Physics 2 Quiz: Motional Emf
9 questions · exam conditions
0:00
Motional EmfQuestion 1 of 9

Two conducting rods, each of length LL, slide simultaneously along the same pair of conducting rails in a uniform magnetic field BB directed perpendicular to the plane of the rails. Rod 1 moves to the right with speed vv and Rod 2 moves to the right with speed 2v2v. The rails have negligible resistance, and the two rods are the only resistive elements in the circuit, each with resistance RR.

What is the magnitude of the current flowing through the circuit formed by the two rods and the rails?

I=BLvRI = \dfrac{BLv}{R}, because the net emf in the loop equals the difference of the two motional emfs, Enet=BL(2v)BLv=BLv\mathcal{E}_{\text{net}} = BL(2v) - BLv = BLv, and the two rods are in parallel (each provides an independent current path), so the effective resistance is R/2R/2, giving I=2BLv/RI = 2BLv/R total — but each rod carries BLv/RBLv/R.
I=BLv2RI = \dfrac{BLv}{2R}, because the net emf in the closed loop equals the difference of the two motional emfs, Enet=BL(2v)BLv=BLv\mathcal{E}_{\text{net}} = BL(2v) - BLv = BLv, and the two rods act as resistors in series giving total resistance 2R2R.
I=3BLv2RI = \dfrac{3BLv}{2R}, because the net emf is the sum of the two motional emfs, Enet=BL(2v)+BLv=3BLv\mathcal{E}_{\text{net}} = BL(2v) + BLv = 3BLv, and the total resistance is 2R2R.
I=2BLvRI = \dfrac{2BLv}{R}, because only the faster rod contributes to the net emf since it dominates the circuit, giving Enet=BL(2v)=2BLv\mathcal{E}_{\text{net}} = BL(2v) = 2BLv, and the effective resistance is RR (the slower rod's resistance is negligible in comparison).
← Back to quizzes

Physics 2 Quiz

Physics 2 Quiz: Motional Emf

Practice Motional Emf in Physics 2 with focused quiz questions that help you check what you know, review explanations, and build confidence with test-style prompts.

What this quiz covers

This quiz focuses on Motional Emf, giving you a quick way to practice the rules, question types, and explanations that matter most for Physics 2.

How to use this quiz

Try each quiz question before looking at the correct answer. Use the explanations to review missed ideas, then come back to similar questions until the pattern feels familiar.

All questions

Question 1

Two conducting rods, each of length LL, slide simultaneously along the same pair of conducting rails in a uniform magnetic field BB directed perpendicular to the plane of the rails. Rod 1 moves to the right with speed vv and Rod 2 moves to the right with speed 2v2v. The rails have negligible resistance, and the two rods are the only resistive elements in the circuit, each with resistance RR.

What is the magnitude of the current flowing through the circuit formed by the two rods and the rails?

  1. I=BLvRI = \dfrac{BLv}{R}, because the net emf in the loop equals the difference of the two motional emfs, Enet=BL(2v)BLv=BLv\mathcal{E}_{\text{net}} = BL(2v) - BLv = BLv, and the two rods are in parallel (each provides an independent current path), so the effective resistance is R/2R/2, giving I=2BLv/RI = 2BLv/R total — but each rod carries BLv/RBLv/R.
  2. I=BLv2RI = \dfrac{BLv}{2R}, because the net emf in the closed loop equals the difference of the two motional emfs, Enet=BL(2v)BLv=BLv\mathcal{E}_{\text{net}} = BL(2v) - BLv = BLv, and the two rods act as resistors in series giving total resistance 2R2R. (correct answer)
  3. I=3BLv2RI = \dfrac{3BLv}{2R}, because the net emf is the sum of the two motional emfs, Enet=BL(2v)+BLv=3BLv\mathcal{E}_{\text{net}} = BL(2v) + BLv = 3BLv, and the total resistance is 2R2R.
  4. I=2BLvRI = \dfrac{2BLv}{R}, because only the faster rod contributes to the net emf since it dominates the circuit, giving Enet=BL(2v)=2BLv\mathcal{E}_{\text{net}} = BL(2v) = 2BLv, and the effective resistance is RR (the slower rod's resistance is negligible in comparison).
Explanation: When two moving rods form a closed circuit on rails, think of each rod as a battery: a source of motional emf equal to E=BLv\mathcal{E} = BLv. The key question is always how those "batteries" combine — do they add or oppose each other? Since both rods move in the same direction, they drive current around the loop in opposite senses — like two batteries connected positive-to-positive. This means their emfs oppose each other, and the net emf is the difference: Enet=BL(2v)BLv=BLv\mathcal{E}_{\text{net}} = BL(2v) - BLv = BLv. Now for resistance: the current has only one path through the circuit — through Rod 2, along the rails, then through Rod 1, and back. That's a series connection, giving total resistance 2R2R. Applying Ohm's Law: I=BLv2RI = \dfrac{BLv}{2R}, confirming answer B. Answer A contains a subtle error: it correctly identifies the net emf but then misidentifies the rods as being in parallel. The rods are not parallel — there is only a single current loop, so the resistances add in series. Answer C adds the two emfs instead of subtracting them. This would only be correct if the rods moved in opposite directions, driving current the same way around the loop. Answer D wrongly ignores Rod 1's emf entirely and also mishandles the resistance. Both rods contribute emf and both contribute resistance — neither can be dropped from the analysis. Study tip: When multiple sources of emf share a single current loop, always determine whether they aid or oppose each other before computing net emf — this is the most common trap in motional-emf circuit problems.

Question 2

A rod of length LL and resistance rr slides along frictionless conducting rails connected to an external load resistance RextR_{\text{ext}}. Wait — A rod of length LL moves with velocity v=vx^\vec{v} = v\hat{x} in a region where the magnetic field is B=B0(1+αx)z^\vec{B} = B_0(1 + \alpha x)\hat{z}, where xx is the rod's position along the rail direction, B0B_0 and α\alpha are positive constants, and z^\hat{z} is perpendicular to the rail plane. The rod is oriented along y^\hat{y} and slides along rails of negligible resistance connected to a fixed external resistance RR.

At the instant when the rod is at position x=x0x = x_0, what is the motional emf?

  1. E=B0Lv\mathcal{E} = B_0 Lv, because in a non-uniform field only the uniform baseline component B0B_0 contributes to the motional emf; the spatially varying part αx0\alpha x_0 represents a field gradient that produces forces perpendicular to the rod rather than along it, and these do not contribute to the circuit emf.
  2. E=B0Lv+12αB0L2v\mathcal{E} = B_0 L v + \frac{1}{2}\alpha B_0 L^2 v, because the spatially varying field must be integrated along the rod's length LL in the y^\hat{y} direction, giving an extra 12αL\frac{1}{2}\alpha L correction term to the base emf B0LvB_0 Lv.
  3. E=B0(1+αx0)Lv+αB0v2t\mathcal{E} = B_0(1 + \alpha x_0)Lv + \alpha B_0 v^2 t, because the field at the rod's location changes as the rod moves, so a correction term αB0v2t\alpha B_0 v^2 t must be added to account for the cumulative change in field experienced by the moving rod.
  4. E=B0(1+αx0)Lv\mathcal{E} = B_0(1 + \alpha x_0)Lv, because the motional emf depends on the local value of BB at the rod's instantaneous position, and since the field varies only with xx (not with yy), the field is uniform along the rod's length at any given instant, so E=BLv\mathcal{E} = BLv applies with BB evaluated at x0x_0. (correct answer)
Explanation: Whenever you see a motional emf problem with a non-uniform magnetic field, your first move should be to write the fundamental definition: E=(v×B)d\mathcal{E} = \int (\vec{v} \times \vec{B}) \cdot d\vec{\ell}, then carefully evaluate what the field looks like along the rod's length at the instant in question. Here, the rod moves in x^\hat{x} and is oriented along y^\hat{y}, so v×B=vx^×B0(1+αx)z^=B0(1+αx)vy^\vec{v} \times \vec{B} = v\hat{x} \times B_0(1+\alpha x)\hat{z} = -B_0(1+\alpha x)v\,\hat{y}. The critical observation is that BB depends only on xx, not on yy. At the instant the rod sits at position x=x0x = x_0, every point along the rod shares the same xx-coordinate, so the field is perfectly uniform across the rod's length at that moment: B=B0(1+αx0)B = B_0(1+\alpha x_0). Integrating along y^\hat{y} from 0 to LL gives E=B0(1+αx0)Lv\mathcal{E} = B_0(1+\alpha x_0)Lv, confirming D. A is wrong because it falsely claims the spatially varying part doesn't contribute. The field gradient is in x^\hat{x}, so it doesn't vary along the rod — but its full value at x0x_0, including the αx0\alpha x_0 term, absolutely drives the emf. B is wrong because it integrates the α\alpha-dependence in y^\hat{y}, but BB has no yy-dependence. There is no variation to integrate along the rod. C is wrong because it mixes an instantaneous emf calculation with a time-accumulated correction. Motional emf is evaluated at a single instant — you don't add cumulative history terms. Study tip: Always ask, "Does the field vary along the rod's orientation?" If not, pull BB out of the integral evaluated at the rod's current position and use E=BLv\mathcal{E} = BLv directly.

Question 3

A rod of length LL and resistance rr slides along frictionless conducting rails connected to an external load resistance RextR_{\text{ext}}. The system is in a uniform field BB perpendicular to the rail plane. A constant external force FF is applied to the rod. After a long time, the rod reaches a terminal velocity vTv_T.

Which of the following correctly expresses the terminal velocity vTv_T?

  1. vT=FRextB2L2v_T = \dfrac{FR_{\text{ext}}}{B^2 L^2}, because at terminal velocity the power delivered to the external load equals the mechanical input power, so FvT=I2RextFv_T = I^2 R_{\text{ext}}, and solving with I=BLvT/RextI = BLv_T/R_{\text{ext}} (treating the rod as ideal) gives this result.
  2. vT=F(Rext+r)B2L2v_T = \dfrac{F(R_{\text{ext}} + r)}{B^2 L^2}, because at terminal velocity the net force is zero, so the applied force equals the braking force Fbrake=BILF_{\text{brake}} = BIL, where I=E/(Rext+r)=BLvT/(Rext+r)I = \mathcal{E}/(R_{\text{ext}}+r) = BLv_T/(R_{\text{ext}}+r), yielding F=B2L2vT/(Rext+r)F = B^2L^2v_T/(R_{\text{ext}}+r). (correct answer)
  3. vT=FB2L2(Rext+r)2/Rextv_T = \dfrac{F}{B^2 L^2}(R_{\text{ext}} + r)^2 / R_{\text{ext}}, because the terminal condition requires the electrical power dissipated in RextR_{\text{ext}} to equal FvTFv_T, and the current through RextR_{\text{ext}} includes an impedance-matching factor of (Rext+r)/Rext(R_{\text{ext}}+r)/R_{\text{ext}}.
  4. vT=FrB2L2v_T = \dfrac{Fr}{B^2 L^2}, because at terminal velocity all the mechanical power is dissipated internally in the rod's own resistance rr, and the condition FvT=I2rFv_T = I^2 r with I=BLvT/rI = BLv_T/r determines the terminal speed.
Explanation: When a conducting rod moves through a magnetic field, it generates an EMF and experiences a braking force that opposes its motion. Terminal velocity occurs when this magnetic braking force exactly balances the applied force — net force equals zero, so acceleration stops. This force-balance condition is the cleanest path to the answer. At terminal velocity, the rod moves at constant vTv_T, generating EMF E=BLvT\mathcal{E} = BLv_T. The circuit contains both the rod's internal resistance rr and the external load RextR_{\text{ext}} in series, so the current is I=BLvTRext+rI = \frac{BLv_T}{R_{\text{ext}} + r}. The magnetic braking force on the rod is Fbrake=BIL=B2L2vTRext+rF_{\text{brake}} = BIL = \frac{B^2L^2v_T}{R_{\text{ext}}+r}. Setting F=FbrakeF = F_{\text{brake}} and solving gives vT=F(Rext+r)B2L2v_T = \frac{F(R_{\text{ext}}+r)}{B^2L^2}, confirming B is correct. A is wrong because it ignores the rod's internal resistance rr, treating the rod as ideal. This means the current formula I=BLvT/RextI = BLv_T/R_{\text{ext}} undercounts the total circuit resistance, giving an artificially low terminal velocity. C introduces a fabricated "impedance-matching factor" — no such correction exists in this DC resistive circuit. The condition FvT=I2RextFv_T = I^2 R_{\text{ext}} is also wrong as the terminal condition; total power input equals total dissipation, not just dissipation in RextR_{\text{ext}}. D incorrectly assumes all mechanical power goes into rr alone, ignoring RextR_{\text{ext}} entirely, and uses a wrong current expression. As a study habit, whenever you see "terminal velocity" in an electromagnetic induction problem, immediately write Fapplied=BILF_{\text{applied}} = BIL and use the full series resistance in the current expression — forgetting internal resistance is the most common trap on this topic.

Question 4

A straight conducting rod of length L=0.50 mL = 0.50 \text{ m} slides along two parallel, frictionless conducting rails separated by the same distance LL. The rails lie in the horizontal plane and are connected at one end by a resistor R=4.0 ΩR = 4.0 \ \Omega. A uniform magnetic field B\vec{B} is directed at an angle θ=30°\theta = 30° below the horizontal, with magnitude B=2.0 TB = 2.0 \text{ T}. The rod moves along the rails with constant velocity v=3.0 m/sv = 3.0 \text{ m/s} perpendicular to its own length.

What is the magnitude of the current through the resistor?

  1. I=0.375 AI = 0.375 \text{ A}, because only the vertical component of B\vec{B} (i.e., BsinθB\sin\theta) contributes to the motional emf, giving E=BLvsinθ=1.5 V\mathcal{E} = BLv\sin\theta = 1.5 \text{ V}, and I=E/RI = \mathcal{E}/R. (correct answer)
  2. I=0.65 AI = 0.65 \text{ A}, because only the horizontal component of B\vec{B} (i.e., BcosθB\cos\theta) contributes to the motional emf, giving E=BLvcosθ2.6 V\mathcal{E} = BLv\cos\theta \approx 2.6 \text{ V}, and I=E/RI = \mathcal{E}/R.
  3. I=0.75 AI = 0.75 \text{ A}, because the full magnitude of B\vec{B} contributes to the motional emf regardless of field orientation, giving E=BLv=3.0 V\mathcal{E} = BLv = 3.0 \text{ V}, and I=E/RI = \mathcal{E}/R.
  4. I=0I = 0, because the rod moves horizontally and the vertical component of B\vec{B} is parallel to the gravitational force rather than to the rod's velocity, so no net work is done on the charges and no emf is induced.
Explanation: Whenever you see a motional emf problem with a tilted magnetic field, your first instinct should be to identify which component of B\vec{B} is perpendicular to the plane of motion — because only that component contributes to the flux change through the circuit loop. Here, the rod slides horizontally, so the circuit loop lies entirely in the horizontal plane. The motional emf is E=(v×B)L\mathcal{E} = (\vec{v} \times \vec{B}) \cdot \vec{L}, but a cleaner way to think about it: emf equals the rate of change of magnetic flux through the loop, E=dΦdt\mathcal{E} = \frac{d\Phi}{dt}. Flux is Φ=BA\Phi = B_\perp \cdot A, where BB_\perp is the component of B\vec{B} perpendicular to the horizontal plane — that's the vertical component, BsinθB\sin\theta. So: E=BsinθLv=(2.0)(0.5)(0.5)(3.0)=1.5 V\mathcal{E} = B\sin\theta \cdot L \cdot v = (2.0)(0.5)(0.5)(3.0) = 1.5 \text{ V} I=ER=1.54.0=0.375 AI = \frac{\mathcal{E}}{R} = \frac{1.5}{4.0} = 0.375 \text{ A} This confirms A is correct. Choice B incorrectly uses the horizontal component BcosθB\cos\theta. The horizontal part of B\vec{B} lies within the plane of the loop and doesn't contribute to flux change as the area sweeps out. Choice C uses the full magnitude of B\vec{B}, ignoring that only the perpendicular component drives flux change — a very common trap. Choice D confuses "no work done by gravity" with "no emf," but emf depends on the magnetic force on charges, not gravitational work. Study tip: Always ask yourself, "What is the orientation of the circuit loop?" then use only the component of B\vec{B} normal to that loop in your emf calculation.

Question 5

A conducting disk of radius RR rotates about its central axis with angular velocity ω\omega in a uniform magnetic field BB directed parallel to the axis. A sliding contact connects the rim of the disk to a resistor, and another contact connects the center of the disk to the same resistor, forming a closed circuit. This device is known as a Faraday disk or homopolar generator.

What is the magnitude of the emf generated between the center and the rim of the disk?

  1. E=12BωR2\mathcal{E} = \dfrac{1}{2}B\omega R^2, because a radial element drdr at distance rr from the center moves with speed ωr\omega r, contributing dV=B(ωr)drdV = B(\omega r)\,dr, and integrating from 00 to RR yields 12BωR2\frac{1}{2}B\omega R^2. (correct answer)
  2. E=BωR2\mathcal{E} = B\omega R^2, because the rim of the disk moves at speed v=ωRv = \omega R and the emf is simply E=BvR=BωR2\mathcal{E} = BvR = B\omega R^2, treating the disk as a single conductor of effective length RR.
  3. E=0\mathcal{E} = 0, because the magnetic flux through the disk is constant (the disk's area does not change and BB is steady), so by Faraday's law no emf is induced.
  4. E=23BωR2\mathcal{E} = \dfrac{2}{3}B\omega R^2, because the average speed of a point on the disk is 23ωR\frac{2}{3}\omega R (the centroid of a disk is at 23R\frac{2}{3}R), and the emf is E=B23ωRR\mathcal{E} = B \cdot \frac{2}{3}\omega R \cdot R.
Explanation: When a conducting disk spins in a magnetic field, you're dealing with motional emf — not Faraday's flux rule. The key insight is that each tiny radial segment of the disk moves through the field and generates a small voltage, and you must integrate those contributions from center to rim. A radial element at distance rr from the center moves with speed v=ωrv = \omega r. The motional emf across that element is dE=Bvdr=Bωrdrd\mathcal{E} = Bv\,dr = B\omega r\,dr. Integrating from 00 to RR: E=0RBωrdr=BωR22=12BωR2\mathcal{E} = \int_0^R B\omega r\,dr = B\omega \cdot \frac{R^2}{2} = \frac{1}{2}B\omega R^2 This confirms A is correct. B is wrong because it treats the entire disk as if every part moves at the rim speed ωR\omega R. Only the rim moves that fast — inner portions move slower, so you cannot shortcut the integration by using the maximum speed. C tempts students who reflexively apply Faraday's law (E=dΦ/dt\mathcal{E} = -d\Phi/dt). While the flux through the disk is indeed constant, Faraday's law in integral form applies to a fixed circuit loop. Here, the conducting path itself is rotating, so motional emf arises from the magnetic force on charge carriers (F=qv×B\vec{F} = q\vec{v} \times \vec{B}), which Faraday's law in this form misses entirely. D incorrectly averages velocity using the centroid location. The centroid gives the geometric center of mass, not a valid substitute for integrating rr in an emf calculation. Study tip: Whenever a conductor moves through a magnetic field, reach for motional emf (dE=Bvdld\mathcal{E} = Bv\,dl) and integrate — don't assume Faraday's flux rule applies directly to rotating or sliding conductors.

Question 6

An airplane with a wingspan of 60 m60 \text{ m} flies horizontally at 250 m/s250 \text{ m/s} in a region where Earth's magnetic field has magnitude 5.0×105 T5.0 \times 10^{-5} \text{ T}. The field makes an angle of 60°60° with the horizontal (dip angle = 60°60°). A physicist wants to calculate the motional emf between the wing tips.

What is the motional emf between the wing tips, and which component of Earth's field is responsible?

  1. E0.375 V\mathcal{E} \approx 0.375 \text{ V}, produced by the horizontal component of Earth's field Bh=Bcos(60°)B_h = B\cos(60°), because the horizontal field component is perpendicular to both the velocity and the wingspan, driving charges along the wing.
  2. E0.75 V\mathcal{E} \approx 0.75 \text{ V}, produced by the full magnitude of Earth's field, because the airplane's horizontal motion means all components of B\vec{B} contribute equally to the Lorentz force on wing charges.
  3. E0.65 V\mathcal{E} \approx 0.65 \text{ V}, produced by the vertical component of Earth's field Bv=Bsin(60°)B_v = B\sin(60°), because only the vertical component of B\vec{B} contributes to the force on charges moving horizontally along the wingspan. (correct answer)
  4. E0.65 V\mathcal{E} \approx 0.65 \text{ V}, produced by the horizontal component of Earth's field Bh=Bsin(60°)B_h = B\sin(60°), because the dip angle is measured from horizontal, so sin(60°)\sin(60°) gives the horizontal component, which is perpendicular to the aircraft's forward velocity and drives current across the span.
Explanation: When solving motional emf problems for a conductor moving through Earth's magnetic field, your first instinct should be to identify which component of B\vec{B} actually exerts a force along the conductor. The motional emf is E=BvL\mathcal{E} = BvL, but only the field component perpendicular to both the velocity and the wingspan contributes. Here, the airplane moves forward (horizontally) and the wingspan runs left-to-right (also horizontal). The force on charges in the wing comes from F=qv×B\vec{F} = q\vec{v} \times \vec{B}. For a force component to push charges along the wingspan, it must point in the wingspan direction — meaning you need the cross product v×B\vec{v} \times \vec{B} to have a component along the wing axis. Only the vertical component of B\vec{B} produces a force in the horizontal wing direction when crossed with the forward horizontal velocity. The vertical component is Bv=Bsin(60°)=(5.0×105)sin(60°)4.33×105 TB_v = B\sin(60°) = (5.0 \times 10^{-5})\sin(60°) \approx 4.33 \times 10^{-5} \text{ T}, giving E=BvvL=(4.33×105)(250)(60)0.65 V\mathcal{E} = B_v v L = (4.33 \times 10^{-5})(250)(60) \approx 0.65 \text{ V}. This confirms C is correct. A is wrong because it uses Bcos(60°)B\cos(60°), the horizontal component. The horizontal field is parallel to the velocity or the wing, so its cross product with v\vec{v} cannot drive charges along the span. B is wrong because not all field components contribute equally — only the geometrically correct component matters. D uses sin(60°)\sin(60°) correctly numerically but misidentifies it as the horizontal component; sin(dip angle)\sin(\text{dip angle}) always gives the vertical component. Remember: the dip angle is measured from horizontal, so sin(θdip)\sin(\theta_{dip}) → vertical, cos(θdip)\cos(\theta_{dip}) → horizontal. Sketch the geometry before plugging in numbers.

Question 7

A rod of mass mm, length LL, and negligible resistance is placed on horizontal conducting rails of negligible resistance and separation LL. The rails are inclined at angle ϕ\phi to the horizontal and are connected at the top by a resistor RR. A uniform magnetic field BB is directed vertically upward. The rod is released from rest and slides down the incline.

As the rod slides down with instantaneous speed vv (measured along the incline), what is the magnitude of the motional emf induced in the circuit?

  1. E=BLvsinϕ\mathcal{E} = BLv\sin\phi, because only the component of velocity perpendicular to the incline surface (i.e., the vertical component vsinϕv\sin\phi) drives charges along the horizontal rod and contributes to the emf.
  2. E=BLv\mathcal{E} = BLv, because the motional emf depends on the rod's speed relative to the field, and since BB is uniform, the full incline speed vv contributes regardless of the tilt angle.
  3. E=BLvcosϕ\mathcal{E} = BLv\cos\phi, because the component of the rod's velocity perpendicular to the magnetic field (which is vertical) is the horizontal component vcosϕv\cos\phi, and the horizontal projection of the rod's length is still LL, giving E=B(vcosϕ)L\mathcal{E} = B(v\cos\phi)L. (correct answer)
  4. E=BLvcos2ϕ\mathcal{E} = BLv\cos^2\phi, because the rod has both a foreshortened effective length LcosϕL\cos\phi (horizontal projection) and a reduced effective velocity vcosϕv\cos\phi, so these two cosine factors multiply to give BLvcos2ϕBLv\cos^2\phi.
Explanation: Whenever you see a motional emf problem with a tilted surface and a non-perpendicular magnetic field, your go-to formula is E=(v×B)d\mathcal{E} = \int (\vec{v} \times \vec{B}) \cdot d\vec{\ell}. The key is identifying which component of velocity is perpendicular to both BB and the rod. Here, the rod lies horizontally across the incline (perpendicular to the page's slope direction), and BB points vertically upward. The rod slides down the incline at speed vv, which has two components: a horizontal component vcosϕv\cos\phi and a vertical component vsinϕv\sin\phi. The force on charges in the rod comes from v×B\vec{v} \times \vec{B}. Since BB is vertical, only the horizontal component of velocity (perpendicular to BB) produces a cross product with a component along the rod. The vertical component of velocity is parallel to BB, so it contributes nothing to v×B\vec{v} \times \vec{B}. The effective speed driving charges along the rod is therefore vcosϕv\cos\phi. The rod's actual length along the rails is LL (the separation is LL, and the rod lies horizontally with full length LL), so the emf is E=B(vcosϕ)L\mathcal{E} = B(v\cos\phi)L, confirming choice C. Choice A incorrectly uses vsinϕv\sin\phi (the vertical component), confusing "perpendicular to the incline" with "perpendicular to BB." Choice B ignores the geometry entirely — the angle always matters when BB is not perpendicular to the velocity. Choice D double-counts the cosine by foreshortening the rod's length to LcosϕL\cos\phi, but the rod spans the full rail separation LL horizontally — its length is not projected. Your study tip: always decompose velocity relative to the field direction, not relative to the surface. Ask yourself, "which component of vv is perpendicular to BB?" — that's your effective speed for emf calculations.

Question 8

A student sets up a rail-and-rod experiment in which a rod of length LL slides at constant velocity vv along frictionless rails in a uniform field BB perpendicular to the rail plane. The rod has resistance RrodR_{\text{rod}} and the external circuit has resistance RextR_{\text{ext}}. The student claims: 'The motional emf is E=BLv\mathcal{E} = BLv regardless of the resistances present, but the terminal velocity of the rod would change if RextR_{\text{ext}} were changed.'

Which evaluation of the student's two claims is correct?

  1. Both claims are wrong: the motional emf BLvBLv is only valid in the open-circuit case; when the circuit is closed, back-reaction from the induced current reduces the effective emf, and changing RextR_{\text{ext}} does not affect terminal velocity because the braking force is independent of the external load.
  2. The first claim is correct but the second is wrong: the emf is indeed BLvBLv, but terminal velocity is determined solely by RrodR_{\text{rod}} because the rod's internal resistance is the only resistance through which the braking current flows; RextR_{\text{ext}} affects power delivery to the load but not the braking force.
  3. The first claim is wrong and the second is correct: the motional emf depends on the external resistance through E=BLvRext/(Rrod+Rext)\mathcal{E} = BLv \cdot R_{\text{ext}}/(R_{\text{rod}}+R_{\text{ext}}) (since only the voltage across the external circuit drives the useful current), and changing RextR_{\text{ext}} indeed changes the terminal velocity.
  4. Both claims are correct: the motional emf E=BLv\mathcal{E} = BLv depends only on the rod's kinematics and field, not on circuit resistance; and since the braking force depends on current I=E/(Rrod+Rext)I = \mathcal{E}/(R_{\text{rod}}+R_{\text{ext}}), changing RextR_{\text{ext}} changes the braking force and hence the terminal velocity under a constant applied force. (correct answer)
Explanation: Whenever you see a rail-and-rod (or any motional EMF) problem, anchor yourself to two separate questions: What generates the EMF? and What determines the current? Keeping these distinct prevents the most common mistakes here. The motional EMF arises purely from the magnetic force on charges in the moving rod: E=BLv\mathcal{E} = BLv. This is a source property — like a battery's voltage — and it does not depend on what's connected to it. The rod's kinematics and the field alone determine it. So the student's first claim is correct, and answer D's first half is right. Now, if the rod moves at constant velocity, the net force on it is zero. That means an external applied force exactly cancels the magnetic braking force Fbrake=BILF_{\text{brake}} = BIL. The induced current is I=E/(Rrod+Rext)=BLv/(Rrod+Rext)I = \mathcal{E}/(R_{\text{rod}} + R_{\text{ext}}) = BLv/(R_{\text{rod}} + R_{\text{ext}}). Because RextR_{\text{ext}} appears in the denominator, changing it changes II, which changes FbrakeF_{\text{brake}}, which changes the velocity at which braking force balances the applied force — i.e., the terminal velocity. The student's second claim is also correct, confirming D. A is wrong because it falsely claims EMF is reduced by back-reaction — that confuses EMF with terminal voltage. B is wrong because the braking current flows through the entire series circuit (Rrod+RextR_{\text{rod}} + R_{\text{ext}}), not just RrodR_{\text{rod}}. C is wrong because it mislabels the terminal voltage across RextR_{\text{ext}} as the EMF itself — a classic source-vs-load confusion. Study tip: Always distinguish the source EMF (BLvBLv, a kinematic quantity) from the terminal voltage across any element. On exam questions, distractors almost always blur this line.

Question 9

A rectangular loop of width ww and height hh moves with constant velocity vv directed perpendicular to a long straight wire carrying a steady current I0I_0. At time t=0t = 0, the near side of the loop (the side closest to the wire) is at distance dd from the wire. The loop moves directly away from the wire.

Which expression correctly describes the magnitude of the motional emf induced in the loop at time tt?

  1. E=μ0I0wv2π(1d+vt1d+h+vt)\mathcal{E} = \dfrac{\mu_0 I_0 w v}{2\pi} \left( \dfrac{1}{d + vt} - \dfrac{1}{d + h + vt} \right), because the emf arises from the difference in motional emf between the near and far sides of the loop, each at a different distance from the wire, with the loop's position increasing linearly in time. (correct answer)
  2. E=μ0I0v2π(d+vt)\mathcal{E} = \dfrac{\mu_0 I_0 v}{2\pi (d + vt)}, because only the near side of the loop contributes a significant motional emf; the far side, being at greater distance, experiences a negligible field and its contribution can be dropped, and the top and bottom sides contribute nothing along the circuit.
  3. E=μ0I0wvh2π(d+vt)2\mathcal{E} = \dfrac{\mu_0 I_0 w v h}{2\pi (d + vt)^2}, because the emf is proportional to the rate of change of flux, which scales as the area whwh divided by the square of the distance from the wire.
  4. E=μ0I0wv2π(d+vt)\mathcal{E} = \dfrac{\mu_0 I_0 w v}{2\pi (d + vt)}, because the net emf equals the motional emf of the near side alone (evaluated at its current position), since contributions from the top and bottom sides cancel by symmetry and the far side's emf exactly cancels that of the top and bottom sides.
Explanation: Whenever you see a moving loop near a current-carrying wire, your instinct should be to find the induced emf using either Faraday's law or the motional emf approach — both must agree. The magnetic field from the wire is non-uniform (B=μ0I02πrB = \frac{\mu_0 I_0}{2\pi r}), so you must account for how each segment of the loop experiences a different field. The correct answer is A. As the loop moves away, only the two horizontal sides (parallel to the wire, of length ww) contribute motional emf, because the force on charges in those sides is along the wire direction. The vertical sides move perpendicularly to themselves, so their contributions cancel. The near side sits at distance d+vtd + vt from the wire, giving motional emf μ0I0wv2π(d+vt)\frac{\mu_0 I_0 w v}{2\pi(d+vt)}. The far side sits at d+h+vtd + h + vt, giving a smaller emf in the opposite sense (it opposes the net emf). The net result is their difference, exactly as written in A — and this is consistent with E=dΦ/dt\mathcal{E} = -d\Phi/dt applied to the non-uniform flux through the loop. B is wrong because dropping the far side's contribution is an unjustified approximation — the problem gives no indication that hd+vth \gg d + vt, so you cannot ignore it. C is wrong in its formula's structure; while dΦ/dtd\Phi/dt is the right approach, the actual derivative of the flux through this geometry does not simplify to wvh/(d+vt)2wvh/(d+vt)^2 — that form ignores the logarithmic nature of the flux integral. D is wrong because it mischaracterizes the cancellation: the far side does not cancel with the top/bottom sides; rather, it partially cancels the near side, and that residual difference is the emf. Your takeaway: always track every parallel segment in a moving loop near a non-uniform field source — dropping any segment requires explicit justification.