Physics 2 Quiz: Ohms Law And Power
9 questions · exam conditions
0:00
Ohms Law And PowerQuestion 1 of 9

A resistor network consists of two resistors connected in series: R1=4ΩR_1 = 4\,\Omega and R2=8ΩR_2 = 8\,\Omega. The combination is connected to a battery with an internal resistance of r=2Ωr = 2\,\Omega and an EMF of E=28V\mathcal{E} = 28\,\text{V}.

What fraction of the total power delivered by the battery is dissipated as heat in the internal resistance of the battery?

17\dfrac{1}{7}, because the internal resistance is 17\frac{1}{7} of the total resistance in the circuit, and power dissipated is proportional to resistance when current is the same through all elements.
114\dfrac{1}{14}, because the voltage drop across the internal resistance is 114\frac{1}{14} of the EMF, and the power ratio equals the voltage ratio for series elements.
14\dfrac{1}{4}, because the internal resistance r=2Ωr = 2\,\Omega is compared to the external resistance of 8Ω8\,\Omega, giving a ratio of 14\frac{1}{4} of the externally delivered power.
27\dfrac{2}{7}, because the current through the internal resistance is twice the current through either external resistor, doubling the effective power fraction beyond the resistance ratio.
← Back to quizzes

Physics 2 Quiz

Physics 2 Quiz: Ohms Law And Power

Practice Ohms Law And Power in Physics 2 with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.

What this quiz covers

This quiz focuses on Ohms Law And Power, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for Physics 2.

How to use this quiz

Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.

All questions

Question 1

A resistor network consists of two resistors connected in series: R1=4ΩR_1 = 4\,\Omega and R2=8ΩR_2 = 8\,\Omega. The combination is connected to a battery with an internal resistance of r=2Ωr = 2\,\Omega and an EMF of E=28V\mathcal{E} = 28\,\text{V}.

What fraction of the total power delivered by the battery is dissipated as heat in the internal resistance of the battery?

  1. 17\dfrac{1}{7}, because the internal resistance is 17\frac{1}{7} of the total resistance in the circuit, and power dissipated is proportional to resistance when current is the same through all elements. (correct answer)
  2. 114\dfrac{1}{14}, because the voltage drop across the internal resistance is 114\frac{1}{14} of the EMF, and the power ratio equals the voltage ratio for series elements.
  3. 14\dfrac{1}{4}, because the internal resistance r=2Ωr = 2\,\Omega is compared to the external resistance of 8Ω8\,\Omega, giving a ratio of 14\frac{1}{4} of the externally delivered power.
  4. 27\dfrac{2}{7}, because the current through the internal resistance is twice the current through either external resistor, doubling the effective power fraction beyond the resistance ratio.
Explanation: When a circuit has resistors in series — including a battery's internal resistance — the same current flows through every element. That single current is the key to finding power ratios. First, find the total resistance: Rtotal=r+R1+R2=2+4+8=14ΩR_{total} = r + R_1 + R_2 = 2 + 4 + 8 = 14\,\Omega. The current is I=E/Rtotal=28/14=2AI = \mathcal{E}/R_{total} = 28/14 = 2\,\text{A}. Since power dissipated in any resistor is P=I2RP = I^2 R, and I is identical for every element, the fraction of total power lost in any resistor is simply that resistor's share of the total resistance. For the internal resistance: PrPtotal=I2rI2Rtotal=rRtotal=214=17\frac{P_r}{P_{total}} = \frac{I^2 r}{I^2 R_{total}} = \frac{r}{R_{total}} = \frac{2}{14} = \frac{1}{7}. Answer A is correct. Answer B claims the power ratio equals the voltage ratio, but that's a double error — the voltage ratio across internal resistance is 2/28=1/142/28 = 1/14, and even if you used it, power ratios in series circuits don't equal voltage ratios (power scales as V2/RV^2/R, not VV). Answer C incorrectly compares rr only to R2=8ΩR_2 = 8\,\Omega rather than to the full circuit resistance of 14Ω14\,\Omega, ignoring R1R_1 entirely. Answer D is pure fabrication — in a series circuit, the current through every element is identical, so there's no "doubling" of current through the internal resistance. Study tip: In any series circuit, when current is shared, power fractions reduce to simple resistance ratios. Memorize: Px/Ptotal=Rx/RtotalP_x/P_{total} = R_x/R_{total} for series elements.

Question 2

An electric motor draws 5A5\,\text{A} from a 120V120\,\text{V} supply. The motor's coil has a resistance of 2Ω2\,\Omega. The motor operates at steady state and converts some electrical energy to mechanical work.

What is the mechanical power output of the motor?

  1. 550W550\,\text{W}, because the total input power is Pin=VI=600WP_{\text{in}} = VI = 600\,\text{W}, and the power lost to heat in the coil resistance is PR=I2R=50WP_R = I^2R = 50\,\text{W}, leaving 550W550\,\text{W} for mechanical output. (correct answer)
  2. 600W600\,\text{W}, because all of the power delivered by the source, P=VI=(120)(5)=600WP = VI = (120)(5) = 600\,\text{W}, is converted to mechanical work since an ideal motor has no resistive losses.
  3. 500W500\,\text{W}, because the back-EMF of the motor is Eback=VIR=12010=110V\mathcal{E}_{\text{back}} = V - IR = 120 - 10 = 110\,\text{V}, and the mechanical power is P=EbackI=110×5=550WP = \mathcal{E}_{\text{back}} \cdot I = 110 \times 5 = 550\,\text{W} minus the 50 W lost to heat gives 500 W.
  4. 50W50\,\text{W}, because the only useful work comes from the current flowing through the coil resistance, calculated as P=I2R=(5)2(2)=50WP = I^2R = (5)^2(2) = 50\,\text{W}, while the remaining power maintains the back-EMF.
Explanation: When a real electric motor operates, it behaves as both a resistor (the coil winding) and a generator (the spinning rotor producing a back-EMF). The total voltage from the supply must drive current through both of these effects simultaneously. Your job is to separate the power budget into "wasted heat" and "useful mechanical work." The total electrical power delivered by the source is Pin=VI=(120)(5)=600WP_{\text{in}} = VI = (120)(5) = 600\,\text{W}. Not all of this becomes mechanical output — some is dissipated as heat in the coil's resistance. That resistive loss is PR=I2R=(5)2(2)=50WP_R = I^2R = (5)^2(2) = 50\,\text{W}. By conservation of energy, the mechanical power output is simply what remains: Pmech=60050=550WP_{\text{mech}} = 600 - 50 = 550\,\text{W}. That's answer A, and it's correct. Choice B is wrong because it assumes a perfectly ideal motor with zero resistance — but the problem explicitly gives you a 2Ω2\,\Omega coil, which always dissipates heat. Choice C contains a seductive trap: it correctly identifies the back-EMF as Eback=VIR=110V\mathcal{E}_{\text{back}} = V - IR = 110\,\text{V} and correctly computes EbackI=550W\mathcal{E}_{\text{back}} \cdot I = 550\,\text{W}, but then wrongly subtracts the 50 W heat loss a second time — that loss is already excluded when you use back-EMF times current, since the back-EMF method and the energy-subtraction method are two equivalent routes to the same answer of 550 W, not steps to chain together. Choice D confuses cause and effect entirely: resistive heating is wasted energy, not useful mechanical work. A reliable strategy: for motor problems, always start with Pin=VIP_{\text{in}} = VI, then subtract I2RI^2R for heat loss. The remainder is mechanical power — clean, simple, and hard to mess up.

Question 3

A student measures the current through and voltage across an unknown two-terminal device at several operating points and finds the following: at V=2VV = 2\,\text{V}, I=0.5AI = 0.5\,\text{A}; at V=4VV = 4\,\text{V}, I=2AI = 2\,\text{A}; at V=6VV = 6\,\text{V}, I=4.5AI = 4.5\,\text{A}.

Which statement best characterizes the device, and what is the power dissipated at V=4VV = 4\,\text{V}?

  1. The device is ohmic with R=4ΩR = 4\,\Omega, and the power at 4V4\,\text{V} is 4W4\,\text{W}, because the ratio V/IV/I is approximately constant across all three data points.
  2. The device is non-ohmic because the ratio V/IV/I is not constant; IV2I \propto V^2 fits the data, and the power at 4V4\,\text{V} is 8W8\,\text{W}, calculated directly as P=IV=(2)(4)P = IV = (2)(4). (correct answer)
  3. The device is non-ohmic because the ratio V/IV/I is not constant; IV2I \propto V^2 fits the data, and the power at 4V4\,\text{V} is 4W4\,\text{W}, because applying P=I2/RP = I^2/R with an effective resistance of 2Ω2\,\Omega gives this result.
  4. The device is non-ohmic with an effective resistance that decreases with voltage; the power at 4V4\,\text{V} is 16W16\,\text{W}, because P=V2/ReffP = V^2/R_{\text{eff}} and Reff=1ΩR_{\text{eff}} = 1\,\Omega at that operating point.
Explanation: When a question gives you multiple data points for a device, your first move should always be to check whether V/IV/I is constant — that's the test for ohmic behavior. Here, the ratios are 2/0.5=4Ω2/0.5 = 4\,\Omega, 4/2=2Ω4/2 = 2\,\Omega, and 6/4.51.33Ω6/4.5 \approx 1.33\,\Omega. The ratio is clearly not constant, so the device is non-ohmic. Next, look for a pattern: notice that when voltage doubles (2 V → 4 V), current quadruples (0.5 A → 2 A). That's the signature of IV2I \propto V^2. You can verify: if I=kV2I = kV^2, then 0.5=k(4)0.5 = k(4) gives k=0.125k = 0.125, and indeed 0.125×16=2A0.125 \times 16 = 2\,\text{A} and 0.125×36=4.5A0.125 \times 36 = 4.5\,\text{A}. Power at 4 V is simply P=IV=(2A)(4V)=8WP = IV = (2\,\text{A})(4\,\text{V}) = 8\,\text{W}. That's choice B, the correct answer. Choice A is wrong on two counts: V/IV/I is not constant (it changes at every point), and even the first data point gives R=4ΩR = 4\,\Omega, not a valid fixed resistance for the device. C correctly identifies the non-ohmic behavior and the IV2I \propto V^2 relationship, but then misapplies P=I2/RP = I^2/R using a fabricated "effective resistance" of 2Ω2\,\Omega — this formula only works for true ohmic devices with a fixed RR. D misreads the effective resistance at 4 V; Reff=V/I=4/2=2ΩR_{\text{eff}} = V/I = 4/2 = 2\,\Omega, not 1Ω1\,\Omega, so the power calculation is wrong. The universal power formula P=IVP = IV always works regardless of device type — memorize it as your safe default whenever the device behavior is unknown or non-ohmic.

Question 4

Three identical resistors, each with resistance RR, are connected in a circuit. Two of them (RAR_A and RBR_B) are in parallel with each other, and this parallel combination is in series with the third resistor (RCR_C). The entire network is connected to an ideal battery of EMF E\mathcal{E}.

What is the ratio of the power dissipated in RCR_C to the power dissipated in RAR_A?

  1. PC:PA=2:1P_C : P_A = 2 : 1, because RCR_C carries twice the current of RAR_A, and students who forget that power scales as the square of current — not linearly — arrive at twice the power rather than four times.
  2. PC:PA=1:1P_C : P_A = 1 : 1, because all three resistors are identical and the circuit is symmetric, so each must dissipate the same fraction of the total power from the battery.
  3. PC:PA=4:1P_C : P_A = 4 : 1, because RCR_C carries the full circuit current II while RAR_A carries only I/2I/2, and since PI2RP \propto I^2R with equal resistances, the ratio is (I)2R:(I/2)2R=4:1(I)^2 R \,:\, (I/2)^2 R = 4 : 1. (correct answer)
  4. PC:PA=1:4P_C : P_A = 1 : 4, because the voltage across the parallel combination (E/3\mathcal{E}/3) is half the voltage across RCR_C (2E/32\mathcal{E}/3), and students who invert the power ratio — attributing higher power to the element with lower voltage — arrive at 1:4.
Explanation: Whenever you see a resistor network problem asking about power ratios, your first move should be to find the current through each element — then apply P=I2RP = I^2 R carefully, remembering that power scales with the square of current, not linearly. Here's the circuit analysis: RAR_A and RBR_B are in parallel, giving a combined resistance of R/2R/2. That combination is in series with RC=RR_C = R, so the total resistance is 3R/23R/2. The full circuit current is I=E/(3R/2)=2E/3RI = \mathcal{E}/(3R/2) = 2\mathcal{E}/3R. This entire current II flows through RCR_C. At the parallel junction, it splits equally, so each of RAR_A and RBR_B carries only I/2I/2. Since all resistances are equal, the power ratio is: PCPA=I2R(I/2)2R=I2I2/4=4\frac{P_C}{P_A} = \frac{I^2 R}{(I/2)^2 R} = \frac{I^2}{I^2/4} = 4 So PC:PA=4:1P_C : P_A = 4 : 1, confirming C is correct. A is the classic trap of treating power as proportional to current rather than current-squared. RCR_C carries twice the current of RAR_A, but that means four times the power, not two. B is wrong because symmetry only applies to RAR_A and RBR_B (which carry equal currents), not to RCR_C, which sits in a fundamentally different position in the circuit. D inverts the correct ratio entirely — higher voltage across RCR_C means more power, not less. Study tip: Always write down P=I2RP = I^2 R explicitly before comparing power. The squared relationship is the most commonly forgotten detail in circuit power problems.

Question 5

A cylindrical resistor of length LL, cross-sectional area AA, and resistivity ρ\rho carries a current II. The resistor is then replaced by one made of the same material but with twice the length and twice the radius. By what factor does the power dissipated in the resistor change if the voltage across it is held constant?

  1. The power decreases by a factor of 2, because doubling the length doubles the resistance while the area is unchanged, and P=V2/RP = V^2/R therefore halves.
  2. The power increases by a factor of 2, because the new resistance is R=ρ(2L)/[π(2r)2]=ρ(2L)/(4πr2)=R/2R' = \rho(2L)/[\pi(2r)^2] = \rho(2L)/(4\pi r^2) = R/2, so with constant voltage P=V2/RP = V^2/R gives P=2V2/R=2PP' = 2V^2/R = 2P. (correct answer)
  3. The power decreases by a factor of 2, because the new resistance is R=R/2R' = R/2, and applying P=I2RP = I^2 R with the original current II gives P=I2(R/2)=P/2P' = I^2(R/2) = P/2.
  4. The power remains the same, because doubling both the length and the radius preserves the aspect ratio L/rL/r, and students often (incorrectly) associate a preserved geometric ratio with a preserved resistance and therefore unchanged power.
Explanation: Whenever you see a resistor problem involving geometry changes, your first move should always be to find the new resistance using R=ρL/AR = \rho L / A, then apply the correct power formula based on what's held constant — voltage or current. That choice of formula is everything. Here, the new resistor has twice the length (2L2L) and twice the radius (2r2r), so its cross-sectional area becomes A=π(2r)2=4πr2=4AA' = \pi(2r)^2 = 4\pi r^2 = 4A. Plugging into the resistance formula: R=ρ(2L)/(4A)=12ρLA=R/2R' = \rho(2L)/(4A) = \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{\rho L}{A} = R/2. The resistance halves. Since voltage is held constant, you use P=V2/RP = V^2/R. With resistance cut in half, power doubles: P=V2/(R/2)=2V2/R=2PP' = V^2/(R/2) = 2V^2/R = 2P. Answer B is correct. Answer A makes a critical geometry error — it acknowledges that length doubles but ignores that the area also quadruples, so the net effect on resistance is actually a decrease, not an increase. Answer C correctly finds R=R/2R' = R/2, but then uses P=I2RP = I^2 R with the original current. That formula is only valid when current is held constant. Since voltage is held constant here, current changes too, making that approach invalid. Answer D is a tempting trap — the ratio L/rL/r is indeed preserved (both double), but resistance depends on L/A=L/(πr2)L/A = L/(\pi r^2), not L/rL/r. Doubling both LL and rr does not preserve resistance. Study tip: Always identify what's held constant (voltage or current) before choosing your power formula — P=V2/RP = V^2/R vs. P=I2RP = I^2R give opposite trends when resistance changes, and that's a classic exam trap.

Question 6

A heating element in a device is rated at 1200W1200\,\text{W} when operated at 120V120\,\text{V}. Due to a brownout, the supply voltage drops to 108V108\,\text{V} (a 10% decrease). Assume the resistance of the heating element remains constant.

By approximately what percentage does the power dissipated in the heating element decrease during the brownout?

  1. Approximately 10%, because power is proportional to voltage and a 10% decrease in voltage produces a 10% decrease in power.
  2. Approximately 19%, because power is proportional to V2V^2, and a 10% decrease in voltage gives (0.9)2=0.81(0.9)^2 = 0.81, representing a 19% decrease in power. (correct answer)
  3. Approximately 20%, because the current also decreases by 10%, and since P=IVP = IV, the combined 10% decrease in both II and VV produces a 20% decrease — but this must be corrected for the nonlinearity, yielding approximately 19%.
  4. Approximately 21%, because the resistance of a heating element slightly decreases as it cools during reduced power operation, which amplifies the power reduction beyond the simple (0.9)2(0.9)^2 prediction.
Explanation: Whenever you see a question involving power dissipation with a fixed resistance, your instinct should be to reach for P=V2RP = \frac{V^2}{R}. This formula reveals a critical insight: power depends on the square of voltage, not voltage directly. Here's why B is correct. If voltage drops by 10%, the new voltage is 0.9V0.9V. Plugging into the formula: Pnew=(0.9V)2R=0.81V2R=0.81PoriginalP_{new} = \frac{(0.9V)^2}{R} = \frac{0.81V^2}{R} = 0.81 \cdot P_{original}. The power becomes 81% of its original value — a 19% decrease. You can verify with numbers: the original resistance is R=V2P=(120)21200=12ΩR = \frac{V^2}{P} = \frac{(120)^2}{1200} = 12\,\Omega. At 108 V, P=(108)212=1166412=972WP = \frac{(108)^2}{12} = \frac{11664}{12} = 972\,\text{W}, which is indeed about 19% less than 1200 W. A is the most common trap — it assumes a linear relationship between voltage and power. That's only true if current were held constant (like in P=IVP = IV with fixed II), but here resistance is fixed, not current. C correctly identifies that both II and VV drop by 10%, and that P=IVP = IV gives a combined effect — but the math is (0.9)(0.9)=0.81(0.9)(0.9) = 0.81, which is exactly 19%, not "approximately 20% corrected to 19%." The framing is unnecessarily confusing and circular. D introduces a real-world nuance (resistance decreasing as the element cools), but the problem explicitly states resistance remains constant, so this consideration is ruled out by the given assumptions. Your study tip: memorize that for fixed resistance, PV2P \propto V^2 — a 10% voltage drop means roughly a 19% power drop, not 10%. This squared relationship appears frequently on Physics 2 exams.

Question 7

A student connects a 10Ω10\,\Omega resistor and a 40Ω40\,\Omega resistor in parallel, then connects this parallel combination in series with a battery that has an internal resistance of r=2Ωr = 2\,\Omega and EMF E=20V\mathcal{E} = 20\,\text{V}.

What is the power delivered to the parallel combination of resistors?

  1. 16W16\,\text{W}, because the terminal voltage across the parallel combination is VT=EIr=20(2)(2)=16VV_T = \mathcal{E} - I \cdot r = 20 - (2)(2) = 16\,\text{V}, and power is P=VT/Rext=16/8=2WP = V_T / R_{\text{ext}} = 16/8 = 2\,\text{W} — but since current is 2A2\,\text{A}, multiplying gives P=VTIhalf=16×1=16WP = V_T \cdot I_{\text{half}} = 16 \times 1 = 16\,\text{W}, using only the current through the 10Ω10\,\Omega branch.
  2. 40W40\,\text{W}, because the total power from the battery is P=EI=20×2=40WP = \mathcal{E} \cdot I = 20 \times 2 = 40\,\text{W}, and since the internal resistance is much smaller than the external resistance, essentially all of it is delivered to the parallel combination.
  3. 50W50\,\text{W}, because the terminal voltage of the battery equals the full EMF of 20V20\,\text{V} when the external resistance is much larger than the internal resistance, giving P = V^2/R_{\text{ext}} = 400/8 = 50\,\text{W}}.
  4. 32W32\,\text{W}, because the equivalent parallel resistance is 8Ω8\,\Omega, the total circuit resistance is 10Ω10\,\Omega, the current is I=20/10=2AI = 20/10 = 2\,\text{A}, and Pext=I2Rext=(2)2(8)=32WP_{\text{ext}} = I^2 R_{\text{ext}} = (2)^2(8) = 32\,\text{W}. (correct answer)
Explanation: When a battery with internal resistance powers an external circuit, the internal resistance acts like a resistor in series with everything else — it "steals" some of the voltage before the current even reaches the external components. Your job is to find how much voltage (and therefore power) actually reaches the parallel combination. Start by finding the equivalent resistance of the parallel combination: 1Rext=110+140=540\frac{1}{R_{\text{ext}}} = \frac{1}{10} + \frac{1}{40} = \frac{5}{40}, so Rext=8ΩR_{\text{ext}} = 8\,\Omega. The total circuit resistance is Rtotal=r+Rext=2+8=10ΩR_{\text{total}} = r + R_{\text{ext}} = 2 + 8 = 10\,\Omega. Ohm's law gives the current: I=ERtotal=2010=2AI = \frac{\mathcal{E}}{R_{\text{total}}} = \frac{20}{10} = 2\,\text{A}. The power delivered to the parallel combination is then Pext=I2Rext=(2)2(8)=32WP_{\text{ext}} = I^2 R_{\text{ext}} = (2)^2(8) = 32\,\text{W}, confirming D. Choice A reaches the right terminal voltage (16V16\,\text{V}) but then misapplies it — mixing up total current with branch current in a contradictory way, producing a meaningless hybrid calculation. Choice B correctly finds total power from the source (EI=40W\mathcal{E} \cdot I = 40\,\text{W}) but ignores the fact that some power is dissipated internally — the internal resistance always takes its share, regardless of how small it seems. Choice C assumes the terminal voltage equals the full EMF, which would only be true if r=0r = 0; with r=2Ωr = 2\,\Omega carrying 2A2\,\text{A}, there's a real 4V4\,\text{V} drop across the internal resistance. As a rule, always account for internal resistance by finding total resistance first, then solving for current — never assume the terminal voltage equals the EMF unless explicitly told the battery is ideal.

Question 8

Two resistors, R1=6ΩR_1 = 6\,\Omega and R2=3ΩR_2 = 3\,\Omega, are connected in parallel across an ideal voltage source of 12V12\,\text{V}. A student proposes replacing both resistors with a single resistor R3R_3 such that the total power delivered by the source remains the same.

What value of R3R_3 must the student use, and which of the following correctly explains why a common intuitive approach leads to the wrong answer?

  1. R3=9ΩR_3 = 9\,\Omega. A student who correctly identifies the parallel formula but applies it upside-down adds the resistances directly, R3=R1+R2=9ΩR_3 = R_1 + R_2 = 9\,\Omega, confusing the series combination rule with the parallel rule and overestimating the equivalent resistance by a factor of 4.5.
  2. R3=9ΩR_3 = 9\,\Omega. A student who averages the two resistances obtains R3=(R1+R2)/2=4.5ΩR_3 = (R_1 + R_2)/2 = 4.5\,\Omega, and then doubles it to account for the parallel configuration, arriving at 9Ω9\,\Omega — but this two-step procedure has no physical basis.
  3. R3=2ΩR_3 = 2\,\Omega. A common wrong approach is to average the two resistances, giving (R1+R2)/2=4.5Ω(R_1 + R_2)/2 = 4.5\,\Omega; this underestimates the correct equivalent resistance by more than a factor of 2 and would predict only 144/4.532W144/4.5 \approx 32\,\text{W}, less than half the correct power of 72W72\,\text{W}. (correct answer)
  4. R3=4.5ΩR_3 = 4.5\,\Omega. A student who uses the arithmetic mean of the two resistances obtains 4.5Ω4.5\,\Omega, and since this equals the average, it appears to be a reasonable estimate — but parallel combinations always yield a value strictly less than the smaller resistor, so 4.5Ω4.5\,\Omega is far too large.
Explanation: Whenever you see resistors in parallel, your first instinct should be to find the equivalent resistance using the reciprocal formula, then use that to analyze power — not to average or add the resistances directly. For two resistors in parallel, the equivalent resistance is 1Req=1R1+1R2=16+13=12\frac{1}{R_{eq}} = \frac{1}{R_1} + \frac{1}{R_2} = \frac{1}{6} + \frac{1}{3} = \frac{1}{2}, giving Req=2ΩR_{eq} = 2\,\Omega. The total power delivered by the source is P=V2Req=1442=72WP = \frac{V^2}{R_{eq}} = \frac{144}{2} = 72\,\text{W}. To preserve this power, R3R_3 must equal 2Ω2\,\Omega — confirming answer C. Notice that 2Ω2\,\Omega is strictly less than the smaller resistor (3Ω3\,\Omega), which is always true for parallel combinations. Choice C also correctly identifies the intuitive trap: averaging the resistances gives 4.5Ω4.5\,\Omega, which would predict only 144/4.532W144/4.5 \approx 32\,\text{W} — less than half the actual power. Choice A describes a student who adds the resistances as if they were in series (9Ω9\,\Omega), a classic series/parallel mix-up. This overestimates resistance dramatically and delivers only 16W16\,\text{W}. Choice B invents a fictional two-step averaging-then-doubling procedure that has no grounding in circuit theory and also lands on 9Ω9\,\Omega. Choice D gets the resistance value wrong (4.5Ω4.5\,\Omega instead of 2Ω2\,\Omega) and merely restates the rule that parallel resistance is less than the smallest branch — it identifies a true principle but applies it to the wrong number. Study tip: For parallel resistors, always use the reciprocal formula. A quick sanity check — your answer must be smaller than the smallest individual resistor — will catch most errors immediately.

Question 9

A student builds a voltage divider using two resistors R1=1kΩR_1 = 1\,\text{k}\Omega and R2=3kΩR_2 = 3\,\text{k}\Omega connected in series across a 12V12\,\text{V} ideal battery. A load resistor RLR_L is connected in parallel with R2R_2 to draw power from the divider. The student wants the voltage across RLR_L to remain at exactly 9V9\,\text{V}.

For the output voltage across RLR_L to equal exactly 9V9\,\text{V}, what must RLR_L equal, and what is the power dissipated in R1R_1 under this condition?

  1. RL=9kΩR_L = 9\,\text{k}\Omega, and the power in R1R_1 is 16mW16\,\text{mW}, because connecting 9kΩ9\,\text{k}\Omega in parallel with 3kΩ3\,\text{k}\Omega gives RLR2=2.25kΩR_L \parallel R_2 = 2.25\,\text{k}\Omega, and the output voltage is 12×2.25/3.258.3V12 \times 2.25/3.25 \approx 8.3\,\text{V}, not 9 V, so R1R_1 must carry extra current to compensate.
  2. RL=3kΩR_L = 3\,\text{k}\Omega, and the power in R1R_1 is 18mW18\,\text{mW}, because RLR2=1.5kΩR_L \parallel R_2 = 1.5\,\text{k}\Omega and the output voltage becomes 12×1.5/(1+1.5)=7.2V12 \times 1.5/(1+1.5) = 7.2\,\text{V}, not 9 V, so the student must compensate by using a higher RLR_L.
  3. RLR_L must be infinite (open circuit), and the power in R1R_1 is 27mW27\,\text{mW}, because the voltage across R1R_1 is 3V3\,\text{V}, the current is 3mA3\,\text{mA}, and P=VI=(3)(0.003)=9mWP = VI = (3)(0.003) = 9\,\text{mW} — but an additional 18mW18\,\text{mW} is stored in the electric field of R2R_2, giving a total of 27mW27\,\text{mW} attributed to R1R_1.
  4. RLR_L must be infinite (open circuit), and the power in R1R_1 is 9mW9\,\text{mW}, because only with no load current can the unloaded divider ratio R2/(R1+R2)=3/4R_2/(R_1+R_2) = 3/4 yield 9V9\,\text{V}, with current I=12/4kΩ=3mAI = 12/4\,\text{k}\Omega = 3\,\text{mA} and PR1=I2R1=(3mA)2(1kΩ)=9mWP_{R_1} = I^2 R_1 = (3\,\text{mA})^2(1\,\text{k}\Omega) = 9\,\text{mW}. (correct answer)
Explanation: Voltage divider questions test your ability to analyze how a parallel load disturbs an existing series circuit — and recognize when "no disturbance" is itself the answer. An unloaded voltage divider splits the supply proportionally: Vout=VsR2R1+R2V_{out} = V_s \cdot \frac{R_2}{R_1 + R_2}. Plugging in: Vout=1231+3=9VV_{out} = 12 \cdot \frac{3}{1+3} = 9\,\text{V}. The divider already delivers exactly 9 V across R2R_2 with no load attached. The moment you connect any finite RLR_L in parallel with R2R_2, the effective resistance drops below 3kΩ3\,\text{k}\Omega, pulling the output voltage below 9 V. Therefore, the only way to maintain exactly 9 V is to leave RLR_L as an open circuit (infinite resistance). With that, the single loop carries I=12V/4kΩ=3mAI = 12\,\text{V} / 4\,\text{k}\Omega = 3\,\text{mA}, and the power in R1R_1 is P=I2R1=(3×103)2×1000=9mWP = I^2 R_1 = (3\times10^{-3})^2 \times 1000 = 9\,\text{mW}. That confirms D. A is self-contradictory — it correctly computes that 9kΩ3kΩ=2.25kΩ9\,\text{k}\Omega \parallel 3\,\text{k}\Omega = 2.25\,\text{k}\Omega gives only 8.3 V, then invents a nonsensical "compensation" mechanism rather than accepting the result disproves the premise. B makes the same structural error: it connects a finite load, correctly finds the output drops to 7.2 V, then wrongly suggests adjusting RLR_L upward fixes things — which only works in the infinite limit (answer D). C reaches the correct RL=R_L = \infty conclusion but fabricates the idea that energy is "stored in the electric field of R2R_2" and adds it to the resistor's dissipation. Resistors dissipate power — they don't store it. Strategy tip: When a voltage divider question asks what load produces a specific output, always check the unloaded ratio first. If it already matches, the answer is no load at all — a classic trap that rewards students who calculate before assuming a finite RLR_L is required.