lost during the low phase. Because charging targets 10V10\,\text{V} and discharging targets 0V0\,\text{V}, and both half-cycles share the same τ\tau and same duration, the system is perfectly symmetric about 5V5\,\text{V}. Solving the steady-state equations confirms Vmin1.60VV_{\min} \approx 1.60\,\text{V} and Vmax8.40VV_{\max} \approx 8.40\,\text{V}, equidistant from 5V5\,\text{V}. D is correct. A assumes T/2τT/2 \gg \tau, but 2.5τ2.5\tau is nowhere near large enough for complete charge/discharge. B makes the same error about full discharge, and also incorrectly treats each cycle as independent rather than recognizing that in steady state the capacitor starts each half-cycle from a nonzero residual voltage. C is tempting but wrong — the asymmetry argument fails because the same exponential behavior applies symmetrically in both half-cycles around the midpoint 5V5\,\text{V}. When you see RC circuits driven by square waves, always compare T/2T/2 to τ\tau first, then ask whether steady-state symmetry applies — it does whenever the circuit and drive are symmetric about the signal's midpoint.

Question 7

A series RC circuit has R=5kΩR = 5\,\text{k}\Omega and C=20μFC = 20\,\mu\text{F}. The capacitor is initially uncharged and a step voltage Vs=10VV_s = 10\,\text{V} is applied at t=0t = 0. An engineer needs the capacitor voltage to reach 8V8\,\text{V} as quickly as possible and proposes adding a second resistor R=5kΩR' = 5\,\text{k}\Omega in parallel with the existing resistor RR.

How does adding RR' in parallel with RR affect the time tt^* required for the capacitor to reach 8V8\,\text{V}?

  1. tt^* decreases, but not by exactly a factor of 2; the parallel resistance lowers τ\tau while simultaneously reducing the steady-state voltage the capacitor approaches, so the capacitor may never reach 8V8\,\text{V} depending on the new Thévenin equivalent.
  2. tt^* increases by a factor of 2, because adding a parallel resistor doubles the current paths, effectively doubling the time constant and slowing the rate at which the capacitor charges.
  3. tt^* is unchanged, because the time to reach a given fraction of VsV_s depends only on the ratio VC/VsV_C/V_s, which is independent of RR; the resistor affects only the maximum current, not the voltage threshold.
  4. tt^* decreases by a factor of 2, because the parallel combination halves the effective resistance to 2.5kΩ2.5\,\text{k}\Omega, halving τ\tau; since t=τln5t^* = \tau \ln 5, the time is halved accordingly. (correct answer)
Explanation: When you see a series RC circuit with a step input, your first instinct should be to identify two things: the time constant τ=RC\tau = RC and the steady-state (Thévenin) voltage the capacitor ultimately charges toward. Both determine how quickly VCV_C reaches any target value. Here, the capacitor charges according to VC(t)=Vs(1et/τ)V_C(t) = V_s(1 - e^{-t/\tau}). To find tt^* when VC=8VV_C = 8\,\text{V}: solving 8=10(1et/τ)8 = 10(1 - e^{-t^*/\tau}) gives t=τln5t^* = \tau \ln 5. The original time constant is τ=(5kΩ)(20μF)=0.1s\tau = (5\,\text{k}\Omega)(20\,\mu\text{F}) = 0.1\,\text{s}, so t=0.1ln5t^* = 0.1\ln 5. Adding R=5kΩR' = 5\,\text{k}\Omega in parallel with RR gives an equivalent resistance of Req=2.5kΩR_{eq} = 2.5\,\text{k}\Omega, halving τ\tau to 0.05s0.05\,\text{s}. Crucially, both resistors connect between the source and the same nodes — the Thévenin voltage seen by the capacitor remains 10V10\,\text{V}. So the same formula applies: t=0.05ln5t^* = 0.05\ln 5, exactly half the original. Answer D is correct. Answer A incorrectly claims the Thévenin voltage changes. It would change only if RR' were placed in a voltage-divider configuration (e.g., in series), not in parallel across RR. Answer B has the direction of the effect exactly backwards — parallel resistance reduces ReqR_{eq}, which decreases τ\tau, not increases it. Answer C wrongly treats the resistor as irrelevant; while the target fraction 8/108/10 doesn't change, τ\tau itself depends directly on RR, so tt^* absolutely changes. Study tip: Always separately check (1) how a circuit modification changes τ\tau and (2) whether it changes the Thévenin voltage. Confusing these two effects is the most common trap in RC transient problems.

Question 8

A student measures the voltage across a discharging capacitor at two times: V1=8.0VV_1 = 8.0\,\text{V} at t1=0mst_1 = 0\,\text{ms} and V2=2.0VV_2 = 2.0\,\text{V} at t2=60mst_2 = 60\,\text{ms}.

Using only these two data points, what is the best estimate of the time constant τ\tau of the circuit, and what voltage would be expected at t3=90mst_3 = 90\,\text{ms}?

  1. τ=60ln443.3ms\tau = \frac{60}{\ln 4} \approx 43.3\,\text{ms}; the expected voltage at t3=90mst_3 = 90\,\text{ms} is approximately V3=8.0e90/43.31.0VV_3 = 8.0\,e^{-90/43.3} \approx 1.0\,\text{V}. (correct answer)
  2. τ=60ln286.6ms\tau = \frac{60}{\ln 2} \approx 86.6\,\text{ms}; the expected voltage at t3=90mst_3 = 90\,\text{ms} is approximately V3=8.0e90/86.63.0VV_3 = 8.0\,e^{-90/86.6} \approx 3.0\,\text{V}.
  3. τ=30ms\tau = 30\,\text{ms}; the expected voltage at t3=90mst_3 = 90\,\text{ms} is approximately V3=8.0e30.40VV_3 = 8.0\,e^{-3} \approx 0.40\,\text{V}, since the voltage quarters every 60ms60\,\text{ms}, implying a half-life of 30ms30\,\text{ms}, which is mistakenly used as τ\tau.
  4. τ=60ln443.3ms\tau = \frac{60}{\ln 4} \approx 43.3\,\text{ms}; the expected voltage at t3=90mst_3 = 90\,\text{ms} is approximately V3=2.0e30/43.31.27VV_3 = 2.0\,e^{-30/43.3} \approx 1.27\,\text{V}, extrapolating forward from the second data point.
Explanation: When a capacitor discharges through a resistor, the voltage follows V(t)=V0et/τV(t) = V_0\,e^{-t/\tau}. Your job with two data points is to extract τ\tau by comparing them — this eliminates V0V_0 and isolates the exponential decay rate. Dividing the two measurements: V2V1=2.08.0=14=e(t2t1)/τ\frac{V_2}{V_1} = \frac{2.0}{8.0} = \frac{1}{4} = e^{-(t_2 - t_1)/\tau}. Taking the natural log of both sides gives ln4=60τ-\ln 4 = -\frac{60}{\tau}, so τ=60ln443.3ms\tau = \frac{60}{\ln 4} \approx 43.3\,\text{ms}. Plugging into the full equation: V3=8.0e90/43.31.0VV_3 = 8.0\,e^{-90/43.3} \approx 1.0\,\text{V}. This is exactly answer A, and it correctly anchors the exponential at t=0t = 0 using V0=8.0VV_0 = 8.0\,\text{V}. Answer B is wrong because it uses ln2\ln 2 instead of ln4\ln 4. This would only be valid if the voltage had halved — it actually dropped to one-quarter, so you need ln4=2ln2\ln 4 = 2\ln 2. Answer C confuses the half-life with τ\tau. Noticing that voltage quarters in 60 ms correctly implies a half-life of 30 ms, but τ\tau and half-life are related by t1/2=τln20.693τt_{1/2} = \tau \ln 2 \approx 0.693\,\tau — they are not the same value. Answer D uses the correct τ\tau but makes an error by starting the exponential from the second data point (t2,V2)(t_2, V_2) rather than from the initial condition. The formula V(t)=V0et/τV(t) = V_0\,e^{-t/\tau} requires tt measured from t=0t = 0, not from an arbitrary reference. A reliable strategy: always divide two voltage measurements to cancel V0V_0, solve for τ\tau, then return to the original V0V_0 at t=0t = 0 when predicting future voltages.